The changing profile of infective endocarditis: A multi-year retrospective study for dentists.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) has high morbidity and mortality and is often attributed to dental procedures. AIM: This study characterized variables related to paediatric IE in a paediatric hospital cohort. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records, from January 1, 2008, to January 1, 2020, to examine demographic, medical and dental history, and risk factors associated with children diagnosed with IE at Nationwide Children's Hospital. RESULTS: Of the 242 patients who were admitted with tentative IE diagnoses, 67 met the inclusion criteria: 46 (69%) had underlying cardiac conditions and 21 (31%) had not. One-third had an infection with S. aureus and viridans streptococci. Age was significantly associated with intracardiac devices in children with IE. Mean hospitalization was 25 days, and the mortality was 6 (9%); 41(61%) required surgery for causative defects, and 24 (32%) had dental consultation during admission. CONCLUSION: Although cardiac-related conditions were present in most cases, IE occurred in patients without cardiac factors.

Ohio School Nurses´ Perceptions of School Absences for Dental Care.

Purpose: To evaluate the knowledge, practices and attitudes of Ohio school nurses regarding school absenteeism (SA) for dental treatment. Methods: A 40-item questionnaire was generated and distributed to 246 attendees at an annual conference for Ohio school nurses in December 2019. Results: The response rate was 65.9 percent (n=162 out of 246 attendees) and 136 surveys were eligible for inclusion. The sample was female (100 percent), worked at public schools (86.0 percent, n=117) and trained as registered nurses (83.8 percent, n=114). Nurses reported no change in concerns over children missing school for dental appointments in the last five years (69.9 percent, n=95) and most agreed that SA for dental visits "almost never" negatively impacted the educational needs of children. The medical history of the patient was the most common factor when determining the duration of a school excuse (81.6 percent, n=111) and the potential for pain was the most common dental consideration (93.4 percent, n=127). Nurses reported that they "sometimes" had problems with a child after a dental visit (44.9 percent, n=61) and pain was the most reported problem (83.8 percent, n=114). Conclusion: Nurses did not feel that SA for dental treatment negatively impacted the educational needs of children.

The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Applicants to Advanced Education in Pediatric Dentistry Programs and Recommendations for Virtual Interviews.

Purpose:To assess the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on applicants for advanced education programs in pediatric dentistry in the United States and provide recom- mendations for virtual interviews (VI).
Methods:A cross-sectional survey was emailed to pediatric dentistry applicants in the 2020-2021 cycle.
Results:One hundred seventy-five applicants responded. Virtual interviews were the universal format during this timeframe. Forty-four percent admitted to applying to programs they were not initially strongly considering and 42 percent accepted inter- views they would have declined if they had to travel. Applicants found social events with residents only (80 percent), a program overview presentation (86 percent), a virtual tour (77 percent) and a question-and-answer session with residents (85 percent) to be helpful. One-on-one or paired faculty interviews were the most preferred inter- view method. More than half (55 percent) thought programs were not able to learn about them as effectively through virtual compared to an in-person format.
Conclusions: VI caused different applicant behavior due to the low time and financial investment. Applicants valued their time with residents to learn about programs, but were split in their preferences for virtual, in-person or hybrid interviews. Programs can use findings from this study to plan future recruitment cycles.

Safety Training in US Pediatric Dentistry Advanced Education Programs: A Survey of Program Directors.

Purpose: Incorporation of patient safety and quality improvement into the educational framework of all health care trainees, including those in dentistry, is growing. The purpose of this study was to characterize the current state of patient safety training and education in US pediatric dentistry residency programs. Methods: A 19-item web-based survey was emailed to all US pediatric dentistry residency program directors in 2021. The survey collected information regarding program background, safety education, safety protocol and experience, attitudes toward safety, and potential support for safety education. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test. Results: Seventy-two directors (76 percent response rate) completed the survey. The majority felt safety education was somewhat (11 percent, N equals six) or extremely important (68 percent, N equals 49) for residents. Only six percent (N equals four) reported residents entered their program with an adequate understanding of safety science. Most (74 percent, N equals 53) taught safety science through both didactic seminars and clinical experience. Timeouts under general anesthesia (78 percent, N equals 56) and emergency simulations (72 percent, N equals 52) were more common modes of clinical safety training. Overall, a limited number of program directors had familiarity with many safety tools used to prevent adverse events. Program directors' experience with adverse events was not associated with opinions regarding the importance of safety education. The majority expressed interest in AAPD supporting safety education. Conclusions: Although program directors feel safety education is important, programs do not sufficiently address safety education and look for support to help integrate safety measures into education.

