A descriptive evaluation of causes of death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has become an important support modality for patients with acute respiratory failure refractory to optimal medical therapy, such as low tidal volume mechanical ventilator support, early paralytic infusion, and early prone positioning. The objective of this cohort study was to investigate the causes and timing of in-hospital mortality in patients on VV ECMO. All patients, excluding trauma and bridge to lung transplant, admitted 8/2014-6/2019 to a specialty ICU for VV ECMO were reviewed. Two hundred twenty-five patients were included. In-hospital mortality was 24.4% (n = 55). Most non-survivors (46/55, 84%) died prior to lung recovery and decannulation from VV ECMO. Most common cause of death (COD) for patients who died on VV ECMO was removal of life sustaining therapy (LST) in setting of multisystem organ failure (MSOF) (n = 24). Nine patients died a median of 9 days [6, 11] after decannulation. Most common COD in these patients was palliative withdrawal of LST due to poor prognosis (n = 3). Non-survivors were older and had worse predictive mortality scores than survivors. We found that death in patients supported with VV ECMO in our study most often occurs prior to decannulation and lung recovery. This study demonstrated that the most common cause of death in patients supported with VV ECMO was removal of LST due MSOF. Acute hemorrhage (systemic or intracranial) was not found to be a common cause of death in our patient population.

COVID-19 outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure vs historical cohort of non-COVID-19 viral infections.

INTRODUCTION: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has become a support modality for patients with acute respiratory failure refractory to standard therapies. VV ECMO has been increasingly used during the current COVID-19 pandemic for patients with refractory respiratory failure. The object of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of VV ECMO in patients with COVID-19 compared to patients with non-COVID-19 viral infections. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients supported with VV ECMO between 8/2014 and 8/2020 whose etiology of illness was a viral pulmonary infection. The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included length of ECMO course, ventilator duration, hospital length of stay, incidence of adverse events through ECMO course. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included (35 COVID-19 vs 54 non-COVID-19). Forty (74%) of the non-COVID-19 patients had influenza virus. Prior to cannulation, COVID-19 patients had longer ventilator duration (3 vs 1 day, p = .003), higher PaCO2 (64 vs 53 mmHg, p = .012), and white blood cell count (14 vs 9 ×103/µL, p = .004). Overall in-hospital mortality was 33.7% (n = 30). COVID-19 patients had a higher mortality (49% vs. 24%, p = .017) when compared to non-COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 survivors had longer median time on ECMO than non-COVID-19 survivors (24.4 vs 16.5 days p = .03) but had a similar hospital length of stay (HLOS) (41 vs 48 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenationdays p = .33). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO have a higher mortality than non-COVID-19 patients. While COVID-19 survivors had significantly longer VV ECMO runs than non-COVID-19 survivors, HLOS was similar. This data add to a growing body of literature supporting the use of ECMO for potentially reversible causes of respiratory failure.

A Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Bleeding remains a major source of morbidity associated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Moreover, there remains significant controversy, and a paucity of data regarding the ideal anticoagulation strategy for VV-ECMO patients. All patients undergoing isolated, peripheral VV-ECMO between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients (n = 123) were stratified into one of three sequential eras of anticoagulation strategies: activated clotting time (ACT: 160-180 seconds, n = 53), high-partial thromboplastin time (H-PTT: 60-80 seconds, n = 25), and low-PTT (L-PTT: 45-55 seconds, n = 25) with high-flow (>4 L/min). Pre-ECMO APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, and Murray scores were not significantly different between the groups. Patients in the L-PTT group required less red blood cell units on ECMO than the ACT or H-PTT group (2.1 vs. 1.3 vs. 0.9; p < 0.001) and patients in the H-PTT and L-PTT group required less fresh frozen plasma than the ACT group (0.33 vs. 0 vs. 0; p = 0.006). Overall, major bleeding events were significantly lower in the L-PTT group than in the ACT and H-PTT groups. There was no difference in thrombotic events. In this single-institution experience, a L-PTT, high-flow strategy on VV-ECMO was associated with fewer bleeding and no difference in thrombotic events than an ACT or H-PTT strategy.

