RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobials are commonly used in patients near the end of life, but the percentage and predictors of patients prescribed antibiotics while hospitalized on a comfort care protocol are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine how often patients in the acute care setting are continued on antimicrobials when they are transitioned to comfort-focused care and to describe patient characteristics correlated with antimicrobial use. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study conducted from June 2012 to August 2014. SETTING: Two interrelated academic medical centers. PATIENTS: Inpatients >18 years old transitioned to a comfort care protocol. MEASUREMENTS: Administration of antimicrobials to patients on the comfort care protocol. ANALYSIS: We generated descriptive statistics and used a modified Poisson regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted associations along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. RESULTS: There were 1881 patients included in the study; 77% of patients ultimately transitioned to a comfort care protocol received antimicrobials during their admission and 82% died in hospital. Of the 711 alive at ≥24 hours after comfort care orders, 111 (15.6%) were still on antimicrobials. After adjusting for age, a documented infection was positively associated with being on antibiotics (adjusted relative risk [ARR] = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.00-2.12, p = 0.05). Patients in the medical and surgical intensive care units (ICUs) were less likely than those on medicine to receive antimicrobials (MICU ARR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.72, p = 0.01; SICU/Neuro ARR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12-0.85, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial use is relatively high in hospitalized patients near the end of life, even when the goal is comfort.
Assuntos
Cuidados Paliativos , Anti-Infecciosos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Citarabina , Etoposídeo , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Metotrexato , Conforto do Paciente , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
It is well established that competent patients have the right to refuse artificial nutrition and hydration. There is less clarity regarding withholding nutrition in patients who lack decision-making capacity but who are still physically able to eat and drink. This case highlights the ethical dilemma of withholding food and drink in a patient with advanced dementia.