Out-of-hospital sepsis recognition by paramedics improves the course of disease and mortality: A single center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of sepsis and a prompt initiation of goal-directed therapy is important for sepsis survival. Little is known about the impact of early recognition of sepsis in the out-of-hospital setting when paramedics are the 1st medical professionals arriving on the scene. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of sepsis recognition by paramedics in the 1st out-of-hospital contact and to establish a predictive model by combining preclinical patient characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we included a total of 263 patients diagnosed with sepsis after admission to the emergency department and correlated them to the emergency medical protocols of the paramedics who have seen the patient out-of-hospital. RESULTS: Only 25 patients were correctly diagnosed by paramedics out-of-hospital. If sepsis was diagnosed, the median time to antibiotic administration was significantly lower (136.50 min compared to 206.98 min, p = 0.0069) and mortality was reduced from 22.8% to 8% (p = 0.0292). We have identified predictors for prognosis and calculated a predictive model with a modified quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, which fits the needs for out-of-hospital usage and results in a better discrimination of vitally threatened patients (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under curve (AUC) of 0.641 compared to 0.719), as compared to the standard qSOFA. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis recognition by paramedics at the 1st out-of-hospital contact significantly reduces sepsis mortality. The qSOFA and modified qSOFA are suitable tools for sepsis recognition, and have an impact on mortality and disease management when used.

Soluble syndecan-1 as marker of intestinal inflammation: A preliminary study and evaluation of a new panel of biomarkers for non-invasive prediction of active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Syndecan-1 (Sdc1) is a heparin sulfate proteoglycan expressed in intestinal epithelium, which plays a crucial role in inflammation and epithelial repair. Sdc1-knockout mice have a deteriorated course of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis as compared to controls. Syndecan-1 is also shed into the serum during inflammation of the epithelium. We hypothesized that an increased serum level of soluble Sdc1 is a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate serum soluble Sdc1 as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in UC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a proof-of-concept study. Patients were recruited by the University Hospital Münster and HELIOS Albert Schweitzer Klinik Northeim (Germany). Blood samples were collected from UC patients actively suffering from this condition and those in remission. The levels of Sdc1 were measured with Diaclone CD 138 ELISA kit (Diaclone Research, Besançon, France) and routine clinical data were collected (C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, calprotectin in stool samples). Data were analyzed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Soluble Sdc1 levels were significantly elevated in the active UC group as compared to the inactive UC group (94.5 ±68.1 ng/mL compared to 28.3 ±12.6 ng/mL, p = 0.0020). The levels of Sdc1 also significantly correlated with the severity of UC as measured with the Mayo score (p = 0.0248). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed a good correlation of Sdc1 with an endoscopic Mayo score ≥2, with a value of 0.7747 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.5775-0.9718). A cutoff value of 37.1 ng/mL of Sdc1 showed a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 77%. A panel of biomarkers including CRP, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and Sdc1 was able to precisely predict active UC with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.9395 (95% CI = 0.8509-1.0000). CONCLUSIONS: Serum soluble Sdc1 correlates significantly with mucosa inflammation and Mayo score in UC. Clinical trials No. NCT02333526.

Standard versus Endocuff versus cap-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colon cancer screening is most important for cancer prophylaxis. This work is the first three-armed randomised controlled clinical trial aimed at comparing a head-to-head setting standard colonoscopy (SC) with Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EC) and cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC) for improvement of ADR. METHODS: Patients from Poland and Germany with independent indication for colonoscopy were randomised into three arms of this trial: EC, CAC and SC. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, active Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, known stenosis and post-colonic resection status. RESULTS: A total of 585 patients (195 SC, 189 EC and 186 CAC) were enrolled in this study. Indications were not different between the groups (colorectal cancer screening 51%, diagnostic colonoscopy in 31% and post-polypectomy follow-up in 18%; p = 0.94). Withdrawal time was a mean of 7 min in all groups (p = 0.658), and bowel preparation did not differ between the groups. The time to reach the caecum was significantly reduced when using the cap (a mean of 6 min for CAC vs. 7 min for SC; p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of the ADR between the groups (EC 32%, CAC 30%, SC 30%; p = 0.815). EC proved to be superior (EC vs. SC) in the sigmoid colon and transverse colon for polyp detection. CONCLUSION: The use of EC increased the total number of polyps seen during colonoscopy. In contrast to recent studies, no significant improvement of the ADR was detected.

