Unplanned Return to Hospital After Same Day Oral Cavity Resection: A Dual Institution Study.

OBJECTIVES: Primary objective: describe rates of 30-days unplanned readmission following outpatient resection of oral cavity cancer. Secondary objective: evaluate for patient and treatment factors associated with readmission. METHODS: Retrospective, dual-institution cohort study of 2 tertiary care referral centers involving adult patients undergoing resection of oral cavity cancer with plans for same-day discharge. Consecutive sample of 77 patients included. Primary outcome was unplanned readmission to emergency room or inpatient stay in the 30 days following surgery. Comparison testing was used between return and non-return groups. RESULTS: Among 77 patients treated with outpatient surgery for oral cavity cancer, 19 (25%) returned to the hospital within 30 days. Among the reasons for return, 16 (80%) were directly related to surgery, and 4 (20%) were related to perioperative medical complications not directly related to a surgical site. Among the 25 patients also undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy with their oral cavity resection, none returned to the hospital for neck-related complications. While most patients could be safely observed and discharged after return to the hospital, 8 patients (10%) required inpatient readmission. No significant differences between return and non-return groups were identified, although there was a trend toward shorter driving distance from hospital for the return group (47.6 miles vs. 69.5 miles, P = 0.097). CONCLUSION: Unplanned return to the hospital following outpatient oral cavity resection is prevalent and primarily driven by postoperative primary resection site concerns. Among patients selected for same day discharge, no definite population at highest risk of unplanned return was identified.

Complication of head and neck cancer: Carotid blowout syndrome.

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition characterized by the spontaneous or traumatic rupture of the carotid artery in the neck. Oftentimes, CBS is due a loss of structural arterial integrity from local radiotherapy or surgical procedures. A vast majority of patients who develop CBS also have a previous diagnosis of head and neck cancer. Due to the specific patient population who develop CBS and its life-threatening nature, CBS should be a part of emergency physicians differential for those who present with a chronic neck wound or neurological symptoms in those with a previous head and neck cancer diagnosis. In this case report, a patient with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx who was treated with chemoradiation therapy, presented to the emergency department with spontaneous bleeding from an existing chronic wound on the left lateral neck. Conservative measures were taken including wound dressing, and the patient was discharged to see dermatology for biopsy of a suspected cancerous lesion. Once the chronic lesion was biopsied, the patient had to be immediately rushed to the operating room due to a brisk pulsatile bleeding from puncturing the carotid artery. Proper wound packing and an ultrasound of the neck for a proper diagnosis may have prevented the need for surgical intervention in this case. Although CBS is not common, complications can lead to death as seen in this case. Timely recognition and proper interventions are critical for preventing potentially fatal outcomes in those with CBS.

Outcomes after Anatomic Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using Transtibial and Tibial Inlay Techniques.

Surgical reconstruction is recommended for symptomatic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency. While anatomic double-bundle PCL reconstruction (PCLR) has been reported to be associated with biomechanical and clinical advantages over other methods, there is still debate regarding the optimal technique for tibial positioning and fixation. Based on reported advantages and disadvantages, we employed two tibial fixation techniques, transtibial (TT) and tibial inlay (TI) for anatomic double-bundle PCLR with technique selection based on body mass index, comorbidities, and primary versus revision surgery. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes following PCLR utilizing either TT or TI techniques to validate relative advantages, disadvantages, and indications for each based on the review of prospectively collected registry data. For 37 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 26 underwent arthroscopic TT PCLR using all-soft- tissue allograft with suspensory fixation in the tibia and 11 patients underwent open TI PCLR using an allograft with calcaneal bone block and screw fixation in the tibia. There were no significant preoperative differences between cohorts. Success rates were 96% for TT and 91% for TI with all successful cases documented to be associated with good-to-excellent posterior stability and range of motion in the knee at the final follow-up. In addition, patient-reported outcome scores were within clinically meaningful ranges for pain, function, and mental health after PCLR in both cohorts, suggesting similarly favorable functional, social, and psychological outcomes. Patient-reported pain scores at 6 months postoperatively were significantly (p = 0.042) lower in the TT cohort, which was the only statistically significant difference in outcomes noted. The results of this study support the use of TT and TI techniques for double-bundle anatomic PCLR in restoring knee stability and patient function when used for the treatment of isolated and multiligamentous PCL injuries. The choice between tibial fixation methods for PCLR can be appropriately based on patient and injury characteristics that optimize respective advantages for each technique.