The cost and distribution of firefighter injuries in a large Canadian Fire Department.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data available regarding the cost of firefighter injuries. This information is necessary to develop targeted injury prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To categorize the cost of injuries filed in 2012 by firefighters from a from a large department by job duty, injury type, body part affected, and the general motion pattern employed at the time of injury. METHODS: Data were taken from reports filed by CFD personnel and claims filed with the Workers' Compensation Board (WCB) of Alberta between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012. RESULTS: Of the 244 injuries reported, 65% were categorized as sprains and strains, the most frequent of which affected the back (32%). The total cost of all claims was $555,955; 77% were sprain/strain-related. Knee and back injuries were most costly ($157,383 and $100,459). Categorized by job duty, most sprains/strains (31%) were sustained while attending to fire station responsibilities, although physical training was associated with the highest costs (34%). Fireground operations were attributed to 18% of sprains/strains and 16% of costs. Lifting injuries were more frequent (23%) and costly (20%) than all injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The most common and costly injuries occurred while attending to fire station-related responsibilities and during physical training.

Firefighter injuries are not just a fireground problem.

BACKGROUND: Linking firefighter injury reporting to general motion patterns may provide insight into potential injury mechanisms and the development of prevention strategies. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the injuries sustained by members of a large Canadian metropolitan fire department over a 5-year span. METHODS: Data were taken from injury reports filed by career firefighters between 2007 and 2011. Injuries were described by job duty, type, body part affected, and the general motion pattern employed at the time of injury (e.g. lifting). RESULTS: Of the 1311 injuries reported, 64% were categorized as sprains and strains (musculoskeletal disorders -MSDs), the most frequent of which affected the back (32%). Categorized by job duty, 65% of MSDs were sustained while working at the fire station or during physical training-related activities. Only 15% were attributed to fireground operations. Furthermore, the associated job duty could not differentiate the types of injuries sustained; back injuries occurred primarily while lifting, knee injuries while stepping, and shoulder injuries during pushing/pulling-related activities. CONCLUSIONS: Firefighter injuries are not just a fireground problem. Injury causation may be better understood by linking the injury location and type with motion patterns rather than job duties. This information could assist in developing general prevention strategies for the fire service.

When exposed to challenged ventilation, those with a history of LBP increase spine stability relatively more than healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if spine stability would be affected by the competing demands of simultaneous challenged ventilation and supporting a hand-held load. DESIGN: Subjects were their own controls in a repeated measures design where a single task was repeated, once in a different condition, in a random order. BACKGROUND: Muscle stiffness influences spine stability. The same muscles that contribute to spine stability assist in challenged breathing. We hypothesized that a challenged ventilation task would place low back pain (LBP) sufferers at risk of spine instability. METHODS: Subjects (14 normal; 14 with low back pain) performed two trials with a 22kg hand-held weight and the trunk angled forward at 30 degrees . One trial was of 60s duration while breathing ambient air, the other of 70s duration, while breathing 10% carbon dioxide. Spine stability and compression were quantified, using an EMG assisted optimization model in both trials. FINDINGS: Contrary to expectation, spine stability increased during the challenged breathing trials compared to the ambient air condition for subjects with a history of low back pain when abdominal muscle activity was accounted for as a covariate. INTERPRETATION: Subjects with a history of low back pain had higher stability in challenged breathing trials, indicating that some active mechanism protects the spine for the LBP groups in challenging situations. This may be to provide some margin of safety for damaged passive tissues but could be adversely affected by fatigue in the longer term.

