Self-Reported Pain Tolerance and Opioid Pain Medication Use After Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons must consider their postoperative pain management strategies to minimize harm from prescription opioid use. Patients often reference their pain threshold to predict how they will tolerate surgical pain and the need for postoperative analgesia, but the direct relationship between these factors has not yet been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between patients' self-reported pain tolerance and prescription opioid usage after foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective follow-up of a prospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent outpatient foot and ankle surgeries. Patient and procedural demographics, opioid pills dispensed, and opioid pills consumed by the first postoperative visit were obtained. Patients were contacted at a mean of 13.1 ± 4.0 months postoperatively and asked to respond to the qualitative statement "Pain doesn't bother me as much as it does most people." Patients were also asked their quantitative pain threshold (0-100), with 0 being "very pain intolerant" and 100 being a "very high pain tolerance," as well other questions regarding past surgical and narcotic consumption history. RESULTS: Of the 700 survey respondents, the average age was 50.9 years and 34.7% were male. Bivariate analysis determined that predictors of lower postoperative opioid consumption included higher quantitative (P = .047) and qualitative (P = .005) pain tolerance scores. Multivariate analysis for the entire cohort demonstrated that higher qualitative pain threshold was associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption (P = .005) but this did not meet statistical significance as an independent predictor of the top quartile of pill consumers. CONCLUSION: Assessment of both qualitative and quantitative score of patients' pain threshold prior to surgery may assist the surgeon in tailoring postoperative pain control. Additionally, asking this question can create an opportunity for educating patients regarding responsible utilization of narcotic medication. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Return to Driving After Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Novel Survey to Predict Passing Brake Reaction Time.

Introduction. Brake reaction time (BRT) is an accepted method for establishing recommendations for safe return to driving by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Other than performing a BRT test in clinic, there is no established clinical tool to help physicians differentiate safe from unsafe drivers once patients reach general recovery milestones. The purpose is to present individual recommendations to the patient through a novel, validated survey evaluating safe return to driving after orthopaedic surgery of the right foot and ankle. Methods. A total of 171 patients undergoing 1 of 3 specific foot and ankle procedures were prospectively enrolled. A 4-question survey and BRT were completed 6 weeks postoperatively. The following questions were asked: (1) "I think my brake reaction time is slower than most drivers my age," (2) "I think my brake reaction time is faster than most drivers my age," (3) "I think my brake reaction time is about the same as most drivers my age," (4) "Based on what I think my brake reaction time is, I think I am ready to drive." Internal consistency was determined with Cronbach's α and item total correlation. External validity was determined by Spearman's correlation coefficient. A BRT less than 0.850 s was considered as a pass. Results. Of 171 patients, 162 (95%) with ages ranging from 21 to 83 years achieved a passing BRT by 7.6 weeks. After removing 1 question because of internal inconsistency, the optimal threshold for predicting passing BRT was 10/15 points or higher, which had 99% probability of success that a patient would pass the BRT (95% CI = 96%, 100%). Conclusion. This novel, 3-question driving readiness survey can accurately predict a passing BRT Achilles rupture repair, total ankle arthroplasty, and hallux valgus correction performed in the right foot and ankle as early as 6 weeks postoperatively.Level of Evidence: Level II: Comparative study.

High Prevalence of Degenerative Changes at the Metatarsal Head Sesamoid Articulation Found During Hallux Valgus Correction Surgery.

Background. Despite the absence of complications and a restoration of normal hallux alignment, some patients have suboptimal outcomes from hallux valgus correction surgery. One risk factor for persistent pain may be the presence of arthritic changes at the metatarsal head articulation with the sesamoids, an area not easily assessed with standard radiographs unless dedicated sesamoid views are obtained. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the metatarsal head for degenerative changes during hallux valgus correction surgery and identified preoperative risk factors associated with these changes. Methods. We prospectively evaluated 200 feet in 196 patients who underwent hallux valgus surgery intraoperatively for the pattern and severity of arthritic changes at the metatarsal head. Mann-Whitney U testing was implemented to compare differences in arthritic scores between preoperative deformity groups. The Spearman correlation test was used to determine the association between age and preoperative deformity with the severity of degenerative changes. Results. More than half of all feet assessed had severe arthritic changes at the plantar medial aspect of the metatarsal head and 40% of feet at the plantar lateral aspect. Age and intermetatarsal angle were found to be positively correlated with arthritis in this area. Conclusion. Our prospective study has demonstrated the high prevalence of arthritic changes at the metatarsal head sesamoid articulation and the positive influence of age and severity of deformity on metatarsal head arthritic changes seen during hallux valgus correction surgery. Furthermore, these arthritic changes were found to have no significant influence on preoperative functional and pain levels.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Coding Education in Residency and in Practice Improves Accuracy of Coding in Orthopedic Surgery.

The goal of training in orthopedic residency is to produce surgeons who are proficient in all aspects of the practice of orthopedic surgery; however, most residents receive either inadequate or no training in medical coding. The purpose of this study was to determine how well orthopedic residents code when compared with practicing surgeons and to identify whether coding education improves accuracy in medical coding. A mock coding survey was developed using commonly encountered orthopedic clinical scenarios. The survey was distributed to orthopedic trainees post-graduate years (PGY) 1 to 6 at 2 training programs and to attending surgeons. Results were analyzed in 3 groups: junior residents (PGY 1-3), senior residents (PGY 4-6), and attending surgeons. Overall and subcategory scores of (1) type of visit, (2) modifiers, (3) Evaluation and Management (E/M), and (4) Current Procedural Terminology code identification were recorded. Participants were also asked if they had ever received various forms of coding education. Sixty-seven total participants were enrolled, including 28 junior residents, 24 senior residents, and 15 attendings. Practicing surgeons performed significantly better than both senior (P<.027) and junior (P<.001) residents in all categories, with a mean overall correct response rate of 72.8%, 51.0%, and 47.4%, respectively. Any form of coding education was associated with a significantly improved overall score for residents (P=.013) and a nonsignificant increase for attending surgeons (P=.390). This study demonstrates that residents performed poorly when identifying proper billing codes for common procedures and encounters in orthopedic surgery. Further, those participants who received coding education did better than those who did not. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):380-383.].

When is it Safe to Drive After Total Ankle Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: With the increase in the number of total ankle arthroplasties (TAA), guidelines on when physicians should begin to consider patients' return to driving are valuable. Further, due to sagittal motion strength, the ankle is the most important mover in braking motions over the knee and hip. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does brake-reaction time return to a safe value within 6 weeks of TAA? (2) Are there factors associated with a delay of return of brake-reaction time to safe values after TAA? METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval for the study, we prospectively recruited 60 patients undergoing right TAA. A large proportion of the patients undergoing TAA during the period were recruited. Patients who had extensive concomitant surgery, such as triple arthrodesis or tibial osteotomy, were excluded from the study. Patients were between 43 and 83 years old (median, 63 years), and 35 (59%) were men. Brake-reaction time was tested at 6 weeks postoperatively and repeated weekly until patients achieved a passing brake-reaction time. A control group of 20 volunteer participants matched for age and sex who did not have right lower-extremity pathology or pain were used to establish a passing brake-reaction time of 0.850 seconds. Patients were given a novel driver-readiness survey to complete; a score of 10 of 15 points or higher was considered a passing score. The following factors were explored for their association with brake-reaction time: age, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)-Hindfoot assessment and VAS for pain via a patient-reported survey, and ankle plantarflexion and dorsiflexion via dedicated weightbearing lateral radiographs made with the ankle in maximum plantarflexion and dorsiflexion. RESULTS: At 6 weeks postoperatively, 92% of patients (54 of 59) achieved a passing brake-reaction time and were considered able to drive safely, and the mean brake-reaction time of the patients with a passing brake-reaction time was 0.626 seconds (± 0.111). At 9 weeks, all patients who completed the study achieved a passing brake-reaction time. Patients with a failed brake-reaction time at 6 weeks had greater median VAS scores for pain (3 [interquartile range 2 to 7] versus 1 [IQR 0 to 3]; p = 0.022) and diminished ankle plantarflexion (14° [± 5°] versus 24° [± 10°]; p = 0.037) compared with those with a passing brake-reaction time at that time point. All five patients with a failed brake-reaction time also had a failing score for the driver-readiness survey. CONCLUSIONS: More than 90% of patients in this series achieved a safe brake-reaction time within 6 weeks of TAA, and those who did not were more likely to have had more pain and a stiffer ankle. Surgeons might counsel patients with persistent pain and stiffness at 6 weeks to delay driving for an additional 3 weeks, since by 9 weeks after TAA, all patients in this series had a brake-reaction time comparable with patients who had not undergone surgery. Future studies might elucidate what key gaps in knowledge remain and determine a practical way to answer these questions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

How Does Perioperative Ketorolac Affect Opioid Consumption and Pain Management After Ankle Fracture Surgery?

BACKGROUND: The investigation of nonnarcotic drug regimens for postoperative pain management is important in addressing the opioid epidemic. NSAIDs can be a powerful adjunct in managing postoperative pain, but the possibility of delayed bone healing is a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Our recent retrospective study on ketorolac administration demonstrated that the NSAID is not associated with an increased risk of delayed union or nonunion after ankle fracture surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To determine whether postoperative ketorolac (1) reduces opioid consumption, (2) improves VAS pain control, and (3) affects fracture healing after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. METHODS: Between August 2016 and December 2017, 128 patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of an acute ankle fracture were randomized before surgery via simple randomization to treatment with or without ketorolac. No patients changed treatment regimen groups or opted out of randomization. All other aspects of perioperative care were treated identically. A once-daily survey was distributed via email on postoperative Days 1 to 7. Unblinded participants were asked to report their daily opioid consumption, pain level, and sleep interference using the VAS, and pain frequency using a five-point Likert scale, and side effects with the VAS. For VAS pain, > 20 mm/100 mm on the VAS scale was required to be considered "improved." In all, 83% (106 of 128) patients completed all seven postoperative surveys with 14 in the control group and eight in the ketorolac group lost to follow-up. Fifty-six patients were administered ketorolac with opioid medication (treatment group) and 50 were administered opioids alone (control group). Participants were comprised of 42% men (44), and 58% women (62); mean age was 48 years. The treating surgeon assessed clinical healing based on the patient's ability to ambulate comfortably at 12 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic healing was assessed by two fellowship-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons blinded to the patient's name and time since surgery. The surgeons evaluated randomized standard ankle series (anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral) radiographs for resolution of each fracture line to determine fracture union, with delayed union being defined as fracture lines present on radiographs taken at 12-week postoperative visits. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: Patients in the treatment group consumed a mean of 14 opioid pills, which was less than the mean of 19.3 opioids pills consumed by patients in the control group (p = 0.037). Patients with ketorolac had lower median VAS scores for pain (p < 0.035) postoperatively on postoperative Days 1 and 2 than did control patients. By contrast, patient-reported pain scores and scores for sleep did not convincingly show a benefit to the use of ketorolac. For patients whose ankle fractures healed at 12 weeks, there was no difference between the groups in terms of clinical healing (p = 0.575) and radiographic healing (p = 0.961). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized study, adding ketorolac to the postoperative drug regimen decreased the use of opioid medication after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures in the early postoperative period, and there were mixed, small effects on pain reduction. This NSAID is a valuable tool in helping patients manage postoperative pain with less use of narcotic analgesia. However, our study was underpowered to determine the true safety of this drug in terms of fracture healing and side effects and these questions warrant higher-powered randomized study investigation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Pin Site Infection of Exposed Kirschner Wires Following Elective Forefoot Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Kirschner wires (K-wires) are commonly utilized for temporary metatarsal and phalangeal fixation following forefoot procedures. K-wires can remain in place for up to 6 weeks postoperatively and are at risk for complications. This study investigated the incidence of infectious complications of exposed K-wires after forefoot surgery and identifies risk factors for these complications. METHODS: A single-surgeon retrospective chart review of forefoot surgeries from 2007 to 2017 was undertaken. Inclusion criteria were adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing elective forefoot surgery with the use of exposed K-wires. Incidence of pin site infectious complication, defined as cellulitis, or pin site drainage and/or migration/loosening of the pin was noted. Patient demographic and perioperative data were analyzed, along with the number of K-wires placed per procedure. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were performed to determine predictive factors related to pin site infection rates, with a multivariable model with significant factors subsequently performed. Two-thousand seventeen K-wires in 1237 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 35 pin site infections for a rate of 1.74%. Combined forefoot procedures (507 pins in 229 patients) had a pin site infection rate of 4.93% (N = 25), followed by lesser metatarsal osteotomies (667 pins in 446 patients) at 1.05% (N = 7), then hammertoe corrections (694 pins in 421 patients) at 0.43% (N = 3), and no pin site infections with chevron osteotomies (149 pins in 141 patients). Male sex, body mass index (BMI), current smoker, and number of pins were significant risk factors (P ≤ .05). Additionally, there were 23 non-infection-related K-wire complications. No long-term sequelae were encountered based on any complications. CONCLUSION: K-wires are commonly used for temporary immobilization of the smaller bones of the forefoot following deformity correction. Male sex, BMI, current smoker, and number of pins were significant risk factors for pin site infection, with a higher rate of infection with 2 or more pins placed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Determination of Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Scores After Hallux Valgus Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) defines a threshold when determining clinically significant treatment improvement. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure activities of daily living (FAAM-ADL) are commonly used for measuring hallux valgus correction. This study aimed to determine MCID in VAS pain and FAAM-ADL scores for hallux valgus correction and additionally, to identify variables influencing achievement of the VAS pain MCID. METHODS: Patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery were retrospectively included. VAS pain, FAAM-ADL, and pain satisfaction surveys were collected preoperatively and minimum 1-year postoperatively. Using a 6-point Likert-type pain satisfaction scale, patients reporting low postoperative satisfaction scores 1 through 3 were categorized as "dissatisfied," and high satisfaction scores 4 through six as "satisfied." One distribution-based method and 2 anchor-based methods were used to calculate MCID. Further, a logistic regression was calculated to determine if one group (defined by sex, pain satisfaction, preoperative VAS pain, concomitant lesser toe deformity correction, and specific hallux valgus correction procedure) had a greater likelihood of achieving the VAS pain MCID threshold. This study included 170 patients with postoperative follow-up averaging 23.6 months. RESULTS: Calculated MCID scores ranged from 1.8 to 5.2 points for VAS pain and 11.1 to 22.7 points for FAAM-ADL. Moderate deformity correction with proximal first metatarsal osteotomy (Ludloff) (OR=2.236, P = .036) or severe deformity correction with first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis (Lapidus) (OR=3.145, P = .046); and higher preoperative pain scores (OR=1.045, P < .010) had significantly higher odds of meeting VAS pain MCID. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated MCID values that may indicate significant pain and function improvement after hallux valgus correction. Higher preoperative pain, and utilization of proximal metatarsal osteotomy or first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for moderate or severe deformity correction resulted in significantly greater likelihood of reaching the VAS pain MCID than utilizing distal metatarsal and/or proximal phalanx osteotomy for mild deformity treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, validating outcome measures.

