Immunosuppression Therapy in Kidney Transplantation.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred choice of treatment of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Improvement in surgical techniques and immunotherapy has transformed the field of kidney transplantation. Patients undergoing a kidney transplant have a 95% and 90% graft survival rate at one and 5 years. Although advances in immunosuppressive agents have reduced the incidence of acute rejection, the outcome of kidney grafts is still limited by chronic rejection and complications of these medications. The goal of kidney transplantation is to use the combination of immunosuppressive agents that best optimizes allograft and patient survival while limiting drug toxicity and complications. In this review, the immunology of transplantation is described with a focus on current immunosuppressive agents used in kidney transplantation.

Interrogating the haemodynamic effects of haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula on cardiac structure and function.

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred type of vascular access for maintenance haemodialysis but it may contribute to maladaptive cardiovascular remodelling. We studied the effect of AVF creation on cardiac structure and function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this prospective cohort study patients with CKD listed for first AVF creation underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at baseline and at 6 weeks. All participants had ultrasound measurements of fistula blood flow at 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular (LV) mass. Secondary outcomes included changes in LV volumes, LV ejection fraction, cardiac output, LV global longitudinal strain and N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). A total of 55 participants were enrolled, of whom 40 (mean age 59 years) had AVF creation and completed both scans. On the second CMR scan, a mean increase of 7.4 g (95% CI 1.1-13.7, p = 0.02) was observed in LV mass. Significant increases in LV end-diastolic volumes (p = 0.04) and cardiac output (p = 0.02) were also seen after AVF creation. No significant changes were observed in LV end-systolic volumes, LV ejection fraction, NT-proBNP and LV global longitudinal strain. In participants with fistula blood flows ≥ 600 mL/min (n = 22) the mean increase in LV mass was 15.5 g (95% CI 7.3-23.8) compared with a small decrease of 2.5 g (95% CI - 10.6 to 5.6) in participants with blood flows < 600 mL/min (n = 18). Creation of AVF for haemodialysis resulted in a significant increase of LV myocardial mass within weeks after surgery, which was proportional to the fistula flow.

Five-year outcomes after a change from a cyclosporin-based to a 'low-dose' tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression regimen for incident kidney transplants--the Glasgow experience.

In January 2007, our centre changed from a cyclosporin (CyA)/azathioprine (Aza)/ prednisolone (Pred) primary immunosuppression regimen (with basiliximab induction and mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] for those at immunologically high risk) to a tacrolimus (Tac) (low dose)/MMF/Pred regimen with basiliximab induction, following presentation of Symphony trial results. This analysis assesses the impact of this change on 5-year outcomes. Three hundred consecutive renal-only transplants were identified: 140 from the 2005-06 era and 160 from the 2007-08 era. The proportions of living donor (37.5 vs. 22.9%; p = 0.04) and donors after circulatory death (11.9 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.03) were higher in the 2007-08 cohort. Five-year actuarial patient survival was higher in the 2007-08 cohort (96.8 vs. 87.1%; p = 0.003), with a trend toward higher 5-year transplant survival (84.7 vs. 76.3%; p = 0.08). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was higher than in the 2005-06 era at 1 (53.5 vs. 44.5 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.0006) and 3 years (50.9 vs. 43.4 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.02), with a trend toward higher eGFR at 5 years (41.8 vs. 49.6 ml/min/1.73m2; p = 0.09). Differences were consistent when living donor and deceased donor transplants were analysed separately. In a "real world" population, a change from a CyA-based to a Tac (low-dose)/MMF/Pred primary immunosuppression regimen has been associated with better 5-year outcomes.

Renal transplantation is not associated with regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: a magnetic resonance study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRD) have an increased risk of premature cardiovascular (CV) disease. Left ventricular hypertrophy is an independent risk factor for CV events and death in ESRD. Renal transplantation has been associated with reduction in CV risk and echocardiographic regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. However, echocardiography overestimates LV mass in ESRD patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides more detailed, volume-independent, measures of cardiac structure. Changes in LV mass measured by CMR after renal transplantation were studied. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Fifty patients underwent CMR on two occasions. Twenty-five were transplanted before the second scan. CMR was performed to measure LV mass index (LVMI), ejection fraction, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes. Changes were expressed as percentage change over time. Patients with CV events between scans (e.g., acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction) were excluded. All transplant patients had serum creatinine <150 mumol/L. RESULTS: There was no significant change in LVMI between patients who underwent renal transplantation and those who remained on dialysis (transplanted mean, 2.75%/yr, +/- 9.1 versus dialysis, -3.6%/yr +/- 16.7). In addition, there were no significant changes in end-diastolic volume (transplant, 0.1%/yr +/- 19.5 versus not transplanted, -3.4%/yr +/- 31.5), end-systolic volume (transplanted mean, 15.2%/yr +/- 65.2 versus not transplanted, 3.0%/yr +/- 55.5), or ejection fraction (transplant, 2.1%/yr +/- 11.9 versus not transplanted, -0.4%/yr +/- 5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation is not associated with significant regression of LVMI on CMR compared with patients who remain on the transplant waiting list.