Sitting on a chair or an exercise ball: various perspectives to guide decision making.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged sitting is recognized as a risk factor for the reporting of low back troubles. Despite the use of exercise balls in replacement of the office chair, little quantitative evidence exists to support this practice and hence motivated this research. Given the potential for several biological effects and mechanisms this study was approached with several layers of instrumentation to quantify differences in muscle activation, spine posture, spine compression and stability while sitting on an exercise ball versus a stable seat surface. Also, differences in the pressure distribution at the seat-user interface were quantified for the different seat surfaces to provide an objective perspective on the mechanism influencing perceived comfort levels. METHODS: Eight male subjects volunteered to sit for 30 min on an exercise ball and on a wooden stool. Muscle activity and spine position were used to model spine load and stability. An additional seven sat on an exercise ball and chair to examine pressure distribution over the contact area. FINDINGS: There was no difference in muscle activation profiles of each of the 14 muscles between sitting on the stool and ball. Calculated stability and compression values showed sitting on the ball made no difference in mean response values. The contact area of the seat-user interface was greatest on the exercise ball. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study suggest that prolonged sitting on a dynamic, unstable seat surface does not significantly affect the magnitudes of muscle activation, spine posture, spine loads or overall spine stability. Sitting on a ball appears to spread out the contact area possibly resulting in uncomfortable soft tissue compression perhaps explaining the reported discomfort.

Transfer of the horizontal patient: the effect of a friction reducing assistive device on low back mechanics.

Recognizing that the transfer of bedridden patients is associated with a high rate of low back injuries, various devices have been developed to assist with sparing the patient handlers. The purpose of this study was to quantify the friction-reducing ability of three different 'sliding' patient transfer devices together with the subsequent consequences on the low back loads of people performing the transfers. Coefficients of friction of the devices were determined by 'transferring' a standard object and a 'patient' over several surfaces common to a hospital setting. Then three participants performed controlled transfers with the various devices. Electromyography to measure muscle activation levels together with external forces and kinematic positional data were collected during push, pull and twist transfers. Spine loads were estimated with a three-dimensional biomechanical static link-segment model of the human body. Simply sliding a patient on a cotton sheet (control condition) produced a coefficient of friction of 0.45. The assistive devices substantially reduced friction by well over one-half (coefficients of 0.18 - 0.21). However, when using the devices the subjects adopted a variety of postures and techniques, such that there were no consistent influences on trunk inclination, low back compression or muscle activation profiles. Direct measurement of reduced friction between the bed and the patient with a friction-reducing device together with measurement of the back loads when actually transferring a patient formed a proof of principle. Specifically, while the device lowers friction, the transfer technique adopted by the lifter must be proper to reduce low back loading and any subsequent risks of back troubles associated with patient transfers. The direction of hand forces and torso position remains important.

On the implications of interpreting the stability index: a spine example.

Quantifying the stability of the spinal column offers a perspective on the effectiveness of the motor control strategy to ensure a stable spine--and minimize the risk of injury from experiencing an unstable event. There are essentially three energy based methods of calculating a stability index for the lumbar spine. All three methods involve mathematical manipulation of an 18 x 18 Hessian matrix. The purpose of this paper was to consider the mathematical implications for the three methods of determining a single stability index, and examine the effects of biological factors such as muscle activation in each of these methods. The first approach computes the Hessian's determinant and is thought to represent a more global or "average" perspective on stability. A second approach computes the smallest eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix to determine the weakest link of the spine. The final method determines an average critical stiffness difference for the spine and is intended to effectively determines how far a human spine is from instability, and allows comparison between tasks. This study shows that the same interpretation of stability is achieved via all three computational approaches--they agree as to whether the spine is stable or not. However they appear to differ in their sensitivity to the effect of muscle activation patterns.

A qualitative study of the psychosocial implications of lipodystrophy syndrome on HIV positive individuals.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the psychosocial impact of lipodystrophy on the lifestyles of HIV positive patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHODS: In-depth interviews were conducted with 14 HIV positive patients on HAART at an outpatient sexually transmitted infections (STI) and HIV clinic in central London. Qualitative data from interview transcripts were analysed using grounded theory to elicit key categories and subcategories. RESULTS: Three main themes relating to lipodystrophy emerged: effect on the individual; impact on the social world of the individual; responses of the individual. Lipodystrophy had physical and psychological effects, ranging from bodily discomfort to low self esteem and depression. Owing to its physical manifestations it was viewed as a visible marker of HIV disease. At the level of social functioning, lipodystrophy led to problems with personal and family relationships, although having a partner was protective. Individuals reported narrowing their social world, in some cases to degrees of social isolation. Individual responses included changes in diet, increased exercise regimes, steroid use and plastic surgery (mainly collagen injections to the face). For those who had experienced serious illness related to HIV, there was a more sanguine acceptance of lipodystrophy as an unfortunate consequence of longevity and drug therapy CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals need to address the psychosocial implications of lipodystrophy, including the ways in which it may affect different groups and their adherence to therapy. Formative evaluations are needed to assess the potential for targeted interventions.