Improvement of Outcomes During the First Two Years Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Many studies of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) have focused on the range of motion and functional outcomes at the time of intermediate-term follow-up. The purpose of our study was to analyze the progression of ankle hindfoot range of motion and patient-reported measures through the first 2 years following TAA. METHODS: The charts of 134 patients who had been treated with a TAA by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed, and 107 (109 TAAs) were included in the study. The overall range of motion in the sagittal plane was measured as the change in the position of the tibia relative to the floor on dedicated weight-bearing lateral radiographs made with the ankle in maximum plantar flexion and dorsiflexion preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. In addition, patients completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports Subscales, and the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary scores at each time interval. RESULTS: The mean overall range of motion in the sagittal plane was 20.7° preoperatively and improved to 28.3°, 34.3°, 33.3°, and 33.3° at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively (p < 0.001). At each postoperative time point, the median VAS score was improved (p < 0.001) compared with the preoperative VAS score. Similarly, the FAAM and SF-12 scores were improved, compared with the preoperative score, at 6 months and later (p < 0.001). An increased range of motion correlated with a lower VAS score preoperatively (ρ = -0.31, p = 0.035) and at 1 year (ρ = -0.36, p = 0.003) postoperatively. An increased range of motion correlated with a higher FAAM ADL score at 3 months (ρ = 0.50, p = 0.012), 1 year (ρ = 0.26, p = 0.040), and 2 years (ρ = 0.39, p = 0.003) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent TAA had improvement, compared with preoperatively, in the overall sagittal plane range of motion up to 6 months and maintained improvement in pain and function scores up to 2 years. Pain scores remained improved throughout the 2-year follow-up period. A better range of motion was correlated with less pain as measured with the VAS. An increased range of motion postoperatively was correlated with better function as measured with the FAAM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prospective Evaluation of Utilization Patterns and Prescribing Guidelines of Opioid Consumption Following Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Overprescription of narcotic pain medication is a major culprit in the present opioid epidemic plaguing the United States. The current literature on lower extremity opioid usage has limitations and would benefit from additional study. The purpose of our study was to prospectively assess opioid consumption patterns following outpatient orthopedic foot and ankle procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic foot and ankle procedures who met inclusion criteria had the following prospective information collected: patient demographics, preoperative health history, patient-reported outcomes, anesthesia type, procedure type, opioid prescription and consumption details. The morphine equivalent dose was calculated for each prescription and then converted to the equivalent of a 5-mg oxycodone "pill." Univariable analyses were performed to identify variables with a statistically robust association with opioid consumption for inclusion in a multivariable linear regression. A stepwise backward regression was then performed to identify independent predictors of opioid consumption. Postoperative opioid utilization was reported for 988 patients (mean age: 49 years). RESULTS: Overall, patients consumed a median of 20 pills whereas the median number of pills prescribed was 40. This resulted in a utilization rate of 50% and 20 631 pills left unused. Independent factors associated with higher opioid consumption were anesthesia type ( P < .004), age <60 years ( P < .001), preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain report of >6 ( P = .008), and bony procedures ( P = .008); residual standard error 16.73 ( F7,844=14.3, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our study found that patients who underwent orthopedic foot and ankle procedures were overprescribed narcotic medication by nearly twice the amount that was actually consumed. Although we identified 4 independent factors associated with opioid consumption, the large residual standard error suggests that there remains a substantial degree of unexplained variance of opioid consumption observed in the patient population. Physicians face a challenging task of setting appropriate protocols when balancing pain relief and generalizable guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective observational cohort study.

Participatory systems approach to health improvement in Australian Aboriginal children.

Summary: The factors underlying poor child health in remote Australian Indigenous (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) communities are complex. There is a lack of consistent and reliable information that allows: (i) the identification of priorities or areas of particular need at household and community levels; (ii) monitoring progress over time; and (iii) the assessment of the impact of interventions. This paper describes the process and methods used to identify the factors that underlie high rates of poor child health in remote Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory (NT). This work has led to the development of indicators and tools suitable for use within a continuous quality improvement programme. Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals from a range of disciplines and backgrounds participated in study activities. This allowed for a range of perspectives, including scientific, lay and Aboriginal perspectives, to be accommodated and reflected in study outcomes and outputs. Study participants identified a wide range of physical and social factors that they believe underlies poor child health in remote Aboriginal community contexts in the NT. The approach taken in this study provides some confidence that the indicators developed will be seen as meaningful and appropriate by the residents of remote communities and key stakeholders. Two tools have been developed and are now in use in the practice setting. One assesses social determinants of health at the community level, for example water supply, food supply. The second applies to individual households and assesses the social and environmental indicators that are recognized as placing children at greater risk of poor health and development outcomes.

