[German resuscitation registry : science and resuscitation research]. / Deutsches Reanimationsregister : Wissenschaft und Reanimationsforschung.

Sudden death due to cardiac arrest represents one of the greatest challenges facing modern medicine, not only because of the massive number of cases involved but also because of its tremendous social and economic impact. For many years, the magic figure of 1 per 1000 inhabitants per year was generally accepted as an estimate of the annual incidence of sudden death in the industrialized world, with a survival rate of 6 %. This estimate was based on large numbers of published reports of local, regional, national and multinational experience in the management of cardiac arrest. Measuring the global incidence of cardiac arrest is challenging as many different definitions of patient populations are used. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) provide insights into the value of specific treatments or treatment strategies in a well-defined section of a population. Registries do not compete with clinical studies, but represent a useful supplement to them. Surveys and registries provide insights into the ways in which scientific findings and guidelines are being implemented in clinical practice. However, as with clinical studies, comprehensive preparations are needed in order to establish a registry. This is all the more decisive because not all of the questions that may arise are known at the time when the registry is established. The German resuscitation registry started in May 2007 and currently more than 230 paramedic services and hospitals take part. More than 45,000 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest are included. With this background the German resuscitation registry is one of the largest databases in emergency medicine in Germany. After 5 years of running the preclinical care dataset was revised in 2012. Data variables that reflect current or new treatment were added to the registry. The postresuscitation basic care and telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) datasets were developed in 2012 and 2013 as well. The German resuscitation registry is an instrument of quality management and a research network. The registry documents the course in patients who have undergone resuscitation at the time points of first aid, further management and long-term outcome and it can therefore provide a complete presentation of the procedures carried out and the quality of the outcomes. In addition, important scientific questions can be answered from the database. For example, a score for benchmarking the outcome quality after out-of-hospital resuscitation, known as the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest (RACA) score, has been developed. The registry is available for all emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals in Germany and other German-speaking countries.

[Mechanical resuscitation assist devices]. / Mechanische Reanimationshilfen.

In Germany 100,000-160,000 people suffer from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) annually. The incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after OHCA varies between emergency ambulance services but is in the range of 30-90 CPR attempts per 100,000 inhabitants per year. Basic life support (BLS) involving chest compressions and ventilation is the key measure of resuscitation. Rapid initiation and quality of BLS are the most critical factors for CPR success. Even healthcare professionals are not always able to ensure the quality of CPR measures. Consequently in recent years mechanical resuscitation devices have been developed to optimize chest compression and the resulting circulation. In this article the mechanical resuscitation devices currently available in Germany are discussed and evaluated scientifically in context with available literature. The ANIMAX CPR device should not be used outside controlled trials as no clinical results have so far been published. The same applies to the new device Corpuls CPR which will be available on the market in early 2014. Based on the current published data a general recommendation for the routine use of LUCAS™ and AutoPulse® CPR cannot be given. The preliminary data of the CIRC trial and the published data of the LINC trial revealed that mechanical CPR is apparently equivalent to good manual CPR. For the final assessment further publications of large randomized studies must be analyzed (e.g. the CIRC and PaRAMeDIC trials). However, case control studies, case series and small studies have already shown that in special situations and in some cases patients will benefit from the automatic mechanical resuscitation devices (LUCAS™, AutoPulse®). This applies especially to emergency services where standard CPR quality is far below average and for patients who require prolonged CPR under difficult circumstances. This might be true in cases of resuscitation due to hypothermia, intoxication and pulmonary embolism as well as for patients requiring transport or coronary intervention when cardiac arrest persists. Three prospective randomized studies and the resulting meta-analysis are available for active compression-decompression resuscitation (ACD-CPR) in combination with an impedance threshold device (ITD). These studies compared ACD-ITD-CPR to standard CPR and clearly demonstrated that ACD-ITD-CPR is superior to standard CPR concerning short and long-term survival with good neurological recovery after OHCA.

Realistic assessment of the physician-staffed emergency services in Germany.

In Germany the emergency medical services, which include dispatching emergency physicians to the scene, are considered to be among the best in the world. However, the hospitals admitting these patients still report shortcomings in prehospital care. The quality of an emergency medical service depends on both formal qualification and experience in managing such emergencies. Therefore, we determined how frequently emergency medical service physicians in Germany actually encountered complex and demanding emergency situations outside the hospital and how often they had to carry out emergency interventions. We therefore evaluated data from more than 82,000 ground emergency medical service scene calls registered in the MIND ("minimaler Notarztdatensatz") data base of the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany and more than 47,000 helicopter emergency medical service scene calls from the "Luftrettungs-, Informations- und Kommunikationssystem" (LIKS) data base of the German ADAC air rescue service. The results, which were unexpectedly distinct, impressively demonstrate that in part emergency medical service staff only encountered some emergencies very rarely. In particular, patients with life-threatening conditions such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, head trauma, as well as multiple trauma were only treated once every 0.4-14.5 months and cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation were only carried out once every 0.5-1.5 months. Furthermore, a time period of 6 months to more than 6 years may pass before a chest tube has to be placed. There are, of course, considerable differences between ground and helicopter emergency medical services. Particularly in areas where the frequency of such emergency cases is low, the clinical experience required to competently manage a demanding emergency situation cannot be gained or maintained just by working in the emergency medical system. As a result of the general pressure to cut costs and also of changes in hospital politics, however, only highly qualified and experienced emergency medical services may survive in Germany in the long term. In addition to formal qualifications and accompanying practice-related courses, future emergency medical service personnel should be drafted from clinical department staff that are experienced in treating severely ill and severely injured patients.

[Mobile blood gas and laboratory monitoring. A new technology in clinical routine]. / Mobiles Blutgas- und Labormonitoring. Eine neue Technologie in der klinischen Routine.

INTRODUCTION: Decision-making on therapy in acute cases involves clinical examination and monitoring of vital parameters and fluid balance; especially, however, laboratory parameters. The present study compared the results of a new bedside laboratory analysis system (PortLab, i-STAT Corp., Princeton NJ) with the analytical results obtained in our central laboratory. In a second phase personnel costs and turnover times of the two methods were evaluated comparatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PortLab system consists of a basic unit (539 g) with an integrated display and disposable silicon cartridges with thin-film electrodes. Up to 8 parameters can be determined simultaneously in 60 microliters of whole blood. Fifty results obtained with the PortLab system of the parameters sodium, potassium, chlorid, glucose, BUN, hematocrit, the calculated haemoglobin and blood gas analysis were correlated with the results obtained by central laboratory analysis. In a second phase, all procedural steps, the time needed and the turnover times for laboratory analysis were compared with the expenditure for the same analyses performed with the PortLab system. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results obtained using PortLab analysis correlated very well with those of the central laboratory (between 0.966 for the hematocrit and 0.994 for pO2). Three steps were required to perform bedside analysis with the PortLap system. The staff was occupied for 1 min. and 15 sec. and the results were ready within 4 min. and 45 sec. (pure analysis time < 2 min.). Analysis in the central laboratory required 8 steps, the intensive care staff was occupied for 6 min. and 15 sec., 5 min. and 15 sec. of which they were away from the patients' side. Analysis of blood gases required 4 steps, the result was ready in 4 min. 15 sec. The personnel was occupied for an equally long time. The use of PortLab saved personnel resources of 5 minutes per laboratory analysis and 3 minutes per blood gas analysis. CONCLUSION: The PortLab system proved easy to handle and reliable. Valuable personnel resources can be saved. This method cannot replace conventional laboratory analyses, but enables more extensive monitoring of patients and their laboratory parameters. The industry should develop analogous monitoring systems for modular solutions.

[Quality management in autologous blood donation]. / Qualitätsmanagement in der Eigenblutspende.

In many anaesthesia departments, the autologous transfusions concept is an integral part of the perioperative measures catalogue. All patients benefit from this procedure, especially those who face an operation during which much blood will be lost. If a patient donates his/her own blood for their operation, there should not be any increase in risk to this patient. By employing contemporary quality management practices, including computer technology, the quality of the execution and management of the components as well as the quality of the patient care can be evaluated according to the quality of the structure, process and results. By this assessment the efficiency of the procedure can be confirmed and the advantages of using this technique, when utilised by an anaesthesiologist experienced in transfusion, can be underlined. An overview of the pre-existing and expected perioperative risk is of special advantage to the anaesthesiologist to make a realistic and effective decision regarding the possibility of safely processing the autologous blood donation concept.

[Preclinical resuscitation--which factors influence the long-term course? A 5-year follow-up]. / Präklinische Reanimation--welche Faktoren beeinflussen den Langzeitverlauf? Eine 5-Jahres-Nachbeobachtung.

OBJECTIVE: The factors that influence long-term survival after out-of-hospital resuscitations were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1989, out of a total of 8403 responded emergency calls, 505 resuscitations were undertaken out of hospital by the emergency medical service in Göppingen. All emergency calls were recorded uniformly. Of the 505 resuscitations, 154 were primarily successful (30.5%), and 58 were secondarily successful, i.e. the patients were ultimately discharged from hospital. In 56 of them the further course could be followed at least 5 years after the resuscitation (45 males, 11 females; mean age 57 [10-83] years). The patients' charts were analysed; in 51 cases data could be obtained from the family doctor, from ambulant care or from home visits. RESULTS: 34 patients (60.4%) were still alive 5 years after the resuscitation. The highest death rate (16%) was in the first post-resuscitation year. Prognostically unfavourable factors were: advanced age (P < 0.01), underlying cardiac disease (n = 49; P < 0.025), especially coronary heart disease (n = 34; P < 0.01). Patients with primary ventricular fibrillation and previous myocardial infarction (n = 10) had a poorer prognosis than those with acute infarction (n = 24; P < 0.05). Reduced survival chances occurred in those with impaired left ventricular function, as measured echocardiographically (P < 0.05), or with cardiac arrhythmias, Lown classes III and IV (P < 0.05), as well as in those with severe neurological sequelae (n = 8; P < 0.08). CONCLUSION: Long-term prognosis depends, in the first instance, on the resuscitated patient's basic condition and not so much on the circumstances of the resuscitation.