Association of Volume Status During Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Outcome.

Fluid overload in acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with increased mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of cumulative fluid balance (CFB) during the first 7 days of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and mortality. Adult patients on VV ECMO for greater than 168 hours, between November 2015 and October 2019, were included. CFB during the first 7 ECMO days was compared between survivors and nonsurvivors, and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and cox proportional hazards modeling. One hundred forty-six patients were included. Median age was 45 years [32, 55], respiratory ECMO survival prediction score was 3 [0, 5], and P/F ratio was 70 [55, 85]. CFB for ECMO days 1-3 was +2,350 cc [-540, 5,941], days 4-7 -3,070 cc [-6,545, 437], and days 1-7 -341 cc [-4,579, 5,290]. One hundred seventeen patients (80%) survived to hospital discharge. Survivors were younger (41 years [31, 53] vs. 53 years [45, 60], p < 0.001) and had a higher respiratory ECMO survival prediction score, (3 [1, 5] vs. 1.5 [-1, 3], p = 0.002). VV ECMO survivors had a significantly more negative CFB during the first 7 days of VV ECMO (-1,311 cc [-4,755, 4,217] vs. 3,617 cc [-2,764, 9,413], p = 0.02), and CFB was an independent predictor of 90 day mortality (HR = 1.07 [1.01, 1.14], p = 0.02). Further studies are needed to determine the causal relationship between fluid balance and survival during VV ECMO.

A Dedicated Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Unit during a Respiratory Pandemic: Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Part I: System Planning and Care Teams.

BACKGROUND: The most critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may require advanced support modalities, such as veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). A systematic, methodical approach to a respiratory pandemic on a state and institutional level is critical. METHODS: We conducted retrospective review of our institutional response to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the creation of a dedicated airlock biocontainment unit (BCU) to treat patients with refractory COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). Data were collected through conversations with staff on varying levels in the BCU, those leading the effort to make the BCU and hospital incident command system, email communications regarding logistic changes being implemented, and a review of COVID-19 patient census at our institution from March through June 2020. RESULTS: Over 2100 patients were successfully admitted to system hospitals; 29% of these patients required critical care. The response to this respiratory pandemic augmented intensive care physician staffing, created a 70-member nursing team, and increased the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) capability by nearly 200%. During this time period, 40 COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO were managed in the BCU. Challenges in an airlock unit included communication, scarcity of resources, double-bunking, and maintaining routine care. CONCLUSIONS: Preparing for a surge of critically ill patients during a pandemic can be a daunting task. The implementation of a coordinated, system-level approach can help with the allocation of resources as needed. Focusing on established strengths of hospitals within the system can guide triage based on individual patient needs. The management of ECMO patients is still a specialty care, and a systematic and hospital based approach requiring an ECMO team composed of multiple experienced individuals is paramount during a respiratory viral pandemic.

A Dedicated Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Unit during a Respiratory Pandemic: Lessons Learned from COVID-19 Part II: Clinical Management.

(1) Background: COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) has several distinctions from traditional acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, patients with refractory respiratory failure may still benefit from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support. We report our challenges caring for CARDS patients on VV-ECMO and alterations to traditional management strategies. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional strategies for managing patients with COVID-19 who required VV-ECMO in a dedicated airlock biocontainment unit (BCU), from March to June 2020. The data collected included the time course of admission, VV-ECMO run, ventilator length, hospital length of stay, and major events related to bleeding, such as pneumothorax and tracheostomy. The dispensation of sedation agents and trial therapies were obtained from institutional pharmacy tracking. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. (3) Results: Forty COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO were managed in the BCU during this period, from which 21 survived to discharge and 19 died. The criteria for ECMO initiation was altered for age, body mass index, and neurologic status/cardiac arrest. All cannulations were performed with a bedside ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique. Ventilator and ECMO management were routed in an ultra-lung protective approach, though varied based on clinical setting and provider experience. There was a high incidence of pneumothorax (n = 19). Thirty patients had bedside percutaneous tracheostomy, with more procedural-related bleeding complications than expected. A higher use of sedation was noted. The timing of decannulation was also altered, given the system constraints. A variety of trial therapies were utilized, and their effectiveness is yet to be determined. (4) Conclusions: Even in a high-volume ECMO center, there are challenges in caring for an expanded capacity of patients during a viral respiratory pandemic. Though institutional resources and expertise may vary, it is paramount to proceed with insightful planning, the recognition of challenges, and the dynamic application of lessons learned when facing a surge of critically ill patients.

