Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JACC Adv ; 2(2): 100277, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938303

RESUMO

Background: Despite advances in the treatment of oncology patients, therapy-related side effects may lead to premature morbidity. Inflammatory activation that has been linked to cardiovascular disease is crucial for the pathogenesis of both Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the vascular effects of chemotherapy in patients with HL and NHL by positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG PET/CT) and to investigate interactions with systemic inflammation as assessed by circulating inflammatory markers. Methods: Between July 2015 and July 2019, 65 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 17.78 years) with confirmed diagnosis of either HL (n = 33) or NHL (n = 32) were prospectively studied. PET/CT imaging was performed at baseline, at an interim phase, and after first-line treatment. Aortic FDG uptake was assessed by measuring global aortic target-to-background ratio (GLA-TBR). Serum biomarkers interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-1b were measured at each phase. Results: Patients with HL demonstrated significant reduction in aortic TBR after first-line treatment (median GLA-TBR baseline: 1.98, median GLA-TBR third scan: 1.75, median difference = -0.20, 95% CI: -0.07 to -0.33, P = 0.006), which remained significant after adjustment for confounders (adj. R2 of model = 0.53). In contrast, patients with NHL did not demonstrate a significant aortic inflammation response (P = 0.306). Furthermore, patients with HL demonstrated a significant reduction in IL-6 (P = 0.048) and IL-1b (P = 0.045), whereas patients with NHL did not demonstrate significant reduction in IL-6 (P = 0.085) and IL-1b levels (P = 0.476). Conclusions: Aortic inflammation, as assessed by 18-FDG PET/CT, is reduced in HL patients after first-line treatment but not in NHL patients. These findings imply that different pathophysiological pathways and different therapies might affect the arterial bed in different ways for patients with lymphoma.

2.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 35(5): 955-964, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30706352

RESUMO

To develop and test a model predicting 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) standardized uptake value (SUV) changes over time in the aorta and the superior vena cava (SVC). Maximum aortic SUV and mean SVC SUV were determined at two time points (T1 and T2) in the ascending (ASC), descending (DSC), abdominal (ABD) aorta, aortic arch (ARC) and SVC of patients who have undergone [18F]FDG PET/CT for clinical purposes. For SUV prediction at T2, linear and non-linear models of SUV difference for a given time change were developed in a derivation group. The results were tested in an independent validation group, whilst model reproducibility was tested in patients of the validation group who have undergone a second clinically indicated scan. Applying the linear model in the derivation group, there were no statistically significant differences in measurements obtained in the examined segments: mean differences ranged from 0 ± 0.10 in SVC to 0.01 ± 0.13 in ARC between measured and predicted SUV. In contrast, in the non-linear model, there were statistically significant differences in measurements, except in ARC, with mean differences ranging from 0.04 ± 0.14 in ARC to 0.28 ± 0.13 in ABD. In the validation group using the linear model, there were no statistically significant differences, with mean differences ranging from - 0.01 ± 0.08 in ASC to - 0.03 ± 0.11 in ABD. Regarding reproducibility, mean differences were no statistically significant, ranging from 0.004 ± 0.06 in ASC to - 0.02 ± 0.16 in ABD. We have developed a linear model allowing accurate and reproducible prediction of SUV changes over time in the aorta and SVC.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/farmacocinética , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/farmacocinética , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta Abdominal/metabolismo , Aorta Torácica/metabolismo , Feminino , Fluordesoxiglucose F18/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Distribuição Tecidual , Veia Cava Inferior/metabolismo
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 80(1): 31-8, 2011 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20646864

RESUMO

PURPOSE: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) following wide local excision of the primary tumor is the standard treatment in early breast cancer. In some circumstances this procedure is not possible or is contraindicated or difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) when EBRT is not feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We report our experience with TARGIT in three centers (Australia, Germany, and the United Kingdom) between 1999 and 2008. Patients at these centers received a single radiation dose of 20 Gy to the breast tissue in contact with the applicator (or 6 Gy at 1-cm distance), as they could not be given EBRT and were keen to avoid mastectomy. RESULTS: Eighty patients were treated with TARGIT. Reasons for using TARGIT were 21 patients had previously received EBRT, and 31 patients had clinical reasons such as systemic lupus erythematosus, motor neuron disease, Parkinson's disease, ankylosing spondylitis, morbid obesity, and cardiovascular or severe respiratory disease. Three of these patients received percutaneous radiotherapy without surgery; 28 patients were included for compelling personal reasons, usually on compassionate grounds. After a median follow-up of 38 months, only two local recurrences were observed, an annual local recurrence rate of 0.75% (95% confidence interval, 0.09%-2.70%). CONCLUSIONS: While we await the results of the randomized trial (over 2,000 patients have already been recruited), TARGIT is an acceptable option but only in highly selected cases that cannot be recruited in the trial and in whom EBRT is not feasible/possible.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Contraindicações , Feminino , Seguimentos , Alemanha , Humanos , Período Intraoperatório , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Radioterapia/métodos , Carga Tumoral , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA