Predictors of 30-day mortality, unplanned related readmission and reoperation among isolated closed femoral shaft fractures.

Background: Isolated, closed, femoral shaft fractures are dangerous injuries that commonly occur in the setting of high energy trauma or among older patients with significant comorbidities. Despite their prevalence, relatively little data exists connecting patient independent risk factors to the time to 30-day mortality, unplanned reoperations and unplanned readmissions in these fractures. Methods: Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, isolated close femoral shaft fractures were identified using ICD-10 codes. Patient demographics, perioperative course and adverse events were identified. Categorical and binary variables were analyzed among procedure cohorts using Chi2 analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to identify independent risk factors associated with primary outcomes. Results: Between 2010 and 2019, 1346 closed isolated femoral shaft fracture patients with a mean age of 66.7 were identified, of whom 30.6% and 69.4% were male and female, respectively. Surgical procedures included: 915 (68.0%) intramedullary nail (IMN); 428 (31.8%) open reduction internal fixation (ORIF); and 3 (0.2%) external fixator (Ex-fix). Patients who underwent ORIF reported 3.19 (OR: 3.19; CI: 1.45-7.03; p = 0.004) and 2.12 (OR: 2.12; CI: 1.10-4.09; p = 0.024) increased odds of mortality and unplanned related readmission compared to patients who received IMN. Transfusion, DVT, and PE rates were 34.2%, 1.4%, and 1.1%, respectively. Furthermore, 50% of mortality cases occurred within 6 days of surgery. Patients requiring reintubation reported 61.8 (OR: 61.8; CI: 15.7-242.40; p < 0.001) increased odds of mortality compared to patients not requiring reintubation. Conclusion: Patients with femoral shaft fractures who require reintubation have increased odds of mortality than those successfully extubated. In addition to precautions prior to extubation, patients with femoral shaft fractures should also be carefully monitored for the development of DVT or PE, and they should be definitively fixed with IMN whenever possible.

Association between preoperative hematologic markers and aggressive behavior in meningiomas.

INTRODUCTION: Meningiomas have varying degrees of aggressive behavior. Some systemic hematologic makers are associated with malignancy, but their value in predicting aggressive meningioma behavior is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between preoperative markers such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-monocyte ratio (NMR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and diagnostic and prognostic factors including WHO grade, proliferation index, presence of edema on preoperative MRI, and tumor recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated between 2000 and 2019 with a preoperative complete blood count (CBC) differential lab draw before intracranial meningioma resection was conducted. All preoperative steroid dosages were converted to dexamethasone equivalents. Primary outcomes included presence/absence of perilesional edema, WHO grade, Ki-67/MIB-index, and recurrence. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 209 meningioma patients were included. Of these, 143 (68 %) were WHO grade I, 61 (29 %) grade II and 5 (2 %) were grade III. Recurrence was reported in 19 (9.1 %) tumors. No hematologic markers were associated with recurrence. In separate multivariable logistic analyses, no biomarkers were associated with perilesional edema or WHO grade. MLR was associated with higher MIB-index (p = 0.018, OR 6.57, 95 % CI 1.37-30.91). CONCLUSION: Most hematologic markers were not associated with meningioma invasiveness, grade, proliferative index, or aggressiveness. Preoperative MLR was associated with high proliferation index in patients undergoing surgery for intracranial meningioma. Higher MLR could be a surrogate for meningioma proliferation and has potential to be used as an adjunct for risk-stratifying meningiomas.

Conditional Recurrence-Free Survival After Surgical Resection of Meningioma.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after meningioma resection warrants serial surveillance imaging, but little evidence guides the optimal time interval between imaging studies/surveillance duration. OBJECTIVE: To describe recurrence-free survival (RFS) after meningioma resection, conditioned to short-term RFS. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study for adults presenting for meningioma resection from 2000 to 2018 was conducted. The primary outcome was postoperative follow-up RFS. Conditional RFS Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 years, conditioned to 6-month and 12-month RFS. RFS probabilities conditioned to 6-month RFS were estimated in subgroups, stratified by World Health Organization grade, extent of resection, and need for postoperative radiation. RESULTS: In total, 723 patients were included. Median age at surgery was 57.4 years (IQR = 47.2-67.2). Median follow-up was 23.5 months (IQR = 12.3-47.8). Recurrence was observed in 90 patients (12%), with median time to recurrence of 14.4 months (IQR = 10.3-37.1). Conditioned to 6-month postoperative RFS, patients had 90.3% probability of remaining recurrence-free at 2 years and 69.4% at 10 years. Subgroup analysis conditioned to 6-month RFS demonstrated grade 1 meningiomas undergoing gross total resection (GTR) had 96.0% probability of RFS at 1 year and 82.8% at 5 years, whereas those undergoing non-GTR had 94.5% and 79.9% probability, respectively. RFS probability was 78.8% at 5 years for non-grade 1 meningiomas undergoing GTR, compared with 69.7% for non-grade 1 meningiomas undergoing non-GTR. Patients with non-grade 1 meningiomas undergoing upfront radiation had a 1-year RFS of 90.1% and 5-year RFS of 51.7%. CONCLUSION: Recurrence risk after meningioma resection after an initial recurrence-free period is reported, with high-risk subgroups identified. These results can inform objective shared decision-making for optimal follow-up.

Comparison of supratentorial meningioma resection outcomes by dural reconstruction technique.