Impact of housing improvement and the socio-physical environment on the mental health of children's carers: a cohort study in Australian Aboriginal communities.

BACKGROUND: The mental health of carers is an important proximate factor in the causal web linking housing conditions to child health, as well as being important in its own right. Improved understanding of the nature of the relationships between housing conditions, carer mental health and child health outcomes is therefore important for informing the development of housing programs. This paper examines the relationship between the mental health of the carers of young children, housing conditions, and other key factors in the socio-physical environment. METHODS: This analysis is part of a broader prospective cohort study of children living in Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory (NT) of Australia at the time of major new community housing programs. Carer's mental health was assessed using two validated scales: the Affect Balance scale and the Brief Screen for Depression. The quality of housing infrastructure was assessed through detailed surveys. Secondary explanatory variables included a range of socio-environmental factors, including validated measures of stressful life events. Hierarchical regression modelling was used to assess associations between outcome and explanatory variables at baseline, and associations between change in housing conditions and change in outcomes between baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: There was no clear or consistent evidence of a causal relationship between the functional state of household infrastructure and the mental health of carers of young children. The strongest and most consistent associations with carer mental health were the measures of negative life events, with a dose-response relationship, and adjusted odds ratio of over 6 for carers in the highest stress exposure category at baseline, and consistent associations in the follow up analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the need for housing programs to be supported by social, behavioral and community-wide environmental programs if potential health gains are to be more fully realized, and for rigorous evaluation of such programs for the purpose of informing future housing initiatives.

Development and trialling of a tool to support a systems approach to improve social determinants of health in rural and remote Australian communities: the healthy community assessment tool.

INTRODUCTION: The residents of many Australian rural and remote communities do not have the essential infrastructure and services required to support healthy living conditions and community members choosing healthy lifestyle options. Improving these social determinants of health is seen to offer real opportunities to improve health among such disadvantaged populations. In this paper, we describe the development and trialling of a tool to measure, monitor and evaluate key social determinants of health at community level. METHODS: The tool was developed and piloted through a multi-phase and iterative process that involved a series of consultations with community members and key stakeholders and trialling the tool in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory of Australia. RESULTS: The indicators were found to be robust, and by testing the tool on a number of different levels, face validity was confirmed. The scoring system was well understood and easily followed by Indigenous and non-Indigenous study participants. A facilitated small group process was found to reduce bias in scoring of indicators. CONCLUSION: The Healthy Community Assessment Tool offers a useful vehicle and process to help those involved in planning, service provision and more generally promoting improvements in community social determinants of health. The tool offers many potential uses and benefits for those seeking to address inequities in the social determinants of health in remote communities. Maximum benefits in using the tool are likely to be gained with cross-sector involvement and when assessments are part of a continuous quality improvement program.

The impact of housing improvement and socio-environmental factors on common childhood illnesses: a cohort study in Indigenous Australian communities.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in health are an important expected outcome of many housing infrastructure programs. The authors aimed to determine if improvement in the notoriously poor housing infrastructure in Australian Indigenous communities results in reduction in common childhood illness and to identify important mediating factors in this relationship. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective cohort study of 418 children aged 7 years or younger in 10 Australian Indigenous communities, which benefited most substantially from government-funded housing programs over 2004-2005. Data on functional and hygienic state of houses, reports of common childhood illness and on socio-economic conditions were collected through inspection of household infrastructure and interviews with children's carers and householders. RESULTS: After adjustment for a range of potential confounding variables, the analysis showed no consistent reduction in carers' reporting of common childhood illnesses in association with improvements in household infrastructure, either for specific illnesses or for these illnesses in general. While there was strong association between improvement in household infrastructure and improvement of hygienic condition of the house, there were only marginal improvements in crowding. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of household crowding and poor social, economic and environmental conditions in many Australian Indigenous communities appear to place major constraints on the potential for building programs to impact on the occurrence of common childhood illness. These findings reinforce the need for building programs to be supported by a range of social, behavioural and community-wide environmental interventions in order for the potential health gains of improved housing to be more fully realised.