Novel score predicts risk for cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with relapse and exacerbation of ulcerative colitis (UC), especially in immunosuppressed patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for CMV colitis and to develop a predictive risk score to estimate the probability of CMV colitis in UC patients supporting clinical decision making. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 239 UC-patients was retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis identified several independent risk factors for CMV colitis and a predictive risk score was established using ROC analysis. RESULTS: CMV colitis is common in patients with severe ulcerative colitis. Clinical UC activity, disease duration and extent as well as the use of steroids and anti-TNF-α agents were identified as risk factors (p < 0.05 each). Based on five predictive parameters, a web-based risk score was developed. A strong correlation between the predicted and actual rates of CMV colitis was found (AUC: 0.855; 95% CI 0.79-0.92; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the pathogenic relevance of CMV in UC. The predictive risk score estimates the risk of CMV colitis and might aid in clinical decision making, especially when timely modifications of therapeutic regimens are needed and reliable diagnostic tools are not readily available.

Preoperative prediction of curative surgery of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma by combination of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are often considered incurable. Late diagnosis is common. Advanced disease therefore frequently causes questioning of curative surgical outcome. AIM: This study aimed to develop a prediction model of curative surgery in patients suffering from perihilar cholangiocarcinomas based on preoperative endosonography and computer tomography. METHODS: A cohort of 81 patients (median age 67 (54-75) years, 62% male) with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma was retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of staging variables taken from the European Staging System was performed and applied to ROC analysis. RESULTS: The correlation of predicted rates of eligibility for surgery with actual rates reached AUC values between 0.652 and 0.758 for endosonography and computer tomography (p < 0.05 each). Best prediction for curative surgical option was achieved by combining endosonography and computer tomography (AUC: 0.787; 95% CI 0.680-0.893, p < 0.0001). A predictive model (pSurg) was developed using multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our predictive web-based model pSurg with inclusion of T, N, M, B, PV, HA and V stage of the recently published European Staging System for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma results in highly significant predictability for curative surgery when combining preoperative endosonography and computer tomography, thus allowing for better patient selection in terms of possibility of curative surgery.

Endoscopic Improvement of the Adenoma Detection Rate during Colonoscopy - Where Do We Stand in 2015?

BACKGROUND: The presence of colorectal adenomas is considered a major risk factor for colorectal cancer development. The implementation of screening colonoscopy programs in the Western world has led to a substantial reduction of colorectal cancer death. Many efforts have been made to reduce the adenoma miss rates by the application of new endoscopic devices and techniques for better adenoma visualization. SUMMARY: This special review gives the readership an overview of current endoscopic innovations that can aid in the increase of the adenoma detection rate (ADR) during colonoscopy. These innovations include the use of devices like EndoCuff® and EndoRings® as well as new technical equipment like third-eye endoscope® and full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE®). KEY MESSAGE: Technical improvements and newly developed accessories are able to improve the ADR. However, additional costs and a willingness to invest into potentially expensive equipment might be necessary. Investigator-dependent skills remain the backbone in the ADR detection.

Hepatorenal syndrome: outcome of response to therapy and predictors of survival.

Aim. Treatment of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) in patients with liver cirrhosis is still challenging and characterized by a very high mortality. This study aimed to delineate treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with HRS intravenously treated with terlipressin. Methods. In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 119 patients (median [IQR]; 56.50 [50.75-63.00] years of age) with HRS were included. All patients were treated with terlipressin and human albumin intravenously. Those with response to treatment (n = 65) were compared to the patient cohort without improvement (n = 54). Patient characteristics and clinical parameters (Child stage, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, HRS type I/II, and initial MELD score) were retrieved. Univariate analysis of factors influencing the success of terlipressin therapy and Cox regression analysis of factors influencing survival was carried out. Results. One-month survival was significantly longer in the group of responders (p = 0.048). Cox regression analysis identified age [Hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.05, 1.01-1.09, resp.], alcohol abuse [HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.11-8.38], duration of treatment [HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.96], and MELD score [HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14] to be independent predictors of survival. Conclusions. Survival of HRS patients after treatment depends on age, etiology of liver disease, and the duration of treatment.

Novel endocuff-assisted colonoscopy significantly increases the polyp detection rate: a randomized controlled trial.

