A multicenter randomized controlled feasibility trial of a digital self-management intervention for adults with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Self-management interventions may enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in epilepsy. However, several barriers often impair their implementation in the real world. Digital interventions may help to overcome some of these barriers. Considering this, the Helpilepsy Plus Prototype was developed as a prototype smartphone-delivered self-care treatment program for adults with epilepsy. METHODS: The 12-week Helpilepsy Plus Prototype was evaluated through a randomized controlled feasibility trial with a waiting-list control (WLC) group. Outcome measurement at baseline and at 12 weeks assessed adherence to the prototype intervention and changes in epilepsy-related outcomes. The primary endpoint was patient autonomy measured with EASE, and secondary endpoints included HRQoL measured with QOLIE-31, health literacy measured with HLQ, anxiety, and depression symptoms measured with HADS. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a heterogeneous sample of participants to assess user-friendliness and usefulness. The prototype program was delivered through the Neuroventis Platform (Neuroventis, BV, Overijse, Belgium), a certified medical device (under EU/MDD Class I, and EU/MDR grace period). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included (46 in the intervention group, 46 in WLC). Most participants (63%, 58/92 women, median age 30 years) had pharmacoresistant epilepsy (61%, 56/92). Only 22% of participants (10/46) in the intervention group completed at least half of all intervention sessions. No significant differences between the intervention group and WLC were observed. Although there was a larger proportion of patients in the intervention group with meaningful improvements in HRQoL compared to WLC (19/46 versus 11/46), the difference was not significant (p = 0.119). Qualitative feedback showed that participants would appreciate more personalization, such as adaptation of the content to their current epilepsy knowledge level, a more interactive interface, shorter text sections, and interaction through reminders and notifications. SIGNIFICANCE: Digital interventions should allow sufficient scope for personalization and interaction to increase patient engagement and enable benefits from self-care apps. Feedback loops allow the participatory development of tailored interventions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of an app-based self-help intervention. Study participants were either randomly assigned to a group that had access to the app or a group that received access to the app after the end of the study. Although a larger proportion of participants in the intervention group showed a relevant improvement in quality of life, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Less than one-fifth of participants in the intervention group attended at least half of all intervention sessions; patient feedback showed that patients required more personalization and interactive options.

Psychobehavioral B-Criteria of Somatic Symptom Disorder Are Associated with Somatic Symptom Reporting in a Large Sample of Psychosomatic Outpatients.

Introduction: Somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as introduced by the DSM-5 is characterized by chronic somatic symptoms not fully explained by underlying pathology and accompanied by psychological factors, the diagnostic B-criteria. These cognitive, affective, and behavioral disturbances are related to increased attention to somatic symptoms. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence regarding the association between the B-criteria and high symptom reporting in clinical settings. Methods: This 12-year retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study examined 6,491 patients from a German psychosomatic outpatient center. The somatoform subscale of HEALTH-49 was used to evaluate somatic symptom reporting. Excessive health concerns and other potential criteria associated with symptom reporting were determined using the ICD-10-Symptom Rating and other HEALTH-49 subscales. Results: Regression analysis revealed that the established B-criteria for SSD were the strongest factors associated with somatic symptom reporting, with a standardized beta-coefficient of ß = 0.31 (R2 = 0.428, df = 24, F = 187.886). Other psychobehavioral factors were clearly less associated with somatic symptom reporting, such as depressive symptoms with ß = 0.15 and impaired activity and participation with ß = 0.12. Sociodemographic factors, such as age (ß = 0.16) and gender (ß = 0.12), were also independently associated with somatic symptom reporting. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for the concept of SSD related to specific B-criteria associated with somatic symptom reporting, based on a large patient sample. These results point to an important role of psychological symptomatology in patients with somatic symptoms. The findings also suggest that additional factors contribute to the reporting of somatic symptoms. Our results may inform future diagnostic criteria for SSD.

