Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microb Genom ; 10(5)2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717815

RESUMO

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant public health threat globally. New interventions to treat CDI rely on an understanding of the evolution and epidemiology of circulating strains. Here we provide longitudinal genomic data on strain diversity, transmission dynamics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of C. difficile ribotypes (RTs) 014/020 (n=169), 002 (n=77) and 056 (n=36), the three most prominent C. difficile strains causing CDI in Australia. Genome scrutiny showed that AMR was uncommon in these lineages, with resistance-conferring alleles present in only 15/169 RT014/020 strains (8.9 %), 1/36 RT056 strains (2.78 %) and none of 77 RT002 strains. Notably, ~90 % of strains were resistant to MLSB agents in vitro, but only ~5.9 % harboured known resistance alleles, highlighting an incongruence between AMR genotype and phenotype. Core genome analyses revealed all three RTs contained genetically heterogeneous strain populations with limited evidence of clonal transmission between CDI cases. The average number of pairwise core genome SNP (cgSNP) differences within each RT group ranged from 23.3 (RT056, ST34, n=36) to 115.6 (RT002, ST8, n=77) and 315.9 (RT014/020, STs 2, 13, 14, 49, n=169). Just 19 clonal groups (encompassing 40 isolates), defined as isolates differing by ≤2 cgSNPs, were identified across all three RTs (RT014/020, n=14; RT002, n=3; RT056, n=2). Of these clonal groups, 63 % (12/19) comprised isolates from the same Australian State and 37 % (7/19) comprised isolates from different States. The low number of plausible transmission events found for these major RTs (and previously documented populations in animal and environmental sources/reservoirs) points to widespread and persistent community sources of diverse C. difficile strains as opposed to ongoing nationwide healthcare outbreaks dominated by a single clone. Together, these data provide new insights into the evolution of major lineages causing CDI in Australia and highlight the urgent need for enhanced surveillance, and for public health interventions to move beyond the healthcare setting and into a One Health paradigm to effectively combat this complex pathogen.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Filogenia , Ribotipagem , Clostridioides difficile/genética , Clostridioides difficile/classificação , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Austrália/epidemiologia , Humanos , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/transmissão , Genoma Bacteriano , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Genótipo
2.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 76(7): 1815-1821, 2021 06 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33895826

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile was listed as an urgent antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threat in a report by the CDC in 2019. AMR drives the evolution of C. difficile and facilitates its emergence and spread. The C. difficile Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CDARS) study is nationwide longitudinal surveillance of C. difficile infection (CDI) in Australia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile isolated in Australia between 2015 and 2018. METHODS: A total of 1091 strains of C. difficile were collected over a 3 year period by a network of 10 diagnostic microbiology laboratories in five Australian states. These strains were tested for their susceptibility to nine antimicrobials using the CLSI agar incorporation method. RESULTS: All strains were susceptible to metronidazole, fidaxomicin, rifaximin and amoxicillin/clavulanate and low numbers of resistant strains were observed for meropenem (0.1%; 1/1091), moxifloxacin (3.5%; 38/1091) and vancomycin (5.7%; 62/1091). Resistance to clindamycin was common (85.2%; 929/1091), followed by resistance to ceftriaxone (18.8%; 205/1091). The in vitro activity of fidaxomicin [geometric mean MIC (GM) = 0.101 mg/L] was superior to that of vancomycin (1.700 mg/L) and metronidazole (0.229 mg/L). The prevalence of MDR C. difficile, as defined by resistance to ≥3 antimicrobial classes, was low (1.7%; 19/1091). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of C. difficile isolated in Australia did not show reduced susceptibility to antimicrobials recommended for treatment of CDI (vancomycin, metronidazole and fidaxomicin). Resistance to carbapenems and fluoroquinolones was low and MDR was uncommon; however, clindamycin resistance was frequent. One fluoroquinolone-resistant ribotype 027 strain was detected.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Austrália/epidemiologia , Clostridioides , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ribotipagem
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(1): 102-7, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16390956

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to determine the diversity of Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular serotypes in an Australian setting. Consecutive (n = 293) nonrepetitive isolates of K. pneumoniae from a large teaching hospital laboratory were analyzed. The majority of isolates were from urinary specimens (60.8%); the next most common source was sputum (14.3%), followed by blood (14%). Serotyping revealed a wide range of capsule types. K54 (17.1%), K28 (4.1%), and K17 (3.1%) were the most common, and K54 isolates displayed a high degree of clonality, suggesting a common, nosocomial source. In vitro, one K54 isolate was more adherent to urinary catheters and HEp-2 cells than four other tested isolates; it was slightly more resistant to chlorhexidine but was more susceptible to drying than heavily encapsulated strains. This is the first seroprevalence survey of K. pneumoniae to be performed on Australian isolates, and the high level of diversity of serotypes suggests that capsule-based immunoprophylaxis might not be useful for Australia. In addition there are significant differences in the predominance of specific serotypes compared to the results of surveys performed overseas, which has important implications for capsule-based immunoprophylaxis aimed at a global market.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Infecções por Klebsiella/epidemiologia , Infecções por Klebsiella/mortalidade , Klebsiella pneumoniae/classificação , Austrália/epidemiologia , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Bacterianas/imunologia , Hospitais , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/prevenção & controle , Klebsiella pneumoniae/imunologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Escarro/microbiologia , Assistência Terminal , Urina/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA