Improved Metastatic-Free Survival after Systematic Re-Excision Following Complete Macroscopic Unplanned Excision of Limb or Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Whether re-excision (RE) of a soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of limb or trunk should be systematized as adjuvant care and if it would improve metastatic free survival (MFS) are still debated. The impact of resection margins after unplanned macroscopically complete excision (UE) performed out of a NETSARC reference center or after second resection was further investigated. METHODS: This large nationwide series used data from patients having experienced UE outside of a reference center from 2010 to 2019, collected in a French nationwide exhaustive prospective cohort NETSARC. Patient characteristics and survival distributions in patients reexcised (RE) or not (No-RE) are reported. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was conducted to adjust for classical prognosis factors. Subgroup analysis were performed to identify which patients may benefit from RE. RESULTS: Out of 2371 patients with UE for STS performed outside NETSARC reference centers, 1692 patients were not reviewed by multidisciplinary board before treatment decision and had a second operation documented. Among them, 913 patients experienced re-excision, and 779 were not re-excised. Characteristics were significantly different regarding patient age, tumor site, size, depth, grade and histotype in patients re-excised (RE) or not (No-RE). In univariate analysis, final R0 margins are associated with a better MFS, patients with R1 margins documented at first surgery had a better MFS as compared to patients with first R0 resection. The study identified RE as an independent favorable factor for MFS (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.93; p = 0.013). All subgroups except older patients (>70 years) and patients with large tumors (>10 cm) had superior MFS with RE. CONCLUSIONS: RE might be considered in patients with STS of limb or trunk, with UE with macroscopic complete resection performed out of a reference center, and also in originally defined R0 margin resections, to improve LRFS and MFS. Systematic RE should not be advocated for patients older than 70 years, or with tumors greater than 10 cm.

Clinical outcomes after inferior vena cava resection for malignant disease. A single center experience of 51 vena cava resections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For tumors involving inferior vena cava (IVC), surgery with complete resection remains the first line treatment. Management of IVC after resection, either ligation without reconstruction or primary reconstruction, is debated. Our study aimed to evaluate type of venous reconstruction, anticoagulation management and morbidity. METHODS: A French single center database of patients who underwent partial or total circumferencial resection of the IVC for malignant disease was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were any oncologic procedure for a retroperitoneal neoplasm requiring concomitant resection of the IVC with or without venous reconstruction with prosthesis. Exclusion criteria were surgery before year 2000. Data were descriptive and reverse Kaplan Meier was used for follow-up calculation. The endpoints were the rate of prosthetic reconstruction, the use of anticoagulation and the post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty - one patients were included with a median duration of follow-up of 54.8 months. The majority of patients were men (56.9%). Median age of the population was 44.1 years. Most of the patients underwent surgery for primary testicular cancer and for sarcoma. Complete IVC resections were performed in 46 (90,2%) patients, 32 having a concomitant prosthetic replacement. Eight patients underwent aortic resection in the same operative time. Postoperative morbidity was 33.3%. Post-operative anticoagulation was done in 24 patients. At 1 month, four patients developed thrombosis in the prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: IVC resections are feasible and safe. Venous reconstruction and postoperative management were planned according to the preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings. We propose a decision-tree for peri-operative management and anticoagulation.

A CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and tumour grade in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RADSARC-R): a retrospective multicohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are tumours with a poor prognosis. Upfront characterisation of the tumour is difficult, and under-grading is common. Radiomics has the potential to non-invasively characterise the so-called radiological phenotype of tumours. We aimed to develop and independently validate a CT-based radiomics classification model for the prediction of histological type and grade in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma. METHODS: A retrospective discovery cohort was collated at our centre (Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK) and an independent validation cohort comprising patients recruited in the phase 3 STRASS study of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Patients aged older than 18 years with confirmed primary leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma proceeding to surgical resection with available contrast-enhanced CT scans were included. Using the discovery dataset, a CT-based radiomics workflow was developed, including manual delineation, sub-segmentation, feature extraction, and predictive model building. Separate probabilistic classifiers for the prediction of histological type and low versus intermediate or high grade tumour types were built and tested. Independent validation was then performed. The primary objective of the study was to develop radiomic classification models for the prediction of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma type and histological grade. FINDINGS: 170 patients recruited between Oct 30, 2016, and Dec 23, 2020, were eligible in the discovery cohort and 89 patients recruited between Jan 18, 2012, and April 10, 2017, were eligible in the validation cohort. In the discovery cohort, the median age was 63 years (range 27-89), with 83 (49%) female and 87 (51%) male patients. In the validation cohort, median age was 59 years (range 33-77), with 46 (52%) female and 43 (48%) male patients. The highest performing model for the prediction of histological type had an area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 0·928 on validation, based on a feature set of radiomics and approximate radiomic volume fraction. The highest performing model for the prediction of histological grade had an AUROC of 0·882 on validation, based on a radiomics feature set. INTERPRETATION: Our validated radiomics model can predict the histological type and grade of retroperitoneal sarcomas with excellent performance. This could have important implications for improving diagnosis and risk stratification in retroperitoneal sarcomas. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, the National Institutes for Health, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research.