This scientific study examines the association between psychobehavioral factors and somatic symptom reporting in a large sample of psychosomatic outpatients. We investigated the association of established and possible additional psychobehavioral criteria for somatic symptom disorder (SSD) as defined in the DSM-V. The study included 6,491 patients from a psychosomatic outpatient center over a 12-year period. The participants completed self-report questionnaires to assess somatic symptom reporting and psychobehavioral factors. The results showed that the B-criteria of SSD were associated with somatic symptom reporting, indicating the validity of these criteria in clinical practice. Other psychobehavioral factors, such as depressive symptoms and impaired activity and participation, as well as sociodemographic factors such as age and gender were also associated with somatic symptom reporting but to a much lesser extent. This study has limitations, including its retrospective and cross-sectional design, reliance on self-report measures, and the need for further research using longitudinal data and clinician-rated assessments to complement self-report data. However, our research highlights the importance of psychological symptomatology in individuals who report somatic symptoms. These findings may inform future diagnostic criteria and treatment approaches for individuals with SSD and improve treatment and patient outcomes.

[Understanding and explaining functional movement disorders]. / Funktionelle Bewegungsstörungen verstehen und verständlich machen.

Functional movement disorders are not uncommon in neurological consultations, hospitals and emergency departments. Although the disorder can usually be recognized clinically, the communication of the diagnosis is often unsatisfactory. Those affected are indirectly accused of a lack of insight or openness but it is often the doctors who fail to formulate a coherent and comprehensible explanation of the underlying disorder. In this review an integrative model for the development of functional movement disorders is presented, which places the motor (and nonmotor) symptoms in a neuroscientific light. In addition, explanations and metaphors are presented that have proven helpful in conveying an understanding of the disorder.

Dissociative seizures in the emergency room: room for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Dissociative seizures, also known as functional or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, account for 11%-27% of all emergency seizure presentations. Misdiagnosis as epileptic seizures is common and leads to ineffective and potentially harmful treatment escalations. We assess the potential for diagnostic improvement at different stages of emergency workup and estimate the utility of benzodiazepines. METHODS: A retrospective study of all emergency presentations with a discharge diagnosis of acute dissociative seizures seen at a university hospital 2010-2022 was performed to assess clinical characteristics and emergency decision-making. RESULTS: Among 156 patients (73% female, median 29 years), 15% presented more than once for a total of 203 presentations. Half of seizures were ongoing at first medical contact; prolonged seizures and clusters were common (23% and 24%). Diagnostic accuracy differed between on-site emergency physicians and emergency department neurologists (12% vs 52%). Typical features such as eye closure, discontinuous course and asynchronous movements were common. Benzodiazepines were given in two-thirds of ongoing seizures, often in high doses and preferentially for major hyperkinetic semiology. Clinical response to benzodiazepines was mixed, with a minority of patients remaining either unaffected (16%) or becoming critically sedated (13%). A quarter of patients given benzodiazepines by emergency medical services were admitted to a monitoring unit, 9% were intubated. CONCLUSIONS: Improved semiological assessment could reduce early misdiagnosis of dissociative seizures. Although some seizures seem to respond to benzodiazepines, critical sedation is common, and further studies are needed to assess the therapeutic ratio.

Psychological precursors of epileptic seizures.

Psychological stress is the most commonly self-reported precursor of epileptic seizures. However, retrospective and prospective studies remain inconclusive in this regard. Here, we explored whether seizures would be preceded by significant changes in reported stressors or resource utilization. This study is based on high-frequency time series through daily online completion of personalized questionnaires of 9-24 items in epilepsy outpatients and compared responses 1-14 days before seizures with interictal time series. Fourteen patients (79% women, age = 23-64 years) completed daily questionnaires over a period of 87-898 days (median = 277 days = 9.2 months). A total of 4560 fully completed daily questionnaires were analyzed, 685 of which included reported seizure events. Statistically significant changes in preictal compared to interictal dynamics were found in 11 of 14 patients (79%) across 41 items (22% of all 187 items). In seven of 14 patients (50%), seizures were preceded by a significant mean increase of stressors and/or a significant mean decrease of resource utilization. This exploratory analysis of long-term prospective individual patient data on specific stressors and personal coping strategies generates the hypothesis that medium-term changes in psychological well-being may precede the occurrence of epileptic seizures in some patients.

Integrated psychological care services within seizure settings: Key components and implementation factors among example services in four ILAE regions: A report by the ILAE Psychiatry Commission.

Mental health comorbidities are prevalent and problematic in patients with seizures but often suboptimally managed. To address common gaps in care, the Integrated Mental Health Care Pathways Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Psychiatry Commission was tasked with providing education and guidance on the integration of mental health management (e.g., screening, referral, treatment) into routine seizure care. This report aims to describe a variety of established services in this area, with a specific focus on psychological care models. Services were identified by members of the ILAE Psychiatry Commission and authors of psychological intervention trials in epilepsy. A total of eight services met inclusion criteria and agreed to be showcased. They include three pediatric and five adult services located across four distinct ILAE regions (Europe, North America, Africa, Asia Oceania). The report describes the core operations, known outcomes, and implementation factors (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of these services. The report concludes with a set of practical tips for building successful psychological care services within seizure settings, including the importance of having local champions, clearly defining the scope of the service, and establishing sustainable funding models. The breadth of exemplars demonstrates how models tailored to the local environment and resources can be implemented. This report is an initial step to disseminate information regarding integrated mental health care within seizure care settings. Future work is needed to systematically examine both psychological and pharmacological care models and to further establish the evidence base in this area, especially around clinical impact, and cost-effectiveness.

German translation and validation of the brief Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument (brEASI).

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders remain undiagnosed in routine clinical practice in up to two thirds of affected patients with epilepsy despite their significant impact on medical and psychosocial outcomes. The study objective was to translate and validate the German 8-item "brief Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument" (brEASI) to facilitate effective screening for the presence of anxiety disorders in German-speaking patients. METHODS: After expert translation into German, the brEASI was completed by consecutive adult inpatients with epilepsy hospitalized for seizures at an academic reference epilepsy center. Patients also completed the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) for external validity, and underwent a standardized interview (Mini-DIPS-OA) as a gold standard to determine the presence of an ICD-10 anxiety disorder (generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder, agoraphobia, and social phobia). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the brEASI, including the associated area under the curve (AUC) statistics to determine the potential of the brEASI to identify ICD-10 anxiety disorders diagnosed by interview. For comparative purposes, these analyses were also conducted for the GAD-7. RESULTS: Of 80 recruited adult inpatients with epilepsy, 18 (23 %) were found to have a current anxiety disorder through standardized interview. In this study, both brEASI and GAD-7 showed a better diagnostic performance at a cutoff of >5 than at the previously reported cutoff values of >6 and >9, respectively. The AUC of the German brEASI was outstanding (AUC = 0.90, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-0.96) for detecting all anxiety disorders and excellent for detecting non-GAD disorders (AUC = 0.85, CI = 0.76-0.92) at a cutoff of >5. At this optimal cutoff of >5 the brEASI demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity (89 % and 84 %) for identifying anxiety disorders than the GAD-7 (83 % and 74 %). The final German version of the brEASI is free to download at https://www.v-neuro.de/veroeffentlichungen/. CONCLUSION: The German version of the brEASI represents a valid and reliable epilepsy-specific anxiety screening instrument. A positive screening result should be followed by further diagnostic procedures. Appropriate therapeutic steps should be initiated if the presence of an anxiety disorder or other psychiatric disorders is confirmed.

Using the Biopsychosocial Model to Guide Patient-Centered Neurological Treatments.

The biopsychosocial model was defined by George L. Engel to propose a holistic approach to patient care. Through this model, physicians can understand patients in their context to aid the development of tailored, individualized treatment plans that consider relevant biological, psychological, and social-cultural-spiritual factors impacting health and longitudinal care. In this article, we advocate for the use of the biopsychosocial model in neurology practice across outpatient and inpatient clinical settings. To do so, we first present the history of the biopsychosocial model, and its relationships to precision medicine and deep phenotyping. Then, we bring the neurologist up-to-date information on the components of the biopsychosocial clinical formulation, including predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, and protective factors. We conclude by detailing illustrative neurological case examples using the biopsychosocial model, emphasizing the importance of considering relevant psychological and social factors to aid the delivery of patient-centered clinical care in neurology.

Personalized high-frequency monitoring of a process-oriented psychotherapeutic approach to seizure disorders: Treatment utilization and participants' feedback.

