COVID-19 crisis interlinkage with past pandemics and their effects on food security.

BACKGROUND: Pandemics as health and humanitarian crises have exerted traceable impacts on food security. Almost all past and current pandemics have created a food crisis that affects a share of the global population and threaten global food security. With the more frequent outbreaks of emerging and re-emerging diseases or pandemics, this paper looks at the various types of impacts from the current coronavirus crisis and past pandemics to identify their major impact on food security. SCOPE: To this effect, key strategies that could be put in place to ensure the efficient resilience of food systems before, during, and after the pandemics to mitigate the negative impact of the pandemics on global food security are recommended. The most recent effects of the current coronavirus crisis have been disruptions in the flow of farm labourers and inefficient farm operations leading to postharvest food losses. KEY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Modification of diets between social groups has also been observed. Future response orientations to prevent and mitigate the effects of pandemics on food security will consider pro-active and adapted policy, program, and institutional actions towards the systemic development of global food systems as an interconnected network.

Influence of SYSADOA group chemicals on progression of human knee joint osteoarthritis: new objective evaluation method - measuring of rheological properties in vivo.

OBJECTIVES: This study seeks to demonstrate the influence of pharmacological substances from the SYSADOA group on the progression of osteoarthritis in the human knee. The quantification methods were direct measurement of the rheological properties of the knee joints in vivo and standard WOMAC index questionnaires. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The drugs were administered orally to 34 probands with second degree gonarthrosis for 13 weeks. The untreated control group consisted of 10 probands. The rheological properties of the joints were determined by a biorheometer, and subjective assessment of the knees by patients (WOMAC) before and after medication, and for a further 13 weeks. Changes in the calculated parameters over time were compared. RESULTS: During the audited perioda slight deterioration in all of the parameters was observed in the untreated group. The treated group, however, improved in all the parameters and some indicators showed statistically significant differences. The positive effects of the SYSADOA persisted for 3 months after the end of treatments. Partial correlation was found between the results of the WOMAC questionnaire and the rheological measurements. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the positive effects of the preparation on arthritic changes in the knee joint, but due to the large variance of the collected data, this conclusion is on the borderline of statistical significance. The method of measuring the rheological properties of the joints is suitable for evaluating the progression of OA.