Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Pediatric Version of Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale.

CONTEXT: Few instruments in Japanese assess health-related quality of life in pediatric cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To translate the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) into Japanese pediatric and proxy versions (MSAS-J 7-12, MSAS-J 13-18, and MSAS-J-Proxy) and assess validity and reliability. METHODS: Phase I comprised forward-backward translation and pilot testing in 13 children and 16 guardians. Phase II consisted of psychometric testing of the three MSAS-J versions in 162 children and 238 guardians. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct and known-group validity of the MSAS-J were assessed. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the total and subscale scores were over 0.70, excluding the psychological symptom (PSYCH) subscale score of the MSAS-J 7-12. Most MSAS-J scores significantly inversely correlated with two versions of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory. A strong child-guardian correlation was shown in the total and subscale scores (ICC range 0.66-0.83). Kappa estimates showed acceptable child-guardian symptom agreement. MSAS-J 7-12 and proxy differentiated patients according to clinical status. CONCLUSION: MSAS-J is a reliable and valid instrument to assess symptoms among Japanese children with cancer.

Methodological extensions of meta-analysis with excess relative risk estimates: application to risk of second malignant neoplasms among childhood cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

Although radiotherapy is recognized as an established risk factor for second malignant neoplasms (SMNs), the dose response of SMNs following radiotherapy has not been well characterized. In our previous meta-analysis of the risks of SMNs occurring among children who have received radiotherapy, the small number of eligible studies precluded a detailed evaluation. Therefore, to increase the number of eligible studies, we developed a method of calculating excess relative risk (ERR) per Gy estimates from studies for which the relative risk estimates for several dose categories were available. Comparing the calculated ERR with that described in several original papers validated the proposed method. This enabled us to increase the number of studies, which we used to conduct a meta-analysis. The overall ERR per Gy estimate of radiotherapy over 26 relevant studies was 0.60 (95%CI: 0.30-1.20), which is smaller than the corresponding estimate for atomic bomb survivors exposed to radiation as young children (1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.5). A significant decrease in ERR per Gy with increase in age at exposure (0.85 times per annual increase) was observed in the meta-regression. Heterogeneity was suggested by Cochran's Q statistic (P < 0.001), which may be partly accounted for by age at exposure.

Quantitative diagnosis of diffuse alveolar damage using extravascular lung water.

OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by diffuse alveolar damage and increased extravascular lung water levels. However, there is no threshold extravascular lung water level that can indicate diffuse alveolar damage in lungs. We aimed to determine the threshold extravascular lung water level that discriminates between normal lungs and lungs affected with diffuse alveolar damage. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of normal lungs and lungs affected with diffuse alveolar damage was performed. SETTING: Normal lung cases were taken from published data. Lung cases with diffuse alveolar damage were taken from a nationwide autopsy database. All cases of autopsy followed hospital deaths in Japan from more than 800 hospitals between 2004 and 2009; complete autopsies with histopathologic examinations were performed by board-certified pathologists authorized by the Japanese Society of Pathology. PATIENTS: Normal lungs: 534; lungs with diffuse alveolar damage: 1,688. INTERVENTIONS: We compared the postmortem weights of both lungs between the two groups. These lung weights were converted to extravascular lung water values using a validated equation. Finally, the extravascular lung water value that indicated diffuse alveolar damage was estimated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The extravascular lung water values of the lungs showing diffuse alveolar damage were approximately two-fold higher than those of normal lungs (normal group, 7.3±2.8 mL/kg vs diffuse alveolar damage group 13.7±4.5 mL/kg; p<0.001). An extravascular lung water level of 9.8 mL/kg allowed the diagnosis of diffuse alveolar damage to be established with a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 81.2% (area under the curve, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.91). An extravascular lung water level of 14.6 mL/kg represented a 99% positive predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: This study may provide the first validated quantitative bedside diagnostic tool for diffuse alveolar damage. Extravascular lung water may allow the detection of diffuse alveolar damage and may support the clinical diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. The best extravascular lung water cut-off value to discriminate between normal lungs and lungs with diffuse alveolar damage is around 10 mL/kg.

Alternative statistical methods for estimating efficacy of interferon beta-1b for multiple sclerosis clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In the randomized study of interferon beta-1b (IFN beta-1b) for multiple sclerosis (MS), it has usually been evaluated the simple annual relapse rate as the study endpoint. This study aimed to investigate the performance of various regression models using information regarding the time to each recurrent event and considering the MS specific data generation process, and to estimate the treatment effect of a MS clinical trial data. METHODS: We conducted a simulation study with consideration of the pathological characteristics of MS, and applied alternative efficacy estimation methods to real clinical trial data, including 5 extended Cox regression models for time-to-event analysis, a Poisson regression model and a Poisson regression model with Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). We adjusted for other important covariates that may have affected the outcome. RESULTS: We compared the simulation results for each model. The hazard ratios of real data were estimated for each model including the effects of other covariates. The results (hazard ratios of high-dose to low-dose) of all models were approximately 0.7 (range, 0.613 - 0.769), whereas the annual relapse rate ratio was 0.714. CONCLUSIONS: The precision of the treatment estimation was increased by application of the alternative models. This suggests that the use of alternative models that include recurrence event data may provide better analyses.

Meta-analysis of second cancer risk after radiotherapy among childhood cancer survivors.

Cancer risks among childhood cancer survivors following radiotherapy have not yet been well characterised in terms of radiation dose. A meta-analysis of studies on the excess relative risk per gray (ERR) of second cancer was conducted previously; unfortunately, the small number of eligible studies restricted quantitative evaluations. To solve this problem, a statistical method to calculate ERR estimates from other estimates was developed, and a meta-analysis was conducted again. The PubMed database was searched and 26 relevant studies were identified. ERR estimates were available in 15 studies, and for the other 11 studies, the regression-based model was used to calculate ERR estimates from other estimates. The overall ERR estimate was 0.40, which was much lower than that of atomic bomb survivors exposed as young children. Heterogeneity of the risk among studies was suggested, and a further study is needed to explore the heterogeneity among studies.

Risk of second malignant neoplasms among childhood cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy: meta-analysis of nine epidemiological studies.

In the light of notable advances made in childhood cancer therapies, an understanding of the late effects of treatment is important for continued medical care. We conducted a meta-analysis of studies on the excess relative risk (ERR) of second malignant neoplasm (SMN) among childhood cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy. Relevant studies were retrieved by searching the PubMed database, supplemented by hand-searching of reference lists of already retrieved papers. Nine studies were identified and overall ERR estimates were calculated using a fixed effects model and a random effects model. The overall ERR per Gy (absorbed dose of ionising radiation) estimates of radiotherapy by a fixed effect model and a random effects model were 0.50 [95% CI 0.20, 1.21] and 0.53 [95% CI 0.22, 1.31] respectively. Heterogeneity among studies was suggested by Cochran's Q statistic (Q = 40.4, d.f. = 8, P < 0.001). The estimate obtained using a random effects model was far smaller than the corresponding estimate of 1.7 [95% CI 1.1, 2.5] from the study on atomic bomb survivors exposed as young children, suggesting underestimation of ERR estimates among the nine studies compared with the estimates from the study of atomic bomb survivors. In view of the heterogeneity and underestimation in ERR estimates, more studies concerning the risk of SMN among childhood cancer survivors are still needed for further understanding of the carcinogenic effects of radiotherapy on children.