Significance of Spread Through Air Spaces and Vascular Invasion in Early-stage Adenocarcinoma Survival: A Comprehensive Clinicopathologic Study of 427 Patients for Precision Management.

Spread through air spaces (STAS) is a novel invasive pattern of lung cancer associated with poor prognosis in non-small cell cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate the incidence of STAS in a surgical series of adenocarcinomas (ADCs) resected in our thoracic surgery unit and to identify the association of STAS with other clinicopathological characteristics. We retrospectively enrolled patients with stage cT1a-cT2b who underwent resection between 2016 and 2022. For each case, a comprehensive pathologic report was accessible which included histotype, mitoses, pleural invasion, fibrosis, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, necrosis, inflammation, vascular and perineural invasion, as well as STAS. PD-L1 expression was also investigated. A total of 427 patients with ADCs underwent surgery. Regarding overall survival (OS), no significant difference was observed between the STAS positive (STAS+) and STAS negative (STAS-) groups ( P =0.44). However, vascular invasion (VI) was associated with a poorer survival probability ( P =0.018). STAS+/VI+ patients had tendentially worse survival compared with STAS+/VI- ( P =0.089). ADCs with pathologic evidence of immune system (IS) activation (TILs>10% and PD-L1≥1) demonstrated significantly increased OS compared with ADCs with no IS and VI. In terms of recurrence rate, no statistical differences were found between the STAS+ and STAS- samples ( P =0.2). VI was also linked to a significantly elevated risk of recurrence ( P =0.0048). Our study suggests that in resected early-stage ADCs, STAS+ does not seem to influence recurrence or mortality. VI was instead an adverse pathologic prognostic factor for both survival and recurrence, whereas IS seemed to be protective.

Microscopical Variables and Tumor Inflammatory Microenvironment Do Not Modify Survival or Recurrence in Stage I-IIA Lung Adenocarcinomas.

Microscopical predictors and Tumor Immune Microenvironment (TIME) have been studied less in early-stage NSCLC due to the curative intent of resection and the satisfactory survival rate achievable. Despite this, the emerging literature enforces the role of the immune system and microscopical predictors as prognostic variables in NSCLC and in adenocarcinomas (ADCs) as well. Here, we investigated whether cancer-related microscopical variables and TIME influence survival and recurrence in I-IIA ADCs. We retrospectively collected I-IIA ADCs treated (lobectomy or segmentectomy) at the University Hospital (Padova) between 2016 and 2022. We assigned to pathological variables a cumulative pathological score (PS) resulting as the sum of them. TIME was investigated as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs < 11% or ≥11%) and PD-L1 considering its expression (<1% or ≥1%). Then, we compared survival and recurrence according to PS, histology, TILs and PD-L1. A total of 358 I-IIA ADCs met the inclusion criteria. The median PS grew from IA1 to IIA, indicating an increasing microscopical cancer activity. Except for the T-SUVmax, any pathological predictor seemed to be different between PD-L1 < 1% and ≥1%. Histology, PS, TILs and PD-L1 were unable to indicate a survival difference according to the Log-rank test (p = 0.37, p = 0.25, p = 0.41 and p = 0.23). Even the recurrence was non-significant (p = 0.90, p = 0.62, p = 0.97, p = 0.74). According to our findings, resection remains the best upfront treatment in I-IIA ADCs. Microscopical cancer activity grows from IA1 to IIA tumors, but it does not affect outcomes. These outcomes are also unmodified by TIME. Probably, microscopical cancer development and immune reaction against cancer are overwhelmed by an adequate R0-N0 resection.

Laser-assisted lung metastasectomy: a systematic review.

Laser-assisted resection (LAR) of pulmonary metastases offers several potential advantages compared to conventional surgical techniques. However, the technical details, indications and outcomes of LAR have not been extensively reviewed. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify all original articles reporting on LAR of pulmonary metastases. All relevant outcomes, including morbidity rate, R0 rate, pulmonary function tests, overall- (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were collected. Additionally, a comparison between outcomes obtained by laser-assisted and conventional resection techniques was provided. Of 2629 articles found by the initial search, 12 were selected for the systematic review. Following LAR, the R0 rate ranged between 72 and 100% and the morbidity rate ranged from 0 to 27.5%. The postoperative decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s varied between 3.4 and 11%. Median OS and RFS were 42-77.6 months and 9-34.1 months, respectively. Compared with patients treated by other resection techniques, patients treated by LAR frequently had a higher number of metastases and a higher rate of bilateral disease. Despite this, no significant differences were observed in R0 rate, morbidity rate, and median OS rate, while only 1 study found a lower RFS rate in the LAR cohort. Although selection bias limits the comparability of outcomes, the findings of this review suggest that LAR is a valid alternative to conventional procedures of lung metastasectomy. The main difficulties of this technique consist in the adoption of a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach, and in the pathologic assessment of resection margins.

Vascular/epithelial changes as late sequelae after recovery from SARS-COV-2 infection: an in-vivo comparative study.

AIMS: While there is partial evidence of lung lesions in patients suffering from long COVID there are substantial concerns about lung remodelling sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia. The aim of the present retrospective comparative study was to ascertain morphological features in lung samples from patients undergoing tumour resection several months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: The severity of several lesions with a major focus on the vascular bed was analysed in 2 tumour-distant lung fragments of 41 cases: 21 SARS-CoV-2 (+) lung tumour (LT) patients and 20 SARS-CoV-2 (-) LT patients. A systematic evaluation of several lesions was carried out by combining their scores into a grade of I-III. Tissue SARS-CoV-2 genomic/subgenomic transcripts were also investigated. Morphological findings were compared with clinical, laboratory and radiological data. SARS-CoV-2 (+) LT patients with previous pneumonia showed more severe parenchymal and vascular lesions than those found in SARS-CoV-2 (+) LT patients without pneumonia and SARS-CoV-2 (-) LT patients, mainly when combined scores were used. SARS-CoV-2 viral transcripts were not detected in any sample. SARS-CoV-2 (+) LT patients with pneumonia showed a significantly higher radiological global injury score. No other associations were found between morphological lesions and clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study that, after a granular evaluation of tissue parameters, detected several changes in lungs from patients undergoing tumour resection after SARS-CoV-2 infection. These lesions, in particular vascular remodelling, could have an important impact overall on the future management of these frail patients.

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: A Review of the Most Updated Literature and a Presentation of Three Cases.

In a Surgical Thoracic Center, two females and a man were unexpectedly diagnosed with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL) in a single year. HAL is a rare lung cancer with pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma with no evidence of liver tumor or other primitive sites of neoplasms. As of today, a comprehensive treatment is still not written. We reviewed the most updated literature on HAL, aiming to highlight the proposed treatments available, and comparing them in terms of survival. General hallmarks of HAL are confirmed: it typically affects middle-aged, heavy-smoker males with a median of 5 cm bulky right upper lobe mass. Overall survival remains poor (13 months), with a longer but non-significant survival in females. Treatments are still unsatisfactory today: surgery guarantees a small benefit compared to non-operated HALs, and only N0 patients demonstrated improved survival (p = 0.04) compared to N1, N2, and N3. Even though the histology is fearsome, these are probably the patients who will benefit from upfront surgery. Chemotherapy seemed to behave as surgery, and there is no statistical difference between chemotherapy only, surgery, or adjuvant treatments, even though adjuvant treatments tend to be more successful. New chemotherapies have been reported with notable results in recent years, such as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In this complicated picture, new cases are needed to further build shared evidence in terms of diagnosis, treatments, and survival opportunities.

Sublingual Sufentanil in Pain Management After Pulmonary Resection: A Randomized Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Successful postoperative pain management after major lung resection surgery is mostly achieved through intravenous administration of analgesic drugs. This study explored the use of sublingual sufentanil cartridges (Zalviso) as a noninvasive alternative to postoperative analgesia. METHODS: From July 2019 to April 2020, patients who underwent major thoracoscopic lung resection surgery were randomly allocated to receive either intravenous pain management, or patient-controlled analgesia by the Zalviso system. Pain assessment scores were collected for a 72-hour time window, and requests for additional medication due to insufficient pain control were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients enlisted, 40 were assigned to the Zalviso group and 40 to the control group. The groups were not statistically different from each other. The difference in the mean pain scores reported was statistically significant in the first 24 hours in favor of the Zalviso group (P = .046), and the need for additional pain medication was significantly higher in the control group (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled analgesia using sublingual sufentanil cartridges can provide effective pain relief for patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery and can reduce the need for additional medication, offering a noninvasive alternative to traditional intravenous therapy.