RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Exercise addiction can be secondary to eating disorders, or a primary condition in the absence of another disorder. Currently, to determine secondary exercise addiction, two screening tools must be administered. The aim of this study was to validate a novel screening tool able to stratify between primary and secondary exercise addiction, called the secondary exercise addiction scale (SEAS). METHODS: Phase 1 (n = 339) described the statistical reduction of an initial pool of scale items. Phase 2 (n = 382) used a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the robustness of the latent structure. Phase 3 (n = 721) determined cut off scores for the eating disorder and exercise addiction sections of the SEAS and determine concurrent reliability with the exercise addiction inventory (EAI) and the SCOFF questionnaires. Phase 4 (n = 45) determined test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Phase 1 extracted two components: exercise addiction and eating disorder symptomology, with 11 items retained. The CFA in Phase 2 showed an acceptable fit to the proposed model (comparative fit index = 0.93, Tucker Lewis Index = 0.91). Phase 3 determined cut off scores of ≥ 28 (specificity = 91.97%), and ≥ 20 (specificity = 96.27%) in the respective exercise addiction and eating disorders sections of the SEAS. The respective sections also correlated well with the EAI (r = 0.70, p = < 0.001) and the SCOFF (r = 0.72, p = < 0.001). Phase 4 showed excellent test-retest reliability (exercise addiction r = 0.95, p = < 0.001, eating disorders r = 0.93, p = < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SEAS appears to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring primary and secondary exercise addiction. Further studies are warranted to further validate this tool amongst clinical populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: evidence obtained from cohort or case-control analytic studies.
Assuntos
Comportamento Aditivo , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos , Comportamento Aditivo/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Humanos , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date, no attempt has been made to collate literature on the relationship between the social environmental impact of COVID-19 and erectile dysfunction. The aim of this explorative review was to assess and compare the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in male healthcare workers and males during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A systematic review of major databases from inception to February 2021 was conducted. Prevalence data were extracted, and a random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken. OUTCOMES: The pooled prevalence of ED amongst healthcare workers working in COVID-19 specific environments, and non-healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Of 52 initial studies, six were included for the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of ED in healthcare workers working in a COVID-19 environment was 63.6% (95% CI 20.3-92.3%), and in non-healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic was 31.9% (95% CI 19.5-47.6%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of ED in healthcare workers working in COVID-19 environments was higher than representative samples and is of concern. Sexual health (and by extension, overall health), should be a priority when considering ways to care for this population. Considering the social environmental impact of COVID-19 on sexual health and in particular on ED, it is important to provide adequate psychological support systems and to promote quality of life with particular attention to sexual health.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Disfunção Erétil/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Meio Social , Adolescente , Adulto , COVID-19/terapia , Disfunção Erétil/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The aim of the present study is to use the syndemic framework to investigate the risk of contracting HIV in the US population. Cross-sectional analyses are from The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We extracted and aggregated data on HIV antibody test, socio-demographic characteristics, alcohol use, drug use, depression, sexual behaviours and sexually transmitted diseases from cycle 2009-2010 to 2015-2016. We carried out weighted regression among young adults (20-39 years) and adults (40-59 years) separately. In total, 5230 men and 5794 women aged 20-59 years were included in the present analyses. In total, 0.8% men and 0.2% women were tested HIV-positive. Each increasing HIV risk behaviour was associated with elevated odds of being tested HIV-positive (1.15, 95% CI 1.15-1.15) among young adults and adults (1.61, 95% CI 1.61-1.61). Multi-faceted, community-based interventions are urgently required to reduce the incidence of HIV in the USA.