Transfer of Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage who Need External Ventricular Drain: Does Admission Location Matter?

INTRODUCTION: Patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) are associated with high mortality and require early neurosurgical interventions. At our academic referral center, the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) receives patients directly from referring facilities. However, when no NCCU bed is immediately available, patients are initially admitted to the critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU). We hypothesized that the CCRU expedites transfer of sICH patients and facilitates timely external ventricular drain (EVD) placement comparable to the NCCU. METHODS: This is a pre-post study of adult patients transferred with sICH and EVD placement. Patients admitted between January 2011-July 2013 (2011 Control) were compared with patients admitted either to the CCRU or the NCCU (2013 Control) between August 2013-September 2015. The primary outcome was time interval from arrival at any intensive care units (ICU) to time of EVD placement (ARR-EVD). Secondary outcomes included time interval from emergency department transfer request to arrival, and in-hospital mortality. We assessed clinical association by multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: We analyzed 259 sICH patients who received EVDs: 123 (48%) CCRU; 81 (31%) 2011 Control; and 55 (21%) in the 2013 Control. The groups had similar characteristics, age, disease severity, and mortality. Median ARR-EVD time was 170 minutes [106-311] for CCRU patients; 241 minutes [152-490] (p < 0.01) for 2011 Control; and 210 minutes [139-574], p = 0.28) for 2013 Control. Median transfer request-arrival time for CCRU patients was significantly less than both control groups. Multivariable logistic regression showed each minute delay in ARR-EVD was associated with 0.03% increased likelihood of death (odds ratio 1.0003, 95% confidence interval, 1.0001-1.006, p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Patients admitted to the CCRU had shorter transfer times when compared to patients admitted directly to other ICUs. Compared to the specialty NCCU, the CCRU had similar time interval from arrival to EVD placement. A resuscitation unit like the CCRU can complement the specialty unit NCCU in caring for patients with sICH who require EVDs.

Neurological complications during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Does the configuration matter? A retrospective analysis of the ELSO database.

BACKGROUND: Single- (SL) and double-lumen (DL) catheters are used in clinical practice for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) therapy. However, information is lacking regarding the effects of the cannulation on neurological complications. METHODS: A retrospective observational study based on data from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. All adult patients included in the ELSO registry from 2011 to 2018 submitted to a single run of V-V ECMO were analyzed. Propensity score (PS) inverse probability of treatment weighting estimation for multiple treatments was used. The average treatment effect (ATE) was chosen as the causal effect estimate of outcome. The aim of the study was to evaluate differences in the occurrence and the type of neurological complications in adult patients undergoing V-V ECMO when treated with SL or DL cannulas. RESULTS: From a population of 6834 patients, the weighted propensity score matching included 6245 patients (i.e., 91% of the total cohort; 4175 with SL and 20,270 with DL cannulation). The proportion of patients with at least one neurological complication was similar in the SL (306, 7.2%) and DL (189, 7.7%; odds ratio 1.10 [95% confidence intervals 0.91-1.32]; p = 0.33). After weighted propensity score, the ATE for the occurrence of least one neurological complication was 0.005 (95% CI - 0.009 to 0.018; p = 0.50). Also, the occurrence of specific neurological complications, including intracerebral hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, seizures or brain death, was similar between groups. Overall mortality was similar between patients with neurological complications in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large registry, the occurrence of neurological complications was not related to the type of cannulation in patients undergoing V-V ECMO.