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer has proven to reduce mortality rates. Recently the Endocuff (EC), an attachment to the distal tip of the colonoscope, was introduced. The aim of our study was to compare EC-assisted colonoscopies with standard colonoscopies for the detection of colonic polyps. STUDY: This study is a randomized prospective 2-center trial. The study was conducted at 2 tertiary care centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 498 patients [249 males; median age 67 y; interquartile range (IQR), 56-75 y] for colon adenoma screening purposes were included. All patients underwent standard colonoscopy with or without the use of EC. Overall polyp detection rate, the number of colonic polyps, and the polyp distribution in the colon were measured. Difference in recognition of polyps with or without the use of EC was assessed. Statistical analysis was applied. RESULTS: In the EC group, the number of polyps detected per patient was 63% higher [2.00 (IQR, 1.00-4.00) vs. 1.00 (IQR, 1.00-2.25), P<0.0001]. The polyp detection rate in patients increased by 14% with the use of EC (56% vs. 42%, P=0.001). For polyp detection, superiority by use of EC could be observed in the sigmoid (P=0.001) and cecum (P=0.002) for polyps <1 cm in diameter. In the EC group, the number of adenomas detected per patient significantly increased by 86% (P=0.002). No major complications occurred in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the EC is feasible and safe with significantly higher polyp detection rates, especially for those located in the sigmoid region. The cuff system has the potential to improve the accuracy of screening colonoscopies.

Higher adenoma detection rates with endocuff-assisted colonoscopy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVES: The Endocuff is a device mounted on the tip of the colonoscope to help flatten the colonic folds during withdrawal. This study aimed to compare the adenoma detection rates between Endocuff-assisted (EC) colonoscopy and standard colonoscopy (SC). METHODS: This randomized prospective multicenter trial was conducted at four academic endoscopy units in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: 500 patients (235 males, median age 64[IQR 54-73]) for colon adenoma detection purposes were included in the study. All patients were either allocated to EC or SC. The primary outcome measure was the determination of the adenoma detection rates (ADR). RESULTS: The ADR significantly increased with the use of the Endocuff compared to standard colonoscopy (35.4%[95% confidence interval{CI} 29-41%] vs. 20.7%[95%CI 15-26%], p<0.0001). Significantly more sessile polyps were detected by EC. Overall procedure time and withdrawal time did not differ. Caecal and ileum intubation rates were similar. No major adverse events occurred in both groups. In multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; 95%[CI] 1.01-1.05), male sex (OR 1.74; 95%CI 1.10-2.73), withdrawal time (OR 1.16; 95%CI 1.05-1.30), procedure time (OR 1.07; 95%CI 1.04-1.10), colon cleanliness (OR 0.60; 95%CI 0.39-0.94) and use of Endocuff (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.34-3.27) were independent predictors of adenoma detection rates. CONCLUSIONS: EC increases the adenoma detection rate by 14.7%(95%CI 6.9-22.5%). EC is safe, effective, easy to handle and might reduce colorectal interval carcinomas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02034929.

Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures.

AIM: To compare endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), intraductal ultrasound (IDUS), endosonography (EUS), endoscopic transpapillary forceps biopsies (ETP) and computed tomography (CT) with respect to diagnosing malignant bile duct strictures. METHODS: A patient cohort with bile duct strictures of unknown etiology was examined by ERCP and IDUS, ETP, EUS, and CT. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of the diagnostic procedures were calculated based on the definite diagnoses proved by histopathology or long-term follow-up in those patients who did not undergo surgery. For each of the diagnostic measures, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were calculated. In all cases, the gold standard was the histopathologic staging of specimens or long-term follow-up of at least 12 mo. A comparison of the accuracy rates between the localization of strictures was performed by using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the χ(2) test as appropriate. A comparison of the accuracy rates between the diagnostic procedures was performed by using the McNemar's test. Differences were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (127 males, 107 females, median age 64, range 20-90 years) with indeterminate bile duct strictures were included. A total of 161 patients underwent operative exploration; thus, a surgical histopathological correlation was available for those patients. A total of 113 patients had malignant disease proven by surgery; in 48 patients, benign disease was surgically found. In these patients, the decision for surgical exploration was made due to the suspicion of malignant disease in multimodal diagnostics (ERCP, CT, or EUS). Fifty patients had a benign diagnosis and were followed by a surveillance protocol with a follow-up of at least 12 mo; the median follow-up was 34 mo. Twenty-three patients had extended malignant disease, and thus were considered palliative. A comparison of the different diagnostic tools for detecting bile duct malignancy resulted in accuracy rates of 91% (ERCP/IDUS), 59% (ETP), 92% (IDUS + ETP), 74% (EUS), and 73% (CT), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the accuracy rates (%, ERCP + IDUS/ETP/IDUS + ETP; EUS; CT) for each tumor entity were as follows: cholangiocellular carcinoma: 92%/74%/92%/70%/79%; pancreatic carcinoma: 90%/68%/90%/81%/76%; and ampullary carcinoma: 88%/90%/90%/76%/76%. The detection rate of malignancy by ERCP/IDUS was superior to ETP (91% vs 59%, P < 0.0001), EUS (91% vs 74%, P < 0.0001) and CT (91% vs 73%, P < 0.0001); EUS was comparable to CT (74% vs 73%, P = 0.649). When analyzing accuracy rates with regard to localization of the bile duct stenosis, the accuracy rate of EUS for proximal vs distal stenosis was significantly higher for distal stenosis (79% vs 57%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: ERCP/IDUS is superior to EUS and CT in providing accurate diagnoses of bile duct strictures of uncertain etiology. Multimodal diagnostics is recommended.

Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - updated June 2014.

This Guideline is an official statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). It addresses the prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis. Main recommendations 1 ESGE recommends routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before or after ERCP in all patients without contraindication. In addition to this, in the case of high risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), the placement of a 5-Fr prophylactic pancreatic stent should be strongly considered. Sublingually administered glyceryl trinitrate or 250 µg somatostatin given in bolus injection might be considered as an option in high risk cases if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are contraindicated and if prophylactic pancreatic stenting is not possible or successful. 2 ESGE recommends keeping the number of cannulation attempts as low as possible. 3 ESGE suggests restricting the use of a pancreatic guidewire as a backup technique for biliary cannulation to cases with repeated inadvertent cannulation of the pancreatic duct; if this method is used, deep biliary cannulation should be attempted using a guidewire rather than the contrast-assisted method and a prophylactic pancreatic stent should be placed. 4 ESGE suggests that needle-knife fistulotomy should be the preferred precut technique in patients with a bile duct dilated down to the papilla. Conventional precut and transpancreatic sphincterotomy present similar success and complication rates; if conventional precut is selected and pancreatic cannulation is easily obtained, ESGE suggests attempting to place a small-diameter (3-Fr or 5-Fr) pancreatic stent to guide the cut and leaving the pancreatic stent in place at the end of ERCP for a minimum of 12 - 24 hours. 4 ESGE does not recommend endoscopic papillary balloon dilation as an alternative to sphincterotomy in routine ERCP, but it may be advantageous in selected patients; if this technique is used, the duration of dilation should be longer than 1 minute.

Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: higher failure rate in malignant biliary obstruction - a prospective single center cohort analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The performance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) in patients with post-surgically altered anatomy is technically ambitious. Our study aimed at comparing a cohort of patients having successfully undergone single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE)-assisted ERCP to those in whom SBE-ERCP failed. METHODS: This trial is a prospective single center cohort study. Participants included 30 patients (median age 69.5 years, range 20-86 years) with previous pancreaticobiliary surgery. First, a conventional ERCP approach was attempted in all patients. Additionally, those patients in whom prior conventional ERCP had failed underwent SBE-ERCP (n = 26). Patients' baseline characteristics were retrieved and patient cohorts with and without successful SBE-ERCPs were compared and analyzed. Statistical analysis was applied. Univariate analysis was performed to detect possible risk factors of SBE-ERCP failure. RESULTS: The overall success rate of SBE-ERCP, including two patients with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography- assisted rendezvous technique was 65.4% (17/26). Patients with malignant obstructive cholestasis had a significantly higher failure rate compared to those with benign strictures (84.2% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: SBE-ERCP is a promising tool for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the pancreaticobiliary system of selected, previously operated patients with failure of conventional ERCP. However, higher failure rates in malignant biliary obstruction should be taken into account.

Innovative video capsule endoscopy for detection of ubiquitously elongated small intestinal villi in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome.

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS) is a rare non-familial disorder with multiple gastrointestinal polyps and ectodermal changes. Adenomatous and carcinomatous changes have been reported. Video capsule endoscopy is a useful non-invasive tool to reveal polypoid lesions of the gastrointestinal tract suspicious for malignancy. We report a case of a patient with CCS with excessively elongated intestinal villi resembling dense sea grass under water as well as multiple polyps of the intestinal mucosa revealed by video capsule endoscopy. This report presents for the first time small bowel video sequences of CCS qualifying video capsule endoscopy for screening purposes and early detection of malignancy.

