RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Use of handheld portable ultrasound is increasing and would improve access for people with rheumatic disease when conventional, cart-based ultrasound is unavailable. This study compared handheld and cart-based ultrasound for the assessment of gout lesions in people with gout. METHODS: The lower limbs of 21 participants with gout were independently scanned at six sites (1st and 2nd metatarsophalangeal joints, knee, patellar ligament, Achilles tendon, and peroneal tendons) using cart-based (LOGIQ P9) and handheld (Vscan Air™) ultrasound by two rheumatologists. One rheumatologist was randomized to scan the right or left leg first with the cart-based or handheld ultrasound. The other rheumatologist scanned the legs in the opposite order with the imaging devices reversed. Images were saved and blinded images scored for double contour, tophus, erosion and aggregates using OMERACT definitions by two rheumatologists experienced in gout ultrasound. RESULTS: On handheld ultrasound, 90% of participants had at least one site with double contour, tophus and erosions, and 100% had at least one site with aggregates. There were similar findings using cart-based ultrasound. However, site-level inter-device analysis showed only fair-good agreement: kappa (percentage agreement) for double contour 0.22 (67%), tophus 0.46 (77%), erosion 0.63 (83%) and aggregates 0.37 (75%). There were more aggregates detected by cart-based ultrasound in joints and more tophi detected by handheld ultrasound in ligaments and tendons. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld ultrasound can detect gout lesions in people with established gout. However, concordance between cart-based and handheld ultrasound in detection of some gout lesions is low, particularly double contour and aggregates.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to determine predictors of gout flare when commencing allopurinol using the "start-low go-slow" dose escalation strategy. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a 12-month double-blind placebo-controlled noninferiority trial with participants randomized 1:1 to colchicine 0.5 mg daily or placebo for the first six months was undertaken. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of gout flares in the first and last six months of the trial. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed a significant association between risk of a gout flare in the first six months and flare in the month before starting allopurinol (odds ratio [OR] 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-5.17) and allopurinol 100 mg starting dose (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.41-7.27). The predictors of any gout flares in the last six months of the trial, after stopping colchicine or placebo, were having received colchicine (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.48-5.86), at least one flare in the month before stopping study drug (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.21-13.15), and serum urate ≥0.36 mmol/L at month 6 (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.14-7.12). CONCLUSION: Anti-inflammatory prophylaxis when starting allopurinol using the "start-low go-slow" dose escalation strategy may be best targeted at those who have had a gout flare in the month before starting allopurinol and are commencing allopurinol 100 mg daily. For those with ongoing gout flares during the first six months of starting allopurinol who have not yet achieved serum urate target, a longer period of prophylaxis may be required.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We previously identified that zoledronate administered at 18-month intervals reduced fragility fractures by a third in a 6-year trial of women older than 65 years with osteopenia. This extension aims to identify the persistence of these effects. METHODS: Of the 2000 ambulant, community dwelling, postmenopausal women older than 65 years recruited in Auckland, New Zealand, with T-scores at the total hip or femoral neck in the range -1·0 to -2·5, we invited participants who received four doses of intravenous zoledronate, completed follow-up to year 6 of the core trial, did not have metabolic bone disease (other than osteoporosis), and were not using bone-active drugs into this 4-year observational study extension, during which further treatment was at the discretion of their own doctors. Participants were asked to notify study staff of any new fractures and were telephoned at 7·5 years and 9·0 years to update their health status. Participants were then invited to an onsite visit at 10·0 years. Fractures and other health events were documented at each contact and analysed in all women who entered the extension, and bone mineral density (BMD; analysed in participants without notable use of bone-active medications who attended an onsite visit at 10 years) and turnover markers (measured from fasting morning blood in a random subset of 50 participants) were measured at year 10. FINDINGS: Of the 1000 women randomly assigned to receive zoledronate in the core trial, 796 participants were eligible for the extension, of whom 762 (96%) entered the extension between Sept 24, 2015, and Dec 13, 2017. Mean follow-up duration was 4·24 years (SD 0·57, range 0·61-6·55; final follow-up on May 25, 2022). 727 (91%) of participants were assessed at 10 years. 25 women died during the extension, six withdrew for medical reasons, and four were lost to follow-up. 92 women suffered 114 non-vertebral fractures during the extension. Non-vertebral fracture rates increased from a nadir of 15 fractures per 1000 woman-years (95% CI 10-21) in the last 2 years of the core trial to 24 fractures (17-33) in years 6-8 and 42 fractures (32-53) in years 8-10, similar to that in the placebo group in the last 2 years of the core trial. Total hip BMD (relative risk per 0·1 g/cm2 0·73, 95% CI 0·57-0·93; p=0·011) and a previous history of non-vertebral fracture (1·74, 1·12-2·69; p=0·013) at year 6 predicted incident fractures but change in total hip BMD did not. Total hip BMD decreased from 4·2% above study baseline to 0·8% above baseline (p<0·0001) during the extension. Turnover markers were not useful for predicting BMD loss in individuals. Osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femoral fractures did not occur in any participants. INTERPRETATION: The reduced fracture rates following zoledronate in the core trial were substantially maintained for 1·5-3·5 years after the last zoledronate infusion, but not thereafter. FUNDING: Health Research Council of New Zealand.