Development of Seven New dPCR Animal Species Assays and a Reference Material to Support Quantitative Ratio Measurements of Food and Feed Products.

Laboratory testing methods to confirm the identity of meat products and eliminate food fraud regularly rely on PCR amplification of extracted DNA, with most published assays detecting mitochondrial sequences, providing sensitive presence/absence results. By targeting single-copy nuclear targets instead, relative quantification measurements are achievable, providing additional information on the proportions of meat species detected. In this Methods paper, new assays for horse, donkey, duck, kangaroo, camel, water buffalo and crocodile have been developed to expand the range of species that can be quantified, and a previously published reference assay targeting the myostatin gene has been modified to include marsupials and reptiles. The accuracy of this ratio measurement approach was demonstrated using dPCR with mixtures of meat DNA down to 0.1%. However, the limit of detection (LOD) of this approach is not just determined by the assay targets, but by the samples themselves, with food or feed ingredients and processing impacting the DNA yield and integrity. In routine testing settings, the myostatin assay can provide multiple quality control roles, including monitoring the yield and purity of extracted DNA, identifying the presence of additional meats not detected by the suite of species-specific assays and potentially estimating a sample-specific LOD based on measured copy numbers of the myostatin target. In addition to the myostatin positive control assay, a synthetic DNA reference material (RM) has been designed, containing PCR targets for beef, pork, sheep, chicken, goat, kangaroo, horse, water buffalo and myostatin, to be used as a positive template control. The availability of standardised measurement methods and associated RMs significantly improves the reliability, comparability and transparency of laboratory testing, leading to greater confidence in results.

Droplet Volume Variability and Impact on Digital PCR Copy Number Concentration Measurements.

Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is increasingly being adopted by reference material producers and metrology institutes for value assignment, and for homogeneity and stability studies of nucleic acid reference materials. A reference method procedure should fulfill several requirements, and the uncertainty and biases should be completely understood. A bias in target concentration when inaccurate droplet volume is used in the droplet dPCR measurement equation has previously been documented. In this study, we characterize both intrawell and interwell droplet volume variability using optical microscopy and determine the impact of these two sources of variability on target concentration estimates. A small optical distortion across the image was measured which, without correction, biased droplet volume measurements. Longitudinal monitoring of interwell droplet volume over 39 weeks using several lots of Mastermix demonstrated a mean droplet volume of 0.786 nL and intermediate precision of 1.7%. The frequency distribution of intrawell droplet volumes varied. Some wells displayed a skewed distribution which resulted in a small bias in estimated target concentration for a simulated dPCR with target concentrations of between 62 and 8000 copies µL-1. The size and direction of this bias was influenced by the distribution pattern of the droplet volumes within the well. The proportion of Mastermix in dPCR mix affected droplet volume. A pipetting error of 10% during mixing of the premix and Mastermix resulted in a 2.6% change in droplet volume and, consequently, a bias in concentration measurements highlighting the advantages of gravimetric preparation of dPCR mixes for high accuracy measurements.

International Comparison of Enumeration-Based Quantification of DNA Copy-Concentration Using Flow Cytometric Counting and Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Enumeration-based determination of DNA copy-concentration was assessed through an international comparison among national metrology institutes (NMIs) and designated institutes (DIs). Enumeration-based quantification does not require a calibration standard thereby providing a route to "absolute quantification", which offers the potential for reliable value assignments of DNA reference materials, and International System of Units (SI) traceability to copy number 1 through accurate counting. In this study, 2 enumeration-based methods, flow cytometric (FCM) counting and the digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), were compared to quantify a solution of the pBR322 plasmid at a concentration of several thousand copies per microliter. In addition, 2 orthogonal chemical-analysis methods based on nucleotide quantification, isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) were applied to quantify a more concentrated solution of the plasmid. Although 9 dPCR results from 8 laboratories showed some dispersion (relative standard deviation [RSD] = 11.8%), their means were closely aligned with those of the FCM-based counting method and the orthogonal chemical-analysis methods, corrected for gravimetric dilution factors. Using the means of dPCR results, the RSD of all 4 methods was 1.8%, which strongly supported the validity of the recent enumeration approaches. Despite a good overall agreement, the individual dPCR results were not sufficiently covered by the reported measurement uncertainties. These findings suggest that some laboratories may not have considered all factors contributing to the measurement uncertainty of dPCR, and further investigation of this possibility is warranted.

Effect of sustained elevated temperature prior to amplification on template copy number estimation using digital polymerase chain reaction.

Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) has the potential to enable accurate quantification of target DNA copy number provided that all target DNA molecules are successfully amplified. Following duplex dPCR analysis from a linear DNA target sequence that contains single copies of two independent template sequences, we have observed that amplification of both templates in a single partition does not always occur. To investigate this finding, we heated the target DNA solution to 95 °C for increasing time intervals and then immediately chilled on ice prior to preparing the dPCR mix. We observed an exponential decline in estimated copy number (R(2)≥ 0.98) of the two template sequences when amplified from either a linearized plasmid or a 388 base pair (bp) amplicon containing the same two template sequences. The distribution of amplifiable templates and the final concentration (copies per µL) were both affected by heat treatment of the samples at 95 °C from 0 s to 30 min. The proportion of target sequences from which only one of the two templates was amplified in a single partition (either 1507 or hmg only) increased over time, while the proportion of target sequences where both templates were amplified (1507 and hmg) in each individual partition declined rapidly from 94% to 52% (plasmid) and 88% to 31% (388 bp amplicon) suggesting an increase in number of targets from which both templates no longer amplify. A 10 min incubation at 95 °C reduced the initial amplifiable template concentration of the plasmid and the 388 bp amplicon by 59% and 91%, respectively. To determine if a similar decrease in amplifiable target occurs during the default pre-activation step of typical PCR amplification protocol, we used mastermixes with a 20 s or 10 min hot-start. The choice of mastermix and consequent pre-activation time did not affect the estimated plasmid concentration. Therefore, we conclude that prolonged exposure of this DNA template to elevated temperatures could lead to significant bias in dPCR measurements. However, care must be taken when designing PCR and non-PCR based experiments by reducing exposure of the DNA template to sustained elevated temperatures in order to improve accuracy in copy number estimation and concentration determination.