Clinical Characteristics and Therapeutic Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Elderly Patients Compared with Young Adult Patients: A Prospective Multicentre Study.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory dermatitis in developed countries, and has a major impact on those affected. Little is known about AD in elderly patients. This prospective multicentre observational study described the clinical characteristics and burden of AD in elderly subjects ≥ 65 years, as well as the therapeutic options chosen for this population in routine care, and compared findings with those in young adults with AD < 30 years. Cohort data from adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD enrolled in a French national prospective registry (December 2020 to May 2023) were analysed. Patients ≥ 65 years made up 12.5% of the total adult cohort and presented less head-and-neck and extremity involvement, and were less affected by generalized forms than young adult patients. Elderly patients predominantly had late-onset AD and had similar disease severity to younger adults. Although the overall impact of AD appeared to be lower in elderly patients and treatment was initially less used in this age group, the substantial impact on sleep and psychiatric comorbidities was similar in older and younger adult patients. Better understanding of AD in elderly patients and the establishment of age-specific treatment guidelines may help dermatologists manage the disease in older people.

Compared Burden of Psoriasis, Atopic Dermatitis, Hidradenitis Suppurativa, and Chronic Urticaria: Baseline Characteristics of the Patients Included in the OMCCI Cohort - A French, Prospective Multicenter Study of Chronic Inflammatory Dermatoses.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inflammatory dermatoses (CIDs) can significantly affect patients' lives. The Observatory of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Diseases (OMCCI) cohort was initiated to quantify the impact and disease evolution of four CID over 4 years' follow-up; at least 1,000 patients per CID are planned to be enrolled. The objective of this study was to present baseline characteristics of patients included in the OMCCI cohort between December 2020 and September 2022. METHODS: This French, prospective, multicenter registry included adult patients treated in daily practice for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PS), atopic dermatitis (AD), hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), or chronic urticaria (CU) starting or modifying a systemic treatment. At the inclusion visit and then every 6 months during 4 years, patient-reported outcomes and data on these diseases and their treatments are recorded. RESULTS: A total of 2,058 patients from 24 centers were included: 1,137 PS, 413 AD, 301 HS, and 207 CU. Of these, 1,950 patients started or changed systemic treatment, and 108 reduced the dose of existing systemic treatment. Disease impact was qualified as debilitating by 80.1% (PS), 90.5% (AD), 90.5% (HS), and 89.4% (CU), affecting daily, family, and professional life. According to the SF-12 Survey, the impact of all four diseases was borderline pathological for physical health and severe for mental health. At inclusion, 20.4% of patients were receiving a conventional systemic or biologic treatment. After the first visit, this percentage raised to 83.3%. During the 6 months preceding study inclusion, 17.7% (PS), 27.9% (AD), 43.1% (HS), and 43.6% (CU) of patients missed work due to their illness, and 26.3% of patients with HS had been admitted to hospital (vs. 8.1%, 5.8%, and 13% of patients with PS, AD, or CU, respectively). CONCLUSION: These CIDs (especially HS) had a major impact on all aspects of patients' quality of life. The low baseline use of systemic drugs and the high burden of these CIDs suggest that these agents are underused. Long-term and dynamic evaluation of the changes brought by the initiation or optimization of these treatments on the evolution of patients' lives will be studied prospectively during the 4-year follow-up of the OMCCI.

Occurrence of focal myositis during Behçet's disease: The identification of a specific vasculitis-associated focal myopathy.

