Evinacumab: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare and serious genetic condition characterized by premature cardiovascular disease due to severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). HoFH primarily results from loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in the LDL receptor (LDLR), reducing LDL-C clearance such that patients experience severe hypercholesterolemia, exacerbating the risk of developing cardiovascular events. Treatment options such as statins, lomitapide, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and apheresis help lower LDL-C; however, many patients with HoFH still fail to reach their target LDL-C levels and many of these lipid-lowering therapies are not indicated for pediatric use. Angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been identified as a target to treat elevated LDL-C by acting as a natural inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL), enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of the triglyceride and phospholipid content of very low-density lipoproteins. Persons heterozygous for LOF mutations in ANGPTL3 were reported to have lower LDL-C than non-carriers and lower risk of coronary artery disease. Evinacumab is a first-in-class human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to ANGPTL3 to prevent its inhibition of LPL and EL. In clinical trials, a 15 mg/kg intravenous dose every 4 weeks has shown a mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C of ~50% in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with HoFH. This mini review article describes the mechanism of action of evinacumab, evinacumab population PK and PD modeling, and clinical development history of evinacumab for the treatment of HoFH.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mibavademab (a leptin receptor agonist): Results from a first-in-human phase I study.

Mibavademab (previously known as REGN4461), a fully human monoclonal antibody, is being investigated for the treatment of conditions associated with leptin deficiency. Here, we report pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity from a phase I study in healthy participants (NCT03530514). In part A, lean or overweight healthy participants were randomized to single-ascending-dose cohorts of 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10, and 30 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.), or 300 and 600 mg subcutaneous doses of mibavademab or placebo. In part B, overweight or obese participants were randomized to receive multiple doses of mibavademab (15 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and 10 mg/kg i.v. at weeks 3, 6, and 9) or placebo, stratified by body mass index and baseline leptin levels: low leptin (<5 ng/mL) or relatively low leptin (5-8 ng/mL in men and 5-24 ng/mL in women). Fifty-six and 55 participants completed the single-ascending-dose and multiple-dose parts, respectively. In the single-ascending-dose cohorts, mibavademab PKs were nonlinear with target-mediated elimination, greater than dose-proportional increases in exposure, and there were no dose-dependent differences in total soluble leptin receptor (sLEPR) levels in serum over time. Following multiple-dose administration of mibavademab in participants with leptin <8 ng/mL, lower mean mibavademab concentrations, higher mean total sLEPR concentrations, and larger mean decreases in body weight than in the relatively low leptin cohorts were observed. Baseline leptin was correlated with mibavademab PKs and pharmacodynamics. No treatment-emergent anti-mibavademab antibodies were observed in any mibavademab-treated participant. Results from this study collectively inform further development of mibavademab to treat conditions associated with leptin deficiency.

Evinacumab for Pediatric Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels due to profoundly defective LDL receptor (LDLR) function. Given that severely elevated LDL-C starts in utero, atherosclerosis often presents during childhood or adolescence, creating a largely unmet need for aggressive LDLR-independent lipid-lowering therapies in young patients with HoFH. Here we present the first evaluation of the efficacy and safety of evinacumab, a novel LDLR-independent lipid-lowering therapy, in pediatric patients with HoFH from parts A and B of a 3-part study. METHODS: The phase 3, part B, open-label study treated 14 patients 5 to 11 years of age with genetically proven HoFH (true homozygotes and compound heterozygotes) with LDL-C >130 mg/dL, despite optimized lipid-lowering therapy (including LDLR-independent apheresis and lomitapide), with intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Evinacumab treatment rapidly and durably (through week 24) decreased LDL-C with profound reduction in the first week, with a mean (SE) LDL-C reduction of -48.3% (10.4%) from baseline to week 24. ApoB (mean [SE], -41.3% [9.0%]), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-48.9% [9.8%]), and total cholesterol (-49.1% [8.1%]) were similarly decreased. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 10 (71.4%) patients; however, only 2 (14.3%) reported events that were considered to be treatment-related (nausea and abdominal pain). One serious treatment-emergent adverse event of tonsillitis occurred (n=1), but this was not considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Evinacumab constitutes a new treatment for pediatric patients with HoFH and inadequately controlled LDL-C despite optimized lipid-lowering therapy, lowering LDL-C levels by nearly half in these extremely high-risk and difficult-to-treat individuals. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04233918.

