Pain after midurethral sling; the underestimated role of mesh removal.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the results of midurethral sling (MUS) removal in women who have pain as their single complication of MUS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart study supplemented with a cross sectional questionnaire. Women who underwent MUS removal for pain as the solitary reason for removal between 2004 and 2018 were included. Primary outcome was change in pain levels assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range 0-10). Secondary outcome was the recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). RESULTS: Twenty-six of 31 patients returned the questionnaire. Median medical file follow-up was 12 months (range 2-66) and 25 months (range 5-104) regarding questionnaires. VAS pain score dropped from 7.8 (SD 1.9) at baseline to 4.5 (SD 3.2) at follow-up (p <.00). Seven (23%) patients were pain-free. Patients undergoing partial vaginal resection (n = 6) had a VAS pain score decrease of 4.7 (p = .02) versus 2.7 (p = .02) for complete vaginal removal (n = 14). Twenty-three (89%) patients experienced SUI at follow-up, whereof 10 (45%) reported (almost) no incidents of SUI. CONCLUSIONS: MUS removal is a viable and safe option with a significant drop in VAS pain score in patients with chronic pain after MUS placement. A post-operative increase of SUI and a possible renewed wish for SUI treatment have to be considered. This should not be a reason to refrain from information and/or referral for surgical removal.

De-implementation of urodynamics in The Netherlands after the VALUE/VUSIS-2 results: a nationwide survey.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to estimate the level of de-implementation of preoperative routine urodynamics (UDS) before stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery in The Netherlands and to analyze facilitators and barriers. Routine UDS was performed by 37% of the medical specialists in 2010. We hypothesized that the recommendations from the recent Value of Urodynamics prior to Stress Incontinence Surgery (VUSIS) and Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) studies would have been followed by a reduction of routine UDS. METHODS: A national survey was performed among all Dutch gynecologists and urologists dealing with SUI in daily practice. The questionnaire contained two parts: (1) respondents' characteristics and their actual care concerning preoperative UDS, and (2) facilitators and barriers. RESULTS: The response rate was 41% (127/308). Of the respondents, 93% (n = 118) did not perform routine UDS in the preoperative workup for women in this group. Professional characteristics associated with not following the recommendations were profession urologist, academic hospital, and a lower number of midurethral sling (MUS) placed yearly. Facilitators to follow the recommendation not to perform routine UDS were adequate design of the VUSIS-II study and outcome and recommendations from the studies. Barriers not to follow the recommendation were believe in the additional value of UDS, especially the pressure transmission ratio, and the presence of detrusor overactivity. CONCLUSION: According to respondents to this questionnaire, VUSIS-II and ValUE study results are well implemented in The Netherlands. The vast majority of respondents replied as not performing routine preoperative UDS in women with primary, uncomplicated (predominant) SUI. Therefore, there is no need for a further de-implementation strategy.

The Impact of Midurethral Sling Surgery on Sexual Activity and Function in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence.

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence has a negative impact on sexual function. AIM: To assess the effect of midurethral sling surgery on sexual activity and function in women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the Value of Urodynamics Prior to Stress Incontinence Surgery (VUSIS-II) study, which assessed the value of urodynamics in women with (predominantly) stress urinary incontinence. Patients who underwent retropubic or transobturator sling surgery were included in the present study if information was available on sexual activity before and 12 months after surgery. Data were collected from a self-report validated questionnaire combined with non-validated questions. The association between midurethral sling surgery and sexual function (coital incontinence, satisfaction, and dyspareunia) was compared with McNemar χ(2) tests for nominal data and paired t-tests for ordinal data. Potentially influential factors were analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in sexual activity and sexual function after midurethral sling surgery. RESULTS: Information on sexual activity was available in 293 of the 578 women (51%) included in the VUSIS-II study. At baseline, 252 of 293 patients (86%) were sexually active vs 244 of 293 (83%) after 12 months. More patients with cured stress urinary incontinence were sexually active postoperatively (213 of 247 [86%] vs 31 of 46 [67%], P < .01). There was a significant decrease in coital incontinence (120 of 236 [51%] preoperatively vs 16 of 236 [7%] postoperatively, P < .01). De novo dyspareunia was present in 21 of 238 women (9%). There was a greater improvement in coital incontinence after placement of the retropubic sling compared with the transobturator sling (odds ratio = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.10-3.80, P = .02). CONCLUSION: These data show that midurethral sling surgery has an overall positive influence on sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. The retropubic sling is more effective than the transobturator sling for improvement of coital incontinence. De novo dyspareunia was present in 1 of 11 women.

Effect of undiagnosed deep adenomyosis after failed NovaSure endometrial ablation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of adenomyosis and deep adenomyosis after NovaSure (Hologic Inc., Newark, DE) endometrial ablation in hysterectomy specimens after NovaSure endometrial ablation failure. DESIGN: Prospective observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: The TweeSteden Hospital, a teaching hospital in the south of the Netherlands. PATIENTS: All women who underwent hysterectomy for menorrhagia and/or dysmenorrhea after failure of NovaSure endometrial ablation between November 2007 and January 2011. INTERVENTIONS: All patients who underwent hysterectomy between January 2005 and April 2009 for the same indication but did not undergo prior endometrial ablation from choice or the lack of availability of the endometrial ablation procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 213 patients who underwent NovaSure therapy, 22 (10.3%) underwent a hysterectomy because NovaSure failed. Of these, 10 (45.5%) exhibited adenomyosis in their hysterectomy specimens. The control group patients had a similar adenomyosis prevalence (74/173, 42.8%). However, the NovaSure failure group had a significantly higher prevalence of deep adenomyosis (>2.5 mm endometrial penetration) (9/22, 40.9%) than the control group (37/173, 21.4%, p < .05). CONCLUSION: Deep adenomyosis after failed NovaSure endometrial ablation was present in a significant number of patients. It is not clear whether adenomyosis is induced by endometrial ablation or whether it causes endometrial ablation failure.

Urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In patients with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, there is still a debate regarding the benefit of a multichannel urodynamic investigation prior to surgical management. The purpose of this article is to review recent evidence on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS: Results of two large randomized controlled trials provided evidence that preoperative urodynamics do not improve outcome of incontinence surgery in women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence. Furthermore, in this selected group of women, urodynamics hardly lead to deviation of surgery as a primary treatment in case of an indication for operation based on symptoms and signs. Low urethral closure pressures and detrusor overactivity are urodynamic parameters which were associated with impaired cure of symptoms of stress urinary incontinence after surgery. SUMMARY: Preoperative urodynamics do not improve outcome in women with complaints of stress incontinence and do hardly alter the treatment plan. It remains questionable whether a more accurate counselling on the postoperative perspectives counterbalances the disadvantages attended with urodynamics. The routine use in women with uncomplicated stress incontinence should no longer be advised. Preoperative urodynamic evaluation should only be used to answer a specific clinical question or if the results are likely to influence the choice of treatment.