Plasma Amyloid and in vivo Brain Amyloid in Late Middle-Aged Hispanics.

BACKGROUND: Determining amyloid positivity is possible with cerebrospinal fluid and brain imaging of amyloid, but these methods are invasive and expensive. OBJECTIVE: To relate plasma amyloid-ß (Aß), measured using Single-molecule array (Simoatrademark) assays, to in vivo brain Aß, measured using positron emission tomography (PET), examine the accuracy of plasma Aß to predict brain Aß positivity, and the relation of APOE ɛ4 with plasma Aß. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a cohort of 345 late middle-aged Hispanic men and women (age 64 years, 72% women). Our primary plasma variable was Aß42/Aß40 ratio measured with Simoa. Brain Aß burden was measured as global SUVR with 18F-Florbetaben PET examined continuously and categorically. RESULTS: Plasma Aß42/Aß40 ratio was inversely associated with global Aß SUVR (ß= -0.13, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.23, -0.03; p = 0.013) and Aß positivity (Odds Ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38, 0.91; p = 0.016), independent of demographics and APOE ɛ4. ROC curves (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.82; p < 0.0001) showed that the optimal threshold for plasma Aß42/Aß40 ratio in relation to brain Aß positivity was 0.060 with a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 62.8%. APOE ɛ4 carriers had lower Aß42/Aß40 ratio and a higher Aß positivity determined with the Aß42/Aß40 ratio threshold of 0.060. CONCLUSION: Plasma Aß42/Aß40 ratio assayed using Simoa is weakly correlated with in vivo brain amyloid and has limited accuracy in screening for amyloid positivity and for studying risk factors of brain amyloid burden when in vivo imaging is not feasible.