Delftia acidovorans pseudo outbreak in portable reverse osmosis machines: Interventions to ensure safe and cost-effective hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Reverse osmosis (RO), a major advance in hemodialysis (HD) safety, effectively clears most water organisms. Delftia acidovorans is an environmental water-borne pathogen that is rarely reported to cause human infections. We report a pseudo outbreak caused by colonization of RO machines with D acidovorans with no reported human infections and interventions to improve HD safety. METHODS: Repeated positive RO product water cultures triggered our hospital to initiate an investigation, RO machines were examined for mechanical integrity by biomedical engineers. Cultures of product water as well as RO parts were done. Testing for bacterial relatedness after identification was performed. An investigation was conducted in a systematic fashion to determine the cause and the extent of the problem. RESULTS: Upon formal review of policies and procedures, there were minor deficiencies. Rectifying these deviations from policies did not stop the repeated positive water cultures. A 7-step investigation and correction was successfully conducted. City water testing with filtration and concentration methods was positive for D acidovorans. Major renovation of the HD unit with replacement of all RO machines and a 2-step water filtration resulted in elimination of the pseudo outbreak. CONCLUSION: City water was the source of biofilm formation of D acidovorans in RO machines that was not possible to eradicate. Application of incoming water filters was an effective preventive strategy. Replacement of RO machines after 4 failed disinfection attempts is the most cost-effective strategy as well for persistent positive water cultures. The HD remains RO water culture negative 2 years after changes.

Disposable Bronchoscope Model for Simulating Endoscopic Reprocessing and Surveillance Cultures.

BACKGROUND Endoscope-associated infections are reported despite following proper reprocessing methods. Microbiological testing can confirm the adequacy of endoscope reprocessing. Multiple controversies related to the method and interpretation of microbiological testing cultures have arisen that make their routine performance a complex target. OBJECTIVE We conducted a pilot study using disposable bronchoscopes (DBs) to simulate different reprocessing times and soaking times and to compare high-level disinfection versus ethylene oxide sterilization. We also reviewed the time to reprocessing and duration of the procedures. METHODS Bronchoscopes were chosen because an alternative disposable scope is commercially available and because bronchoscopes are more prone to delays in processing. Disposable bronchoscopes were contaminated using a liquid bacterial suspension and were then incubated for 1-4 hours. Standard processing and high-level disinfection were performed on 36 endoscopes. Ethylene oxide sterilization was performed on 21 endoscopes. Endoscope cultures were performed using the standard "brush, flush, brush" technique. RESULTS After brushing was performed, a final water-flush culture procedure was the most effective method of detecting bacterial persistence on the disposable scopes. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most commonly recovered organism after reprocessing. Ethylene oxide sterilization did not result in total elimination of viable bacteria. CONCLUSION Routine endoscopy cultures may be required to assess the adequacy of endoscopic processing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:136-142.