Clinical Outcomes of Pregnant and Postpartum Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a rescue therapy for cardiopulmonary failure is expanding in critical care medicine. In this case series, we describe the clinical outcomes of 21 consecutive pregnant or postpartum patients that required venovenous (VV) or venoarterial (VA) ECMO. Our objective was to characterize maternal and fetal survival in peripartum ECMO and better understand ECMO-related complications that occur in this unique patient population. METHODS: Between January 2009 and June 2019, all pregnant and postpartum patients treated with ECMO for respiratory or circulatory failure at a single quaternary referral center were identified. For all patients, indications for ECMO, maternal and neonatal outcomes, details of ECMO support, and anticoagulation and bleeding complications were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-one obstetric patients were treated with ECMO over 10 years. Thirteen patients were treated with VV ECMO and 8 patients were treated with VA ECMO. Six patients were pregnant at the time of cannulation and 3 patients delivered while on ECMO; all 6 maternal and infant dyads survived to hospital discharge. The median gestational age at cannulation was 28 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 24-31). In the postpartum cohort, ECMO initiation ranged from immediately after delivery up to 46 days postpartum. Fifteen women survived (72%). Major bleeding complications requiring surgical intervention were observed in 7 patients (33.3%). Two patients on VV ECMO required bilateral orthotopic lung transplantation and 1 patient on VA ECMO required orthotopic heart transplantation to wean from ECMO. CONCLUSIONS: Survival for mother and neonate are excellent with peripartum ECMO in a high-volume ECMO center. Neonatal and maternal survival was 100% when ECMO was used in the late second or early third trimester. Based on these results, ECMO remains an important treatment option for peripartum patients with cardiopulmonary failure.

Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor Levels During Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adults.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) has multiple anticoagulant properties. To our knowledge, no studies have measured TFPI levels in adult veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. We hypothesized that adult VA ECMO patients would have increased TFPI levels and slowed tissue factor triggered thrombin generation. Twenty VA ECMO patients had TFPI levels and thrombin generation lag time measured on ECMO day 1 or 2, day 3, and day 5. TFPI levels and thrombin generation lag time were compared against healthy control plasma samples. Mean TFPI levels were significantly higher in ECMO patients on ECMO day 1 or 2 = 81,877 ± 19,481 pg/mL, day 3 = 73,907 ± 26,690 pg/mL, and day 5 = 77,812 ± 23,484 pg/mL compared with control plasma = 38,958 ± 9,225 pg/mL (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Median thrombin generation lag time was significantly longer in ECMO patients on ECMO day 1 or 2 = 10.0 minutes [7.5, 13.8], day 3 = 9.0 minutes [6.8, 12.1], and day 5 = 10.7 minutes [8.3, 15.2] compared with control plasma = 3.6 minutes [2.9, 4.2] (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). TFPI is increased in VA ECMO patients and tissue factor triggered thrombin generation is slowed. Increased TFPI levels could contribute to the multifactorial coagulopathy that occurs during ECMO.