High-frequency monitoring of psychological variables has been recommended to monitor and manage psychotherapeutic processes. However, high-frequency monitoring might be regarded as burdensome for participating patients. This feasibility study applied the concept of high-frequency treatment monitoring in patients with seizures and psychiatric comorbidities in an outpatient neurology service. The treatment monitoring entailed the development of a personalized process questionnaire, daily online monitoring, and regular reflection of the current time series graphs. Participants' feedback on user-friendliness and usefulness of this treatment monitoring was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Participants' compliance rates (CRs) of daily self-assessments after 6 months were correlated with their quantitative feedback on user-friendliness and usefulness and the number of scheduled treatment sessions during this time period. Twenty patients, 15 women/5 men, median age 48 years (range: 23-73 years), were recruited. The median number of scheduled sessions was 11 sessions (range: 6-22). Participants reported a high overall satisfaction with the user-friendliness and usefulness of treatment monitoring. No notable correlations could be found between CRs and quantitative feedback nor between CRs and the number of scheduled treatment sessions. Personalized high-frequency monitoring of psychological variables seems to be feasible to monitor and manage process-oriented psychotherapeutic care in patients with seizures and psychiatric comorbidities. The results support the user-friendliness and usefulness of high-frequency monitoring and suggest that high-frequency monitoring may be suitable for monitoring of low-frequent treatment sessions and patients with attendance issues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

[Development and content validation of a questionnaire for functional movement disorders]. / Entwicklung und inhaltliche Validierung eines Fragebogens für funktionelle Bewegungsstörungen.

From shell shock tremors to TikTok tics, functional movement disorders have long been assumed to be motor expressions of emotional turmoil. However, psychodynamic explanations are increasingly complemented by neurophysiological findings, meaning that specialized physiotherapy is gaining in importance alongside psychotherapy. Still, there is no disease-specific outcome measure that adequately assesses patient-relevant aspects of this heterogeneous condition. Such a questionnaire was developed and its content was validated in a multistage development process. The relevance and comprehensibility of the items were first evaluated by a panel of experts and then by affected patients, and questions and possible response categories were adjusted accordingly. The resultant revised questionnaire yields good content-related validity and thus allows, for the first time, a quantification of the subjective complaints and implications associated with functional movement disorders. The next step will be a multicenter study to analyze the psychometric properties and factorial structure of this new instrument.

Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of psychological treatment on health-related quality of life in people with epilepsy: an update by the ILAE Psychology Task Force, highlighting methodological changes.

Clinical interest in using psychological interventions for people with epilepsy (PWE) aiming at decreasing mental health difficulties, improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and seizure-related outcomes, continues to grow. This article summarizes the 2020 update of the 2017 Cochrane Review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions for PWE, highlighting the reasons for major methodological modifications such as the recategorization of interventions and expanded risk of bias assessment. A 2020 literature search yielded 36 RCTs (n=3526) investigating psychological treatments for PWE with a validated HRQOL measure as an outcome. Twenty-seven trials were skills-based psychological interventions, whilst nine studies were education-only interventions. Among skills-based psychological interventions, 11 studies (n=643) used the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) or other QOLIE inventories convertible to QOLIE-31 as an outcome measure and were pooled for meta-analysis. Significant mean changes were observed for the QOLIE-31 total score (mean improvement of 5.23 points; p< 0.001) and in six out of seven subscales (emotional well-being, energy and fatigue, overall QoL, seizure worry, medication and cognitive functioning). The mean changes in the QOLIE-31 total score and the overall QoL subscale exceeded the threshold of minimally important change (MIC), indicating clinically meaningful post-intervention improvement. These results provide moderate evidence that psychological treatments for adults and adolescents with epilepsy enhance HRQOL. In addition to the summary of the Cochrane review, we provide a detailed characterization of the interventions and patient populations of the meta-analyzed studies.

Screening for Psychiatric Comorbidities and Psychotherapeutic Assessment in Inpatient Epilepsy Care: Preliminary Results of an Implementation Study.

