Total neoadjuvant therapy with mFOLFIRINOX versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results of the UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23 trial.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in an excellent local disease control but the metastasis rates remain high. PRODIGE 23 demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) with total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard of care in this population. Long-term analysis of overall survival (OS) is reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study design, participants, and primary endpoint DFS have been reported for this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial investigating the neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX (6 cycles) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (6 cycles), versus chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (12 cycles) in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma under peritoneal reflection on magnetic resonance imaging, and staged cT3/T4. Key secondary endpoints included OS, MFS, and local and metastatic recurrence rate. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 82.2 months, the 7-year DFS was 67.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.7% to 73.9%] and 62.5% (95% CI 55.6% to 68.6%) [restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference 5.73 months, 95% CI 0.05-11.41 months, P = 0.048] in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the standard-of-care groups, respectively. The 7-year MFS was 79.2% (95% CI 73.0% to 84.4%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 72.3% (95% CI 65.8% to 77.8%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 6.1 months, 95% CI 0.93-11.37 months, P = 0.021). The 7-year OS was 81.9% (95% CI 75.8% to 86.6%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 76.1% (95% CI 69.7% to 81.2%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 4.37 months, 95% CI 0.35-8.38 months, P = 0.033). The safety profile remained unchanged since the previous analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy improved OS, confirmed long-term DFS and MFS benefits in LARC patients, and should be considered as one of the best options of care for these patients.

Osteoporosis treatment and 10 years' oestrogen receptor+ breast cancer outcome in postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for breast cancer relapse are well-known, such as large tumour size or lymph node involvement. The aim of our study was to analyse the influence of bone mineral density, fractures and bisphosphonate or vitamin D prescription on 10 years' breast cancer outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a longitudinal and prospective cohort of 450 postmenopausal women with local oestrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer. For every patient, we analysed tumour characteristics, bone status at the beginning of aromatase inhibitor treatment and 10 years' cancer outcome with Cox model. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 10.3 ± 3.0 years. Seventy nine women died, and 75 had a relapse; 30.7% had a history of fracture, 16.9% had a T-score ≤ -2.5 and 11.3% had vitamin D deficiency. Bisphosphonates were prescribed to 35.3% women for osteoporosis for a mean duration of 5 ± 1.7 years. Tumour size (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, P ≤ 0.01) and the number of lymph nodes involved (HR = 1.07, P = 0.03) were significantly associated with relapse. Bisphosphonate treatment was significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse (HR = 0.51, P = 0.03). Age at cancer diagnosis (HR = 1.07, P ≤ 0.01) and vitamin D deficiency (HR = 1.85, P = 0.04) were significantly associated with an increased risk of death, whereas bisphosphonate treatment was associated with a decreased risk of death (HR = 0.46, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis treatment, including vitamin D and bisphosphonates, is associated with a 50% reduction of relapse and death in women treated with aromatase inhibitors for ER+ breast cancer.

[Use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract]. / Quelle place pour la radiothérapie et la chimiothérapie dans le traitement adjuvant des carcinomes urothéliaux des voies excrétrices urinaires supérieures ?

Urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract are rare entities. Surgery remains the mainstay of the management. The use of others therapeutic modalities is not clearly defined yet. However, the frequency of local recurrence and locoregional encourage us to evaluate the indication of adjuvant therapies. We conducted a synthesis of key data in the literature on the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. A literature search on PubMed was performed using the following keywords (MeSH) "urothelial carcinoma", "upper urinary tract", "radiation", "chemotherapy", and adjuvant.

Fracture incidence after 3 years of aromatase inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the fracture incidence and bone mineral density (BMD) evolution in a large cohort of post-menopausal women with breast cancer after 3 years of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal study in real-life setting. Each woman had an extensive medical assessment, a biological evaluation, a BMD measurement, and systematic spinal X-rays at baseline and after 3 years of AI therapy. Women with osteoporosis at baseline (T-score < -2.5 and/or non-traumatic fracture history) were treated by oral weekly bisphosphonates. RESULTS: Among 497 women (mean age 63.8 ± 9.6 years) included in this study, 389 had a bone evaluation both at baseline and after 3 years of AI therapy: 267 women (mean age 61.2 ± 8.6) with no osteoporosis at baseline and 122 women (mean age 67.2 ± 9.1) with osteoporosis at baseline justifying a weekly oral bisphosphonate treatment. Women without bisphosphonates had a significant decrease in spine BMD (-3.5%, P < 0.01), neck BMD (-2.0%, P < 0.01), and total hip BMD (-2.1%, P < 0.01) over the 3 years but only 15 of them (5.6%) presented an incident vertebral or non-vertebral fracture. In osteoporotic women treated with bisphosphonates, spine and hip BMD were maintained at 3 years but 12 of them (9.8%) had an incident fracture. These fractured women were significantly older (74.1 ± 9.8 versus 66.5 ± 8.8) but also presented BMD loss during treatment suggesting poor adherence to bisphosphonate treatment. CONCLUSION: This real-life study confirmed that AIs induced moderate bone loss and low fracture incidence in post-menopausal women without initial osteoporosis. In women with baseline osteoporosis and AI therapy, oral bisphosphonates maintain BMD but were associated with a persistent fracture risk, particularly in older women.

[Adjuvant treatment of keloid scars: electrons or brachytherapy?]. / Traitement postopératoire des cicatrices chéloïdes : électrons ou irradiation interstitielle ?

PURPOSE: Evaluation of perioperative treatment of keloid scars with electron beam therapy or iridium 192 low dose rate brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 2010, 95 patients with 142 keloid scars have been treated by immediate perioperative irradiation and retrospectively reviewed in our institute: 116 scars were treated by electrontherapy and 26 by brachytherapy. RESULTS: In the electrontherapy group treated locations were: earlobe (n=88, 76%), thorax (n=14, 12%), neck (n=9, 8%), limbs (n=5, 4%). The median size of lesions was 3cm (range [R]: 0.5-18cm). In 95.6% of cases, a dose of 15Gy was delivered in five fractions of 3Gy. The median follow-up was 70 months (R: 7-161 months). The 2-year and 5-year local control were respectively 69% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 59-76%) and 55% (95% CI: 45-64%). In the brachytherapy group treated locations were: neck (n=3, 11%), earlobe (n=8, 32%), abdomen (n=3, 11%), thorax (n=2, 8%), limbs (n=10, 38%). The median size of lesions was 6.6cm (R: 1.7-28cm). The median dose delivered at 5mm from the source was 20Gy (R: 15-20.69). The median follow-up was 113 months (R: 21-219 months). The 2-year and 5-year local control were respectively 84.6% (95% CI: 64-94%) and 73.5% (95% CI: 49-87%). So far, no radiation-induced cancer has occurred. A trend to a better local control with brachytherapy was noted (compared to electrontherapy, 2-year relapse is halved with brachytherapy) though this difference did not reach the significance (P=0.0991), probably due to the reduced number of patients in the brachytherapy group. CONCLUSION: Brachytherapy seems to provide better local control compared to electrontherapy, and should be proposed as first line treatment. However, electrontherapy is an interesting alternative in case of difficulty to realize brachytherapy. There is probably a dose effect: according to published data, 25 to 30Gy should at least be proposed.

[Esophageal cancer: outcome according to therapeutic strategy]. / Évolution des cancers de l'œsophage : impact de la stratégie thérapeutique.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of esophageal cancer according to therapeutic strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and twenty patients with esophageal cancer treated by an association of radiotherapy and chemotherapy and possibly surgery, between 2004 and 2010, were retrospectively studied. The first site of relapse was classified as follows: local (tumour), locoregional (tumour and/or nodal: celiac, mediastinal, sus-clavicular) or metastatic. RESULTS: With a 15.7-months (1.4-62) median follow-up, there were 89 deaths and 79 recurrences. Three types of treatments were performed: 50Gy exclusive chemoradiotherapy (47 patients) or 50 to 65Gy exclusive chemoradiotherapy (44 patients) or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (27 patients). The local first relapse was as much frequent as distant relapse (50 patients). With a-5cm margin up and down to the tumour, there was only one nodal relapse. Two-year survival was 39.5% (95% confidence interval [IC]: 30.5-40.8) and relapse-free survival was 26.5% (CI: 18.6-35). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment type and disease stage had a significant impact on survival, relapse-free survival and locoregional control. Compared to exclusive chemoradiotherapy, surgery improved locoregional control (40.2 versus 8.7 months, P=0.0004) but in a younger population. Despite postoperative mortality, the gain was maintained for distance relapse-free survival (40.2 versus 10 months, P=0.0147) and overall survival (29.3 versus 14.2 months, P=0.0088). Compared to 50Gy chemoradiotherapy, local control was improved if high dose chemoradiotherapy was performed (13.8 versus 7.5 months, P=0.05) but not overall survival (14.0 versus 15.4 months, P=0.24). CONCLUSION: More than one-third relapse is local. Locoregional control is better with high dose chemoradiotherapy. In this study, surgery performed in selected patients only, improved locoregional control, relapse-free disease and overall survival.