A comparison of lumbar range of motion and functional ability scores in patients with low back pain: assessment for range of motion validity.

STUDY DESIGN: A clinical convenience sample of workers with low back problems was tested once for a variety of parameters. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the links between lumbar range of motion and scores obtained from functional evaluation tests. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although lumbar range of motion traditionally has been the standard used to determine disability for the purposes of compensation, a concern arises from the fact that a discrete physical impairment associated with low back pain and diminished range of motion often is never found. METHODS: This study involved 18 workers with chronic low back pain referred to a rehabilitation center for determination of compensation and fitness for return to work. Lumbar range of motion was precisely and accurately measured with a three-dimensional lumbar motion instrument. In addition, typical functional tests were performed for each patient. Comparisons were made between all the lumbar range of motion values and each of the functional ability scores. RESULTS: The most notable finding was the lack of significant correlation between most of the lumbar range of motion values and the functional test scores. Only 9 of a possible 144 correlations were significant. CONCLUSIONS: The relation between lumbar range of motion measures and functional ability is weak or nonexistent. This has implications for clinical practice as it relates to disability determination for patients with chronic low back pain, and perhaps for the current impairment guidelines of the American Medical Association.

Effects of a mechanical pain stimulus on erector spinae activity before and after a spinal manipulation in patients with back pain: a preliminary investigation.

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies in animal models of spinal pain have shown changes in sensory processing and in reflex muscular responses. One group of researchers reported consistent electromyographic responses in the paraspinal muscles of healthy men after spinal manipulation, and they speculated that such responses may underlie some of the observed clinical effects of spinal manipulation (namely, reduction in pain and muscular hypertonicity). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a painful mechanical stimulus applied above a spinous process influences paraspinal electromyographic amplitude and whether this response is modulated by a spinal manipulation. STUDY DESIGN: Analytic cohort with a convenience sample in a research clinic. METHODS: Seventeen subjects with back pain (9 men and 8 women) were recruited. Electromyographic signals were recorded from the paraspinal musculature during the following procedures before and after manipulation: quiet stance and prone during the application of a mechanical pain stimulus. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the effect of the force application on electromyographic amplitude. A second 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance investigated whether the muscular response to a painful stimulus at either segment was influenced by the manipulative procedure. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in bilateral electromyographic activity was observed at the painful motion segment; however, no such statistical increase occurred at the segment that was not painful. It appears that manipulation results in a decrease in bilateral local electromyographic activity in the painful motion segment during the application of the mechanical stimulus; however, a statistically significant decrease was not found in the control segment. It was also found that while the subjects were quietly standing, the left erector spinae at a painful segment was the only muscle group to show significant differences before and after manipulation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that motion segments identified as a problem in subjects with chronic low back pain have an exaggerated local muscular response to a painful stimulus compared with that observed in problem segments. In addition, spinal manipulation appears to attenuate the electromyographic response to a painful stimulus.

