Ovarian Stimulation with FSH Alone versus FSH plus a GnRH Antagonist for Elective Freezing in an Oocyte Donor/Recipient Programme: A Protocol for a Pilot Multicenter Observational Study.

Preliminary data have shown that it is possible to attempt in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in fresh cycles without the use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or any other medication to prevent the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during ovarian stimulation. To date, there is no information on this topic in the context of a prospective controlled trial. However, as prevention of the LH surge is an established procedure in fresh cycles, the question is whether such a study can be performed in frozen cycles. We aim to perform a pilot study in order to compare the efficacy of a protocol using FSH alone with that of a protocol using follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) plus a GnRH antagonist for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in cycles of elective freezing in the context of a donor/recipient program. This is a seven-center, two-arm prospective pilot cohort study conducted at the respective Assisted Reproductive Units in Greece. The hypothesis to be tested is that an ovarian stimulation protocol that includes FSH alone without any LH surge prevention regimens is not inferior to a protocol including FSH plus a GnRH antagonist in terms of the clinical outcome in a donor/recipient model. The results of the present study are expected to show whether the addition of the GnRH antagonist is necessary in terms of the frequency of LH secretory peaks and progesterone elevations >1 ng/mL during the administration of the GnRH antagonist according to the adopted frequency of blood sampling in all Units.

EBCOG position statement inequalities in antenatal care provision in Europe: In the wake of an EBCOG survey.

Health inequalities adversely affect the health outcomes generally but more so for those who are socially deprived, immigrants of unknown status and low socioeconomic status. The inequitable access to care during pregnancy can lead to long term adverse inter-generational effects. Current economic crisis within Europe will have deepening effect on the health of the vulnerable families. The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology calls for action by the European Union.

Provision of antenatal care in Europe-A scientific study commissioned by European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).

Differences in the way health care delivery across countries may have important impacts on health outcomes and can result in inequalities. A questionnaire survey of members of national societies through EBCOG and EAPM was carried out in 2021. A total of 53 responses were received from 26 countries. Most countries reported that routine antenatal care is primarily delivered by medical staff, involving obstetric specialists or family doctors mostly in government-run facilities. Women from minority groups are able to access antenatal care easily in most countries. Less than 10% of women did not attend antenatal care throughout the pregnancy. Most booking for antenatal care takes place in the first trimester and the number of visits range from 6 to 10 depending on parity. Most countries provide routine ultrasound with 2-3 reported scans performed by specifically trained health care professionals. Facilities for prenatal screening/diagnosis of malformations in both low- and high-risk cases varied across Europe. While antenatal care is relatively standardized throughout Europe, important differences still exist in care delivery and accessibility to care. Antenatal preventive strategies appear to be variably available throughout Europe.

EBCOG position statement: Inequality in fertility treatment in people of colour.

Despite advances in promoting sexual and reproductive rights by the United Nations, WHO and UNFPA, inequities in the provision of health care for women exist and are influenced by the socioeconomic status and the ethnicity and the migrant status. Of late, Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA) of the United Kingdom has identified that inequities exists in quality, accessibility and outcomes of fertility services for people of colour in the UK. EBCOG calls upon the EU Commission to set up a monitoring system akin to HFEA to ensure that all citizens of Europe not only enjoy equitable access to fertility treatments but also the outcomes of interventions meet the highest standards of care.

Effect of adiponectin on estradiol and progesterone secretion from human luteinized granulosa cells in vitro.

Ιnformation on the role of adiponectin in human ovarian steroidogenesis is limited. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of adiponectin on the secretion of estradiol and progesterone by human luteinized granulosa cells in culture. Granulosa cells, obtained from women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, were pre-incubated for 24 h and then cultured for 48 h. Adiponectin was used in 3 doses, i.e., 5, 10, and 100 µg/ml alone and in combinations with FSH (10 and 100 ng/ml). Estradiol and progesterone were measured by radioimmunoassays in culture supernatants at 24 h and 48 h. Adiponectin after 48 h of culture stimulated the secretion of estradiol and, to a lesser extent, progesterone in a dose-dependent manner. FSH showed a variable effect on steroidogenesis. However, when the low dose FSH was combined with adiponectin, estradiol, and progesterone secretion were increased disproportionally to the dose of adiponectin. With the high dose FSH, the positive effect of adiponectin on FSH-induced estradiol secretion was less pronounced, while the effect on progesterone secretion was negligible. This study shows for the first time a stimulatory effect of adiponectin on the secretion of estradiol and progesterone by human luteinized granulosa cells in vitro. It is suggested that adiponectin plays a paracrine role in human ovarian steroidogenesis by sensitizing the granulosa cells to FSH.