Calibrating Pediatric Dental Faculty: Caries Management in Primary Teeth.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate caries treatment decisions agreement in primary teeth among board-certified pedi- atric dentistry faculty at a single teaching institution. METHODS: Ten full-time faculty selected a treatment for each of 64 primary teeth in 17 children based on clinical photos and radiographs. Cases were presented under three different social and behavioral scenarios. Descriptive and kappa statistics were calculated. RESULTS: The interrater reliability was 0.59 for the decision at the surgical versus nonsurgical level and 0.55 for the treatment-specific decision (e. g., crown versus extraction). Surgical treatments were the predominant preference (76 percent of responses). Non- surgical treatments were preferred for early-stage lesions and in nonideal social and behavioral scenarios. Surgical options were unanimously preferred in sedation or general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Different clinical scenarios highlight different treatment preferences among faculty. Further emphasis should be placed on calibrating the decision-making process for selecting caries treatment in primary teeth among pediatric dentists.

Acceptability of medical immobilization: Results from a pilot international survey.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists on the acceptability of medical immobilization (MI). AIM: To identify regulations, professional conventions, and opinions on the acceptability of MI and to identify practice patterns through a pilot study of members of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry (IAPD) and their colleagues. DESIGN: A 22-item questionnaire was developed and electronically distributed to 1191 members of the IAPD. RESULTS: Responses were received from 182 dentists in 45 countries. The majority (74.9%) of respondents use MI, and 29.1% use an immobilization device. MI with an immobilization device was reported as professionally acceptable (58.1%) and permitted by medicolegal regulations (70.8%) in their countries of practice. Dentists rated acceptability of MI higher than they perceived parents would overall and perceived MI to be more acceptable by parents for emergency situations and for children with special healthcare needs but 19.8% of respondents found it totally unacceptable in all scenarios. Use and opinions of acceptability varied by geographical location with respondents from North America being more accepting of MI. Most dentists felt that the use of an immobilization device could lead to lasting psychological trauma (72.3%) and violation of the rights of the child (55.4%) but that it improves access to care (58.5%). CONCLUSION: The acceptability of MI remains an area of controversy for paediatric dentists internationally.

Ohio Dentists' Perceptions on Children School Absenteeism for Dental Care Appointments.

Purpose: This cross-sectional study evaluated knowledge, practices, and beliefs of Ohio dentists treating school-aged children regarding school absenteeism in relation to compliance with dental appointments.
Methods: A 26-item questionnaire was distributed to 7,274 dentists licensed in the state of Ohio in 2019. Eligible participants were pediatric dentists (PDs) and general dentists (GDs) who treated individuals younger than 16 years of age.
Results: A return rate of 13.5 percent (958 total participants) provided a sample consisting of approximately 90 percent of GDs, a mean age of 48.5 years and primarily practicing in suburban locations. Respondents felt parental attitudes had changed over the past five years, with a significantly higher proportion of PDs reporting increased parental concerns about school absences than GDs (59.5 percent versus 31.5 percent; P <0.001). Length of excused absence increased with treatment complexity. PDs were more likely to permit longer absences than GDs and to allow parents to decide the length of absence, particularly for children with special health care needs. PDs were 6.6 times more likely to report that concerns about school absences often negatively affected oral health (P <0.001).
Conclusion: Dentists acknowledged that school absences and school policy affected parental choices regarding dental visits, with PDs consistently stating a greater effect than GDs.