Spinal posture and prior loading history modulate compressive strength and type of failure in the spine: a biomechanical study using a porcine cervical spine model.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of posture and loading history on the compressive strength and site of failure in the spine. DESIGN: An in vitro experiment was performed using a porcine cervical model that provided a homogeneous population of young healthy spines. BACKGROUND: The distribution of stresses amongst the many load bearing tissues of the spine is altered throughout the day by posture and the history of loading, but it is not clear how this modulates tissue damage or the risk of injury. METHODS: 48 porcine cervical spines were harvested and dissected into motion segments containing two vertebrae and the intervening disc (C3/4 and C5/6). Compressive loads and rotational torques (flexion/extension) were applied so that the effects of four loading histories (hydrated, neutral dehydration, flexed dehydration, superhydrated) and two failure postures (neutral, flexed) could be examined. Levels of dehydration were based on those reported over the course of a day. Dissection techniques and X-rays were used to document tissue damage. RESULTS. Specimens had a lower yield point (43--63%) and ultimate compressive strength (23--47%) when in a flexed posture than when in a neutral posture. When injured in a neutral posture, superhydrated specimens had a lower strength (22--29%) than dehydrated specimens. Loading history also modulated the site of failure. CONCLUSIONS: The spine may be more prone to injury early in the morning when the discs are at their greatest level of hydration and/or when they are in a fully flexed posture.

Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electromyographic responses.

STUDY DESIGN: Analytic cohort with a convenience sample in a research clinic. OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of a spinal manipulation on trunk kinematics and associated trunk myoelectric activity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: While the mechanism of spinal manipulation is unknown, it has been theorized to influence spinal range of motion and trunk muscle activity. METHODS: Trunk kinematics were measured in low back pain patients (n = 14) during simple range of motion tasks in three planes, while trunk muscle electromyogram signals were recorded bilaterally from paraspinal and abdominal musculature. Kinematics and electromyogram signals were assessed pre-post manipulation. Electromyogram activity was also assessed pre-post manipulation during quiet stance. RESULTS: While no consistent kinematic or electromyographic changes occurred following manipulation across the population, individual changes were observed. The largest changes (> 6 degrees ) in range of motion occurred in the sagittal plane of three patients experiencing the greatest amount of pain. During quiet stance 17 muscles across all subjects exhibited changes in muscle activity following manipulation. Sixteen of those changes were decreases in muscle amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers some preliminary data on the short-term effects of manipulation on lumbar range of motion and dynamic electromyogram. The findings suggest that the response to manipulation is variable and dependent on the individual, with no change in some to the largest changes seen in the more pained patients. Relevance. Basic science investigations into the mechanisms and biomechanical influences of spinal manipulation are few. This study attempts to address issues of measureable functional change with manipulative therapy.

Quantification of the differences in electromyographic activity magnitude between the upper and lower portions of the rectus abdominis muscle during selected trunk exercises.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Controversy exists around exercises and clinical tests that attempt to differentially activate the upper or lower portions of the rectus abdominis muscle. The purpose of this study was to assess the activation of the upper and lower portions of the rectus abdominis muscle during a variety of abdominal muscle contractions. SUBJECTS: Subjects (N = 11) were selected from a university population for athletic ability and low subcutaneous fat to optimize electromyographic (EMG) signal collection. METHODS: Controlling for spine curvature, range of motion, and posture (and, therefore, muscle length), EMG activity of the external oblique muscle and upper and lower portions of rectus abdominis muscle was measured during the isometric portion of curl-ups, abdominal muscle lifts, leg raises, and restricted or attempted leg raises and curl-ups. A one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test for differences in activity between exercises in the external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles as well as between the portions of the rectus abdominis muscle. RESULTS: No differences in muscle activity were found between the upper and lower portions of the rectus abdominis muscle within and between exercises. External oblique muscle activity, however, showed differences between exercises. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Normalizing the EMG signal led the authors to believe that the differences between the portions of the rectus abdominis muscle are small and may lack clinical or therapeutic relevance.

Spinal shrinkage during repetitive controlled torsional, flexion and lateral bend motion exertions.