Background: Anxiety and depression remain underdiagnosed in routine clinical practice in up to two thirds of epilepsy patients despite significant impact on medical and psychosocial outcome. Barriers to adequate mental health care for epilepsy and/or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) include a lack of integrated mental health specialists and standardized procedures. This naturalistic study outlines the procedures and outcome of a recently established psychotherapeutic service. Methods: Routine screening included the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E, cut-off value > 13) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7, cut-off value > 5). Positively (above cut-off in at least one questionnaire) screened patients were seen for a standardized interview for mental health disorders and the development of a personalized treatment plan. PNES patients were seen irrespective of their screening score. Resources were provided to support self-help and access to psychotherapy. Patients were contacted 1 month after discharge to evaluate adherence to therapeutic recommendations. Results: 120 patients were screened. Overall, 56 of 77 positively screened patients (77%) were found to have a psychiatric diagnosis through standardized interview. More epilepsy patients with an anxiety disorder had previously been undiagnosed compared to those with a depressive episode (63% vs. 30%); 24 epilepsy patients (62%) with a psychiatric comorbidity and 10 PNES patients (59%) were not receiving any mental health care. At follow-up, 16/17 (94%) epilepsy patients and 7/7 PNES patients without prior psychiatric treatment were adhering to therapeutic recommendations. Conclusion: Integrating mental health specialists and establishing standardized screening and follow-up procedures improve adherence to mental health care recommendations in epilepsy and PNES patients.

Process-oriented and personalized psychotherapeutic care for epilepsy: Interim results of a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: There is great scientific and clinical interest in the effective integration of psychological treatments into comprehensive epilepsy care to optimize treatment outcomes and psychosocial functioning in people with epilepsy. Stepped care is a promising approach to accommodate personalized psychotherapeutic care in academic and regular outpatient settings. It aims at providing patients with the most adequate treatment duration, number of sessions, and treatment method while systematically monitoring their treatment processes. METHODS: This is an uncontrolled feasibility study of process-oriented and personalized psychotherapeutic care for epilepsy in a naturalistic setting. The objective of this study was to evaluate individual changes of health-related quality of life (QOLIE-31) and psychiatric comorbidity (BDI-II, BSI) in participants by applying the concept of the reliable change index (RCI) to outcomes that were obtained at baseline and six months after the beginning of the intervention. Additionally, we assessed the relationship between outcome scores, the number of attended sessions, and history of childhood trauma by linear regression models. RESULTS: Twenty patients [15 women/5 men, median age 48 years (range: 23-73 years)] were recruited. The median number of scheduled sessions was 11 (range: 6-22); there were no drop-outs. After psychotherapy quality of life (QOLIE-31), global distress (BSI) and depression (BDI-II) scores improved significantly (p-values: QOLIE-31: 0.03; BSI: 0.01; BDI-II: 0.01). The largest improvements were achieved for the emotional well-being subscale of the QOLIE-31 (47%, p-value: 0.02), the global severity index of the BSI (83%), and depression severity (BDI-II) (60%). Linear regression models did not reveal any significant association between interim changes, number of attended treatment sessions, and history of childhood trauma. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that process-oriented and personalized psychotherapeutic has low attrition and results in improved quality of life and reduced psychiatric symptoms in people with epilepsy. Our findings indicate that responsiveness to psychotherapy is not dependent on the number of attended treatment sessions. Participants with childhood trauma did not need more treatment sessions to achieve an improvement. More research is needed to understand and address mechanisms and precursors of responsiveness to psychotherapy.

Misdiagnosis of prolonged psychogenic non-epileptic seizures as status epilepticus: epidemiology and associated risks.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the epidemiology of prolonged psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (pPNES) misdiagnosed as status epilepticus, as well as the risks associated with non-indicated treatment. METHODS: We performed an individual patient data analysis from the Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior to Arrival Trial (RAMPART) and the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) to assess incidence, patient characteristics and clinical course of misdiagnosed pPNES. RESULTS: Among 980 patients aged 8 years or older diagnosed and treated for status epilepticus in RAMPART and ESETT, 79 (8.1%) were discharged with a final diagnosis of pPNES. The relative incidence was highest in adolescents and young adults (20.1%). The typical female preponderance seen in that age bracket was not evident in children and older adults. Adverse effects, including respiratory depression and intubation, were documented in 26% of patients with pPNES receiving benzodiazepines in RAMPART and 33% of patients receiving additional second-line medication in ESETT. In ESETT, patients who were treated with benzodiazepines before hospital admission had higher rates of unresponsiveness and severe adverse effects than those treated after admission, suggesting cumulative effects of accelerated treatment momentum. Across trials, one in five patients with pPNES were admitted to an intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis and treatment of pPNES as status epilepticus are a common and widespread problem with deleterious consequences. Mitigating it will require training of emergency staff in semiological diagnosis. Status epilepticus response protocols should incorporate appropriate diagnostic re-evaluations at each step of treatment escalation, especially in clinical trials.