Mortality Risk Assessment in COVID-19 Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: A life-threatening complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional management. Venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (VV-ECMO) is used to support patients with ARDS in whom conventional management fails. Scoring systems to predict mortality in VV-ECMO remain unvalidated in COVID-19 ARDS. This report describes a large single-center experience with VV-ECMO in COVID-19 and assesses the utility of standard risk calculators. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database of all patients with COVID-19 who underwent VV-ECMO cannulation between March 15 and June 27, 2020 at a single academic center was performed. Demographic, clinical, and ECMO characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; survivor and nonsurvivor cohorts were compared by using univariate and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Forty patients who had COVID-19 and underwent ECMO were identified. Of the 33 patients (82.5%) in whom ECMO had been discontinued at the time of analysis, 18 patients (54.5%) survived to hospital discharge, and 15 (45.5%) died during ECMO. Nonsurvivors presented with a statistically significant higher Prediction of Survival on ECMO Therapy (PRESET)-Score (mean ± SD, 8.33 ± 0.8 vs 6.17 ± 1.8; P = .001). The PRESET score demonstrated accurate mortality prediction. All patients with a PRESET-Score of 6 or lowers survived, and a score of 7 or higher was associated with a dramatic increase in mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that favorable outcomes are possible in patients with COVID-19 who undergo ECMO at high-volume centers. This study demonstrated an association between the PRESET-Score and survival in patients with COVID-19 who underwent VV-ECMO. Standard risk calculators may aid in appropriate selection of patients with COVID-19 ARDS for ECMO.

Intoxication and overdose should not preclude veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

INTRODUCTION: Acute intoxication (AI) related morbidity and mortality are increasing in the United States. For patients with severe respiratory failure in the setting of an acute ingestion, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) can provide salvage therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with overdose-related need for VV ECMO. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a specialty VV ECMO unit between August 2014 and August 2018. Patients were stratified by those whose indication for VV ECMO was directly related to an acute ingestion (alcohol, illicit drug, or prescription drug overdose) and those with unrelated diagnoses. Demographics, pre-cannulation clinical characteristics, ECMO parameters, and outcomes data was collected and analyzed with parametric and non-parametric statistics as indicated. RESULTS: 189 patients were enrolled with 27 (14%) diagnosed with AI. Patients requiring VV ECMO for an AI were younger, had lower median BMI and PaO2/FiO2, and higher RESP scores than non-AI patients (p = 0.002, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.01). There was no difference in pre-cannulation pH, lactate, or SOFA scores between the two groups (p = 0.24, 0.5, 0.6). There was no difference in survival to discharge (p = 0.95). Among survivors, there was no difference in ECMO time or hospital stay (p = 0.24, 0.07). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate no survival difference for patients with and without an AI-related need for VV ECMO. AI patients should be supported with VV ECMO when traditional therapies fail despite potential stigma against acceptance on referral.

Platelet factor-4 concentration in adult veno-arterial ECMO patients.

BACKGROUND: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is reported at a variable rate in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. A critical factor impacting platelet factor-4 (PF4)-heparin antibody formation is plasma PF4 concentration. We hypothesized that PF4 concentration would be increased during veno-arterial (VA) ECMO. METHODS: Plasma PF4 concentration was measured during the first 5 ECMO days in 20 VA ECMO patients and 10 control plasma samples. PF4-heparin ratios were estimated using an assumed heparin concentration of 0.4 IU/mL. This correlates with an activated partial thromboplastin time of 60 to 80 seconds, which is the anticoagulation target in our center. RESULTS: Twenty VA ECMO patients were enrolled, 10 of which had pulmonary embolism. Median PF4 concentration was 0.03 µg/mL [0.01, 0.13] in control plasma. Median PF4 concentration was 0.21 µg/mL [0.12, 0.34] on ECMO day 1 or 2, 0.16 µg/mL [0.09, 0.25] on ECMO day 3, and 0.12 µg/mL [0.09, 0.22] on ECMO day 5. Estimated median PF4-heparin ratios were 0.04, 0.03, and 0.02 respectively. Two patients (10%) developed HIT that was confirmed by serotonin release assay. PF4 concentration did not differ significantly in these patients compared to non-HIT patients (p = 0.37). No patient had an estimated PF4-heparin ratio between 0.7 and 1.4, which is the reported optimal range for PF4-heparin antibody formation. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that PF4 concentration is mildly elevated during VA ECMO compared to control plasma. Estimated PF4-heparin ratios were not optimal for HIT antibody formation. These data support epidemiologic studies where HIT incidence is low during VA ECMO.

Breathing Life Back Into the Kidney-Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy and Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients supported with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). Secondary outcomes included mortality and the need for hemodialysis on hospital discharge. We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to a specialty unit on VV ECMO between August 2014 and August 2018. Trauma and bridge to lung transplant patients were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, pre-ECMO, ECMO, and renal replacement therapy outcome data were collected and analyzed with parametric and nonparametric statistics as appropriate. One hundred eighty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age was 45 (32, 55) years; precannulation pH, 7.21 (7.12, 7.30); PaO2/FiO2 ratio, 69 (56, 86); respiratory ECMO survival prediction score, 3 (0, 5); sequential organ failure assessment score, 12 (10, 14); and creatinine, 1.45 (0.93, 2.35) mg/dL. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 74.6%. Ninety-four (50.3%) patients had CRRT while on VV ECMO. Median time on CRRT was 14 (7, 21) days with 59 (61.4%) of these patients surviving to hospital discharge. Four (6.8%) patients, none with documented preexisting renal disease, required hemodialysis on discharge. CRRT patients had a statistically higher precannulation sequential organ failure assessment score, creatinine, total bilirubin and lower precannulation pH, respiratory ECMO survival prediction score, and platelet count compared with non-CRRT patients. Survival was 61.4% vs. 88.1% (p < 0.001). More than half of our patients received CRRT while on VV ECMO. CRRT was used in a more critically ill patient population and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality. However, for patients who survived to hospital discharge, the majority have full renal recovery.

Von Willebrand Factor Concentrate Administration for Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome- Related Bleeding During Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: To review the use of Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentrate for treatment of acquired Von Willebrand syndrome (VWS)-related bleeding in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients and determine if it was associated with improved VWF laboratory parameters. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Adult ECMO patients who received VWF concentrate for treatment of acquired VWS- related bleeding. INTERVENTIONS: None, observational study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ten adult ECMO patients received VWF concentrate for treatment of bleeding with evidence of acquired VWS over a 15-month period. Six patients were on veno-arterial ECMO and 4 were on veno-venous ECMO. The most common site of bleeding was airway or tracheal bleeding. The mean dose of VWF concentrate was 41 IU/kg. Mean VWF antigen was 263 ± 93 IU/dL before treatment and 394 ± 54 after treatment. Mean ristocetin cofactor activity was 127 ± 47 IU/dL before treatment and 240 ± 33 after treatment. The mean VWF ristocetin cofactor activity antigen ratio increased from 0.52 ± 0.14 before treatment to 0.62 ± 0.04 after treatment. Four of 10 patients had complete resolution of their bleeding within 24 hours, and 6 of 10 had complete resolution of their bleeding within 2- to- 4 days. There were 3 patients who had thrombotic events potentially related to VWF concentrate administration. No patient had an arterial thrombosis, stroke, or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: VWF concentrate administration increases VWF function in adult ECMO patients, but also may be associated with increased thrombotic risk. Larger studies are needed to determine VWF concentrate's safety, efficacy, and optimal dosing in adult ECMO patients.

Aspirin Use Is Associated With Decreased Mechanical Ventilation, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulability and increased thrombotic risk in critically ill patients. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated whether aspirin use is associated with reduced risk of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: A retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 to multiple hospitals in the United States between March 2020 and July 2020 was performed. The primary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes were ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for study outcomes were calculated using Cox-proportional hazards models after adjustment for the effects of demographics and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Four hundred twelve patients were included in the study. Three hundred fourteen patients (76.3%) did not receive aspirin, while 98 patients (23.7%) received aspirin within 24 hours of admission or 7 days before admission. Aspirin use had a crude association with less mechanical ventilation (35.7% aspirin versus 48.4% nonaspirin, P = .03) and ICU admission (38.8% aspirin versus 51.0% nonaspirin, P = .04), but no crude association with in-hospital mortality (26.5% aspirin versus 23.2% nonaspirin, P = .51). After adjusting for 8 confounding variables, aspirin use was independently associated with decreased risk of mechanical ventilation (adjusted HR, 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.85, P = .007), ICU admission (adjusted HR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.38-0.85, P = .005), and in-hospital mortality (adjusted HR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31-0.90, P = .02). There were no differences in major bleeding (P = .69) or overt thrombosis (P = .82) between aspirin users and nonaspirin users. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin use may be associated with improved outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, a sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial is needed to assess whether a causal relationship exists between aspirin use and reduced lung injury and mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Tracheostomy in Patients on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND: The anticoagulation and coagulopathy associated with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) lead to concern for increased risks of tracheostomy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of tracheostomy in patients on VV-ECMO. METHODS: Patients admitted between November 2015 and January 2019 to a dedicated intensive care unit for VV-ECMO were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: 96 patients underwent tracheostomy. Tracheostomy was performed percutaneously in 51 patients, open in 24, and hybrid in 21. 28 patients had postprocedure bleeding which was from the tracheostomy site in 13, the airway in 13, and both in 2. 6 patients had major tracheostomy site bleeding and 3 patients had major airway bleeding. 7 patients had minor tracheostomy site bleeding, 10 patients had minor airway bleeding, and 2 patients had minor bleeding at both. Bleeding complications were more common following percutaneous tracheostomy. Being on anticoagulation prior to tracheostomy was protective. DISCUSSION: Bleeding following tracheostomy in VV-ECMO is common with higher bleeding rates observed for those done percutaneously. Most complications were minor. Tracheostomy in patients on VV-ECMO appears safe.

Single Center Experience With Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed TBI patients ≥ 18 years of age treated with VV-ECMO. The primary outcome was survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes included progression of intracranial hemorrhage, bleeding complications, and episodes of oxygenator thrombosis requiring exchange. Medians and interquartile ranges were reported where appropriate. RESULTS: 13 TBI patients received VV-ECMO support during the study period. The median age was 28 years (Interquartile range (IQR) 25-37.5) and 85% were men. Median admission Glasgow coma scale was 5 (IQR 3-13.5). Median injury severity score (ISS) was 48 (IQR 33.5-66). Median pre-ECMO PaO2:FiO2 ratio was 58 (IQR 47-74.5). Five (38.4%) patients survived to discharge. Six patients (46%) received systemic A/C while on ECMO. No patient had worsening of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography imaging. There were two bleeding complications in patients on A/C, neither was related to TBI. Four patients required an oxygenator change; 2 in patients on A/C. CONCLUSION: VV-ECMO appears safe with TBI. We have demonstrated that A/C can be withheld without increased complications. Traumatic brain injury should not be considered an absolute contraindication to the use of VV-ECMO for severe respiratory failure and should be decided on a case by case basis. Additional research is needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Care Intensity During Transport to the Critical Care Resuscitation Unit: Transport Clinician's Role.

OBJECTIVE: Patients are often transferred between hospitals for a higher level of care. Critically ill patients require high-intensity care after transfer, but their care intensity during transport is unknown. We studied transport clinicians' management for patients who had time-sensitive or critical illnesses and were transferred to a critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU) at a quaternary academic center. METHODS: We prospectively surveyed transport clinicians who brought interhospital transport patients to the CCRU between March 1, 2019, and January 8, 2020. The primary outcome was care intensity during transport, which was defined as new interventions rendered by transport clinicians. RESULTS: We analyzed 852 surveys. Seventy-four percent of transports occurred by ground, and 54% originated from emergency departments. Up to 19% of patients received 2 or more interventions, whereas 29% received at least 1 intervention during transport. Ventilator management occurred in 25% of cases. When adjusting for known confounders, respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome, air transport, and contacting the CCRU attending physicians en route were associated with a higher likelihood of an intervention during transport. CONCLUSION: Transport clinicians provided new interventions in 48% of patients being transferred to the CCRU. Patients with respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome and those transported by helicopter emergency medical services were more likely to receive interventions en route.