Effectiveness of remote exercise programs in reducing pain for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review of randomized trials.

Objective: Remote knee osteoarthritis (OA) management programs are becoming more popular. This systematic review examined the efficacy of remote exercise programs for relieving pain in persons with knee OA. Design: We conducted a search of studies published between January 1st, 2013 to March 31st, 2021 in PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE. We included randomized trials of patients with knee OA or chronic knee pain, studying interventions with an element of telehealth exercise management, and evaluating knee pain as an outcome. Interventions could include fully remote or both remote and in-person components. We excluded observational cohort studies, pilot studies, and studies with poor Physiotherapy Exercise Database (PEDro) scores. Two reviewers extracted pain data, consisting of mean differences from baseline and between groups, and compared them to minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. Results: We identified 1867 reports, of which eleven trials with a total of 1861 participants met inclusion criteria. Only one trial demonstrated a clinically meaningful change from baseline between groups. Four interventions were found to result in clinically meaningful improvements in pain from baseline. Conclusion: This review was limited by variability in outcome measures, intervention content, and comparators. One trial with an inactive control demonstrated clinically meaningful between group differences in pain. All four interventions demonstrating meaningful improvements from baseline included study-initiated communications to discuss and personalize remotely delivered exercise programs. More studies comparing fully or partially remote exercise programs with both active and inactive controls could help optimize the use of remote programs for management of knee OA pain.

Treatment of the syndrome of knee pain and meniscal tear in middle-aged and older persons: A narrative review.

Objective: To summarize the literature investigating management, treatment strategies, short- and longer-term outcomes of treatment for meniscal tear in middle-aged and older adults. Design: We performed a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles and selected 15 for a narrative summary on the available evidence. Results: The literature suggests that middle-age and older adults with meniscal tear may benefit from initial physical therapy (PT) potentially followed by arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) for those who do not experience sufficient benefit after PT and in whom other sources of pain are deemed unlikely. There is moderate evidence to suggest that some factors at baseline, such as radiographic OA, meniscal tear type, and pain at baseline may influence outcomes after APM. Over time, APM appears to increase the risk of degenerative changes in cartilage, bone, and other knee structures as evidenced by radiograph and MRI-based assessments. Conclusion: Evidence from research investigating outcomes of treatment for meniscal tear in middle-aged and older adults demonstrates that PT is a reasonable initial treatment. More research is needed to investigate the best treatment for those who do not benefit substantially from initial PT. The evidence also demonstrates that APM may be associated with greater risk of radiographic osteoarthritic changes, though more research and the addition of enhanced quantitative MRI-assessments are needed to further detail any compositional changes in the knee. Focusing on these areas of further study will clarify whether these imaging findings are clinically meaningful.

Mechanical symptoms and meniscal tear: a reappraisal.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and summarize literature related to the association between mechanical symptoms (catching and locking of the knee), the presence of meniscal tear, and outcomes after arthroscopic surgery. DESIGN: We searched PubMed and hand-searched reference lists for relevant articles and selected 38 for analysis. RESULTS: Mechanical symptoms appear to have modest sensitivity (ranging 0.32-0.69), specificity (ranging 0.45-0.74) and positive predictive value (ranging 0.75-0.81) for meniscal tear. There is also very little evidence to suggest that those with mechanical symptoms experience better outcomes after arthroscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: Our examination of the literature does not support the hypothesis that mechanical symptoms are related to the presence of meniscal tear or portend better outcomes after arthroscopic surgery.