The availability and quality of breastfeeding guidelines for women with spinal cord injury: a narrative review.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the availability and quality of breastfeeding guidelines for women with spinal cord injury (SCI). SETTING: International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Department of Medicine, Vancouver, BC. METHODS: An environmental scan restricted to English language literature was performed to identify existing postpartum and breastfeeding guidelines. Guidelines were evaluated using a structured, validated tool (AGREE II) by 13 appraisers [medical/research experts (n = 10) and those with lived experience (n = 3)] from Vancouver and two international sites. Seven guidelines were evaluated across Domain 1 of the AGREE II tool to determine if they were applicable to mothers with SCI/physical disabilities. Domains 2 to 7 were evaluated if the guideline made mention of the SCI population. RESULTS: Of the seven guidelines evaluated, only one mentioned SCI (Postpartum Care in SCI from BC Women's Hospital). Other guidelines were excluded from further evaluation as they did not address the issue of breastfeeding in women with SCI. The overall scaled score for this guideline was 34.5%. There was significant variability between domains but no AGREE II domain scored greater than 50%, indicating substantial limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Current breastfeeding guidelines are not targeted to persons with SCI. The one guideline that made mention of women with SCI had significant global deficits. This highlights the importance of developing guidelines for health care providers focused specifically on women with SCI to support and optimize breastfeeding in this unique population for the benefit of mother and infant across the lifespan.

Physical activity measurement in people with spinal cord injury: comparison of accelerometry and self-report (the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury).

Purpose: To (1) evaluate the level of agreement between individually calibrated accelerometers and the self-reported Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury when assessing moderate-vigorous physical activity; and (2) qualitatively examine the different components of physical activity each measure assesses.Materials/methods: Nineteen manual wheelchair users with chronic spinal cord injury (19.0 ± 12.9 years post injury, C5-L2 injury level) wore a wrist and spoke accelerometer for one week then returned to the lab and completed the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury for their last 3 days of accelerometer wear.Results: Bland-Altman plots revealed low levels of agreement between the two measures when measuring total (bias = -5.6 ± 70.41 min/d, 95% agreement limits = -143.6-132.4 min/d), wheeled (bias = -9.7 ± 30.2 min/d, 95% agreement limits = -69.0-49.5 min/d), and non-wheeled (bias =12.3 ± 53.8 min/d, 95% agreement limits = -93.1-117.6 min/d) moderate-vigorous physical activity. The accelerometer was beneficial for detecting intermittent or brief activities while the self-report measure was useful for measuring lifting activities (e.g., resistance training) and wheeling on inclined surfaces.Conclusion: Total and wheeled moderate-vigorous physical activity measured by an accelerometer and a self-report measure showed low agreement at the individual level. Additional research is needed to examine whether physical activity may be best measured using accelerometers and a self-report measure concurrently.Implications for RehabilitationAccurate physical activity measurement has important implications for understanding the relationship between physical activity and health outcomes.Many limitations exist to accurately measuring physical activity in people with spinal cord injury.The most commonly used measures of physical activity in spinal cord injury are accelerometers and the self-reported Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury.Accelerometers and the Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury show low levels of agreement, highlighting that there are differences in the specific physical activity patterns that each measure is able to capture.

Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord injury leads to severe locomotor deficits or even complete leg paralysis. Here we introduce targeted spinal cord stimulation neurotechnologies that enabled voluntary control of walking in individuals who had sustained a spinal cord injury more than four years ago and presented with permanent motor deficits or complete paralysis despite extensive rehabilitation. Using an implanted pulse generator with real-time triggering capabilities, we delivered trains of spatially selective stimulation to the lumbosacral spinal cord with timing that coincided with the intended movement. Within one week, this spatiotemporal stimulation had re-established adaptive control of paralysed muscles during overground walking. Locomotor performance improved during rehabilitation. After a few months, participants regained voluntary control over previously paralysed muscles without stimulation and could walk or cycle in ecological settings during spatiotemporal stimulation. These results establish a technological framework for improving neurological recovery and supporting the activities of daily living after spinal cord injury.

Oral contraceptives modulate the muscle metaboreflex in healthy young women.

There are known sex differences in blood pressure regulation. The differences are related to ovarian hormones that influence ß-adrenergic receptors and the transduction of muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Oral contraceptives (OC) modulate the ovarian hormonal profile in women and therefore may alter the cardiovascular response. We questioned if OC would alter the absolute pressor response to static exercise and influence the day-to-day variability of the response. Healthy men (n = 11) and women (n = 19) completed a familiarization day and 2 experimental testing days. Women were divided into those taking (W-OC, n = 10) and not taking (W-NC, n = 9) OC. Each experimental testing day involved isometric handgripping exercise, at 30% of maximal force, followed by circulatory occlusion to isolate the metaboreflex. Experimental days in men were 7-14 days apart. The first experimental testing in W-OC occurred 2-7 days after the start of the active phase of their OC. Women not taking OC were tested during the early and late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle as determined by commercial ovulation monitor. The increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during exercise was significantly lower in W-NC (95 ± 4 mm Hg) compared with men (114 ± 4 mm Hg) and W-OC (111 ± 3 mm Hg) (P < 0.05), with the differences preserved during circulatory occlusion. The rise in MAP was significantly correlated between the 2 testing days in men (r = 0.72, P < 0.01) and W-OC (r = 0.77, P < 0.05), but not in W-NC (r = 0.17, P = 0.67), indicating greater day-to-day variation in W-NC. In conclusion, OC modulate the exercise pressor response in women and minimize day-to-day variability in the exercise metaboreflex.

Wrist Accelerometry for Physical Activity Measurement in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury-A Need for Individually Calibrated Cut-Points.

OBJECTIVE: To create and compare individual and group-based cut-points for wrist accelerometry that correspond to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Participants completed a graded treadmill-wheeling test while being assessed for oxygen consumption, wrist-acceleration vector magnitude, and spoke acceleration. Oxygen consumption was converted to SCI metabolic equivalents (METs), and linear regression was applied to determine an individualized vector magnitude cut-point (counts per minute, VM-CPM) corresponding with MVPA (≥3 SCI METs). Multilevel linear regression was applied to determine a group MVPA cut-point. Participants then completed a 6-day monitoring period while wearing the accelerometers. SETTING: A local SCI research center. PARTICIPANTS: Manual wheelchair users (N=20; aged 31-64y; injury levels, C5 to L2) with chronic (>1y) SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean total daily MVPA, wheeled MVPA, and nonwheeled MVPA were calculated using both the individual and group cut-points. Agreement on measures of minutes per day of MVPA between the individual and group mean cut-point method was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Individual cut-points for MVPA ranged from 6040 to 21,540 VM-CPM, with a group cut-point of 11,652 (95% confidence interval, 7395-15,909). For total daily MVPA, Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of .22±33.0 minutes, with 95% limits of agreement from -64.5 to 64.9 minutes, suggesting a large discrepancy between total MVPA calculated from individual and group mean cut-points. CONCLUSIONS: Individual calibration of wrist-worn accelerometry is recommended for effective habitual PA monitoring in this population.