High-frequency monitoring of personalized psychological variables during outpatient psychotherapy in people with seizures: An uncontrolled feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: This feasibility study applied the concept of daily systematic monitoring of personalized psychological variables and investigated patients' compliance in order to evaluate if its integration in outpatient psychotherapy is feasible and if patients found the development and daily application of personalized questionnaires user-friendly and useful. METHODS: A naturalistic sample of patients with epilepsy (PWE) was enrolled to participate in an outpatient psychotherapy program. A personalized process questionnaire was developed with each patient based on an individual psychological system's model at the outset of therapy. Daily time-stamped self-assessments were collected during outpatient psychotherapy. This process-monitoring was technically realized by an internet-based device for data collection and data analysis, the Synergetic Navigation System (SNS). The reflection of person-specific time series informed by patients' replies to their personalized process questionnaire was integrated in the therapy process. Compliance rates were assessed during a period of six months (i.e., 180 days) after the first entry of the questionnaire [compliance rate = (number of completed questionnaires/180) × 100]. User-friendliness and usefulness of this process monitoring were evaluated quantitatively. RESULTS: Twenty patients [15 women/5 men, median age 48 years (range 23-73 years)] were recruited. Compliance rates were high (median: 93%, range 31-100%) among the participants. Participants reported a high overall satisfaction with the application and user-friendliness of SNS. CONCLUSION: The results support the feasibility of high-frequency monitoring of personalized psychological processes during outpatient psychotherapy. Repeated daily assessments of a personalized questionnaire yield highly resolved, equidistant time series data, which gives insight into individual psychological processes during outpatient psychotherapy.

Managing depression and anxiety in people with epilepsy: A survey of epilepsy health professionals by the ILAE Psychology Task Force.

Objectives: The Psychology Task Force of the Medical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has been charged with taking steps to improve global mental health care for people with epilepsy. This study aimed to inform the direction and priorities of the Task Force by examining epilepsy healthcare providers' current practical experiences, barriers, and unmet needs around addressing depression and anxiety in their patients. Methods: A voluntary 27-item online survey was distributed via ILAE chapters and networks. It assessed practices in the areas of screening, referral, management, and psychological care for depression and anxiety. A total of 445 participants, from 67 countries (68% high income), commenced the survey, with 87% completing all components. Most respondents (80%) were either neurologists or epileptologists. Results: Less than half of respondents felt adequately resourced to manage depression and anxiety. There was a lack of consensus about which health professionals were responsible for screening and management of these comorbidities. About a third only assessed for depression and anxiety following spontaneous report and lack of time was a common barrier (>50%). Routine referrals to psychiatrists (>55%) and psychologists (>41%) were common, but approximately one third relied on watchful waiting. A lack of both trained mental health specialists (>55%) and standardized procedures (>38%) was common barriers to referral practices. The majority (>75%) of respondents' patients identified with depression or anxiety had previously accessed psychotropic medications or psychological treatments. However, multiple barriers to psychological treatments were endorsed, including accessibility difficulties (52%). Significance: The findings suggest that while the importance of managing depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy is being recognized, there are ongoing barriers to effective mental health care. Key future directions include the need for updated protocols in this area and the integration of mental health professionals within epilepsy settings.

The importance of semiological information based on epileptic seizure history.

