A New Approach to the Development of Hollow Fiber Membrane Modules for Water Treatment: Mixed Polymer Matrices.

In this study, mixed matrix hollow fiber polymeric membranes were prepared using polyethersulfone (PES) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) as polymers in their composition. N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) was used as a solvent and demineralized water with an electrical conductivity below 3 µS·cm-1 was used as a non-solvent. A new approach to producing enhanced polymeric hollow fiber membranes based on the preparation of a simple blend PVDF/PES solution, and on the conformation of the composite membranes through the extrusion technique followed by the phase inversion process in a non-solvent bath, was applied. The investigation focused on the preparation of polymeric membranes with different polymer ratios and further assessment of the effects of these proportions on the membrane performance and in specific physical properties. The amount of PVDF ranged from 10 to 90% with 10% steps. The presence of PVDF, although it increased the membranes' plasticity, had a negative effect on the overall mechanical properties of the composite membranes. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results showed good dispersion of both polymers in the polymeric matrix. Furthermore, the membrane permeability showed a slight negative correlation with contact angle, suggesting that membrane hydrophilicity played an important role in membrane permeability. Finally, it was found that membranes with low ratios of PVDF/PES may have potential for water treatment applications, due to the combined advantageous properties of PES and PVDF.

Evaluation of aerobic biological process with post-ozonation for treatment of mixed industrial and domestic wastewater for potential reuse in agriculture.

Suspended growth biological process (SGBP) with post-ozonation (O3) was investigated for treatment of simulated complex mixed industrial and domestic wastewater at specific conditions. The SGBP was operated under complete aeration, 30/30-min and 60/30-min on/off aeration cycles and effluent was exposed to ozone at 250 mgO3/h fixed dose and contact time 1 to 60-min. The SGBP performance was maximum under 60/30-min aeration conditions achieving 92.1, 90.6, 83.3 and 83.8% reduction in COD, BOD5, TN and PO4-P respectively. Nitrification (64.1%) was uninhibited even on transition to pulse aeration cycles. The concentrations of diesel oil and methylene blue dye were reduced by 83.6 and 93.5% respectively. Post-ozonation oxidized residual organics up to 19.9%, based on COD measurement, and increased effluent BOD5 up to 49.5%. The results including the crop growth outcomes indicate that SGBP-O3 process has great potential to improve the quality of mixed industrial and domestic wastewater considerably for various water reuse applications.

Removal of sulfadiazine from simulated industrial wastewater by a membrane bioreactor and ozonation.

Ozonation can be used as a polishing treatment for degrading low-concentration pharmaceutical compounds recalcitrant to biological treatment, when large amounts of biodegradable organics have been previously removed by biological processes. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation has not yet been carried out for the coupled MBR + O3 process through an experimental design approach. Thereby, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of different processes (membrane bioreactor-MBR, ozonation; and integrated MBR + O3) for removing the antibiotic sulfadiazine (SDZ) from a synthetic wastewater matrix of industrial interest. The MBR behavior was monitored over seven months for different parameters (pH, temperature, permeate flow, transmembrane pressure, biological oxygen demand-BOD5, chemical oxygen demand-COD, total organic carbon-TOC, solids, and SDZ concentration). Additionally, the amount of SDZ sorbed onto the sludge was characterized, an issue which is scarcely addressed in most research works. Ozonation experiments were conducted in batch mode in a 2-L glass reactor provided with openings for gas flow. For the MBR + O3 process, the effects of gas flow rate (0.1-1.5 L min-1) and inlet ozone concentration (4-12 mg L-1) on SDZ removal from the MBR permeate were systematically assessed using a Doehlert experimental design and response surface methodology. The results indicated that the MBR system showed good performance regarding organic matter removal efficiency, evaluated in terms of BOD5 (91.5%), COD (93.1%) and TOC (96.3%). In contrast, SDZ was partially removed (33%) by the MBR; in that case, the results indicated that the antibiotic was moderately removed with the sludge and partially biodegraded. In turn, the MBR + O3 system showed excellent performance for removing SDZ (100%), TOC (97%), BOD5 (94%) and COD (97%). The statistical analysis confirmed that the influence of ozone gas flow rate upon the SDZ removal rate was more important than that exhibited by inlet ozone concentration. Therefore, coupling MBR and ozone can be considered a promising alternative for point source treatment of antibiotic production wastewater.

Dataset and detailed methodology for structure and performance characterization of modified polymeric membranes.