CO2 insufflation during single-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation has previously been shown to have advantages over air insufflation in terms of procedure-related pain and oral insertion depth during double-balloon enteroscopy. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the performance of CO2 vs. air insufflation during single-balloon enteroscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was a randomized European multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01524055). Patients and endoscopists were blinded to the type of insufflation gas used. Patient discomfort during and after the procedure was scored using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in the study (52 in the CO2 group and 55 in the air group). Patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. The mean (±SD) oral intubation depth was not significantly deeper in the CO2 group vs. the air group (254±80 vs. 238±55 cm; P=0.726). However, in patients with previous abdominal surgery, oral intubation depth was significantly higher in the CO2 group compared with the air group (258±84 vs. 192±42 cm; P<0.05). In patients undergoing SBE via the anal approach, CO2 showed no significant difference in intubation depth compared with air insufflation (86±67 vs. 110±68 cm; P=0.155). The diagnostic yield was comparable (CO2 67%; air 73%). Procedure times, dosage of sedation, and therapeutic interventions did not differ between the two groups. Patients in the CO2 group reported less pain than those in the air group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an advantage of using CO2 insufflation during single-balloon enteroscopy in patients with a history of previous abdominal surgery. Overall, single-balloon enteroscopy was a well-tolerated procedure that may benefit from the use of CO2 insufflation to reduce post-procedural pain.

Clearance of refractory bile duct stones with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy: higher failure rate in obese patients.

OBJECTIVE: Bile duct stones that cannot be removed endoscopically are still a challenge in interventional gastroenterology. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) with subsequent endoscopic extraction of residual fragments is an established treatment option if other endoscopic means are not successful. Our study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ESWL for clearance of refractory bile duct stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 73 consecutive patients treated for refractory choledocholithiasis with ESWL were retrospectively analyzed. Success and complication rates were calculated. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance was achieved in 66 cases (90%). Patients with complete clearance had a significantly lower body mass index or BMI (25.55 ± 5.01 kg/m² vs. 31.60 ± 6.26 kg/m², p = 0.035) and needed less ESWL treatments (3.61 ± 1.87 vs. 5.00 ± 1.63, p = 0.048). A relevant drop of hemoglobin occurred significantly more often in the group with partial clearance (43% vs. 6%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: ESWL proves to be an excellent clearing approach to refractory bile duct stones with high success rates. However, obesity is one risk factor for ESWL failure and higher procedural hazard.

Clinical outcome and predictors of survival in patients with pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia--results of a tertiary referral centre.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia also known as pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic respiratory infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients that may also develop in non-HIV immunocompromised persons. The aim of our study was to evaluate mortality predictors of PCP patients in a tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with symptomatic PCP were enrolled in the study. The patients had either HIV infection (n = 21) or other immunosuppressive conditions (n = 30). Baseline characteristics (e.g. age, sex and underlying disease) were retrieved. Kaplan-Meier analysis was employed to calculate survival. Comparisons were made by log-rank test. A multivariate analysis of factors influencing survival was carried out using the Cox regression model. Chi-squared test and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied as appropriate. RESULTS: The median survival time for the HIV group was >120 months compared with 3 months for the non-HIV group (P = 0.009). Three-month survival probability was also significantly greater in the HIV group compared with the non-HIV group (90% vs 41%, P = 0.002). In univariate log-rank test, intensive care unit (ICU) necessity, HIV negativity, age >50 years, haemoglobin <10g/dl, C-reactive protein >5 mg/dL and multiple comorbidities were significant negative predictors of survival. In the Cox regression model, ICU and HIV statuses turned out to be independent prognostic factors of survival. CONCLUSION: PCP is a serious problem in non-HIV immunocompromised patients in whom survival outcomes are worse than those in HIV patients.

Liver transplantation versus supraselective transarterial chemoembolization in palliative patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan Criteria - is it time for a more individual approach?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of liver transplantation (LTX) and STACE on overall survival in palliative patients with HCC exceeding Milan criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At a single center 63 HCC patients exceeding Milan criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Forty patients underwent STACE as palliative therapy modality and 23 palliative patients were scheduled for LTX. The primary endpoint was overall patient survival. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier method, log rank, chi squared tests and Cox regression model for the identification of prognostic factors. RESULTS: There was no significant difference when comparing the 2 groups (LTX vs. no LTX) in terms of Child classification, co-morbidities, underlying disease, and sex. Overall survival was significantly prolonged after LTX was performed (p=0.012). In the Cox regression model, LTX (p=0.021), LTX <3Mo (p=0.047), CHILD stage (p=0.007), AFP (p=0.020), and tumor size of largest HCC nodule <40 mm (p=0.028) were independent prognostic factors for survival. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative patients beyond Milan have a significant survival benefit after they received early liver transplantation in comparison with STACE. The current approach to waiting list candidacy based on Milan criteria should be modified with a more individualized approach that considers age, AFP level, and tumor size.

Endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results of a multicenter cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered a gold standard in the initial staging of esophageal cancer. There is an ongoing debate whether EUS is useful for tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Ninety-five patients with esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. In 45 patients, EUS was performed prior to and after NAC, while 50 patients had no induction therapy. Histological correlation through surgery was available. uT/uN classifications were compared to pT/pN stages. Statistical analysis included calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates. Agreement between endosonography and T staging was assessed with Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: For those patients with prior NAC, overall accuracy of yuT and yuN classification was 29 and 62%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates for local tumor extension after NAC were as follows (%): T1: -/97/84, T2: 13/76/53, T3:86/29/46, T4:20/100/91, T1/2: 27/83/56, T3/4: 89/31/56. Cohen's kappa indicated poor agreement (kappa = 0.129) between yuT classification and ypT stage. Relative to positive lymph node detection, sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 6%, respectively (kappa = 0.06). T stage was overstaged in 23 (51%) and understaged in seven (16%) patients. CONCLUSION: EUS is an unreliable tool for staging esophageal cancer after NAC. Overstaging of the T stage is common after NAC.

Intraductal ultrasound substantiates diagnostics of bile duct strictures of uncertain etiology.

AIM: To report the largest patient cohort study investigating the diagnostic yield of intraductal ultrasound (IDUS) in indeterminate strictures of the common bile duct. METHODS: A patient cohort with bile duct strictures of unknown etiology was examined by IDUS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of IDUS were calculated relating to the definite diagnoses proved by histopathology or long-term follow-up in those patients who did not undergo surgery. Analysis of the endosonographic report allowed drawing conclusions with respect to the T and N staging in 147 patients. IDUS staging was compared to the postoperative histopathological staging data allowing calculation of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates for T and N stages. The endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography and IDUS procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a side-viewing duodenoscope (Olympus TJF 160, Olympus, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). All procedures were performed under conscious sedation (propofol combined with pethidine) according to the German guidelines. For IDUS, a 6 F or 8 F ultrasound miniprobe was employed with a radial scanner of 15-20 MHz at the tip of the probe (Aloka Co., Tokyo, Japan). RESULTS: A total of 397 patients (210 males, 187 females, mean age 61.43 ± 13 years) with indeterminate bile duct strictures were included. Two hundred and sixty-four patients were referred to the department of surgery for operative exploration, thus surgical histopathological correlation was available for those patients. Out of 264 patients, 174 had malignant disease proven by surgery, in 90 patients benign disease was found. In these patients decision for surgical exploration was made due to suspicion for malignant disease in multimodal diagnostics (computed tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging). Twenty benign bile duct strictures were misclassified by IDUS as malignant while 14 patients with malignant strictures were initially misdiagnosed by IDUS as benign resulting in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates of 93.2%, 89.5% and 91.4%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of malignancy prediction, IDUS showed best performance in cholangiocellular carcinoma as underlying disease (sensitivity rate, 97.6%) followed by pancreatic carcinoma (93.8%), gallbladder cancer (88.9%) and ampullary cancer (80.8%). A total of 133 patients were not surgically explored. 32 patients had palliative therapy due to extended tumor disease in IDUS and other imaging modalities. Ninety-five patients had benign diagnosis by IDUS, forceps biopsy and radiographic imaging and were followed by a surveillance protocol with a follow-up of at least 12 mo; the mean follow-up was 39.7 mo. Tumor localization within the common bile duct did not have a significant influence on prediction of malignancy by IDUS. The accuracy rate for discriminating early T stage tumors (T1) was 84% while for T2 and T3 malignancies the accuracy rates were 73% and 71%, respectively. Relating to N0 and N1 staging, IDUS procedure achieved accuracy rates of 69% for N0 and N1, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Pre-test likelihood of 52% may not rule out bias and over-interpretation due to the clinical scenario or other prior performed imaging tests. CONCLUSION: IDUS shows good results for accurate diagnostics of bile duct strictures of uncertain etiology thus allowing for adequate further clinical management.