Prospective surveillance of patients after palliative radiation for painful bone metastases: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastasis is the most common cause of cancer-related pain. Radiation therapy (RT) can provide successful palliation but there is currently no consensus for surveillance after palliative radiation. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of surveillance after RT for painful bone metastases. METHODS: The study took place in an academic cancer center. Patient feasibility measures included % of calls answered, ease of recruitment and study retention. Clinician measures included % of calls made within 3 days, call time and qualitative feedback. Patients were identified with a painful bone metastasis treated with RT. The bone metastasis had a worst pain score of at least 4 (0-10 scale), with pain localized to a radiographically confirmed lesion. Patients were called at weeks 1, 4 and 8 following RT. Pain response and opioid use were assessed. Quality of life was assessed using a validated questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to assess if these metrics were met for patients and clinicians over 8 weeks post-RT. RESULTS: Twenty patients were consented: 14 participants completed treatment and were not hospitalized or deceased prior to week 1. The patients were 50% male and 50% female. Recruitment was completed quickly, with no patients withdrawing. Response rate was week 1: 85% week 4: 83% and week 8: 83%. Six patients were referred back to their provider for pain management. Calls were made to patients within 3 days a median of 63% of the time (range, 40-82%), with a median call time of 16 (range, 8-42) minutes. Call lengths were longer for patients who required interpretation. Nurse feedback highlighted length of call and nursing time available as limitations. CONCLUSIONS: All patient feasibility measures were met. Six patients required further pain management, highlighting a need for improved follow up post-RT for bone metastases. Staffing challenges for this intervention must be overcome.

Equivocal end-of-therapy imaging findings do not predict a higher risk of local relapse after definitive radiotherapy in pediatric Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Posttherapy imaging studies can provide reassurance or induce anxiety regarding risk of recurrence for patients and their families. In some cases, it is difficult to determine if imaging findings represent posttreatment changes or residual disease. Equivocal radiographic findings can occur due to therapy-related inflammation or residual, inactive soft tissue masses, but it is unknown if such findings indicate an increased likelihood of local recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the value of initial posttherapy scans for predicting local relapse in patients with Ewing sarcoma (EWS) or rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) who received radiotherapy (RT) for local control. These findings are critical to inform clinicians' surveillance recommendations and ability to accurately counsel patients and their families. PROCEDURE: The primary endpoint was time to local progression (LP). Patients were classified as having posttherapy scans that were "positive" (residual disease within the RT field), "negative" (no evidence of residual disease within the RT field), or "equivocal" (no determination could be made). The value of initial posttreatment scans for predicting LP was assessed using positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: Negative imaging findings (n = 51) had an NPV of 88%, and positive imaging findings (n = 1) had a PPV of 100%. When equivocal findings (n = 16) were categorized with negative results (i.e., positive vs. equivocal/negative), the NPV was 90%. When equivocal findings were categorized with positive results (equivocal/positive vs. negative), the PPV was 12%. CONCLUSION: Equivocal findings within the RT field on end-of-therapy imaging studies indicate no higher risk of local recurrence than negative findings. These results may contribute to appropriate surveillance schedules and accurate counseling of patients with RMS and EWS who have received RT for local control.