Garetosmab in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: Clinical Pharmacology Results from the Phase 2 LUMINA-1 Trial.

Here, we report the clinical pharmacology data from LUMINA-1 (NCT03188666), a Phase 2 trial that evaluated garetosmab (a monoclonal antibody against activin A) in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Forty-four patients were randomly assigned to intravenous 10 mg/kg of garetosmab or placebo every 4 weeks in a double-blind 28-week treatment period, followed by a 28-week open-label treatment period with garetosmab, and subsequent open-label extension. Serum samples were obtained to assess pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP9). Comparative exposure-response analyses for efficacy and safety were performed with trough concentrations (Ctrough ) of garetosmab prior to dosing. Steady-state PK was reached 12-16 weeks after the first dose of garetosmab, with mean (standard deviation) Ctrough of 105 ± 30.8 mg/L. Immunogenicity assessments showed anti-garetosmab antibody formation in 1 patient (1/43; 2.3%); titers were low, and did not affect PK or clinical efficacy. Median concentrations of BMP9 in serum were approximately 40 pg/mL at baseline. There were no meaningful differences in PK or BMP9 concentration-time profiles between patients who did and did not experience epistaxis or death. The comparative exposure-response analyses demonstrated no association between Ctrough and efficacy or safety. PK findings were consistent with prior data in healthy volunteers and were typical for a monoclonal antibody administered at doses sufficient to saturate target-mediated clearance. There were no trends that suggested patients with higher serum exposures to garetosmab were more likely to experience a reduction in heterotopic ossification or adverse events. Garetosmab is being further evaluated in the Phase 3 OPTIMA trial.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Quizartinib in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Quizartinib is an FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor that has shown robust clinical activity in patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication-mutated relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This analysis evaluated the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of quizartinib and its active metabolite, AC886, in a pooled analysis of data from 649 healthy volunteers or patients with AML from 8 clinical trials including the phase 3 QuANTUM-R study. Quizartinib was given as a single dose or multiple once-daily doses of 20, 30, 60, or 90 mg. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was performed using observed concentrations of quizartinib and AC886. Strong CYP3A inhibitor use resulted in an 82% increase in the area under the curve (AUC) and a 72% increase in the maximum concentration (Cmax ) of quizartinib. Albumin level, age, and body surface area were statistically significant covariates on quizartinib PK. However, their individual effects on quizartinib AUC and Cmax were <20%. For AC886, strong CYP3A inhibitor use, body surface area and black/African American race were significant covariates. Except for strong CYP3A inhibitor use, the effects on the overall exposure (AUC of quizartinib + AC886) were <20%. The population PK model provided an adequate description of the observed concentrations of quizartinib and AC886 in both healthy volunteers and patients with AML. Only concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors had a clinically meaningful effect on quizartinib PK exposure.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Single-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effects of Esaxerenone on QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects.

This phase 1 single-center, single-dose, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 4-period and 4-sequence crossover study assessed the potential of esaxerenone, a novel nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker used to treat hypertension, to affect cardiac repolarization. In this double-blind study, 55 subjects were randomized to single doses of 10 mg esaxerenone (therapeutic dose), 40 mg esaxerenone (supratherapeutic dose), 400 mg moxifloxacin, or placebo. Serial electrocardiograms and pharmacokinetics (PK) were obtained over 24 and 168 hours, respectively. The primary end point was Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF). Secondary end points included safety and PK. Assay sensitivity was confirmed as the lower limit of 90% confidence interval (90%CIs) for placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcF (∆∆QTcF) for moxifloxacin was >5 milliseconds at the prespecified times; mean ∆∆QTcF was 12.5 milliseconds at 3 and 4 hours postdose. The upper 90%CI limits of ∆∆QTcF were ≤0 milliseconds at all times for both doses of esaxerenone. No concentration-QTc relationship was identified. Therefore, esaxerenone had no potential to inhibit cardiac repolarization. No deaths or serious adverse events (AEs) occurred; 1 subject discontinued the study because of a treatment-emergent AE unrelated to esaxerenone. This clinical evaluation showed that esaxerenone has no QTc prolongation potential.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of DS-1040 Drug-Drug Interactions With Aspirin, Clopidogrel, and Enoxaparin.

DS-1040, a novel low-molecular-weight inhibitor of activated thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, is under development for the treatment of thromboembolic diseases including venous thromboembolism and acute ischemic stroke. Here we describe the results of 3 studies that evaluated the safety and tolerability of DS-1040 along with the effect on DS-1040 pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, when dosed alone or when coadministered with aspirin (NCT02071004), clopidogrel (NCT02560688), or enoxaparin in healthy subjects. Concomitant administration of single-dose DS-1040 with multiple-dose aspirin, multiple-dose clopidogrel, or single-dose enoxaparin, consistent with clinically relevant dose regimens, was safe and well tolerated with no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation, bleeding-related TEAEs, and no significant changes in coagulation parameters. DS-1040 did not prolong bleeding time when administered concomitantly with aspirin or clopidogrel. In the aspirin study, DS-1040 PK was evaluated following the concomitant administration with multiple-dose aspirin, where the plasma DS-1040 exposure (peak plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUCinf ]) was to be similar to the data previously published in the first-in-human study of DS-1040 in healthy subjects. The PK parameters of DS-1040 coadministered with clopidogrel were similar to those of DS-1040 alone, with small increases in geometric means for Cmax (7%) and AUClast (9%). When coadministered with enoxaparin, the PK parameters of DS-1040 were not affected (1.1% and 1.5% decreases in geometric means for Cmax and AUClast , respectively). Therefore, concomitant administration of DS-1040 and clopidogrel or enoxaparin did not demonstrate PK drug-drug interactions.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Quizartinib.

Quizartinib is an oral, highly potent, and selective type II FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor in development for acute myeloid leukemia. This parallel-group study evaluated potential food effects on quizartinib absorption in healthy subjects who received a single 30-mg dose after overnight fasting (n = 34) or a high-fat, high-calorie meal (n = 30). Blood samples were collected through 504 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated were maximum observed concentration (Cmax ) and area under plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) and from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf ). Mean quizartinib pharmacokinetic profiles were similar under fasted and fed conditions. The geometric least squares means ratios (%) for fed/fasted and associated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for Cmax , AUClast , and AUCinf were 91.58 (82.15-102.08), 105.39 (90.79-122.35), and 108.39 (91.54-128.34), respectively. The 90%CI for the ratio fell within the 80% to 125% limits for Cmax and AUClast , with 90%CI for AUCinf slightly outside the limits (ie, 128%). Food delayed quizartinib time to Cmax by 2 hours. All adverse events were either mild or moderate; no discontinuations due to adverse events occurred. Based on these results, quizartinib can be administered without regard to food.

A drug-drug interaction study to assess the potential effect of acid-reducing agent, lansoprazole, on quizartinib pharmacokinetics.

