Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JBJS Case Connect ; 14(1)2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38207073

RESUMO

CASE: We present a case of a 67-year-old female patient with concomitant cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Surgical intervention, including cervical decompression and arthrodesis, was performed to address cervical myelopathy symptoms. Despite initial improvement, the patient's motor function deteriorated, leading to the diagnosis of GBS. The patient's hospital course was protracted with a complicated recovery. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes the clinical details of coexisting CSM and GBS, highlighting the importance of diagnosing and considering demyelinating diseases when determining the optimal timeline for surgical intervention. These findings inform decision-making for clinicians encountering similar patient presentations.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Doenças da Medula Espinal , Espondilose , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/complicações , Espondilose/complicações , Espondilose/diagnóstico por imagem , Espondilose/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Spine Surg ; 8(2): 214-223, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35875623

RESUMO

Background: Determine effects of pre-operative opiate use on anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery outcomes. Methods: The study design was a single center retrospective cohort study. Patient records were reviewed from 2013 and 2018 for elective 1 to 2 level ACDF surgeries. Patients were classified as: opiate naive (ON: no history of opiate) use, acute opiate (AO: <6 months preoperatively) use, and chronic opiate (CO: 6-12 months preoperatively) use based on prescription history before surgery. Opiate use was quantified by milligram morphine equivalents (MME) at 6-12 months preop, 0-6 months preop, 0-6 months postop, and 6-12 months postop. Charts were reviewed for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and smoking history. Results: Readmission rates were 9.8% for ON, 9.1% for AO, and 30% for CO (P value <0.05). Average opiate use measured in MME 6-12 months post-surgery was 5.76 for ON, 18.44 for AO, and 39.92 for CO (P value <0.05). Readmission rate between nonsmokers, former smokers, and active smokers was 4.4%, 0%, and 10.8% (P value <0.05) at 30-90 days post-surgery, and 1.1%, 14.5%, and 2.5% (P value <0.05) in the 91 days to 1-year post-surgery. Conclusions: There is statistically significant relationship between CO and higher readmission rates after ACDF. Preoperative opiate use is also associated with increased opiate use 6-12 months after surgery. Smoking history is also associated with increased readmission rates.

3.
Cureus ; 14(2): e22663, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35371693

RESUMO

Introduction The prescription opioid epidemic and widespread use of narcotic medications have introduced new challenges when treating patients undergoing spine surgery. Given the ubiquity of preoperative opioid consumption amongst patients undergoing spine surgery, further research is needed to characterize perioperative risks. Our goal is to compare outcomes following primary lumbar decompression, instrumentation, and fusion based on preoperative opioid prescriptions. Methods Patients older than 18 years of age who underwent a primary one- to two-level lumbar decompression, instrumentation, and fusion were included in the study. Patients with known malignancy, surgery involving three or more lumbar levels, current or previous use of neuromodulation, revision surgery, anterior or far lateral interbody fusions, acute fractures, or other concurrent procedures were excluded. Patients were divided into chronic opioid therapy (COT; over six months), acute opioid therapy (AOT; up to six months), and opiate-naïve groups. Opioid prescriptions, demographics, smoking status, readmission rates within one year, and reoperation rates within two years were recorded based on electronic medical record documentation. Results Out of 416 patients identified, 114 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients (33.3%) were on COT, 38 patients (33.3%) were on AOT, and 38 patients (33.3%) were opioid naïve preoperatively. Readmission rates within one year for COT, AOT, and opioid naïve patients were 34.2%, 26.3%, and 10.5%, respectively (p=0.047). Reoperation rates within two years for COT, AOT, and opioid naïve patients were 34.2%, 15.8%, and 13.2%, respectively (p=0.049). We also found current or former smokers were more likely to be on AOT or COT than never smokers (78.4% vs. 57.1%; p=0.017).  Conclusion Long-term opiate use is associated with an increased risk for readmission within one year and revision within two years. Physicians should discuss the increased risks of readmission and revision surgery associated with lumbar decompression and fusion seen in patients on preoperative opioid therapy.

4.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 42(5): e501-e506, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35220336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The majority of children with bone sarcomas experience pain. Opioids remain the mainstay treatment of cancer-related pain in children. The patterns of outpatient opioid prescription after surgery for primary bone sarcomas remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patterns of outpatient opioid prescription in patients with bone sarcomas after resection of the primary tumor, and to assess for factors that may lead to increased opioid dosing in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 28 patients with bone sarcomas undergoing primary tumor resection was performed. Demographic, medical, surgical, and pharmacological data was collected from all patients. The total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed after patient discharge were compared at 30-day intervals. The MMEs were then stratified by tumor location, presence of metastasis at time of surgery, and preoperative opioid use. Independent predictors of increased 30-day and total 120-day opioid utilization were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with preoperative opioid use were prescribed significantly more opioids in every 30-day postoperative interval and for the 120-day total. When stratified by tumor location, patients with primary tumors in the pelvis had significantly greater postoperative opioid utilization when compared with patients with tumors located in the lower and upper extremities during postoperative days 61 to 90 (5970 vs. 1060.4 and 0 MMEs, respectively, P=0.048) and during postoperative days 91 to 120 (6450 vs. 829.6 and 0 MMEs, respectively, P=0.015). Older age, diagnosis of osteosarcoma, increased length of stay postoperatively and presence of metastases were associated with a higher 30-day postoperative opioid utilization. CONCLUSION: Multiple factors were associated with increased opioid use including preoperative opioid use, longer postoperative stay in the hospital, metastatic disease, and primary sarcomas in the pelvis. The patient's sex, body mass index, race, type of insurance, type of surgery performed, reoperation during the same admission and use of nonopioid adjuvants had no effect on opioid use. The results of this study can be used to stratify the average opioid requirement of pediatric patients undergoing primary bone sarcoma resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Assuntos
Osteossarcoma , Sarcoma , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Criança , Hábitos , Humanos , Osteossarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Osteossarcoma/cirurgia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoma/cirurgia
5.
Eur Spine J ; 31(4): 843-850, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34984535

