Response Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Therapies in Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Sarcoma is a complex and heterogeneous disease with a rapidly evolving treatment landscape. With a growing emphasis on neoadjuvant therapy as a way to improve surgical and oncologic outcomes, our approach to monitor treatment efficacy must also continue to evolve. This is paramount to both clinical trial design, where endpoints must accurately reflect disease outcomes, and individual patient, whose treatment response informs therapeutic decisions. In the era of personalized medicine, the response to neoadjuvant treatment in sarcoma remains most effectively gauged by pathologic review following surgical resection. Although measures of pathologic complete response most effectively predict outcome, the requisite surgical excision precludes their use in real-time monitoring of neoadjuvant treatment response. Current image-based metrics such as RECIST and PERCIST have been utilized in many trials; however, they are limited by their unilateral measurement approach. More effective tools are needed to better measure the response to therapy prior to neoadjuvant regimen completion, so that the medication or regimen may be best tailored to patient response in an ongoing fashion. Delta-radiomics and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represent promising novel tools for real-time monitoring of treatment efficacy. These metrics have been shown to predict pathologic complete response and disease progression at a superior level to traditional CT-based guidelines. Delta-radiomics is currently being utilized in a clinical trial among soft tissue sarcoma patients in which radiation dosage is adjusted based on radiomic data. The ability of ctDNA to detect molecular residual disease is also under study in multiple clinical trials, although none in the field of sarcoma. Future directions in the field include the use of ctDNA and molecular residual disease testing among sarcoma patients, as well as increased utilization of delta-radiomics, to more effectively monitor neoadjuvant treatment response prior to surgical resection.

Implementation of a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Program for At-risk Patients Safety-Net Hospital: A Model for National Dissemination.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to enhance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening to achieve earlier diagnosis of patients with hepatitis C (HCV) cirrhosis in our Safety-Net population. BACKGROUND: Adherence to HCC screening guidelines at Safety-Net hospitals is poor. Only 23% of patients with HCC at our health system had a screening exam within 1-year of diagnosis and 46% presented with stage IV disease. HCV-induced cirrhosis remains the most common etiology of HCC (75%) in our patients. METHODS: In the setting of an established HCV treatment clinic, an HCC screening quality improvement initiative was initiated for patients with stage 3 fibrosis or cirrhosis by transient elastography. The program consisted of semiannual imaging. Navigators scheduled imaging appointments and tracked compliance. RESULTS: From April 2018 to April 2021, 318 patients were enrolled (mean age 61 years, 81% Black race, 38% uninsured). Adherence to screening was higher than previously reported: 94%, 75%, and 74% of patients completed their first, second, and third imaging tests. Twenty-two patients (7%) were diagnosed with HCC; 55% stage I and 14% stage IV. All patients were referred and 13 (59%) received treatment. Median time to receipt of treatment was 77 days (range, 32-282). Median overall survival for treated patients was 32 months. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an HCC screening program at a safety-net hospital is feasible and facilitated earlier diagnosis in this study. Patient navigation and tracking completion of imaging tests were key components of the program's success. Next steps include expanding the program to additional at-risk populations.

Patient reported outcomes: Financial toxicity is a barrier to clinical trials and personalized therapy in cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Numerous experimental and targeted therapies are under investigation for patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Objective health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data for patients receiving these therapies are limited. METHODS: Patients engaged in the Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation completed two validated HRQoL surveys: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Hepatobiliary and COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST). RESULTS: Two hundred eight patients were included. Seventy-five percent had intrahepatic CCA and 57% underwent resection, of which 48% had disease recurrence. Twenty-two percent enrolled in a clinical trial and 80% underwent molecular profiling, of which 29% received targeted therapy. While patients enrolled in a clinical trial or received targeted therapy reported similar HRQoL compared to those who did not, they reported higher financial toxicity (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Enrollment in a clinical trial or receipt of targeted therapy do not affect a patient's physical, emotional, social, or functional well-being. However, patients report higher financial burden. These therapies are mainly offered in the advanced setting after significant financial strain has been endured and are often only available at large academic centers, creating a physical barrier to access. These findings underscore the need to increase availability and eliminate physical and financial barriers that threaten access and utilization of personalized and progressive therapies.

Do Oncologic Outcomes From Head and Neck Versus Truncal and Extremity Melanoma Differ? A Single-Institution Single-Subspecialty Experience.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes are thought to be worse in head and neck (H&N) melanoma patients. However, definitive evidence of inferior outcomes in H&N melanoma in the modern era is lacking. We sought to ascertain whether H&N melanomas carry a worse prognosis than melanomas of other sites. METHODS: All patients who underwent excision for primary melanoma by fellowship-trained surgical oncologists at a single institution from 2014 to 2020 were queried from the electronic medical record. Patients who had AJCC eighth edition stage I-III disease were included. RESULTS: Of 1127 patients, 28.7% had primary H&N melanoma. H&N patients were more likely to be male, older, and present with more advanced AJCC stage. Median follow-up was 20.0 months (IQR 26.4). On multivariable analyses controlling for other variables, H&N melanoma was associated with worse RFS. Notably, H&N melanoma was not associated with worse MSS, DMFS, or OS on univariate or multivariable analyses. Among patients who recurred, H&N patients were significantly more likely to recur locally compared to non-H&N patients. On subgroup analysis, scalp melanoma was also associated with worse RFS compared to patients with melanoma in locations other than the scalp. When patients with scalp melanoma were excluded from analysis, non-scalp H&N RFS was not significantly different from the non-H&N group on univariate or multivariable analyses. DISCUSSION: In this series from a high-volume tertiary referral center, the differences in rates and sites of recurrence between H&N and non-H&N melanoma do not impact melanoma-specific or overall survival, suggesting that H&N melanoma patients should be treated similarly with respect to regional and systemic therapies.