Closing the gap and Indigenous housing.

More comprehensive investment is needed to abate the extreme disadvantage experienced in some Aboriginal communities.

Evaluation of an Australian indigenous housing programme: community level impact on crowding, infrastructure function and hygiene.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Housing programmes in indigenous Australian communities have focused largely on achieving good standards of infrastructure function. The impact of this approach was assessed on three potentially important housing-related influences on child health at the community level: (1) crowding, (2) the functional state of the house infrastructure and (3) the hygienic condition of the houses. METHODS: A before-and-after study, including house infrastructure surveys and structured interviews with the main householder, was conducted in all homes of young children in 10 remote Australian indigenous communities. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, follow-up surveys showed (1) a small non-significant decrease in the mean number of people per bedroom in the house on the night before the survey (3.4, 95% CI 3.1 to 3.6 at baseline vs 3.2, 95% CI 2.9 to 3.4 at follow-up; natural logarithm transformed t test, t=1.3, p=0.102); (2) a marginally significant overall improvement in infrastructure function scores (Kruskal-Wallis test, χ(2)=3.9, p=0.047); and (3) no clear overall improvement in hygiene (Kruskal-Wallis test, χ(2)=0.3, p=0.605). CONCLUSION: Housing programmes of this scale that focus on the provision of infrastructure alone appear unlikely to lead to more hygienic general living environments, at least in this study context. A broader ecological approach to housing programmes delivered in these communities is needed if potential health benefits are to be maximised. This ecological approach would require a balanced programme of improving access to health hardware, hygiene promotion and creating a broader enabling environment in communities.

Preventing growth faltering among Australian Indigenous children: implications for policy and practice.

OBJECTIVE: To determine what preventive models or programs are most likely to improve patterns of growth faltering in children aged under 5 years in remote Australian Indigenous communities. METHODS: Nine electronic databases and the websites of key stakeholder, government and non-government agencies were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and for study quality. All types of study design were eligible. RESULTS: 140 studies assessing a diverse range of interventions were identified. Of these, 51 articles referring to 44 individual programs and 7 review articles met the review criteria. The evidence for the effectiveness of many interventions to prevent growth faltering is not strong, and any observed effects are modest. Community-based nutrition education/counselling and multifaceted interventions involving carers, community health workers and community representatives, designed to meet program best-practice requirements and address the underlying causes of growth faltering, may be effective in preventing growth faltering. Other interventions, such as food distribution programs, growth monitoring, micronutrient supplementation and deworming should only be considered in the context of broader primary health care programs and/or when there is an identified local need. CONCLUSION: For remote Indigenous communities, development and implementation of programs should involve a consideration of the evidence for potential impact, strength of community support and local feasibility. Given the lack of strong evidence supporting programs, any new or existing programs require ongoing evaluation and refinement.

Water supply and sanitation in remote indigenous communities--priorities for health development.

OBJECTIVE: To review available national and State/Territory survey data on water supply and sanitation in remote Indigenous Australian communities and to discuss the findings in terms of priorities for health and infrastructure development. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of data on relevant variables from available data sources. RESULTS: All relevant published reports arose from only two data sources: the Community Housing and Infrastructure Needs Surveys, and from a Northern Territory-wide survey of community-owned dwellings. The data show that many communities do not have a reliable water supply and experience frequent and prolonged breakdown in sewerage systems. For example, 12% of communities of 50 people or more experienced five or more periods of water restrictions in a one-year period, and 10% of communities experienced sewage overflow or leakage 20 or more times in a one-year period. Items of basic household infrastructure regarded as essential for household hygiene are missing or not functional in many community-owned dwellings. For example, in about one-third of houses bathroom taps and toilet drainage required major repairs. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Given the widely accepted importance of water and sanitation to health, the data support the contention that poor environmental conditions are a major cause of poor health in remote communities and provide some measure at a national level of the magnitude of the problem. Action to ensure easy access to adequate quantities of water and secure sanitation should receive greater priority. There is need for better quality information systems to monitor progress, equity and accountability in the delivery of water and sanitation services.