AIMS: This study aimed to report the association of focal myositis (FM) and Behçet's disease (BD) and to analyse the main characteristics of such an association. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study of patients with BD and FM (BD + FM+ group) and those without FM (BD - FM+ group). Clinical, laboratory, radiological, pathological, treatment and outcome data were analysed. RESULTS: The BD + FM+ group included 10 patients; the median [interquartile range] age at BD diagnosis was 25 [16-35] years, and at FM diagnosis, it was 30 [26-42] years. The diagnosis of BD preceded FM in the majority of cases (n = 8/10). FM occurrence was associated with BD flare-ups in three cases. The creatine kinase levels remained normal or slightly increased. Histological analyses identified relatively preserved muscle tissue, associated with vasculitis (n = 5/6). All patients required treatment; most patients relapsed (n = 9/10). The BD - FM+ group included 35 patients. A comparison of the groups identified a trend towards a younger median age at diagnosis of FM among those with BD (p = 0.063) and more frequent focal muscle swelling in the BD + FM+ group (p = 0.029). The pathological analysis identified significantly less frequent muscle alterations in the BD + FM+ group (muscle fibre size heterogeneity, p = 0.021; necrosis, p = 0.007; and fibrosis, p = 0.027). BD + FM+ patients had a higher frequency of relapse (p = 0.003) and systematic treatment (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: FM occurring during BD appears to be part of the systemic vasculitis process and presents as a vasculitis-associated focal myopathy with a specific clinico-histological pattern. Patients with this association require long-term follow-up and adapted management. This case series also highlights the need for research on BD diagnostic criteria in cases of FM.

Use of Methotrexate in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in France: A Practice Survey.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the modalities of methotrexate prescription for moderate to severe psoriasis by dermatologists in France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a national online practice survey between October and December 2020. RESULTS: A total of 254 dermatologists responded, 237 reported prescribing methotrexate for moderate to severe psoriasis in adults, of which 57% as a first line systemic treatment. Nineteen percent reported performing a test dose at the initiation of treatment. Methotrexate was prescribed orally in 54.7% of cases, subcutaneously in 44.8% of cases and intramuscularly in 0.4% of cases. The initial weekly dose of methotrexate was <15 mg for 30% of the dermatologists and ≥15 mg for 70% of them. Two hundred and three dermatologists had already change the route of administration for methotrexate from the oral to injectable form due to poor tolerance (48.3%), lack of efficacy (35%) or lack of compliance (16.7%). Two hundred thirty-four dermatologists (98.7%) reported prescribing folic acid with methotrexate, and 79.3% reported prescribing tests evaluating the risk of hepatic fibrosis. Forty-three percent of dermatologists have not initiated or have reduced their prescriptions since the beginning of the pandemic of COVID-19. Prescribing patterns were different according to the type of practice (private practice versus hospital/mixed practice). CONCLUSION: Methotrexate is used by the majority of dermatologists interviewed for moderate to severe psoriasis in adults, with heterogeneity of practices.

Use of Systemic Medications for Treating Adult Atopic Dermatitis in France: Results of a Practice Survey.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have illustrated that systemic medications are underused for treating adult atopic dermatitis (AD) and that dermatologists have concerns regarding the safety profile of cyclosporine in AD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a national online practice survey between March and April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 305 dermatologists responded, 57% with hospital-based activity and 43% with private practice. Overall, 46.9% prescribed cyclosporine for adult AD. Before initiating treatment, 56.9% did not perform evaluation scoring. Reasons for not prescribing cyclosporine were no eligible patients (24.7%), lack of information (52.6%), need for hospital prescription (31.2%), and lack of experience (79.2%). Fifty-four percent of the dermatologists prescribed methotrexate for adult AD. Before initiating treatment, 50.5% did not perform evaluation scoring. Reasons for not prescribing methotrexate were no eligible patients (46.7%), lack of information (39.3%), lack of experience (25.2%), and not approved for AD (47.4%). A total of 2.1% dermatologists prescribed other systemic treatments for adult AD, 9.8% prescribed corticosteroids and 56.4% prescribed dupilumab. CONCLUSION: Systemic treatments for AD are used by half of dermatologists, although cyclosporine and dupilumab must be initiated in hospitals in France. Methotrexate is more frequently used than cyclosporine, although it is not approved for this indication in France. A vast majority of dermatologists do not perform any evaluation scoring before initiating systemic treatment for adult AD.

Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-interleukin-17 Therapies in Elderly Patients with Psoriasis.