Evolution of Patterns of Care and Outcomes in the Real-Life Setting for Patients with Metastatic GIST Treated in Three French Expert Centers over Three Decades.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal tumors characterized by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Over three decades, significant changes in drug discovery and loco-regional (LR) procedures have impacted treatment strategies. We assessed the evolution of treatment strategies for metastatic GIST patients treated in the three national coordinating centers of NetSarc, the French network of sarcoma referral centers endorsed by the National Institute of Cancers, from 1990 to 2018. The primary objective was to describe the clinical and biological profiles as well as the treatment modalities of patients with metastatic GIST in a real-life setting, including access to clinical trials and LR procedures in the metastatic setting. Secondary objectives were to assess (1) patients' outcome in terms of time to next treatment (TNT) for each line of systemic treatment, (2) patients' overall survival (OS), (3) evolution of patients' treatment modalities and OS according to treatment access: <2002 (pre-imatinib approval), 2002-2006 (pre-sunitinib approval), 2006-2014 (pre-regorafenib approval), post 2014, and (4) the impact of clinical trials and LR procedures on TNT and OS in the metastatic setting. 1038 patients with a diagnosis of GIST made in one of the three participating centers between 1990 and 2018 were included in the national prospective database. Among them, 492 patients presented metastasis, either synchronous or metachronous. The median number of therapy lines in the metastatic setting was 3 (range 0-15). More than half of the patients (55%) participated in a clinical trial during the course of their metastatic disease and half (51%) underwent additional LR procedures on metastatic sites. The median OS in the metastatic setting was 83.4 months (95%CI [72.7; 97.9]). The median TNT was 26.7 months (95%CI [23.4; 32.3]) in first-line, 10.2 months (95%CI [8.6; 11.8]) in second line, 6.7 months (95%CI [5.3; 8.5]) in third line, and 5.5 months (95%CI [4.3; 6.7]) in fourth line, respectively. There was no statistical difference in OS in the metastatic setting between the four therapeutic periods (log rank, p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, age, AFIP Miettinen classification, mutational status, surgery of the primary tumor, participation in a clinical trial in the first line and LR procedure to metastatic sites were associated with longer TNT in the first line, whereas age, mitotic index, mutational status, surgery of the primary tumor and LR procedure to metastatic sites were associated with longer OS. This real-life study advocates for early reference of metastatic GIST patients to expert centers to orchestrate the best access to future innovative clinical trials together with LR strategies and further improve GIST patients' survival.

Gynecological carcinosarcomas: Overview and future perspectives.

Gynecologic carcinosarcoma (CS) are rare and aggressive tumors composed of high-grade carcinoma and sarcoma. Carcinosarcoma account for less than 5% of uterine and ovarian carcinoma and patients have poor outcome with a 5-year overall survival of less than 30%. In early-stage setting, the treatment mainstay is surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy in uterine (UCS) and ovarian CS (OCS), respectively. In metastatic or advanced stage disease, chemotherapy is the rule with a lower response rate and poorer prognosis compared to other high-grade carcinomas. Although very few treatment options are available, CS are often excluded from the clinical trials precluding therapeutic improvement. However, recent molecular advances are paving the way for new therapeutic strategies. In the current proposal, we extensively review the uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas including epidemiology, pathology, genomic landscape, as well as current therapies and future perspectives.

Do surgeons overestimate diaphragmatic peritoneal disease in interval debulking surgery of ovarian cancer?

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery is a key point in ovarian cancer treatment. Substantial morbidity may be consecutive to this major radical surgery. However, the objective of no residual tumor (CC-0) had demonstrated its clear improvement of prognosis. Could macroscopically-driven interval debulking surgery (IDS) overestimate active cancer cells and be unnecessarily morbid? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Center Leon Berard Cancer Center between 2000 and 2018. We included women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent an IDS including resection of peritoneal metastases on the diaphragmatic domes. The primary endpoint was the pathological outcome of peritoneal resections of diaphragmatic domes. RESULTS: Peritoneal resections of diaphragmatic domes consisted of 117 patients. 75 patients required resection of nodules from the right cupola only, 2 patients from the left cupola only, and 40 patients bilaterally. Pathological analysis of the diaphragmatic domes found that 84.6% of samples demonstrated the presence of malignant cells, and only 12.8% found no tumor involvement. Pathology analysis could not be performed for 3 patients (2.6%) (vaporization). CONCLUSION: Surgical evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer does not often overestimate peritoneal involvement by active carcinomatosis. Potential surgical morbidity due to peritoneal resection in IDS is admissible.

Surgical outcomes in pelvic exenteration for advanced and recurrent malignancy: a high volume single institution experience.

PURPOSE: Pelvic exenteration remains the only curative treatment for advanced pelvic malignancies. However, identification of predictive factors for successful surgical outcomes is still a controversial issue at present time. METHODS: This retrospective study included data from all adult patients with colorectal or anal advanced pelvic malignancy registered for pelvic exenteration at the Leon Berard Cancer Center (Lyon, France). The primary endpoint was the surgical outcomes and aimed to define the predictive factors for postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and progression free survival in patients having experienced pelvic exenteration (PE). RESULTS: Data from 141 patients with locally advanced tumor (N = 81) or recurrent malignancies (N = 60) diagnosed between May 1994 and November 2018 were collected. The median age was 63.3 years (95%CI 20.0-92.0). Malignancies included different locations (rectal: 69.5%, left colon: 17.0% and anal: 13.5%). Posterior pelvectomy was the most frequent surgery (81.6%). The median length of hospital stay was 23.3 days (95%CI 3.0-82.0). The major complication rate at 30 days was 24.8% and 38.1% at 90 days. The median overall survival was 54.5 months (95%CI 41.5-104.1) and the median PFS was 34.5 months (95%CI 19.6-NA). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, pelvic exenteration is associated with good surgical and survival outcomes.

Prognostic Factors for Local Recurrence after Cryoablation of Desmoid Tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the risk factors for local of adult patients treated for desmoid tumors by cryoablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients treated for nonabdominopelvic desmoid tumors by cryoablation from July 2012 to July 2020 were included in a retrospective study. The population was composed of 64 women (76.19%) and 20 men (23.81%), aged from 16 to 75 years (median, 35 years ± 14.25). Each patient underwent preprocedural gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and was followed up to 36 months with the same technique. Clinical features, such as tumor size and previous treatment, epidemiological features, and the technical parameters of cryoablation, were studied. RESULTS: Local relapse was found in 19 (22.62%) of 84 patients. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-94), 74% (95% CI, 60-83), and 68% (95% CI, 53-79), respectively. In univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors associated with local recurrence were non-abdominal wall location (P = .042), debulking strategy (P = .0105), risk of visceral injury (P = .034) or peripheral nerve injury during cryoablation (P = .033), previous radiation therapy (P = .043), and treatment before 2016 (P = .008). In multivariate analysis, abdominal wall tumors displayed the best outcome, whereas the neck and trunk showed a high rate of recurrence (hazard ratio, 7.307 [95% CI, 1.396-38.261]). CONCLUSIONS: The local recurrence of desmoid tumors after cryoablation depends on a number of prognostic factors, in particular, a non-abdominal wall location of the tumor and previous local treatment such as surgery or radiation therapy.

[Uterin adenosarcoma: French Guidelines of the French Sarcoma Group and the Rare Gynecologic Tumor Group]. / Adénosarcomes mullériens de l'utérus ­ référentiels de prise en charge du GSF-GETO/NETSARC+ et du groupe TMRG.

Uterine adenosarcoma is a very rare malignancy defined as a biphasic tumor composed of both benign epithelial component and a malignant sarcoma component. The stage of the disease is determined by the presence of myometrial invasion and the extent of extra-uterine disease. The most important histopronostic factors are the existence of a sarcomatous overgrowth defined by a sarcomatous contingent occupying more than 25 % of the volume of the tumor (directly correlated to the grade of the disease), the presence of a heterologous and/or a high-grade component. Stage I adenosarcomas without sarcomatous overgrowth have a good prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival of up to 80 %. In localized disease, complete surgical removal is recommended. The role of hormone therapy, chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy is not established. If possible, relapses should be re-treated surgically, with the aim of achieving complete resection. In the advanced inoperable or metastatic setting, hormone therapy is an option for low-grade adenosarcomas with estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) overexpression. For high-grade tumors, the standard chemotherapies are doxorubicin-based combinations, although an integrated approach of surgery and medical treatment should also be considered in this setting.