SARS-CoV-2 vs. human gametes, embryos and cryopreservation.

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is an unprecedented global situation, and all countries have adopted their own measurements to mitigate the spread of the virus in the first as well as in the subsequent waves of infection. All measures, especially in the first wave of the pandemic, were in combination with recommendations provided by professional and scientific organizations. Similar measures were applied to specific procedures, such as the management of infertility, including in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatments. Although there is no clear scientific evidence yet that the SARS-CoV-2 may exert negative effects on IVF outcome, especially at the early stages, several clinical reports indicate that the virus may impact male fertility through specific receptors presented at the somatic cells of the testis and used by the virus in order to gain entry to the respective cells. Nevertheless, it is not unreasonable to suspect that the virus may affect sperm function as well as oocyte performance directly through specific receptors or indirectly through other signaling pathways. Despite the good practice of IVF laboratory techniques, culture media may also be contaminated during equilibration when airborne virus's particles can contaminate culture media from an already infected embryology area or staff. Furthermore, although there is no clinical evidence, liquid nitrogen could be a route of infection for gametes and embryos when it has been contaminated during production or transportation. Therefore, cryopreservation of gametes and embryos must be virus-free. This communication aims to provide some aspects of the possible impact of the virus on gametes and embryos and how it may affect the cryopreservation procedures.Abbreviations: ACE2: angiotensin- converting enzyme 2; ART: assisted reproductive technology; ASRM: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; ESHRE: European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology; ET: embryo transfer; FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; IFFS: International Federation of Fertility Societies; IVF: in vitro fertilization; LH: luteinizing hormone; LN: liquid nitrogen; SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; T: testosterone; WHO: World Health Organization.

Exogenous progesterone for LH surge prevention is redundant in ovarian stimulation protocols.

During ovarian stimulation for IVF-embryo transfer treatment, a premature LH surge may lead to progesterone elevation that disrupts endometrial maturation and affects the probability of pregnancy following fresh embryo transfer. Preventing this LH surge and progesterone elevation using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues is considered a standard practice. The same policy applies to cycles in which the 'freeze-all' protocol has been selected from the outset (e.g. donors), but the need for this has not been discussed. Moreover, in 'freeze-all' cycles, exogenous progesterone administration tends to replace GnRH antagonists, without reducing efficacy after embryo transfer in frozen-thawed cycles. Nevertheless, as exogenous progesterone is expected to have the same impact on the endometrium as endogenous progesterone, it is clear that, unlike in fresh cycles, in 'freeze-all' cycles an endogenous LH surge prevention does not seem necessary. Therefore, both GnRH antagonists and exogenous progesterone appear to be redundant in 'freeze-all' cycles, and in this context the indications for the use of GnRH analogues in ovarian stimulation protocols need to be revisited.

EBCOG position statement on "Ethical analysis of cross-border reproductive care".

Cross border movement of couples to seek assisted conception treatments which are not available in their own countries are creating lots of ethical issues. Eu countires should work together to deliver couple centered care within a legal framework.

COVID-19 and fertility: a virtual reality.

The COVID-19 pandemic is an extraordinary global situation, and all countries have adopted their own strategies to diminish and eliminate the spread of the virus. All measures are in line with the recommendations provided by the World Health Organization. Scientific societies, such as the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine, have provided recommendations and guidance to overcome and flatten the growing curve of infection in patients who undergo IVF treatments. Although there is as yet no evidence that the virus causing COVID-19 might have negative effects on IVF outcomes, fertility treatments have been postponed in order to support healthcare systems by avoiding placing them under additional stress. The possibility of the virus affecting sperm function and egg performance cannot be excluded. In addition, an indirect effect of the virus on gametes and embryos during their manipulation cannot be ruled out. This commentary aims to provide some ideas on the possible effect of the virus on gametes and embryos, as well as how it could affect the normal functioning of the embryology laboratory.

EBCOG position statement: ethics of stem cell research.

Over the past 10 years' significant research developments have taken place on human pluripotent stem cells and human embryonic stem cells to exploit the future potential in gene therapy and other focused treatments. There remains concerns around ethics of research and the fate of the human embryo used in such studies. European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology urge upon all scientists and the research bodies to adhere to the highest ethical principles of confidentiality and their actions should meet the criteria as set out by the international society for stem cell research.

Blood flow velocity comparison in the eye capillaries and postcapillary venules between normal pregnant and non-pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how much and at what diameters the blood flow velocity changes in the female microcirculation during normal pregnancy. METHODS: A non-contact, digital slit-lamp biomicroscopy system was used to measure axial blood velocity (Vax) and diameter (D) in the conjunctival microcirculation of 28 normal non-pregnant women (Control Group), 17 women in the first semester of their normal pregnancy (Group 1) and 16 women in the third trimester of their normal pregnancy (Group 2). Blood volume flow (Q) was estimated from Vax and D. Microvessels were classified as "capillaries" (CAP) with D < 9 µm, "postcapillary venules of size 1" (PC1) with 9 ≤ D < 14 µm and "postcapillary venules of size 2" (PC2) with 14 ≤ D ≤ 24 µm. RESULTS: The women groups did not differ significantly in age, diastolic and systolic pressure and diameter of each size. Taking as baseline the capillary Vax of 0.51 mm/s of the Control Group, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase to 0.74 mm/s (45%) in Group 1 and to 0.95 mm/s (86%) in Group 2. This significant Vax increase in capillaries (CAP) was a consistent finding irrespective of the exact vessel size cut-off value for discriminating CAP from PC1. There was no statistical difference in Vax among groups at postcapillary venules of size 2 (PC2). Statistical conclusions for blood volume flows were similar to velocities. CONCLUSIONS: Normal pregnancy increases significantly axial blood velocity (Vax) in capillaries (CAP) with diameter <9 µm.

The effect of a GnRH antagonist on follicle maturation in normal women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Ganirelix is a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist used for the prevention of premature LH surge during ovarian stimulation. What is the impact of ganirelix on follicle maturation in normal women? DESIGN: Ten normally cycling women were investigated during two menstrual cycles, i.e. cycle 1 (control) and cycle 2 (ganirelix). During both cycles, daily blood samples were taken from day 2, while transvaginal ultrasound scans were performed on cycle days 8 and 10 and daily thereafter. During cycle 2, all women were given 0.25 mg/day subcutaneous injections of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix from day 2 until the day of the endogenous LH surge onset in cycle 1. RESULTS: During treatment with ganirelix, serum FSH and oestradiol concentrations remained stable, while those of LH decreased significantly on days 3, 4, 7 and 9 (P < 0.05) compared with controls. Nevertheless, there was no significant within-cycle variation in LH concentrations. From day 10 onwards, no follicle maturation was observed in cycle 2, in contrast to cycle 1. Ovulation occurred in 9 of 10 women in cycle 1. In cycle 2, ovulation was delayed by at least 1 week in eight women. Follicle growth and ovulation occurred in only one woman while on ganirelix treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that in normal women dominant follicle selection failed during treatment with ganirelix. As there was a similar gonadotrophin profile in the two cycles, it is suggested that ganirelix interferes with the process of follicle selection by acting in the ovary.

Effect of resistin on estradiol and progesterone secretion from human luteinized granulosa cells in culture.

Information on the role of resistin on steroidogenesis is limited to animal studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various doses of resistin on estradiol and progesterone secretion from human luteinized granulosa cells in culture. Granulosa cells were obtained from follicular fluid aspirated from 50 women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. The cells were cultured for 48 h after a 24 h pre-incubation period. The effect of resistin at dosages 1, 10 and 100 ng/ml alone or in combinations with FSH (10 and 100 ng/ml) on steroidogenesis was investigated. Estradiol and progesterone were measured by radioimmunoassays in culture supernatants at 24 h and 48 h. FSH treatment increased both estradiol and progesterone secretion. Resistin suppressed basal estradiol (at 1 ng/ml) and progesterone secretion (at all concentrations tested). When resistin (all concentrations) was combined with FSH (100 ng/ml), it eliminated the stimulatory effect of FSH on the secretion of estradiol and progesterone. This study indicates an inhibitory effect of resistin on the secretion of estradiol and progesterone by human luteinized granulosa cells in vitro. It is likely that this adipokine locally affects ovarian function in women. Abbreviations: 3ß-HSD: 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; CAP1: cyclase-associated protein 1; DCN: decorin; FIZZ: Found in Inflammatory Zones; hCG: human chorionic gonadotropin; IGF1: insulin-like growth factor type 1; IVF: in vitro fertilization; PCOS: polycystic ovary syndrome; RIA: radioimmunoassay; ROR1: receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor-1; TLR4: Toll-like receptor 4.

The Effect of Metformin on the Endometrium of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of metformin on endometrial receptivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Twenty volunteer women with polycystic ovaries and oligomenorrhea were prospectively investigated. All women were treated with exogenous estradiol and progesterone to simulate a normal menstrual cycle (28-day duration) after GnRH-induced pituitary desensitization. Ten of the women received no other medication (group A, control), while the remaining 10 received metformin (group B, metformin). Endometrial biopsy was performed in all women on day 21 of the 2 simulated cycles. RESULTS: The expression of corticotropin - releasing hormone and urocortin in the endometrium was investigated. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. A 3-day delay in the secretory maturation of the glandular epithelium relatively to the stroma was observed in 7 out of 10 women of group B (70%) as compared to only 1 out of 10 women of group A (10%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It is shown for the first time that metformin administration to women with PCOS did not affect the expression of endometrial receptivity markers but delayed histological glandular maturation. It is suggested that metformin may have an impact on the function of the endometrium in PCOS.

Gonadotropin Surge-Attenuating Factor: A Nonsteroidal Ovarian Hormone Controlling GnRH-Induced LH Secretion in the Normal Menstrual Cycle.

Gonadotropin surge-attenuating factor (GnSAF) is a nonsteroidal ovarian substance, which attenuates the endogenous LH surge in superovulated women. Different molecular sequences have been found, but only one of them has shown substantial homology to a known substance of the human genome. A molecular mass of 12.5kDa showing identity to the carboxyl-terminal fragment of human serum albumin and expressing GnSAF bioactivity in vitro has been identified. It has been suggested that in the normal menstrual cycle the in vivo bioactivity of GnSAF increases under the influence of the intercycle rise of FSH. GnSAF is considered the "missing link" between the ovaries and the hypothalamo-pituitary system, maintaining the pituitary in a state of low responsiveness to GnRH in the early- to midfollicular phase of the cycle. A marked decline in GnSAF bioactivity in the late follicular phase facilitates the onset and the full expression of the midcycle LH surge.

Submaximal doses of ghrelin do not inhibit gonadotrophin levels but stimulate prolactin secretion in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: An inhibitory effect of ghrelin on gonadotrophin secretion has been reported in normally menstruating women possibly modulated by endogenous oestrogen. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of ghrelin on gonadotrophin and prolactin (PRL) secretion in oestrogen-deprived postmenopausal women. DESIGN: Prospective intervention study. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Ten healthy postmenopausal volunteer women were studied during two 15-days periods of oestrogen treatment (A and B) a month apart. Four experiments (Exp) were performed in total, two on day 1 (Exp 1A and Exp 1B) and two on day 15 (Exp 15A and Exp 15B) of the two periods. The women received in Exp 1A and in Exp 15A two iv injections of ghrelin (0.15 µg/kg at time 0 minute and 0.30 µg/kg at time 90 minutes) and in Exp1B and in Exp 15B normal saline (2 mL), respectively. Blood samples were taken at -15, 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes. RESULTS: After oestrogen treatment, late follicular phase serum oestradiol levels were attained on day 15 of periods A and B. Ghrelin administration did not affect serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), whereas it increased significantly those of growth hormone (GH) and PRL. In Exp 15A, serum PRL increment in response to ghrelin (area under the curve, net increment) was significantly greater than in Exp 1A (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that in oestrogen-deprived postmenopausal women, ghrelin administration affects neither FSH nor LH levels but stimulates PRL secretion, that is amplified by exogenous oestrogen administration.

Effects of ghrelin on activation of Akt1 and ERK1/2 pathways during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible molecular pathways through which ghrelin accelerates in vitro oocyte maturation. Bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), after 18 or 24 h maturation in the absence or the presence of 800 pg ml-1 of acylated ghrelin were either assessed for nuclear maturation or underwent in vitro fertilization in standard media and putative zygotes were cultured in vitro for 8 days. In a subset of COCs the levels of phosphorylated Akt1 and ERK1/2 (MAPK1/3) were assessed at the 0th, 6th, 10th, 18th and 24th hours of in vitro maturation (IVM). At 18 and 24 h no difference existed in the proportion of matured oocytes in the ghrelin-treated group, while in the control group more (P < 0.05) matured oocyte were found at 24 h. Oocyte maturation for 24 h in the presence of ghrelin resulted in substantially reduced (P < 0.05) blastocyst yield(16.3%) in comparison with that obtained after 18 h (30.0%) or to both control groups (29.3% and 26.9%, for 18 and 24 h in maturation, respectively). Ghrelin-treated oocytes expressed lower Akt1 phosphorylation rate at the 10th hour of IVM, and higher ERK1/2 at the 6th and 10th hours of IVM compared with controls. In cumulus cells, at the 18th and 24th hours of IVM Akt1 phosphorylation rate was higher in ghrelin-treated oocytes. Our results imply that ghrelin acts in a different time-dependent manner on bovine oocytes and cumulus cells modulating Akt1 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which brings about acceleration of the oocyte maturation process.

Embryological Results of Couples Undergoing ICSI-ET Treatments with Males Carrying the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism rs175080 of the MLH3 Gene.

Human MLH3 (hMLH3) gene has been suggested to play a role in the DNA mismatch repair mechanism, while it may also be associated with abnormal spermatogenesis and subsequently male infertility. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible relationships between the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs175080 in the MLH3 gene of males and the embryological results in couples undergoing intracytoplasmatic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) treatments. A total of 132 men volunteered for the study and gave written informed consent. All couples were subjected to ICSI-ET treatments in the years 2010 to 2012. The couples were divided into three groups according to the genotype of their husbands: the wild type GG (n = 28), the heterozygotic type GA (n = 72) and the mutant type AA (n = 32). Significantly lower sperm concentration and progressive motility were observed in the AA group as compared to the other two groups (Concentration: 14.57 ± 4.9 mil/mL in AA, 38.3 ± 5.4 mil/mL in GA and 41.03 ± 6.8 mil/mL in GG, p < 0.05, mean ± standard error of the mean-SEM). However, significantly better embryological results (mean score of embryo quality-MSEQ) were found in the AA (8.12 ± 0.5) and the GA group (7.36 ± 0.4) as compared to the GG group (5.82 ± 0.7), (p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the AA genotype group (43.8%) and the GA group (30.6%) than in the GG group (14.3%), (p < 0.05). Live birth rate was not different. It is suggested for the first time that the deteriorating effect of the mutant type on sperm characteristics does not impact on embryo development after fertilization in vitro.

The current situation of infertility services provision in Europe.

Infertility is a global medical problem of the reproductive system which may affect the quality of a woman's life. Whether infertility provision varies between different European countries has not been investigated in the context of a comparative study. There are, however, differences in legislation between different countries, which encourage "infertility tourism". Women cross borders in order to get access to those treatment modalities that are not provided in their own country. Oocyte donation for example and the high cost of the services locally are common reasons for this mobility. Although treatment of infertility is still aetiology based, unexplained cause is most often the underlying reason. The invention of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has changed the management of infertility globally. In most European countries, treatment is mainly provided by well-organised private IVF centres using highly effective methodologies. Different European scientific organisations, together with European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG), should provide recommendations to the European Union on the development of common legislation to streamline quality assured clinical care for infertile couples. This will hopefully help to eliminate possible inequalities, providing evidence based services according to patients' needs and also reduce the cross border healthcare demand in European countries.