Clinical negligence claims in oral and maxillofacial surgery over the last 10 years.

According to NHS Resolution, the cost of harm from clinical activity in the last year was £8.3 billion. The steady increase in litigation within the National Health Service (NHS) has led to concerns being raised regarding the sustainability of the NHS, the increasing practice of defensive medicine, and the psychological impact on healthcare professionals. To our knowledge, litigation within oral and maxillofacial surgery has not been investigated in the UK since 2010, therefore our aims were to identify the trends within our specialty and the common reasons for negligence claims over the last 10 years. A freedom of information request was made to NHS Resolution for all clinical negligence claims from 2010 to 2020. A total of 1,122 claims were registered and the total for damages paid was £32,631,131. The claims were categorised by the primary injury and further divided into groups of cause codes. Four types of primary injury comprised 65.4% (n = 734) of all negligence claims and were as follows: additional or unnecessary operations (n = 313, 27.9%), unnecessary pain (n = 156, 13.9%), nerve damage (n = 139, 12.4%), and dental damage (n = 126, 11.2%). The damages associated with nerve damage were the costliest, with a total of £8,033,737 being paid. The significant increase in the number and cost of clinical negligence claims is concerning. The lessons from these claims must be shared and implemented to reduce the burden on the NHS, and ensure that we are providing a high quality of care with improved patient outcomes.

Validation of the UICC 8th edition staging of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in a UK cohort.

The eighth edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) staging manual was recently introduced. The staging of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma saw changes in relation to depth of invasion and extra-nodal extension. We aimed to evaluate this system and its prognostic ability in a UK cohort. A retrospective review was undertaken of patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral cavity between January 2009 and December 2013. Data were collected on demographics, histology, and recurrence-free (RFS) and five-year overall survival (OS). Patients were staged using both the seventh and eighth editions of the UICC staging manual. Stage-specific survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 191 records were reviewed and 87 were included in the analysis. The mean (range) age was 60 (37-88) years, and 53% were male. The tongue was the most common site (51%). Using the seventh edition patients were staged as stage I=30, II=14, III=7, IVa=35, and IVb=1. Applying the eighth edition, 26 patients (30%) were upstaged (I=24, II=15, III=14, IVa=17, IVb=17). Ten were upstaged based on pT and 16 on pN status. Both staging manuals showed statistically significant discrimination between stages for both OS and RFS. Patients upstaged from stage IVa in the seventh edition had significantly worse OS in the new system (p=0.043). Both staging systems discriminated accurately between stages. Patients upstaged in stage IVa showed significantly worse OS suggesting improved prognostication with the eighth edition and the changes introduced.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery patient satisfaction with telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic most oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMFS) units have moved to conducting patient consultations over the telephone. The aim of this study was to assess patients' satisfaction with telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective survey was conducted of OMFS patients at our hospital who had telephone consultations between 1 April - 8 June 2020. The survey was conducted by independent interviewers and used the Generic Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (G-MISS) along with a previously published additional questionnaire. Variables recorded included age, gender, theme of consultation, grade of clinician, and type of consultation. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for any differences between patient groups. The records of 150 consecutive patients were reviewed and 135 met inclusion criteria. A total of 109 patients completed the survey giving a response rate of 80.74%. The total G-MISS score for satisfaction was high, which indicates a high level of satisfaction among all patients. We found no statistical difference in satisfaction when comparing patients in terms of gender, age, theme of consultation, or level of clinician. A significant difference was found in compliance levels between review and new patients, with review patients demonstrating higher compliance levels (p=0.004). Overall, 83.48% of patients said they would be willing to have a telephone consultation in future. The majority of patients in this study reported high levels of satisfaction with telephone consultations. New patients reported lower levels of compliance which may suggest this type of consultation is less suited to telephone consultation.

Maxillofacial injuries in patients with major trauma.

Major trauma is an important cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Mortality is high with rates over 10% commonly reported. We studied the epidemiology and aetiology of maxillofacial injuries in patients who presented with major trauma as recorded nationally by retrospectively analysing the database of the Trauma Audit Research Network from 2001 to 2015. All patients who had major trauma with associated maxillofacial injuries were included in the analysis. Of 104645 patients recorded as having had major trauma during the study period, 22148 (21.2%) had an associated maxillofacial injury. Most of them were male (74.2%), and the type of injury was usually blunt (97.5%). Road traffic collisions were the most common mechanism (44.1%), followed by falls of less than 2m (21.6%). An associated serious head injury was more common in those who had a facial injury (81% compared with 60.6%, p<0.0001). Nearly all the facial injuries (94%) were minor, or moderately severe. Maxillofacial injuries commonly present with major trauma but are rarely severe. A maxillofacial injury may indicate an increased likelihood of an associated head injury.