Anti-interleukin-17 agents have recently been developed for the treatment of psoriasis. This study evaluated the tolerance and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-17 agents for psoriasis in elderly patients in daily practice. A multicentre, retrospective study was performed, involving psoriatic patients aged ≥65 years who had received an anti-interleukin-17 agent, including secukinumab, ixekizumab or brodalumab. A total of 114 patients were included: 72 received secukinumab, 35 ixekizumab, and 7 brodalumab. Treatment was stopped in 32 patients (28.9%), because of relapses in 14 patients (41.2%), primary failures in 11 patients (32.4%), or adverse events in 7 patients (20.6%). The 3 most frequently reported adverse events were injection site reactions (n = 4), oral candidiasis (n = 3), and influenza-like illness (n = 3). Regarding effectiveness, 80 patients (70%) reached a Physician Global Assessment score of 0/1, 6 months after treatment initiation. In conclusion, anti-interleukin-17 therapy appears to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for psoriasis treatment in patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chronic Inflammatory Dermatoses: Mixed Messages Regarding the Dermatologist's Point of View and the Patient's Concerns.

is missing (Short communication).

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Apremilast in Older Patients with Psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Apremilast is a drug recently developed for psoriasis. Few data are available on its use in the elderly. We evaluated the tolerance and effectiveness of apremilast used in daily practice for psoriasis treatment in older patients. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study involving patients aged ≥ 65 years who had received apremilast as a psoriasis treatment. Demographic data and details regarding psoriasis and adverse events (AEs) were collected from patient medical records. RESULTS: 135 patients were included (mean age: 73.5 years). Treatment was stopped in 74 patients (54.8%) for AEs (n = 43, 56.6%), primary failures (n = 18, 23.4%), and relapses (n = 7, 9.2%). When patients were stratified by age at treatment initiation, the main cause of discontinuation in patients ≥ 75 years was AEs, whereas in patients aged 65-74 years it was primary failures (28.3%). Sixty-one patients reported AEs, mainly digestive (n = 49). Regarding effectiveness, 45.2% of patients reached PGA 0/1 between 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation. One-year apremilast continuation rates were better in the 65-74 and 75-84 years subgroups than in the > 85 years subgroup (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Apremilast seems to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for psoriasis in the elderly. The main AEs reported by patients did not seem to differ from those reported previously in younger populations. However, AEs were more frequent in patients > 75 years old leading to more frequent discontinuation of apremilast compared with younger patients, suggesting a higher level of vigilance is needed in the elderly.

Socioeconomic Inequalities and Severity of Plaque Psoriasis at a First Consultation in Dermatology Centers.

Psoriasis has major physical, psychological, and social impacts: its management should not be restricted by individual financial considerations in Western countries as these have well-structured health systems and social/insurance coverage. We investigated if the socioeconomic characteristics of patients were associated with severity of psoriasis and access to healthcare. In a cross-sectional study, we included 903 patients with psoriasis that were consulting for the first time. We showed that low educational level was associated with severity of disease in multivariate analyses. Moreover, patients of lower class and lower educational level, with severe psoriasis, had seen fewer physicians and had less frequently received a systemic treatment. Thus, physicians need to be vigilante of patients with a low socioeconomic status. Both low socioeconomic status and less access to dermatologists are associated with clinical severity of psoriasis at a first consultation.

Development of monoclonal gammopathy under biotherapy in psoriasis: a French multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Biotherapies or targeted therapies are fairly new treatments indicated for moderate to severe psoriasis. The side effects appear to be mainly infectious or cancerous. The role of biotherapies in the development of a pre-cancerous condition, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), has recently been debated in the literature. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of MGUS in psoriasis patients treated with biotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a French multicenter retrospective study carried out through the French multicenter study group RESOPSO. Data on the results of serum protein electrophoreses performed before and within at least six months after the start of the biotherapy were collected. Demographic data, medical history, and psoriasis treatment history were specified. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty three patients were eligible for inclusion. Of these, three presented with monoclonal gammopathy for which the assessment was in favor of MGUS. The average treatment period was 19.7 months. Six patients presented with MGUS prior to the treatment. These patients' immunoglobulin levels remained stable, with an average remission of 24 months. Only psoriatic rheumatism appeared to be statistically linked to MGUS. CONCLUSION: The incidence and frequency of MGUS in psoriasis patients treated with biotherapy do not appear to increase relative to the general population.