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the novel vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scoring system. METHODS: Four orthopedic surgery residents at various levels of training (PGY1-4) evaluated 100 noncontrast, T1-weighted MRIs of the lumbar spine. VBQ was calculated as quotient of the median of L1-L4 average signal intensity (SI) and the L3 cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) SI, as described by Ehresman et al. All measurements were repeated 2 weeks later. We performed a stratified analysis based on patient history of instrumentation, pathology, and MRI manufacturer/magnet strength to determine their effect on VBQ reliability. Spinal pathologies included compression fracture, burst fracture, vertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, or neoplasm. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) two-way mixed model on absolute agreement was used to analyze inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. ICC less than 0.40 was considered poor, 0.40-0.59 as fair, 0.60-0.74 as good, and greater than 0.75 as excellent. RESULTS: Intra-observer reliability was excellent (≥ 0.75) for all four observers. When stratified by history of spinal instrumentation or spinal pathology, all raters showed excellent intra-observer reliability except one (0.71 and 0.69, respectively). When stratified by MRI manufacturer, intra-observer reliability was ≥ 0.75 for all raters. Inter-observer reliability was excellent (0.91) and remained excellent (≥ 0.75) when stratified by history of spinal instrumentation, spinal pathology, or MRI-manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS: VBQ scores from spine lumbar MRIs demonstrate excellent intra-observer and inter-observer reliability. These scores are reliably reproduced in patients regardless of previous instrumentation, spinal pathology, or MRI manufacturer/magnetic field strength.


Assuntos
Fraturas por Compressão , Vértebras Lombares , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Região Lombossacral , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
6.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 90: 105508, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34700236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare compression generated by a Precice magnetic lengthening intramedullary nail and a 5.0 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate. METHODS: Transverse osteotomy sites were created in the femoral shaft of ten Sawbones fourth generation composite femurs. Antegrade 10-degree trochanteric Precice nails and 8-hole, 5.0 mm plates were used for fixation. The plates were compressed by placing a neutral screw and three eccentrically drilled compression screws on alternating sides of the osteotomy. Average compression and distribution of compression were compared, and P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. FINDINGS: The Precice nail generated an average of 2.38 megapascal across the osteotomy sites. The plate generated an average of 0.70 megapascal (P < 0.001) with the initial compression screw, 0.93 megapascal (P < 0.001) after the second screw, and 1.04 megapascal (p < 0.001) after the final screw. The distribution of compression was assessed utilizing a polar transformation to compare pressure values. We found that the distribution of compression was more circumferentially uniform in the Precice nail group (P = 0.046). INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates that an electromagnetic intramedullary device is capable of generating significantly higher compression, in a more uniform distribution, than a 5.0 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate in a Sawbones model. The results indicate that electromagnetic intramedullary nail systems may be an ideal alternative to compression plating for treatment of at-risk fractures, nonunions, delayed unions, and intercalary allograft reconstruction.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Placas Ósseas , Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fenômenos Magnéticos
7.
N Am Spine Soc J ; 1: 100006, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38620235

RESUMO

Background: The COVID-19 global pandemic has caused unprecedented levels of strain on the United States healthcare and its workforce. Orthopaedic and neurosurgery residents and fellows, as part of this workforce have also experienced some of the uncertainty and stress caused by this pandemic. Concerns exist regarding the effects of the pandemic on spine surgery education due to the cancellation of all elective surgeries. Current Context: We explore how this pandemic is affecting orthopaedic and neurosurgery residents and fellows and their spine surgery education and experience. We also examined measures taken by the residency and fellowship programs to protect their residents and fellows, and measures taken by regulatory agencies like the ACGME and the ABOS to give programs some flexibility during these difficult times. Conclusion: Orthopaedic and neurosurgery residents and fellows are often on the front lines of patient care. Programs have to ensure adequate resources and training, supervision, and work hour requirements are met. Residents and fellows need to be ready to assist with management of COVID-19 patients if necessary. Residency programs and spine surgery fellowships need to use objective metrics to assess the impact of the pandemic on the spine surgery education of their residents and fellows in order to address any potential area of weakness caused by the decreased exposure to spine surgery.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA