Australian health care workers experience of PPE related side-effects. A cross-sectional survey.

Introduction: Protection of health care workers (HCWs) is a fundamental aspect of an effective pandemic response. During the COVID-19 pandemic, frequency, and duration of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) use increased. The experience of PPE-related side-effects has potential to contribute to decreased compliance resulting in breaches in infection prevention and increasing risk of HCW exposure. This study aims were to measure the frequency of PPE-related side-effects amongst HCW in Australia, and to establish if an increased frequency of adverse reactions was related to the significant increase in use and extended duration of time spent in PPE. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was used. Results: Of the 559 respondents the majority were female (83.7%), aged 31-45 years old (33.6%). A pre-existing skin condition was reported by 266 (47.6%). Frequency of PPE related side-effects were: pressure-related 401 (71.7%), skin 321 (57.4%) and respiratory 20 (3.6%). Surgical mask use was significantly associated with pre-exiting skin conditions (ß = 1.494 (SE 0.186), df (1), p < 0.001). Side effects to N95 respirator use was more commonly reported by staff working in COVID-19 high-risk areas (ß = 0.572 (SE 0.211), df (1), p = 0.007) independent of work duration (ß = -0.056 (SE 0.075), df (1), p = 0.456), and pre-existing skin conditions (ß = 1.272, (SE.198), df (1), p < 0.001). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a significant increase in the use of PPE. While the preventative benefits of PPE are significant, adverse events related to PPE use are frequently reported by HCW. Findings in this study highlight the need for innovation in PPE design to maximize protection while decreasing adverse effects and maintaining adhere to use.

"Building the plane while flying it" Reflections on pandemic preparedness and response; an organisational case study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to learn about acute health organisations experiences implementing a pandemic response plan in real-time. This study was conducted to explore organisational leader's perspectives and experience activating a COVID-19 pandemic response plan in their health service and the impact of this on service provision, clinicians, and consumers. METHODS: This study was conducted at a large metropolitan health service in Australia that provides acute, subacute, and residential aged care services. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 key participants from the COVID-19 leadership team between November-January 2021/2022. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to explore how the health service developed a clinical governance structure, policy and procedures and experience when operationalising each element within the Hierarchy of Controls Framework. Thematic analysis was used to code data and identify themes. A cross-sectional survey of frontline healthcare workers on the impacts and perceptions of infection control practices during the COVID-19 pandemic, was also completed in 2021 with 559 responses. RESULTS: Twelve organisational leaders completed the semi-structured interviews. Key themes that emerged were: (1) Building the plane while flying it, (2) A unified communications strategy, (3) Clinicians fear 'my job is going to kill me', (4) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply and demand, and (5) Maintaining a workforce. When surveyed, front-line healthcare workers responded positively overall about the health services pandemic response, in terms of communication, access to PPE, education, training, and availability of resources to provide a safe environment. CONCLUSION: Health service organisations were required to respond rapidly to meet service needs, including implementing a pandemic plan, developing a command structure and strategies to communicate and address the workforce needs. This study provides important insights for consideration when health service leaders are responding to future pandemics. Future pandemic plans should include detailed guidance for acute and long-term care providers in relation to organisational responsibilities, supply chain logistics and workforce preparation.

Reduction of Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients Using a Mandatory Risk-Scoring System: 5-Year Follow-Up of an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: Sheikh Khalifa Medical City's (SKMC) surgery institute was identified as a high outlier in the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE; deep vein thrombosis [DVT] and pulmonary embolism [PE]) based on the semiannual report of the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) in June 2010. AIM: To report our rates of VTE at SKMC, the results, and 5-year follow-up after an ACS NSQIP quality improvement program. METHODS: A multidisciplinary VTE task force was established in June 2010. We instituted a compulsory risk assessment for VTE and utilized the ACS NSQIP best practice guidelines to review cases of VTE. We prospectively evaluated the observed/expected (O/E) ratio for DVT/PE after implementing the action plan. RESULTS: The O/E ratio for PE/DVT in general and general/vascular (GV) surgery was 6.00 and 4.86 in June 2010. Our compliance with ordering antithrombotic prophylactic measures was as low and it improved to 100% and our O/E ratio decreased to 1.18 and 1.5 in July 2011 and stabilized for the next 4 years. Currently, our compliance with ordering antithrombotic prophylactic measures is 100%, and our last 2 O/E ratio for DVT/PE are 0.74 and 0.75 in GV surgery and 0.82 and 0.78 in the entire surgery institute, respectively, and we are considered an exemplary site of the ACS NSQIP in GV surgery. CONCLUSION: A compulsory risk assessment for VTE has led to an overall improvement in DVT/PE rates in the surgery institute and for GV surgery to become an exemplary site for the ACS NSQIP.

Are results of bariatric surgery different in the Middle East? Early experience of an international bariatric surgery program and an ACS NSQIP outcomes comparison.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric operations performed at the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute Abu Dhabi are submitted randomly from the entire surgery volume at Sheikh Khalifa Medical City to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP. Our aim is to report our early experience and compare our bariatric surgery outcomes with ACS NSQIP hospitals of similar size. STUDY DESIGN: We queried the ACS NSQIP database for bariatric surgery codes between August 2009 and August 2012 for hospitals with >500 beds. Statistical analysis was performed (p < 0.05). RESULTS: We performed 275 bariatric operations compared with a total of 29,715 at other NSQIP hospitals. The ACS NSQIP bariatric surgery cohort at the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute Abu Dhabi represents 275 of 312 (89.3%) of our entire bariatric surgery volume. Our patients were statistically significantly younger (mean age 36 vs 44.8 years), healthier (American Society of Anesthesiologists scores 1 to 2 in 78.6% vs 35.7%), and heavier (body mass index 47.4 vs 45.5). In addition, we had fewer diabetic (18.5% vs 27.3%) and hypertensive (21.1% vs 52.2%) patients. We performed more Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (69.8% vs 54.5%) and sleeve gastrectomy (24.8% vs 17.2%) and fewer laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (0.8% vs 22.7%). Outcomes were similar with regard to rates of reoperation, wounds, urinary tract infection, bleeding, thromboembolic, respiratory, and overall complications. We had lower septic, cardiac, and renal failure complications; lower mortality, and longer hospital stay by 0.4 days. We achieved 94.9% 30-day follow-up compared with 90.7% at other ACS NSQIP hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report comparing outcomes of an international bariatric surgery program (Bariatric and Metabolic Institute Abu Dhabi) with ACS NSQIP bariatric surgery programs. Our outcomes are equivalent to ACS NSQIP bariatric surgery programs.