PURPOSE: Quizartinib, a potent, selective FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor, is currently in phase 3 development for patients with FLT3-internal tandem duplication-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Acid-reducing agents (ARAs; e.g., proton pump inhibitors) are frequently used during AML treatment. Since quizartinib demonstrates pH-dependent solubility, the effect of lansoprazole coadministration on pharmacokinetics (PK) of quizartinib tablet formulation was assessed. METHODS: An open-label, parallel-group study randomized 64 healthy adults to single-dose quizartinib 30 mg alone (reference) or lansoprazole (60 mg once daily, days 1-5) + single-dose quizartinib 30 mg (day 5) (test). Plasma concentrations of quizartinib and its active metabolite, AC886, were measured to 504 h postdose; the effect of lansoprazole on quizartinib PK was assessed by analysis of variance. RESULTS: Quizartinib geometric mean ratios (test/reference) and 90% confidence intervals for maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve to last measurable drug concentration (AUClast), and AUC to infinity were 86.11% (78.4%, 94.6%), 93.96% (79.6%, 110.9%), and 95.30% (80.2%, 113.3%), respectively. Comparisons showed a modest decrease in quizartinib absorption when co-administered with lansoprazole, with lower limits for Cmax and AUClast just below 80-125% limits. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate; the most frequent in either treatment group were headache [quizartinib alone: (n = 3) 10%], upper respiratory tract infection [quizartinib alone: (n = 2) 6.7%; lansoprazole + quizartinib: (n = 3) 9.1%], and muscle tightness [quizartinib alone: (n = 2) 6.7%]. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant lansoprazole had minimal effect on quizartinib PK as a formulated tablet, indicating that quizartinib can be administered with ARAs.

Abuse potential of mirogabalin in recreational polydrug users.

Mirogabalin is a selective calcium channel α2δ subunit ligand being developed to treat neuropathic pain. In accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, the human abuse potential of mirogabalin (15-105 mg) was examined, relative to placebo, diazepam (15 or 30 mg), and pregabalin (200 or 450 mg), in two single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled crossover studies in recreational polydrug users who could discern between positive comparator and placebo. The primary endpoint was maximum observed effect (E max) for Drug Liking Visual Analog Scale. At therapeutic doses, mirogabalin Drug Liking E max did not differ significantly from placebo and was significantly lower than diazepam and pregabalin. This indicates therapeutic doses mirogabalin may have less abuse potential versus diazepam or pregabalin. At supratherapeutic doses (⩾4× therapeutic dose), mirogabalin had significantly higher Drug Liking E max than placebo, but lower E max than pregabalin. In both studies, therapeutic doses of mirogabalin demonstrated limited evidence of abuse potential.

Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, and Excretion of [14C]Esaxerenone, a Novel Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker in Humans.

Esaxerenone (CS-3150) is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor blocker. The absorption, metabolism, distribution, and excretion of esaxerenone were assessed in in vitro studies and in a clinical study, where [14C]esaxerenone (150 µCi/20 mg) was administered orally to six healthy male subjects. The plasma concentrations of esaxerenone and its metabolites (M4, M11, and M1) were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The recovery of radioactivity was 92.5%, with 38.5% and 54.0% excreted in the urine and feces, respectively. The half-life of radioactivity in blood and plasma was approximately 30 hours, similar to that of the unchanged form in plasma. The blood-to-plasma ratio was 0.628, demonstrating low partitioning to blood components. In plasma, esaxerenone was the most abundant moiety (40.8%), followed by O-glucuronide (21.4%; M4), acyl-glucuronide of amide-bond hydrolysate (8.0%; M11), and the deshydroxyethyl form (1.7%; M1). In vitro studies showed that esaxerenone was a substrate of CYP3A and multiple UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoforms. Oxidation contributed approximately 30% to its clearance, as indicated by the excretion ratio of oxidized metabolites into urine and feces. Caco-2 studies showed that esaxerenone was a substrate of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein; however, the excretion ratios of the unchanged form in the feces and urine were 18.7% and 1.6%, respectively, indicating that these transporters were not important for the absorption and elimination of esaxerenone. Low urinary excretion of esaxerenone suggested that the plasma exposure of esaxerenone was not affected by renal dysfunction. Multiple elimination pathways including oxidation, glucuronidation, and hydrolysis, and the low contribution of transporters, indicated limited drug-drug interaction potential.

Patritumab with Cetuximab plus Platinum-Containing Therapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: An Open-Label, Phase Ib Study.

PURPOSE: Patritumab plus cetuximab with platinum as first-line therapy for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) was evaluated for safety and to determine the recommended phase II combination dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed R/M SCCHN received intravenous patritumab (18 mg/kg loading dose; 9 mg/kg maintenance dose every 3 weeks) + cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose; 250 mg/m2 maintenance dose weekly) + cisplatin (100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) or carboplatin (AUC of 5) for six cycles or until toxicity, disease progression, or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities [DLT; grade ≥3 (21-day observation period)] and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). Pharmacokinetics, human antihuman antibodies (HAHA), tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients completed a median (range) of 8.7 (2.0-20.7) patritumab cycles. No DLTs were reported. Serious adverse events were reported in 9 patients (patritumab-related n = 4). TEAEs (N = 15 patients) led to patritumab interruption in 7 patients. Patritumab-related dose reductions were reported in 1 patient. Patritumab (18 mg/kg) pharmacokinetics (N = 15) showed mean (SD) AUC0-21d of 2,619 (560) µg/day/mL and maximum concentration of 499.9 (90.4) µg/mL. All patients were HAHA-negative at study end (single, transient low titer in 1 patient). Tumor response rate (complete plus partial response; N = 15) was 47%. Median (95% confidence interval) PFS and OS (N = 15) were 7.9 (3.7-9.7) and 13.5 (6.6-17.5) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patritumab (18 mg/kg loading dose, 9 mg/kg maintenance dose) plus cetuximab/platinum was tolerable, active in SCCHN, and selected as the phase II dose regimen.

Tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of mirogabalin in healthy subjects: Results from phase 1 studies.

Three phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) studies were conducted in healthy men and women to further characterize the safety, tolerability, and PK/PD of mirogabalin administration with or without food and to guide the dose selection and regimen for phase 2 and 3 clinical development. The 3 studies included 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending-dose studies, and 1 open-label, crossover study to evaluate the PK of mirogabalin administered under fasting and fed (high-fat meal) conditions. Forty-eight and 47 healthy volunteers completed the single- and multiple-dose studies, respectively. Thirty subjects were enrolled and completed the food effect study. Mirogabalin was well tolerated in the fed and fasted states. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)-dizziness and somnolence-were expected based on mirogabalin's mechanism of action. Subjects receiving the highest mirogabalin doses (50 and 75 mg single dose) showed greater dizziness and sedation and higher rates of TEAEs than subjects receiving 3-30 mg. After oral administration, mirogabalin was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum concentration, ∼1 hour) and eliminated through urine unchanged (61%-72% urinary excretion). Exposure increased in a dose-proportional manner after single or multiple mirogabalin doses. No significant accumulation occurred with multiple doses over 14 days. After single doses of mirogabalin (15 mg), the bioavailability was considered equivalent in the fed and fasted states, indicating that mirogabalin can be taken without food restrictions. Based on these data, mirogabalin 15 mg twice daily was selected as the highest target dose for further clinical development.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Mirogabalin When Coadministered With Lorazepam, Zolpidem, Tramadol, or Ethanol: Results From Drug-Drug Interaction Studies in Healthy Subjects.

Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period drug-drug interaction studies were conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions between mirogabalin and commonly used central nervous system depressants. Mirogabalin or placebo was administered alone or with single-dose lorazepam, zolpidem, tramadol, ethanol, or interacting drug placebo. Safety was assessed and serial samples for pharmacokinetic parameters were collected for up to 48 hours postdose. PD assessments included body sway (except tramadol), digit symbol substitution test, vertigo symptom scale short form, brief ataxia rating scale, and the Bond and Lader visual analog scale. Coadministration of mirogabalin with any of the 4 drugs did not cause any clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions. Peak mirogabalin concentration decreased by 28% (least squares mean ratio, 0.72; 90% confidence interval, [CI] 0.67, 0.76) following tramadol coadministration, and increased by 20% (least squares mean ratio, 1.20; 90%CI, 1.12, 1.28) following ethanol coadministration. Mirogabalin alone had little to no effect on PD parameters, but coadministration of mirogabalin with either lorazepam or ethanol increased the PD effects in body sway and digit symbol substitution test assays. Mirogabalin/lorazepam and mirogabalin/zolpidem increased occurrence of somnolence. Increased incidence of nausea and headache was noted with mirogabalin/tramadol and mirogabalin/ethanol, respectively.