OBJECTIVE: Excision of intracranial meningiomas often requires resection or coagulation of the dura mater. The choice of dural closure technique is individualized and based on surgeon preference. The objective of this study was to determine outcomes following various dural closure techniques for supratentorial meningiomas. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed for patients who underwent excision of supratentorial meningiomas from 2000 to 2019. Outcomes including operative time, postoperative in-hospital complications, readmission, causes of readmission including surgical site infection, pseudomeningocele, need for shunt surgery, and imaging appearance of pseudomeningocele on long-term follow-up imaging were compared. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients who had complete clinical and operative data available for review were included. Of these patients, 227 (64.3%) had nonsutured dural graft reconstruction and 126 (35.7%) had sutured dural repair, including primary closure, artificial dura, or pericranial graft. There was significant variability in using nonsutured dural reconstruction compared with sutured dural repair technique among surgeons (p < 0.001). Tumors with sagittal sinus involvement were more likely to undergo nonsutured closure (n = 79, 34.8%) than dural repair (n = 26, 20.6%) (p = 0.003). There were no other differences in preoperative imaging findings or WHO grade. Frequency of surgical site infection and pseudomeningocele, need for shunt surgery, and recurrence were similar between those undergoing nonsutured and those undergoing sutured dural repair. The mean operative time for the study cohort was 234.9 (SD 106.6) minutes. The nonsutured dural reconstruction group had a significantly shorter mean operative time (223.9 [SD 99.7] minutes) than the sutured dural repair group (254.5 [SD 115.8] minutes) (p = 0.015). In a multivariable linear regression analysis, after controlling for tumor size and sinus involvement, nonsutured dural graft reconstruction was associated with a 36.8-minute reduction (95% CI -60.3 to -13.2 minutes; p = 0.002) in operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Dural reconstruction using a nonsutured graft and sutured dural repair exhibit similar postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing resection for supratentorial meningiomas. Although sutured grafts may sometimes be necessary, nonsutured graft reconstruction for most supratentorial meningioma resections may suffice. The decreased operative time associated with nonsutured grafts may ultimately result in cost savings. These findings should be taken into consideration when selecting a dural reconstruction technique for supratentorial meningioma.

Matched case-control analysis of outcomes following surgical resection of incidental meningioma.

PURPOSE: The management of incidentally discovered meningioma remains controversial. We sought to compare outcomes following surgical resection of incidental meningioma to a matched cohort of symptomatic meningiomas. METHODS: A retrospective single-center case-control study was conducted for patients undergoing resection of incidental meningioma from 2000 to 2019. A 1:1 case-control matching for incidental and symptomatic meningioma was performed using the following variables: age at initial visit, gender, tumor location/size, and presence of peritumoral edema. Primary outcomes included (1) WHO grading/histopathological subtype/MIB-1 index, (2) extent of resection (gross total resection or subtotal resection), and (3) recurrence. Outcomes were compared between groups using descriptive/bivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 91 incidental meningiomas were analyzed. Trauma was the most common reason (n = 19, 21%) to obtain imaging, and tumor size the leading reason to operate (n = 37, 41%). Median time-to-surgery from initial clinical encounter was 5-months (Q1:3, Q3:16.5). More incidental meningioma patients (n = 47, 52%) were privately insured compared to their matched symptomatic cohort (n = 30, 33%) (P = 0.006). Patients with incidental meningioma had significantly higher mean Karnofsky Performance Scale at time-of-surgery (93.2, SD:11.1 vs. 81.4, SD:12.7) (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in primary/secondary outcomes between the groups. Incidental meningioma was not associated with recurrence on Cox proportional hazards analysis (HR: 0.795, 95%CI: 0.3-2.1, P = 0.637). CONCLUSION: Matched case-control analysis demonstrated no significant differences in clinical, histopathological, and functional outcomes following resection of incidental and symptomatic meningioma. While non-operative management with close follow-up and serial imaging is preferred for incidental meningiomas, those undergoing resection when indicated can anticipate similar safety and efficacy as symptomatic meningiomas.

Outcomes following surgical resection of cystic intracranial meningiomas.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic meningiomas are rare, accounting for 2-7% of all intracranial meningiomas. Little is known regarding whether these meningiomas behave differently compared to solid meningiomas. We sought to study this relatively uncommon imaging appearance of meningioma and to evaluate its clinical significance. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of surgically-treated meningioma patients between 2000 and 2019 was conducted. Cystic meningioma was defined as a tumor with an intratumoral or peritumoral cyst present on preoperative imaging. Demographics, preoperative imaging, histopathology characteristics, operative data, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. Imaging variables, histopathology and outcomes were reported for cystic meningiomas and compared with non-cystic meningiomas. Univariate/multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of 737 total meningiomas treated surgically, 38 (5.2%) were cystic. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 84.2% of cystic meningioma patients. Eighty-two percent of cystic meningiomas were WHO grade I (n = 31), 15.7% were grade II and 2.6% were grade III. Most cystic meningiomas had low Ki-67/MIB-1 proliferation index (n = 24, 63.2%). A total of 18.4% (n = 7) patients with cystic meningioma had recurrence compared to 12.2% (n = 80) of patients with non-cystic meningioma (p = 0.228). No significant difference in median time to recurrence was observed between cystic and non-cystic meningiomas (25.4, Q1:13.9, Q3:46.9 months vs. 13.4, Q1:8.6, Q3:35.5 months, p = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS: A small portion of intracranial meningiomas have cystic characteristics on imaging. Cystic meningiomas are frequently WHO grade I, have low proliferation index, and had similar outcomes compared to non-cystic meningioma. Cysts in meningioma may not be a surrogate to determine aggressive meningioma behavior.