Semiology is the backbone of any correct categorization of seizures, as epileptic or not, focal or bilateral, and is fundamental to elucidating how they are anatomically generated in the brain. An anatomical hypothesis derived from seizure history is the precondition for optimally designed ancillary studies. Without understanding seizure semiology, no rational therapy is possible. This article describes the semiological approach using patient history based on full use of patients' self-reports as well as descriptions by witnesses. Auras represent the subjective aspects of seizures and provide important semiological clues as observable signs, sometimes including rather precise direct anatomical information. Methods of extracting, facilitating and analysing self-reports including linguistic conversation analysis are presented in detail. It is highlighted that prodromes, seizure triggers and reflex epileptic mechanisms can provide crucial information for diagnostics and therapy. Special issues considering seizure semiology in children are discussed in a separate section. Other sections are dedicated to the two most important issues of differential diagnosis: how to distinguish (1) focal from "generalized" epilepsies, particularly when focal seizure phenomena appear in a bilateral epilepsy; and (2) epileptic from a series of non-epileptic events.

Psychological treatments for people with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Given the significant impact epilepsy may have on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of individuals with epilepsy and their families, there is increasing clinical interest in evidence-based psychological treatments, aimed at enhancing psychological and seizure-related outcomes for this group. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 10, 2017. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of psychological treatments for people with epilepsy on HRQOL outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: For this update, we searched the following databases on 12 August 2019, without language restrictions: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Epilepsy, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 09 August 2019), and PsycINFO (EBSCOhost, 1887 onwards), and from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We screened the references from included studies and relevant reviews, and contacted researchers in the field for unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs for this review. HRQOL was the main outcome. For the operational definition of 'psychological treatments', we included a broad range of skills-based psychological treatments and education-only interventions designed to improve HRQOL, seizure frequency and severity, as well as psychiatric and behavioral health comorbidities for adults and children with epilepsy. These psychological treatments were compared to treatment as usual (TAU), an active control group (such as social support group), or antidepressant pharmacotherapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 36 completed RCTs, with a total of 3526 participants. Of these studies, 27 investigated skills-based psychological interventions. The remaining nine studies were education-only interventions. Six studies investigated interventions for children and adolescents, three studies investigated interventions for adolescents and adults, and the remaining studies investigated interventions for adults. Based on satisfactory clinical and methodological homogeneity, we pooled data from 11 studies (643 participants) that used the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31) or other QOLIE inventories (such as QOLIE-89 or QOLIE-31-P) convertible to QOLIE-31. We found significant mean changes for the QOLIE-31 total score and six subscales (emotional well-being, energy and fatigue, overall QoL, seizure worry, medication effects, and cognitive functioning). The mean changes in the QOLIE-31 total score (mean improvement of 5.23 points, 95% CI 3.02 to 7.44; P < 0.001), and the overall QoL score (mean improvement of 5.95 points, 95% CI 3.05 to 8.85; P < 0.001) exceeded the threshold of minimally important change (MIC: total score: 4.73 points; QoL score: 5.22 points), indicating a clinically meaningful postintervention improvement in HRQOL. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence provided by the meta-analysis due to serious risks of bias in some of the included studies. Consequently, these results provided moderate-certainty evidence that psychological treatments for adults with epilepsy may enhance overall HRQOL. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice: Skills-based psychological interventions improve HRQOL in adults and adolescents with epilepsy. Adjunctive use of skills-based psychological treatments for adults and adolescents with epilepsy may provide additional benefits in HRQOL when these are incorporated into patient-centered management. We judge the evidence to be of moderate certainty. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Investigators should strictly adhere to the CONSORT guidelines to improve the quality of reporting on their interventions. A thorough description of intervention protocols is necessary to ensure reproducibility. When examining the effectiveness of psychological treatments for people with epilepsy, the use of standardized HRQOL inventories, such as the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventories (QOLIE-31, QOLIE-31-P, and QOLIE-89) would increase comparability. Unfortunately, there is a critical gap in pediatric RCTs and RCTs including people with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities. Finally, in order to increase the overall quality of RCT study designs, adequate randomization with allocation concealment and blinded outcome assessment should be pursued. As attrition is often high in research that requires active participation, an intention-to-treat analysis should be carried out. Treatment fidelity and treatment competence should also be assessed. These important dimensions, which are related to 'Risk of bias' assessment, should always be reported.