Edoxaban drug-drug interactions with ketoconazole, erythromycin, and cyclosporine.

AIMS: Edoxaban, a novel factor Xa inhibitor, is a substrate of cytochrome P450 3 A4 (CYP3A4) and the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Three edoxaban drug-drug interaction studies examined the effects of P-gp inhibitors with varying degrees of CYP3A4 inhibition. METHODS: In each study, healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 60 mg edoxaban with or without an oral dual P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor as follows: ketoconazole 400 mg once daily for 7 days, edoxaban on day 4; erythromycin 500 mg four times daily for 8 days, edoxaban on day 7; or single dose of cyclosporine 500 mg with edoxaban. Serial plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Coadministration of ketoconazole, erythromycin, or cyclosporine increased edoxaban total exposure by 87%, 85%, and 73%, respectively, and the peak concentration by 89%, 68%, and 74%, respectively, compared with edoxaban alone. The half-life did not change appreciably. Exposure of M4, the major active edoxaban metabolite, was consistent when edoxaban was administered alone or with ketoconazole and erythromycin. With cyclosporine, M4 total exposure increased by 6.9-fold and peak exposure by 8.7-fold, suggesting an additional interaction. Pharmacodynamic effects were reflective of increased edoxaban exposure. No clinically significant adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of dual inhibitors of P-gp and CYP3A4 increased edoxaban exposure by less than two-fold. This effect appears to be primarily due to inhibition of P-gp. The impact of CYP3A4 inhibition appears to be less pronounced, and its contribution to total clearance appears limited in healthy subjects.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of patritumab, a HER3 inhibitor, in subjects with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for patritumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 3. METHODS: A total of 833 serum concentrations were included in this analysis; serum concentrations were obtained from 145 subjects (136 with non-small cell lung cancer, nine with solid tumors) treated with patritumab [9 or 18 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks (q3w)] in one phase 1 and one phase 1b/2 study. Data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. RESULTS: Patritumab PKs were best described through a two-compartment model with first-order elimination and interindividual variability on clearance (CL), volume of the central compartment (V c), distributional clearance, and volume of the peripheral compartment. In the final model, CL and V c were estimated as 0.0238 L/h and 3.62 L, respectively. Body weight (BW) and baseline albumin were found to be covariates for CL and BW was a covariate for V c. Covariates associated with hepatic and renal impairment were not significant on CL. Simulations showed that BW-based dosing reduced interindividual variability in patritumab exposure compared with fixed dosing. CONCLUSIONS: The PK of patritumab was linear at the doses studied and well described by the two-compartment model. Hepatic and renal impairment did not appear to affect PK. Our results support BW-based dosing of patritumab on a q3w schedule.

Phase 1 Evaluation of [(64)Cu]DOTA-Patritumab to Assess Dosimetry, Apparent Receptor Occupancy, and Safety in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, dosimetry, and apparent receptor occupancy (RO) of [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab, a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody directed against HER3/ERBB3 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. PROCEDURES: Dosimetry subjects (n = 5) received [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab and underwent positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) at 3, 24, and 48 h. Evaluable RO subjects (n = 3 out of 6) received [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab at day 1 and day 8 (after 9.0 mg/kg patritumab) followed by PET/CT at 24 h post-injection. Endpoints included safety, tumor uptake, and efficacy. RESULTS: The tumor SUVmax (± SD) was 5.6 ± 4.5, 3.3 ± 1.7, and 3.0 ± 1.1 at 3, 24, and 48 h in dosimetry subjects. The effective dose and critical organ dose (liver) averaged 0.044 ± 0.008 mSv/MBq and 0.46 ± 0.086 mGy/MBq, respectively. In RO subjects, tumor-to-blood ratio decreased from 1.00 ± 0.32 at baseline to 0.57 ± 0.17 after stable patritumab, corresponding to a RO of 42.1 ± 3. CONCLUSIONS: [(64)Cu]DOTA-patritumab was safe. These limited results suggest that this PET-based method can be used to determine tumor-apparent RO.

