Implementation of a Protocol for Management of Febrile Neutropenia in the Emergency Department at Veteran Health Indiana.

Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a life-threatening oncologic emergency requiring timely evaluation and treatment. Unrecognized fever and infection can progress quickly and have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancy. It is critical to identify patients with neutropenic fever on presentation to the emergency department (ED) and to initiate treatment immediately. Observations: This quality improvement initiative sought to optimize ED care of patients presenting with FN. Delays in antibiotic prescribing for patients with FN presenting to the ED were identified. A protocol was implemented to streamline clinical decision making and decrease the time from triage to the first dose of antibiotics in the ED. Key interventions included obtaining ED staff support, developing a standard empiric therapy protocol, increasing prescriber awareness of the neutropenic fever protocol and integrating it into the electronic health record. Before the protocol, the mean time from triage to the first dose of antibiotics was 3.3 hours with only 6% of patients receiving appropriate empiric therapy within 1 hour. Postimplementation, the average time to antibiotics decreased to 2.3 hours. In the postimplementation group, 17% of patients within 1 hour. Conclusions: Early identification and timely empiric antibiotic therapy are critical to improving outcomes for patients presenting to the ED with FN. Additional optimization of the order sets along with increased protocol comfort and staff education will help to further reduce the time to antibiotic administration in alignment with guideline recommendations.

Tolerability and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy when administered with a corticosteroid-free anti-emetic regimen.

BACKGROUND: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with chemotherapy is commonplace. This study sought to determine whether the omission of corticosteroids from the antiemetic regimen in patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy changes control of nausea and time on ICI therapy. METHODS: This single-site, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Veteran Health Indiana, a level 1A Veterans Affairs tertiary care facility. All patients who received concurrent chemoimmunotherapy between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were included. The replacement of corticosteroids with olanzapine in chemoimmunotherapy regimens occurred on March 27, 2019. Outcomes were compared in patients who received corticosteroids as part of antiemetic prophylaxis versus patients in whom corticosteroids were omitted. Outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving an anti-nausea complete control response (CCR) or partial control response (PCR) with antiemetic prophylaxis, and the time on ICI therapy in months. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients received a chemotherapeutic agent with a concomitant ICI during the designated time frame and were included for anti-emetogenic and ICI efficacy analysis, 36 patients received corticosteroids with chemoimmunotherapy and 36 patients did not. CCR was achieved in 55.6% of patients who received corticosteroids and in 69.4% of patients who did not. PCR was 19.4% versus 25.0%, respectively. Removal of corticosteroids from chemoimmunotherapy regimens did not result in a significant difference in nausea control or time on ICI therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest corticosteroids may be safely continued, or removed and replaced by other novel agents for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting when administered with ICIs.