This experiment analysed the spinal shrinkage due to repetitive exertions confined to each of three separate axes (twist, lateral bend, flexion). While the experiment was performed twice with small technique modifications in the twisting task (and thus two data collections were performed), the essential components were as follows. A total of 20 subjects were loaded with an equal moment of 20 Nm in each of the three axes, on 3 separate days (one axis per day). Subjects performed each task for 20 min at 10 repetitions min(-1), where stadiometer measurements of standing height were taken prior to and immediately following the 20 min exertion. The twisting task demonstrated significant spinal shrinkage (1.81 and 3.2 mm in the two experiments) between the pre- and post-stature measurements while no clear effect emerged for the other two tasks. These data suggest that repetitive torsional motions impose a larger cumulative loading on the spine when compared with controlled lateral or flexion motion tasks of a similar moment.

Low back stability: from formal description to issues for performance and rehabilitation.

Low back stability: from formal description to issues for performance and rehabilitation. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 26-31, 2001. The concept of stability, together with notions of design and the application of stabilization exercise, is briefly synthesized. The objective is to challenge muscle systems to achieve sufficient functional stability but in a way that spares the spine of excessive exacerbating load.

Low back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting.

The aim was to examine lumbar spine kinematics, spinal joint loads and trunk muscle activation patterns during a prolonged (2 h) period of sitting. This information is necessary to assist the ergonomist in designing work where posture variation is possible -- particularly between standing and various styles of sitting. Joint loads were predicted with a highly detailed anatomical biomechanical model (that incorporated 104 muscles, passive ligaments and intervertebral discs), which utilized biological signals of spine posture and muscle electromyograms (EMG) from each trial of each subject. Sitting resulted in significantly higher (p<0.001) low back compressive loads (mean +/- SD 1698 +/- 467 N) than those experienced by the lumbar spine during standing (1076 +/- 243 N). Subjects were equally divided into adopting one of two sitting strategies: a single 'static' or a 'dynamic' multiple posture approach. Within each individual, standing produced a distinctly different spine posture compared with sitting, and standing spine postures did not overlap with flexion postures adopted in sitting when spine postures were averaged across all eight subjects. A rest component (as noted in an amplitude probability distribution function from the EMG) was present for all muscles monitored in both sitting and standing tasks. The upper and lower erector spinae muscle groups exhibited a shifting to higher levels of activation during sitting. There were no clear muscle activation level differences in the individuals who adopted different sitting strategies. Standing appears to be a good rest from sitting given the reduction in passive tissue forces. However, the constant loading with little dynamic movement which characterizes both standing and sitting would provide little rest/change for muscular activation levels or low back loading.

Intervertebral disc herniation: studies on a porcine model exposed to highly repetitive flexion/extension motion with compressive force.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether repeated motion with low magnitude joint forces, and flexion/extension moments consistently produce herniation in a non-degenerated, controlled porcine spine motion segment. DESIGN: Combined loading (flexion/extension motions and compressive forces) was applied to in vitro porcine functional spinal units. Biomechanical and radiographic characteristics were documented. BACKGROUND: While most studies performed in vitro have examined uniaxial or fixed position loading to older specimens, there have been few studies that have examined whether 'healthy' intervertebral discs can be injured by low magnitude repeated combined loading. METHODS: Porcine cervical spine motion segments (C3-C4) were mounted in a custom jig which applied axial compressive loads with pure flexion/extension moments. Dynamic testing was conducted to a maximum of 86400 bending cycles at a rate of 1 Hz with simultaneous torques, angular rotations, axial deformations recorded for the duration of the test. RESULTS: Herniation (posterior and posterior-lateral regions of the annulus) occurred with relatively modest joint compression but with highly repetitive flexion/extension moments. Increased magnitudes of axial compressive force resulted in more frequent and more severe disc injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the notion that intervertebral disc herniation may be more linked to repeated flexion extension motions than applied joint compression, at least with younger, non-degenerated specimens. Relevance. While intervertebral disc herniations are observed clinically, consistent reproduction of this injury in the laboratory has been elusive. This study was designed to examine the biomechanical response and failure mechanics of spine motion segments to highly repetitive low magnitude complex loading.

Changes in lumbar lordosis modify the role of the extensor muscles.