Treatment of radiation-associated angiosarcoma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma is a cutaneous aggressive tumor that is very rare and it represents a specific entity poorly studied in literature. It requires new therapeutic opportunity. RECENT FINDINGS: The complete surgical resection with negative margins is the mainstay treatment of localized treatment, even though it is difficult to reach in case of diffuse cutaneous infiltration. Adjuvant re-irradiation may improve local control with no benefit demonstrated on survival. Many systemic treatments can be efficient not only in metastatic setting but also in neoadjuvant setting in case of diffuse presentation. These treatments have never been compared to each other; the most efficient regimen remains to be determined, and a high heterogeneity of treatment is observed, even between sarcoma reference centers. SUMMARY: Immune therapy represents the most promising treatment under development. At the time of building clinical trial to assess the efficacy of immune therapy, the lack of randomized studies prevents the identification of a strong and consensual reference arm treatment. Given the rarity of the disease, only international collaborative clinical trials may have a chance to include enough patients to draw any conclusion and so will have to counteract the heterogeneity of management.

Doxorubicin combined with Trabectedin in systemic first-line M+/recurrent leiomyosarcoma patients.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Currently, the only systemic therapy approved for advanced leiomyosarcoma is Doxorubicin-based monotherapy. Despite disappointing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), no combination therapy has formally ever proven to be more effective. In this clinical setting, selecting the most efficient therapy is key, as most patients become quickly symptomatic with poor performance status.This review aims to describe the current emerging role of Doxorubicin and Trabectedin in first-line setting, compared with doxorubicin alone the current standard of treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Previous randomized trials focusing on combination therapies (Doxorubicin + ifosfamide, doxorubicin + evofosfamide, doxorubicin + Olaratumab, or Gemcitabine + Docetaxel) never reported positive results on the primary endpoint (OS or PFS). For the first time, the randomized phase III LMS-04 demonstrated that Doxorubicin and Trabectedin have a better PFS and disease control rate (DCR) compared with Doxorubicin, with higher but still manageable toxicities. SUMMARY: In the first-line setting, the results of this trial were pivotal for numerous reasons; Doxorubicin-Trabectedin is the first combination that has been proven to be more effective in terms of PFS, ORR and trend of OS compared with doxorubicin alone; moreover, it is clear that trials regarding soft tissue sarcoma should strive to be histology-driven.

Impact of surgery and chemotherapy in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors from the multicentric Salomé study including 469 patients. A TMRG and GINECO group study.

OBJECTIVE: Identifying prognostic factors and evaluating the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with sex cord stromal tumors (SCST) is crucial. In this study, we aimed to address these challenges. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 13 centers of the French Rare malignant gynecological tumors (TMRG) network. We enrolled 469 adult patients with malignant SCST who received upfront surgery since 2011 to July 2015. RESULTS: 75% were diagnosed with adult Granulosa cell tumors, and 23% had another subtype. With a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 154 patients (33%) developed a first recurrence, 82 (17%) two recurrences, and 49 (10%) three recurrences. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 14.7% of patients at initial diagnosis. In relapse, perioperative chemotherapy was administered in 58.5%, 28.2%, and 23.8% of patients, respectively, in the first, second, and third relapse. In the first-line therapy, age under 70 years, FIGO stage, and complete surgery were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy had no impact on PFS in early-stage disease (FIGO I-II). The PFS was similar using BEP or other chemotherapy regimens (HR 0.88 [0.43; 1.81]) in the first-line therapy. In case of recurrence, PFS was statistically prolonged by complete surgery, but perioperative chemotherapy use did not impact PFS. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy use did not impact survival in the first-line or relapse setting in SCST. Only surgery and its quality demonstrated benefit for PFS in ovarian SCST in any lines of treatment.

[Uterin sarcoma, high-grade stroma, indifferenciated, referential]. / Sarcomes utérins du stroma de haut grade et sarcomes indifférenciés ­ Référentiels de prise en charge du Groupe Sarcome Français et du Groupe des Tumeurs Rares Gynécologiques.

High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) and uterine undifferentiated sarcoma (UUS) are rare uterine malignancies arising from mesenchymal endometrial cells. They are characterized by aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Median age of diagnostic is 55years. The most common symptoms are vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and pelvic mass. Approximately 65 % are diagnosed witch advance disease stage III or IV according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics classification. Median overall survival is around 20months. The management of the disease must be discussed in multidisciplinary staff meetings. The standard management of HGESS and UUS is total hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy. Systematic lymphadenectomy is not recommended. Adjuvant therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy must be discussed. In case of oligo-metastasic disease, surgery of the primary tumor and metastasis must be discussed and if not operable the standard management is doxorubine-based chemotherapy.

[Treatments for rare ovarian tumors: What's new?] / Avancées thérapeutiques dans la prise en charge des tumeurs rares malignes ovariennes.

Even if each rare ovarian tumor (ROT) has a low incidence, the sum of all these entities represents almost the half of all ovarian neoplasms. Thus, development of dedicated clinical trial emerged as a prerequisite to improve their managements. Owing to the spreading of dedicated institutional networks and (supra)national collaborations, the number of clinical trials has increased the past few years, with different types of trials; while some focused on specific molecular features, others assessed innovative molecules. Furthermore, relevant randomized clinical trials were designed as a mean to position new treatment options. Currently, innovative molecular-driven trials, based on master protocol trials are emerging and may shed light towards the improvement of personalized medicine regarding ROT.

[Uterine leiomyosarcoma - French guidelines from the GSF/NETSARC and TMRG groups]. / Léiomyosarcomes utérins ­ Référentiel de prise en charge du GSF-GETO/NETSARC+ et du groupe TMRG.

Uterine leiomyosarcomas represent the most common uterine sarcomas. The prognosis is poor with metastatic recurrence in more than half of the cases. The purpose of this review is to make French recommendations for the management of uterine leiomyosarcomas within the framework of the French Sarcoma Group - Bone Tumor Study Group (GSF-GETO)/NETSARC+ and Malignant Rare Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) networks in order to optimize their therapeutic management. The initial assessment includes a MRI with diffusion perfusion sequence. The diagnosis is histological with a review in an expert center (Reference Network in Sarcoma Pathology (RRePS)). Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, en bloc without morcellation, is performed when complete resection is possible, whatever the stage. There is no indication of systematic lymph node dissection. Bilateral oophorectomy is indicated in peri-menopausal or menopausal women. Adjuvant external radiotherapy is not a standard. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not a standard. It can be an option and consists in doxorobucin based protocols. In the event of local recurrence, the therapeutic options are based on revision surgery and/or radiotherapy. Systemic treatment with chemotherapy is most often indicated. In case of metastatic disease, surgical treatment remains indicated when resecable. In cases of oligo-metastatic disease, focal treatment of metastases should be considered. In the case of stage IV, chemotherapy is indicated, and is based on first-line doxorubicin-based protocols. In the event of excessive deterioration in general condition, management by exclusive supportive care is recommended. External palliative radiotherapy can be proposed for symptomatic purposes.

