Gene-Environment Interaction Between CYP1B1 and Oral Contraception on Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia.

Importance: Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is an increasingly prevalent form of follicular lichen planus, causing irreversible hair loss predominantly in postmenopausal individuals. An earlier genome-wide meta-analysis of female FFA identified risk loci in genes implicated in self-antigen presentation and T-cell homeostasis, including HLA-B*07:02, ST3GAL1, and SEMA4B. However, CYP1B1, which is important for hormone metabolism, was also implicated with the substitution of serine for asparagine at position 453 (c.1358A>G, p.Asn453Ser) exhibiting a protective effect against FFA. Increasing understanding of genetic and environmental variables and their interactions will improve understanding of disease pathogenesis and has the potential to inform risk mitigation strategies. Objective: To investigate whether oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use modulates the protective effect of the common missense variant in CYP1B1 (c.1358A>G, p.Asn453Ser) on FFA risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This gene-environment interaction study using a case-control design enrolled female patients with FFA from UK-based dermatology clinics. The patients were matched with unrelated age- and ancestry-matched female control individuals derived from UK Biobank in a 1:66 ratio, determined by the first 4 principal components from genome-wide genotypes. Data were collected from July 2015 to September 2017, and analyzed from October 2022 to December 2023. Main Outcome and Measure: The main outcomes were the modulatory effect of OCP use on the contribution of the CYP1B1 missense variant to female FFA risk and a formal gene-environment interaction test evaluated by a logistic regression model with a multiplicative interaction term, under the assumptions of an additive genetic model interaction term, under the assumptions of an additive genetic model. Results: Of the 489 female patients with FFA, the mean (SD) age was 65.8 (9.7) years, and 370 (75.7%) had a history of OCP use. Of the 34 254 age- and ancestry-matched control individuals, the mean (SD) age was 65.0 (8.4) years, and previous OCP use was reported in 31 177 (91.0%). An association between female FFA and the CYP1B1 risk allele was observed in individuals who reported OCP use (odds ratio, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.50-2.40]; P = 8.41 × 10-8) but not in those with no documented exposure to OCPs (odds ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.82-1.64]; P = .39). A full gene-environment interaction model demonstrated a significant additive statistical interaction between c.1358A, p.453Asn, and history of OCP use on FFA risk (OR for interaction, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.07-2.46]; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: This gene-environment interaction analysis suggests that the protective effect of the CYP1B1 missense variant on FFA risk might be mediated by exposure to OCPs. The allele that encodes an asparagine at position 453 of CYP1B1 was associated with increased odds of FFA only in participants with OCP history.

Physical urticaria: Clinical features, pathogenesis, diagnostic work-up, and management.

Physical urticaria is a type of urticaria in which recurrent wheals and/or angioedema occur following exposure of the skin to a physical stimulus. It is classified according to its triggers, which may be mechanical (friction, pressure, and vibration), thermal (cold and heat), or solar electromagnetic radiation. Symptoms of different physical urticarias can develop following specific activities that expose patients to an eliciting stimulus and may be variably accompanied by mucosal involvement and systemic symptoms, including nausea, headache, or even anaphylaxis. Differentiation of physical urticaria from other chronic urticarias requires careful clinical assessment and confirmatory provocation testing, which in turn can inform appropriate management. This clinical review provides an evidence-based summary of the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis, diagnostic work-up, and management of physical urticaria.

Are virtual consultations suitable for patients with vulval disease? A multicentre audit of outcomes in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual consultation (VC) was used to replace in-person consultations. This raises specific questions when dealing with vulval conditions. Objectives: To assess the feasibility and the efficiency of VC with and without supplementary imaging, in patients with vulval conditions, and to evaluate the images provided as an aid to diagnosis. Methods: This prospective multicentre audit took place in three specialized vulval clinics in London and Paris. Anonymized data on patients' clinical characteristics, consultation characteristics (including the number and quality of any supplementary images provided) and consultation outcomes (diagnostic certainty and physician satisfaction) were collected. Characteristics and outcomes in those with or without supplementary imaging were compared amongst both new and follow-up consultations. Results: A total of 316 VCs were included. In total, 18.7% (n = 59) were new patient consultations and 81.3% (n = 257) were follow-up. Supplementary imaging (photographs and/or video recordings) were provided by 28.5% (n = 90) of the total cohort. Median photographic quality was significantly higher on a five-point Likert-type scale when photographs were taken by a third party as opposed to the patient themselves (4 vs. 3, Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.0001). There was no association between the provision of supplementary imaging and diagnostic certainty amongst new patient consultations. However, a higher proportion of follow-up patients who provided supplementary imaging received definitive management decisions (χ 2 test, p < 0.001) and physician satisfaction with these consultations, as measured on a five-point Likert-type scale, was significantly higher (Mann-Whitney U-test, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, median physician satisfaction scores ≥4 were observed in follow-up consultations for candidiasis, lichen simplex/eczema and vulvodynia. Conclusions: Although in-person consultation remains the gold standard of care, VC may have a role in the management of selected patients with vulval disease. It is possible to provide good-quality photographs for clinical assessment, particularly with the help of a third party and follow-up patients with an established, cancer-unrelated diagnosis may be best suited for this consultation modality.