STUDY DESIGN: Fiber angles of longissimus thoracis and iliocostalis lumborum at L3 were documented in vivo, using high resolution ultrasound, with the lumbar spine in neutral curve and when fully flexed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of changes in lumbar curvature on the mechanics of these muscles. BACKGROUND: Full flexion modifies the failure tolerance of the lumbar spine, determines the load distribution among muscle and passive tissues, and modulates the types of tissue damage that occur. Related to this issue are the possible changes in muscle line of action with full flexion which changes the ability of the spine to support shear loads. METHODS: Nine normal men and 5 normal women were scanned in three positions: (1) an upright standing posture; (2) with the hips flexed to approximately 30 degrees and the spine fully flexed; (3) hips flexed but the spine returned to a neutral curvature. RESULTS: Mean longissimus/iliocostalis fiber angles for upright standing, hips flexed-spine flexed, and hips flexed-spine neutral lordosis were 25. 7 degrees, 10.7 degrees and 28.3 degrees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior shear load on the lumbar spine has been recently shown to be highly related to the risk of reporting a back injury. Bending forward allowing the spine to fully flex changes the line of action of the largest lumbar extensor muscles compromising their role to support anterior shear forces. Relevance Fiber angles of longissimus thoracis and iliocostalis lumborum were documented with high resolution ultrasound at L3, with the spine in neutral curvature and fully flexed. Full lumbar flexion changes the line of action of these muscle compromising their role to support anterior shear forces on the spine - anterior shear forces have been recently documented to be highly related to the risk of reporting a back injury.

Stadiometry: on measurement technique to reduce variability in spine shrinkage measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of two measurement techniques for repeated measures of spine height using stadiometry following five experimental activity conditions.DESIGN. Six subjects were repeatedly measured while they stepped in and out of the stadiometer for each pair of measures and again on another day when they remained in place in the stadiometer for all 10 measures.RESULTS. There was much greater variability in height measures with the "in-out" method while the "in place" method demonstrated a steady shrinkage over the 3-3.5 min required to obtain the repeated measures. RelevanceContrary to popular practice, leaving a subject in the stadiometer during repeated measures includes the shrinkage that occurs over the 3-3.5 min of measurement when standing and reduces random variation due to posture change.

Abdominal muscle response during curl-ups on both stable and labile surfaces.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: With the current interest in stability training for the injured low back, the use of labile (movable) surfaces, underneath the subject, to challenge the motor control system is becoming more popular. Little is known about the modulating effects of these surfaces on muscle activity. The purpose of this study was to establish the degree of modulating influence of the type of surface (whether stable or labile) on the mechanics of the abdominal wall. In this study, the amplitude of muscle activity together with the way that the muscles coactivated due to the type of surface under the subject were of interest. SUBJECTS: Eight men (mean age=23.3 years [SD=4.3], mean height=177.6 cm [SD=3.4], mean weight=72.6 kg [SD=8.7]) volunteered to participate in the study. All subjects were in good health and reported no incidence of acute or chronic low back injury or prolonged back pain prior to this experiment. METHODS: All subjects were requested to perform 4 different curl-up exercises-1 on a stable surface and the other 3 on varying labile surfaces. Electromyographic signals were recorded from 4 different abdominal sites on the right and left sides of the body and normalized to maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) amplitudes. RESULTS: Performing curl-up exercises on labile surfaces increased abdominal muscle activity (eg, for curl-up on a stable surface, rectus abdominis muscle activity was 21% of MVC and external oblique muscle activity was 5% of MVC; for curl-up with the upper torso on a labile ball, rectus abdominis muscle activity was 35% of MVC and external oblique muscle activity was 10% of MVC). Furthermore, it appears that increases in external oblique muscle activity were larger than those of other abdominal muscles. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Performing curl-ups on labile surfaces changes both the level of muscle activity and the way that the muscles coactivate to stabilize the spine and the whole body. This finding suggests a much higher demand on the motor control system, which may be desirable for specific stages in a rehabilitation program.