Prognostic factors and outcomes of adult spermatic cord sarcoma. A study from the French Sarcoma Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of adult patients with spermatic cord sarcoma (SCS). METHODS: All consecutive patients with SCS managed by the French Sarcoma Group from 1980 to 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was used to identify independent correlates of overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS). RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were recorded. The median age was 65.1 years. Forty-one (20.1%) SCSs were discovered unexpectedly during inguinal hernia surgery. The most common subtypes were liposarcoma (LPS) (73%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (12.5%). The initial treatment was surgery for 218 (97.3%) patients. Forty-two patients (18.8%) received radiotherapy, 17 patients (7.6%) received chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 5.1 years. The median OS was 13.9 years. In MVA, OS decreased significantly with histology (HR, well-differentiated LPS versus others = 0.096; p = 0.0224), high grade (HR, 3 versus 1-2 = 2.7; p = 0.0111), previous cancer and metastasis at diagnosis (HR = 6.8; p = 0.0006). The five-year MFS was 85.9% [95% CI: 79.3-90.6]. In MVA, significant factors associated with MFS were LMS subtype (HR = 4.517; p < 10-4) and grade 3 (HR = 3.664; p < 10-3). The five-year LRFS survival rate was 67.9% [95% CI: 59.6-74.9]. In MVA, significant factors associated with local relapse were margins and wide reresection (WRR) after incomplete resection. OS was not significantly different between patients with initial R0/R1 resection and R2 patients who underwent WRR. CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned surgery affected 20.1% of SCSs. A nonreducible painless inguinal lump should suggest a sarcoma. WRR with R0 resection achieved similar OS to patients with correct surgery upfront.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Re-excised Soft-tissue Sarcoma After Unplanned Resection.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) re-excised after unplanned tumor resection (UPR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2015, we retrospectively evaluated patients with STS of limb or trunk who underwent post-UPR re-excision in our expert center and received or not aRT. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 121 months (IQR 94-165). Among the 145 patients, 37 were not treated with aRT (no-RT) and 108 received aRT with a median radiation dose of 50 Gy (IQR 50-60). At 10 years, patients in the aRT and no-RT groups showed a cumulative incidence of local failure (10y-LF) of 14.7% and 37.7%, and a local recurrence-free survival (10y-LRFS) of 61.3% and 45.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified aRT and age ≥70 years as independent predictors of both LF and LRFS, while grade 3 and deep-seated tumor were independent predictors of LRFS. In overall population, 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (10y-DMFS) and overall survival (10y-OS) were 63.7% and 69.4%. In multivariate analyses, age ≥70 years, grade 3, and deep-seated lesion were associated with shorter DMFS and OS. Acute severe adverse events were not significantly increased in aRT group (14.8% vs. 18.1%, P = .85) but dramatically increased if radiation dose exceeded 50 Gy (risk ratio 2.96 compared to ≤50 Gy, P = .04). CONCLUSION: In STS patients re-excised after UPR, 50 Gy aRT was safe and associated with reduced LF and longer LRFS. It seems to be beneficial even in absence of residual disease or in absence of initial adverse prognostic factors.

[Endometrial stromal sarcoma: French Guidelines from the French Sarcoma Group and the Rare Malignant Gynecologic Tumors Group]. / Sarcomes du stroma endométrial de bas grade : référentiels de prise en charge du GSF-GETO/NETSARC+ et du groupe TMRG.

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) accounts for approximately 15% of all uterine sarcomas. Median age of patients is around 50 years and half of the patients are premenopausal. In all, 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. Preoperatively radiologic findings of ESS are not specific. Pathological diagnosis remains essential. This review aimed to present the French guidelines for low grade ESS treatment within the Groupe sarcome français - Groupe d'étude des tumeurs osseuse (GSF-GETO)/NETSARC+ and tumeur maligne rare gynécologique (TMRG) networks. Treatments should be validated in multidisciplinary team involved in sarcomas or rare gynecologic tumors. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, and morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome and is not recommended. Leaving the ovaries in situ in stage I tumors could be discussed for young women. Adjuvant hormonal treatment could be considered, for two years for stage I with morcellation or stage II and livelong for stages III or IV. Nevertheless, several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Tamoxifen is contraindicated. Secondary cytoreductive surgery if feasible for recurrent disease, appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease is mainly hormonal, with or without surgery.

Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery as Consolidation Therapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who undergo incomplete surgery followed by six cycles of chemotherapy could benefit from second-look or consolidation cytoreductive surgery (CCRS). The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing complete CCRS and the factors affecting survival. The secondary goal was to study the benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in these patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 173 patients with CCRS with (n = 118) or without (n = 55) HIPEC treated at 12 French centers. Only patients having a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) 0/1 resection and a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were included. HIPEC was performed systematically for all patients except those treated at the four centers that did not perform HIPEC. RESULTS: The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 6 (range 0-33). Closed HIPEC was performed in 59 (34.1%) patients and open HIPEC was performed in 56 (32.3%) patients. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in 64 (36.9%) patients. The median OS was 35.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.8-46.1) and was significantly longer for CCRS + HIPEC (31.4 months without HIPEC and 42.5 months with HIPEC; p = 0.022). On multivariate analysis, closed HIPEC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73; p < 0.001) resulted in a longer OS, and age > 65 years (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.14-4.11; p = 0.018) and bowel resection (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27-3.08; p = 0.020) led to a shorter OS. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, closed HIPEC (odds ratio 0.18; p = 0.001) was associated with a lower risk of dying at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: CCRS was performed with an acceptable morbidity and resulted in good overall survival. The role of HIPEC in addition to CCRS should be evaluated in prospective, randomized studies and the closed technique prospectively compared with the open technique.