Central venous catheter tip positioning using ultrasound in pediatric patients-A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: In children, central venous catheter (CVC) placement is usually performed under ultrasound guidance for optimal visualization of vessels and reduction of puncture-related complications. Nevertheless, in many cases, additional radiographic examinations are performed to check the position of the catheter tip. AIM: The primary objective of this observational feasibility study was to determine the number of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter tips that can be identified in a subsequent position check using ultrasonography. Furthermore, we investigated the optimal ultrasound window, time expenditure, and success rate concerning puncture attempts and side effects. In addition, we compared the calculated and real insertion depths and analyzed the position of the catheter tip on postoperative radiographs with the tracheal bifurcation as a traditional landmark. METHODS: Ninety children with congenital heart defects who required a central venous line for cardiac surgery were included in this single-center study. After the insertion of the catheter, the optimal position of its tip was controlled using one of four predefined ultrasound windows. A chest radiograph was obtained postoperatively in accordance with hospital standards to check the catheter tip position determined by ultrasonography. RESULTS: The children had a median (IQR) age of 11.5 (4.0, 58.8) months and a mean (SD) BMI of 15.3 (2.91) kg/m2 Ultrasound visualization of the catheter tip was successful in 86/90 (95.6%) children (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.3%, 99.8%). Postoperative radiographic examination showed that the catheter tip was in the desired position in 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 99.2%) of the cases. None of the children needed the catheter tip position being corrected based on chest radiography. CONCLUSION: Additional radiation exposure after the placement of central venous catheters can be avoided with the correct interpretation of standardized ultrasound windows, especially in vulnerable children with cardiac disease.

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular cannulation of left brachiocephalic versus right internal jugular vein: Comparative analysis of central venous catheter-associated complications.

AIMS: Central venous catheters are essential for the management of pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Recently, an ultrasound-guided access via a supraclavicular approach to the brachiocephalic vein has been described. Central venous catheters are associated with a relevant number of complications in pediatric patients. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of complications of left brachiocephalic vein access compared with right internal jugular vein standard access in children undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all pediatric cases at our tertiary care university hospital over a two-year period receiving central venous catheters for cardiac surgery. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Frequency of complications associated with central venous catheters inserted via the left brachiocephalic vein vs. right internal jugular vein. Complications were defined as: chylothorax, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, or delayed chest closure. Secondary endpoints: Evaluation of the insertion depth of the catheter using a height-based formula without adjustment for side used. RESULTS: Initially, 504 placed catheters were identified. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 480 placed catheters remained for final analysis. Overall complications were reported in 68/480 (14.2%) cases. There was no difference in the frequency of all complications in the left brachiocephalic vein vs. the right internal jugular vein group (15.49% vs. 13.65%; OR = 1.16 [0.64; 2.07]), nor was there any difference considering the most relevant complications chylothorax (7.7% vs. 8.6%; OR = 0.89 [0.39; 1.91]) and thrombosis (5.6% vs. 4.5%; OR = 1.28 [0.46; 3.31]). The mean deviation from the optimal insertion depth was left brachiocephalic vein vs. right internal jugular vein 5.38 ± 13.6 mm and 4.94 ± 15.1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among children undergoing cardiac surgery, there is no significant difference between the supraclavicular approach to the left brachiocephalic vein and the right internal jugular vein regarding complications. For both approaches, a universal formula can be used to determine the correct insertion depth.

Duct Stenting vs. Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt: New Insights Learned From High-Risk Patients With Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation.

Background: As no data were available on the comparison of outcomes between modified Blalock-Taussig shunts (MBTs) vs. duct-stenting (DS) in patients with pulmonary atresia (PA) and an increased ductal tortuosity and in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact septum (PA-IVS) with right ventricle-dependent coronary circulation (RVDCC), we aimed to perform a single-center retrospective evaluation. Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, 127 patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC) underwent either MBTs (without additional repairs) (n = 56) or DS (n = 71). The primary endpoint was defined as arriving at the next planned surgery (Glenn or biventricular repair) avoiding one of the following: (1) unplanned surgery or unplanned perforation of the pulmonary valve (PVP) with a stent, (2) procedure-related permanent complications, and (3) death. Two subgroups were considered: (1) patients who had a ductal curvature index (DCI) >0.45 (n = 32) and (2) patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC (n = 13). Ductal curvature index (DCI) was measured in all the patients to assess the tortuosity of the ducts. Patients with DCI >0.45 were considered as being in a high-risk group for the duct-stenting; a previous study showed that the patients with a DCI < 0.45 had a better outcome when compared with those with a DCI> 0.45. Results: The primary outcome was achieved equally in the two groups (77.5% in DS, 75% in MBTs). Hospital deaths, need for ECMO, and the occurrence of major complications was more frequent in the group with MBTs with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 5, 0.8, and 4, respectively, and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.1-22.6, 0.7-0.9, and 1.6-10.3, respectively, and a P-value < 0.05. For the two subgroups, the primary outcome was achieved in 64% of patients with a DCI >0.45 who received MBTs compared to 20% in those with DS (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10, P 0.005). While 74.1% of the patients with PA-IVS and RVDCC after DS had achieved the primary outcome, all patients with MBTs had an impaired outcome (OR 3.5, 95%CI 1-11.2, P 0.004). Conclusion: MBTs showed a better outcome in patients with tortuous ducts compared to DS. DS seems to be superior in patients with DDPC with DCI <0.45 and patients with PA-IVS with RVDCC.

Sedation versus General Anesthesia for Cardiac Catheterization in Infants: A Retrospective, Monocentric, Cohort Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Children with congenital heart disease require repeated catheterization. Anesthetic management influences the procedure and may influence outcome; however, data and recommendations are lacking for infants. We studied the influence of sedation versus general anesthesia (GA) on adverse events during catheterization for children <2 years old. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective study of all catheterization procedures (2008-2013). High-severity adverse event (HSAE) rates were compared using propensity-score-adjusted models, including pre- and intra-procedural variables. RESULTS: 803 cases (619 patients) (368 (46%) GA, 435 (54%) sedation) with a mean age of 6.9 ± 6.1 months were studied. The conversion rate (GA after sedation) was 18 (4%). Hospital stay was 4.9 ± 4.0 and 4.1 ± 2.5 (p = 0.01) after GA or sedation, respectively. HSAE occurred in 75 (20%) versus 40 (9%) (p < 0.01) in GA versus sedation procedures, respectively. Risk factors (multivariable analysis) were older patients (p = 0.05), smaller weights (p < 0.01), palliated status (OR 3.2 [1.2-8.9], p = 0.02), two-ventricle physiology (OR 7.3 [2.7-20.2], p < 0.01), cyanosis (OR 4.6 [2.2-9.8], p < 0.01), pulmonary hypertension (OR 5.6 [2.0-15.5], p < 0.01), interventional catheterization (OR 1.8 [1.1-3.2], p = 0.02) and procedure-type risk category 4 (OR 28.9 [1.8-455.1], p = 0.02). Sedation did not increase the events rate and decreased the requirement for hemodynamic support (OR 5.2 [2.2-12.0], p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sedation versus GA for cardiac catheterization in children <2 years old is safe and effective with regard to HSAE. Sedation also decreases the requirement for hemodynamic support. Paradoxical effects (older age and two-ventricle physiology) on risk have been found for this specific age cluster.

[Central Venous Access in Children: Technique and Complications]. / Gefäßzugänge bei Kindern: Technik, Komplikationen und Fallstricke beim zentralen Venenkatheter.

Children with complex diseases often need central venous catheter, not only for intraoperative use, but also for parenteral nutrition, multiple blood draw due to lab examination and to administer drugs that cannot be given via peripheral lines. Whereas the landmark driven vascular access was teached for years, nowadays the routine use of ultrasound based techniques can be called the gold standard. This article highlights standard locations for central venous access like cannulation of the internal jugular vein as well as novel alternatives such as the cannulation of the brachiocephalic vein. The correct insertion depth of central lines is essential to avoid serious complications. Several different formulas are available and can be used. Independent of the used formula, you have to make sure that complications due to incorrect depth of central venous line are a topic of the past. Finally, important tips and tricks to avoid failure and serious complications are discussed.