Inadvertent parathyroidectomy during thyroid surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Inadvertent parathyroidectomy is a recognised complication of thyroid surgery. We aimed to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for inadvertent parathyroidectomy during thyroid surgery, in our patient cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of all patients undergoing thyroid surgery in our institution between January 2012 and December 2014 was performed. Medical records, laboratory investigations and histopathology reports were evaluated. Patient demographics, indication for surgery, surgery performed, final pathology, incidental parathyroidectomy and post-operative hypocalcaemia were recorded. Univariate analysis using the Fisher's exact test was performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty procedures were included: 147 hemi-thyroidectomies and 83 total thyroidectomies. Central neck dissection was also performed in 13 cases. The most common indication for surgery was indeterminate cytology (81 cases). Post-operatively, malignant disease was reported in 52 cases (22.6%). Inadvertent parathyroidectomy occurred in 40 cases (17.3%). There was a statistically significant increased risk of inadvertent parathyroidectomy with malignant disease (p = 0.001) and after central neck dissection (p = 0.013) but no difference was seen between hemi- and total thyroidectomies (p = 0.47), gender (p = 1.00) or with increasing age (p = 1.00). Hypocalcaemia occurred in four cases and was transient in three. CONCLUSION: Inadvertent parathyroidectomy is a potential risk during thyroid surgery but post-operative hypocalcaemia as a result is rare. Malignancy and more extensive surgery appear to carry an increased risk for this complication.

Quality of information about maxillofacial trauma on the Internet.

Patients increasingly search the Internet for information about health and potential treatments, but the content and accuracy of some websites are questionable. To evaluate the quality of information on maxillofacial trauma, we searched for the terms "jaw fracture" and "cheekbone fracture" on Google, Yahoo, and Bing. We assessed the first 10 results of each search and excluded duplicates or those that were unrelated. We then used the DISCERN tool and the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) benchmarks to assess those that remained. Of the original 60 found, 38 were excluded (29 duplicates, 9 unrelated). The mean (range) DISCERN score for each search was 38.5 (27-57) for jaw fracture and 41.9 (26-61) for cheekbone fracture. No website achieved an excellent score (more than 63), and over three-quarters were categorised as poor (27-38) or fair (39-50). None met all the JAMA benchmarks, but most adhered to at least two. The standard of online information on maxillofacial trauma varies, but is generally of poor quality. Patients should therefore be advised to be cautious of online sources and should be directed towards higher-quality websites.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis risk assessment in a general surgery cohort: a closed-loop audit.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potential source of morbidity and mortality in surgical in-patients. A number of guidelines exist that advise on prophylactic measures. We aimed to assess VTE prophylaxis prescribing practices and compliance with a kardex-based risk assessment tool in a general surgery population. METHODS: Data on general surgery in-patients were collected on two separate wards on two separate days. Drug kardexes were assessed for VTE prophylaxis measures and use of the risk assessment tool. NICE and SIGN guidelines were adopted as a gold standard. The audit results and information on the risk assessment tool were presented as an educational intervention at two separate departmental teaching sessions. A re-audit was completed after 3 months. RESULTS: In Audit A, 74 patients were assessed. 70% were emergency admissions. The risk assessment tool was completed in 2.7%. 75 and 97% of patients were correctly prescribed anti-embolic stockings (AES) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), respectively. 30 patients were included in Audit B, 56% of whom were emergency admissions. 66% had a risk assessment performed, a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.0001). Rates of LMWH prescribing were similar (96%), but AES prescribing was lower (36%). CONCLUSION: Rates of LMWH prescribing are high in this general surgical population, although AES prescribing rates vary. Use of the VTE risk assessment tool increased following the initial audit and intervention.

Aortic graft sepsis caused by Pasteurella multocida.

A case detailing the successful management of aortic graft sepsis resulting from Pasteurella multocida is reported. The infection was the result of a bite from the patient's dog.