A thorough QTc study demonstrates that olmesartan medoxomil does not prolong the QTc interval.

Two studies (ROADMAP and ORIENT) evaluating the renoprotective effects of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) in patients with type 2 diabetes suggested OM is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. We conducted a thorough QTc study to evaluate the effects of OM on cardiac repolarization. A randomized, double-blind, phase 1 study was conducted per E14 Guidance to assess the effects of single doses of OM therapeutic dose (40 mg), OM supratherapeutic dose (160 mg), placebo, or moxifloxacin (MOXI; 400 mg) on QTc in 56 healthy subjects. The primary endpoint was the baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QTc interval using Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF) for OM and MOXI. Assay sensitivity was concluded if lower limit of 1-sided 95%CI > 5 milliseconds of ΔΔQTcF for MOXI. No threshold pharmacologic effect for OM was concluded if upper limit of 1-sided 95%CI <10 milliseconds for ΔΔQTcF at any timepoint. Pharmacokinetics, ECGs, and safety were assessed. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated. The largest upper limit of the 1-sided 95%CI for ΔΔQTcF was <5 milliseconds for OM. No clinically significant changes were observed in ECGs. Pharmacokinetics and safety profile were consistent with previous data. Therapeutic and supratherapeutic OM doses had no clinically significant effect on cardiac repolarization and were well tolerated.

Clinical Translation and Validation of a Predictive Biomarker for Patritumab, an Anti-human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3 (HER3) Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: During early clinical development, prospective identification of a predictive biomarker and validation of an assay method may not always be feasible. Dichotomizing a continuous biomarker measure to classify responders also leads to challenges. We present a case study of a prospective-retrospective approach for a continuous biomarker identified after patient enrollment but defined prospectively before the unblinding of data. An analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of this approach and the challenges encountered in its practical application are also provided. METHODS: HERALD (NCT02134015) was a double-blind, phase 2 study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) randomized to erlotinib with placebo or with high or low doses of patritumab, a monoclonal antibody targeted against human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3). While the primary objective was to assess safety and progression-free survival (PFS), a secondary objective was to determine a single predictive biomarker hypothesis to identify subjects most likely to benefit from the addition of patritumab. Although not identified as the primary biomarker in the study protocol, on the basis of preclinical results from 2 independent laboratories, expression levels of the HER3 ligand heregulin (HRG) were prospectively declared the predictive biomarker before data unblinding but after subject enrollment. An assay to measure HRG mRNA was developed and validated. Other biomarkers, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, were also evaluated in an exploratory fashion. The cutoff value for high vs. low HRG mRNA levels was set at the median delta threshold cycle. A maximum likelihood analysis was performed to evaluate the provisional cutoff. The relationship of HRG values to PFS hazard ratios (HRs) was assessed as a measure of internal validation. Additional NSCLC samples were analyzed to characterize HRG mRNA distribution. RESULTS: The subgroup of patients with high HRG mRNA levels ("HRG-high") demonstrated clinical benefit from patritumab treatment with HRs of 0.37 (P = 0.0283) and 0.29 (P = 0.0027) in the high- and low-dose patritumab arms, respectively. However, only 102 of the 215 randomized patients (47.4%) had sufficient tumor samples for HRG mRNA measurement. Maximum likelihood analysis showed that the provisional cutoff was within the optimal range. In the placebo arm, the HRG-high subgroup demonstrated worse prognosis compared with HRG-low. A continuous relationship was observed between increased HRG mRNA levels and lower HR. Additional NSCLC samples (N = 300) demonstrated a similar unimodal distribution to that observed in this study, suggesting that the defined cutoff may be applicable to future NSCLC studies. CONCLUSIONS: The prospective-retrospective approach was successful in clinically validating a probable predictive biomarker. Post hoc in vitro studies and statistical analyses permitted further testing of the underlying assumptions. However, limitations of this analysis include the incomplete collection of adequate tumor tissue and a lack of stratification. In a phase 3 study, findings are being confirmed, and the HRG cutoff value is being further refined. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NUMBER: NCT02134015.