The data contained in this publication refers to protocols adopted characterization of clay nanoparticles (CN) membranes with and without the use of polyethylene oxide (PEO) as pore former. The membrane casting solutions were produced by dissolving PS (18% w/w) in NMP with addition of CN (1-5% w/w CN/PS) and/or PEO (1-5% w/w PEO/PS) when applicable. Membranes with no CN or PEO were used as a control. Pure water permeability of cast membranes was determined using the cross-flow cell unit. Viscosity was measured for most casting solution compositions and contact angle was measured for all membranes. The control membrane was further compared in detail to the highest permeability membranes with only CN (1.5%), only PEO (5%), 1.5% CN and 5% PEO (combination of optimal individual permeabilities), and 4.5% CN and 5% PEO (optimal combined permeability) regarding thickness, porosity, rejection, fouling resistance, surface charge, and thermal/mechanical properties. The relevance of the data presented here is to show details about methods for characterizing membranes for future comparison of performance and eventual improvement of characterization methods.

Saúde pública e inovações tecnológicas para abastecimento público / Public health and technological innovations for public supply

Resumo A escassez de água em metrópoles brasileiras tem se agravado em função das características de seu próprio desenvolvimento. A expansão urbana desordenada e próxima a mananciais, junto com a falta de infraestrutura para estes novos núcleos habitacionais, tem favorecido a degradação dos mananciais utilizados para abastecimento público. Em razão disto, a população fica mais suscetível às doenças de veiculação hídrica. Independentemente dos tipos de contaminantes presentes na água, busca-se aprimorar as tecnologias tradicionalmente empregadas nos processos de tratamento hídrico a fim de garantir uma água segura para o abastecimento da população, sem considerar as inovações tecnológicas neste setor. Assim, o presente estudo busca evidenciar a necessidade de melhorar as ações de tratamento de água e esgotos realizadas atualmente no país, em função dos riscos associados à saúde pública. Busca-se também analisar o reúso potável direto e como esta prática pode ser uma solução para promover uma água de qualidade e suprir a demanda de grandes centros urbanos em situação de escassez hídrica.

Abstract Water scarcity in Brazilian metropolises has been aggravated by the characteristics of their very development. The disordered urban expansion near fountainheads and the lack of infrastructure for new housing units has contributed to the degradation of water sources used for public supply. This causes the population to be more susceptible to waterborne diseases. Regardless of the various types of contaminants present in the water, the improvement of traditional technologies used in the water treatment process and wastewater treatment is sought after to promote safe water supply to the population, without considering technological innovations on the sector. This study aims to demonstrate the ineffectiveness of treatment processes currently used in Brazil and the risks to public health. We also analyze the direct potable reuse and how this practice can be a solution to promote water quality and meet the demand of large urban centers in situations of water scarcity.

Tratamento de água para abastecimento público por ultrafiltração: avaliação comparativa através dos custos diretos de implantação e operação com os sistemas convencional e convencional com carvão ativado / Drinking water treatment by ultrafiltration: comparative evaluation through direct capital and operational costs with conventional and conventional with activated carbon systems

Neste trabalho é apresentada uma avaliação comparativa preliminar entre os sistemas de tratamento de água por ultrafiltração, convencional e convencional com carvão ativado, com base nos custos diretos de implantação e operação, utilizando-se os resultados obtidos em uma unidade piloto de ultrafiltração, instalada junto à captação de água no Reservatório Guarapiranga. Para comparação considerou-se os dados relativos à eficiência da remoção de Carbono Orgânico Total. A avaliação de custos foi feita pelo método de cálculo do período de retorno de investimento, obtendo-se valores de R$ 0,20/m³ para o sistema convencional e R$ 0,40/m³ para os outros sistemas. Estes resultados mostram o potencial de processos de separação por membranas no tratamento de água para abastecimento público.

In this work it is presented a comparative evaluation for ultrafiltration, conventional, and conventional with activated carbon water treatment systems, considering direct capital and operational costs, based on the results of an ultrafiltration pilot unit, installed at the Guarapiranga's Reservoir. In order to compare the costs it was considered Total Organic Carbon removal efficiency. Cost evaluation was performed based on the pay back method, resulting in a value of R$ 0.20/m3 for conventional water treatment system, and R$ 0.40/m3 for the others. These results clearly demonstrate the high potential of membrane separation technology for drinking water treatment.