Talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone for advanced melanoma: 5-year final analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) plus ipilimumab has demonstrated greater antitumor activity versus ipilimumab alone, without additional toxicity, in patients with advanced melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from a randomized phase II study. These data provide the longest efficacy and safety follow-up for patients with melanoma treated with a combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor.Eligible patients with unresectable stage IIIB‒IV melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. T-VEC was administered intralesionally at 106 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL in week 1, followed by 108 PFU/mL in week 4 and every 2 weeks thereafter. Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ≤4 doses) was administered intravenously starting at week 1 in the ipilimumab arm and week 6 in the combination arm. The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per immune-related response criteria; key secondary end points included durable response rate (DRR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.Overall, 198 patients were randomized to receive the combination (n=98) or ipilimumab (n=100). The combination improved the ORR versus ipilimumab (35.7% vs 16.0%; OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.7; p=0.003). DRR was 33.7% and 13.0% (unadjusted OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; descriptive p=0.001), respectively. Among the objective responders, the median DOR was 69.2 months (95% CI 38.5 to not estimable) with the combination and was not reached with ipilimumab. Median PFS was 13.5 months with the combination and 6.4 months with ipilimumab (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.09; descriptive p=0.14). Estimated 5-year OS was 54.7% (95% CI 43.9 to 64.2) in the combination arm and 48.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 58.1) in the ipilimumab arm. Forty-seven (48.0%) and 65 (65.0%) patients in the combination and ipilimumab arms, respectively, received subsequent therapies. No new safety signals were reported.At the 5-year follow-up, the improved response rates observed with T-VEC plus ipilimumab were durable. This is the first randomized controlled study of the combination of an oncolytic virus and a checkpoint inhibitor that meets its primary end point.Trial registration number: NCT01740297.

The Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership: Bridging Academic and Community Networks in a Collaborative Approach to Sarcoma.

The treatment of sarcoma necessitates a collaborative approach, given its rarity and complex management. At a single institution, multidisciplinary teams of specialists determine and execute treatment plans involving surgical, radiation, and medical management. Treatment guidelines for systemic therapies in advanced or nonresectable soft tissue sarcoma have advanced in recent years as new immunotherapies and targeted therapies become available. Collaboration between institutions is necessary to facilitate accrual to clinical trials. Here, we describe the success of the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership (MWSTP) in creating a network encompassing large academic centers and local community sites. We propose a new model utilizing online platforms to expand the reach of clinical expertise for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

SALVO: Single-Arm Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Mucosal melanoma is a rare, aggressive form of melanoma with extremely high recurrence rates despite definitive surgical resection with curative intent. Currently there is no consensus on adjuvant therapy. Data on checkpoint inhibitors for adjuvant therapy are lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-arm, multicenter clinical trial using "flip dose" ipilimumab (1 mg/kg q3w × 4 cycles), and nivolumab (3 mg/kg q3w × 4 cycles), then nivolumab 480 mg q4w × 11 cycles to complete a year of adjuvant therapy. Participants must have had R0/R1 resection ≤90 days before registration, no prior systemic therapy (adjuvant radiotherapy allowed), ECOG 0/1, and no uncontrolled autoimmune disease or other invasive cancer. Patients were recruited through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Oncology Network. RESULTS: From September 2017 to August 2021, 35 patients were enrolled. Of these, 29 (83%) had R0 resections, and 7 (20%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. Median age was 67 years, 21 (60.0%) female. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31%-66%] and 37% (95% CI, 19%-55%), respectively. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 87% (95% CI, 68%-95%) and 68% (95% CI, 46%-83%), respectively. Median RFS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.7-25.8). Most common grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (14%), hypertension (14%), and hyponatremia (11%), with no grade 4/5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Flip-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab after resection of mucosal melanoma is associated with outcomes improved over that of surgical resection alone. Long-term follow-up, subgroup analyses and correlative studies are ongoing.

Postoperative Echography for Optimization of Radiation Dosimetry in Patients with Uveal Melanoma Treated with Plaque Brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: (1) To describe the technique of postoperative echography to confirm the intended treatment dose to the tumor apex in patients with uveal melanoma treated with plaque brachytherapy. (2) To describe the local tumor control rate and visual outcomes with the brachytherapy strategies used at our institution. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SUBJECTS: Three hundred seventy-two consecutive patients with uveal melanoma (small, medium, and large) treated with plaque brachytherapy at the University of Iowa from August 2008 to February 2019. METHODS: Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were recorded for each patient. Patients with posterior tumors treated with plaque brachytherapy (n = 355) underwent intraoperative ultrasound to confirm plaque placement, and additional postoperative ultrasound on day 1 to 3 postplaque insertion. In cases where intratumor/episcleral plaque edema or hemorrhage shifted the dose to the prescription point to < 85 Gray (Gy), the duration of plaque brachytherapy was increased to compensate. Statistical analysis was performed to compare variables associated with the need for plaque adjustment. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Variables associated with plaque dose needing to be recalculated, local tumor control, and visual acuity outcomes. RESULTS: In 31 (8.3%) cases, postoperative echography showed that the tumor apex had shifted outside the 85 Gy isodose curve, requiring adjustment of the duration of brachytherapy (28 cases) or repositioning of the plaque (3 cases). Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study tumor size was significantly associated with need to adjust the plaque prescription dose (P = 0.03), with large tumors having the highest rate of adjustment. Tumor thickness was larger in cases requiring plaque adjustment compared with those that were not adjusted (median 4.9 mm vs. 3.0 mm, P < 0.01). Local tumor control was 99% (95% confidence interval, 97%-100%) at 5 years and 99% (95% confidence interval, 97%-100%) at 10 years. The percentage of patients who had experienced a visual acuity decline of ≥ 3 lines of vision or had < 20/200 acuity was 14.9% at 1 year after brachytherapy, 35.3% at 3 years, and 51.6% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative ultrasound performed on postoperative day 1 to 3 after plaque insertion for patients undergoing brachytherapy for uveal melanoma may result in improved local tumor control, particularly in the setting of thicker or larger tumors. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Olutasidenib (FT-2102) in patients with relapsed or refractory IDH1-mutant glioma: A multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Olutasidenib (FT-2102) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, brain-penetrant and selective inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). The aim of the study was to determine the safety and clinical activity of olutasidenib in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1R132X mutation. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ib/II clinical trial. Eligible patients (≥18 years) had histologically confirmed IDH1R132X-mutated glioma that relapsed or progressed on or following standard therapy and had measurable disease. Patients received olutasidenib, 150 mg orally twice daily (BID) in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (cycle 1) and safety in phase I and objective response rate using the Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria in phase II. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled and followed for a median 15.1 months (7.3‒19.4). No DLTs were observed in the single-agent glioma cohort and the pharmacokinetic relationship supported olutasidenib 150 mg BID as the recommended phase II dose. In the response-evaluable population, disease control rate (objective response plus stable disease) was 48%. Two (8%) patients demonstrated a best response of partial response and eight (32%) had stable disease for at least 4 months. Grade 3‒4 adverse events (≥10%) included alanine aminotransferase increased and aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [12%], each). CONCLUSIONS: Olutasidenib 150 mg BID was well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory gliomas harboring an IDH1R132X mutation and demonstrated preliminary evidence of clinical activity in this heavily pretreated population.

T2* Imaging Assessment of Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Combined With Pharmacological Ascorbate in Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Pilot Study.

Background: Extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are commonly treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy followed by surgical resection. However, the pathological near-complete response rate is low (9-25%). Noninvasive imaging assessment that predicts treatment response before and during treatment is desirable to optimize treatment regimens. This pilot study aimed to investigate the application of a quantitative MRI parameter, T2*, in assessing neoadjuvant radiation therapy combined with pharmacological ascorbate in extremity STS. Methods: This prospective cohort study included seven patients diagnosed with extremity STS and scheduled to receive neoadjuvant radiation therapy combined with pharmacological ascorbate. T2* maps were obtained from each patient before treatment (baseline MRI), two weeks after initiating treatment (on-treatment MRI), and before surgery (pre-surgery MRI). The T2* values within the tumor region were transformed into z-scores with respect to the normal- appearing tissue region. The voxel-wise z-scores within the tumor region were thresholded to generate masks representing significantly high (z-score>1.96) and low z-score (z-score<-1.96) voxels. The means of the total z-scores and within each of the significantly high and low z-score mask were computed. Their correlations with percent necrosis from pathological examination were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r. A correlation was considered as moderate or strong when r is higher than 0.6 and 0.8, respectively. A correlation was considered as fair or weak when r is below 0.6. Results: For the baseline and on-treatment MRIs, the means of the significantly high z-scores of the T2* measurements showed moderate correlations with percent necrosis (r = 0.68 and 0.6; p = 0.11 and 0.24). For the pre-surgery MRI, the means of the total and significantly high z-scores showed strong correlations with percent necrosis (r = 0.8 and 0.9; p = 0.13 and 0.08). Tumor volume and baseline MRI-based percent necrosis showed fair or weak correlations (r = 0.3-0.54; p = 0.24-0.68). Conclusion: T2* measurements prior to treatment, two weeks after initiating treatment, and before surgery showed moderate to strong correlations with percent necrosis. These results support the potential for using T2* mapping to predict and assess response to neoadjuvant radiation therapy combined with pharmacological ascorbate in extremity STS. Level of Evidence: IV.

The Impact of TSC-1 and -2 Mutations on Response to Therapy in Malignant PEComa: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are a diverse family of mesenchymal tumors with myomelanocytic differentiation that disproportionately affect women and can be associated with tuberous sclerosis (TS). Although mTOR inhibition is widely used as first-line treatment, it is unclear what genomic alterations exist in these tumors and how they influence the response to therapy. METHODS: This was a multicenter study conducted at five sites within the US. The data were collected from 1 January 2004 to 31 January 2021. We conducted a retrospective analysis to identify PEComa patients with next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and compared outcomes based on mutations. RESULTS: No significant differences in survival were identified between TSC-1 and TSC-2 mutated PEComa or TSC-1/-2 versus other mutations. No significant difference was seen in progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line therapy between mTOR inhibition versus other systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to detect differences in survival based on genomic alterations or PFS between mTOR inhibition versus other systemic therapies. Future studies should seek to identify other drivers of TSC-1/-2 silencing that could predict response to mTOR inhibition.

A randomised phase II trial of a trivalent ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3 combined with immunological adjuvant OPT-821 versus OPT-821 alone in metastatic sarcoma patients rendered disease-free by surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after resection of metastatic sarcoma is common. The gangliosides GM2, GD2 and GD3 are strongly expressed across sarcoma subtypes. We hypothesised that generation of anti-ganglioside antibodies would control micrometastases and improve outcomes in sarcoma patients who were disease-free after metastasectomy. METHODS: We conducted a randomised phase II trial of the immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with a KLH-conjugated ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3, versus OPT-821 alone in patients with metastatic sarcoma following complete metastasectomy. Patients received 10 subcutaneous injections at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 68 and 84 and were followed for evidence of recurrent disease. The primary end-point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end-points included overall survival and serologic response. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were randomised, 68 to each arm. The mean age was 51.2, 52.2% were male, 90.4% had relapsed disease, 86.8% had high-grade tumours and 14% had ≥4 metastases resected. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (33%), spindle cell sarcoma (14%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (13%), osteosarcoma (10%), synovial sarcoma (9%), liposarcoma (9%) and others (12%). Most adverse events were Grade ≤2 (83.8% and 70.6% in the vaccine and adjuvant arms, respectively). The most common (≥20% of patients) were injection site reaction (89.7%), fatigue (44.1%) and pyrexia (27.9%) on the vaccine arm, and injection site reaction (69.1%) on the adjuvant only arm. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate (34.5% and 34.8% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively) did not differ between arms (P = 0.725). One-year overall survival rates were 93.1% and 91.5% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively (P = 0.578). Serologic responses at week 9 were more frequent on the vaccine arm (96.5% of patients) than in the adjuvant arm (32.8%), and the difference between groups was durable. CONCLUSIONS: A sustained serologic response to vaccination was induced with the vaccine, but no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival was observed between treatment arms. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT01141491.

Detection of Ferritin Expression in Soft Tissue Sarcomas With MRI: Potential Implications for Iron Metabolic Therapy.

Background: Cancer cells often have altered iron metabolism relative to non-malignant cells with increased transferrin receptor and ferritin expression. Targeting iron regulatory proteins as part of a cancer therapy regimen is currently being investigated in various malignancies. Anti-cancer therapies that exploit the differences in iron metabolism between malignant and non-malignant cells (e.g. pharmacological ascorbate and iron chelation therapy) have shown promise in various cancers, including glioblastoma, lung, and pancreas cancers. Non-invasive techniques that probe tissue iron metabolism may provide valuable information for the personalization of iron-based cancer therapies. T2* mapping is a clinically available MRI technique that assesses tissue iron content in the heart and liver. We aimed to investigate the capacity of T2* mapping to detect iron stores in soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Methods: In this study, we evaluated T2* relaxation times ex vivo in five STS samples from subjects enrolled on a phase Ib/IIa clinical trial combining pharmacological ascorbate with neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Iron protein expression levels (ferritin, transferrin receptor, iron response protein 2) were evaluated by Western blot analysis. Bioinformatic data relating clinical outcomes in STS patients and iron protein expression levels were evaluated using the KMplotter database. Results: There was a high level of inter-subject variability in the expression of iron protein and T2* relaxation times. We identified that T2* relaxation time is capable of accurately detecting ferritin-heavy chain expression (r = -0.96) in these samples. Bioinformatic data acquired from the KMplot database revealed that transferrin receptor and iron-responsive protein 2 may be negative prognostic markers while ferritin expression may be a positive prognostic marker in the management of STS. Conclusion: These data suggest that targeting iron regulatory proteins may provide a therapeutic approach to enhance STS management. Additionally, T2* mapping has the potential to be used a clinically accessible, non-invasive marker of STS iron regulatory protein expression and influence cancer therapy decisions that warrants further investigation. Level of Evidence: IV.

Surgical management for giant bladder leiomyosarcoma.

While urothelial carcinoma is the most common histologic type of bladder cancer in the United States, leiomyosarcoma is a rare and aggressive variant. The rarity of bladder leiomyosarcoma results in uncertainty regarding the optimal treatment pathway. We report on a patient with a giant non-metastatic bladder leiomyosarcoma effectively managed with primary surgical intervention without chemoradiation.

Turning 'Cold' tumors 'Hot': immunotherapies in sarcoma.

Immunotherapies have an established role in the management of several advanced malignancies. Their responses are largely dependent on the presence of PD-L1, microsatellite instability (MSI), and high tumor mutation burden. Sarcomas are heterogenous tumors which comprise over 100 subtypes. They are broadly considered immunologically inert or "cold". Immunotherapy as monotherapy has shown interesting responses in a certain handful of subtypes, such as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, dedifferentiated and pleomorphic liposarcoma, and alveolar soft part sarcoma. However, the mechanisms of action of immunotherapy agents in several sarcoma subtypes remains unknown. Several sarcoma types such as leiomyosarcoma have been shown to have an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Early clinical studies suggest the emergence of B cell infiltration in sarcoma tumor tissues as well as the role of PD-1 and PD-L1 as biomarkers of response. Immunotherapy combinations with conventional chemotherapies, radiation therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and oncolytic viruses are showing promise in turning these "cold" tumors "hot". Several novel agents as well as repurposing therapies with the potential to enhance immunotherapy responses are undergoing pre-clinical and clinical studies in other tumor types. Herein we review current clinical studies which have explored the use of immunotherapeutic agents in the management of sarcomas and discuss the challenges and future directions.

Overcoming PD-1 Blockade Resistance with CpG-A Toll-Like Receptor 9 Agonist Vidutolimod in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

Patients with advanced melanoma that is resistant to PD-1 blockade therapy have limited treatment options. Vidutolimod (formerly CMP-001), a virus-like particle containing a CpG-A Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist, may reverse PD-1 blockade resistance by triggering a strong IFN response to induce and attract antitumor T cells. In the dose-escalation part of this phase Ib study, vidutolimod was administered intratumorally at escalating doses with intravenous pembrolizumab to 44 patients with advanced melanoma who had progressive disease or stable disease on prior anti-PD-1 therapy. The combination of vidutolimod and pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile, and durable responses were observed in 25% of patients, with tumor regression in both injected and noninjected lesions, including visceral lesions. Patients who responded to vidutolimod and pembrolizumab had noninflamed tumors at baseline and induction of an IFNγ gene signature following treatment, as well as increased systemic expression of the IFN-inducible chemokine CXCL10. SIGNIFICANCE: In this phase Ib study in patients with advanced melanoma, intratumoral TLR9 agonist vidutolimod in combination with pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile and showed promising clinical activity, supporting the further clinical development of vidutolimod to overcome PD-1 blockade resistance through induction of an IFN response. See related commentary by Sullivan, p. 2960. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2945.

Melanoma Brain Metastases in the Era of Targeted Therapy and Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Brain metastases commonly develop in melanoma and are associated with poor overall survival of about five to nine months. Fortunately, new therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, have been developed. The aim of this study was to identify outcomes of different treatment strategies in patients with melanoma brain metastases in the era of checkpoint inhibitors. Patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma were identified at a single institution. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify baseline and treatment factors, which correlated with progression-free and overall survival. A total of 209 patients with melanoma brain metastases were identified. The median overall survival of the cohort was 5.3 months. On multivariable analysis, the presence of non-cranial metastatic disease, poor performance status (ECOG 2-4), whole-brain radiation therapy, and older age at diagnosis of brain metastasis were associated with poorer overall survival. Craniotomy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97) and treatment with a CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.94) were the only interventions associated with improved overall survival. Further studies with novel agents are needed to extend lifespan in patients with brain metastases in melanoma.

Presumed Melanoma of Unknown Primary Origin Metastatic to the Choroid Mimics Primary Uveal Melanoma.

We describe the case of a 69-year-old woman who presented with a decline in vision in the left eye and was found to have a choroidal lesion with clinical and echographic features concerning for primary uveal melanoma. Systemic imaging identified numerous metastases to the liver, kidneys, paratracheal lymph nodes, lung, and brain. The hepatic lesion was biopsied, and genetic analysis identified a Val600Glu (c.1799T>A) BRAF mutation, consistent with a cutaneous primary malignancy, although no primary tumor was identified. This case highlights that metastasis to the choroid is a rare presentation of nonuveal melanoma that can mimic primary uveal melanoma. Genetic analysis of tumor tissue can identify the origin of the melanoma and guide treatment options. Systemic imaging should be performed prior to intervention for choroidal neoplasms.

A randomized, open-label, phase 2, multicenter trial of gemcitabine with pazopanib or gemcitabine with docetaxel in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) are limited. The goal of the current phase 2 study was to examine the clinical activity and safety of the combination of gemcitabine plus pazopanib, a multityrosine kinase inhibitor with activity in STS. METHODS: The current randomized, phase 2 trial enrolled patients with advanced nonadipocytic STS who had received prior anthracycline-based therapy. Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 with pazopanib at a dose of 800 mg daily (G+P) or gemcitabine at a dose of 900 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 8 (G+T) every 3 weeks. Crossover was allowed at the time of disease progression. The study used a noncomparative statistical design based on the precision of 95% confidence intervals for reporting the primary endpoints of median progression-free survival (PFS) and rate of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) for these 2 regimens based on the intent-to-treat patient population (AEs were graded using version 4.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled: 45 patients on each treatment arm. The median PFS was 4.1 months for each arm (P = .3, log-rank test). The best overall response of stable disease or better (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was the same for both treatment arms (64% for both the G+T and G+P arms). The rate of related grade ≥3 AEs was 82% for the G+T arm and 78% for the G+P arm. Related grade ≥3 AEs occurring in ≥10% of patients in the G+T and G+P arms were anemia (36% and 20%, respectively), fatigue (29% and 13%, respectively), thrombocytopenia (53% and 49%, respectively), neutropenia (20% and 49%, respectively), lymphopenia (13% and 11%, respectively), and hypertension (2% and 20%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of G+P as an alternative to G+T for patients with nonadipocytic STS.

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-Related Wound Morbidity in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Perspectives for Radioprotective Agents.

Historically, patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities would undergo limb amputation. It was subsequently determined that the addition of radiation therapy (RT) delivered prior to (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) a limb-sparing surgical resection yielded equivalent survival outcomes to amputation in appropriate patients. Generally, neoadjuvant radiation offers decreased volume and dose of high-intensity radiation to normal tissue and increased chance of achieving negative surgical margins-but also increases wound healing complications when compared to adjuvant radiotherapy. This review elaborates on the current neoadjuvant/adjuvant RT approaches, wound healing complications in STS, and the potential application of novel radioprotective agents to minimize radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity.

The Effect of Concurrent Stereotactic Body Radiation and Anti-PD-1 Therapy for Recurrent Metastatic Sarcoma.

Patients diagnosed with metastatic sarcoma have limited options for achieving both local and distant tumor control. While SBRT can achieve local control, distant response rates remain low. There is limited evidence demonstrating the safety and efficacy for combining SBRT with concurrent PD-1 checkpoint blockade in metastatic sarcoma. In this prospective case-series, we examined five patients with metastatic sarcoma on pembrolizumab treated concurrently with SBRT from July 1, 2016-October 30, 2018. Acute and chronic toxicity were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 5.0). SBRT-treated tumor control was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1). With median follow-up of 14.9 months, three patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, one with intimal, and one with chondroblastic osteosarcoma received SBRT with concurrent pembrolizumab to 10 sites of metastatic disease. No grade 5 toxicities were observed. There was a single incidence of transient grade 4 lymphopenia which resolved without intervention. Grade 3 toxicities included anemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and colitis. One tumor demonstrated local progression after SBRT, and all others remained stable or with response. In conclusion, combining SBRT with PD-1 inhibition appeared to be safe in this patient population. Expected high rates of treated-tumor local control after SBRT were observed. Two of five patients demonstrated either enhanced local tumor regression, or possible abscopal effect.

The clinical characteristics of melanoma with BRAF V600R mutation: a case series study.

Currently, several targeted therapy regimens are approved as first-line treatment in V600E/K-mutant advanced and metastatic melanoma. Patients with the third most common pathologic variant in the BRAF gene, V600R, were not included in BRAF/MEK inhibitors clinical trials, so there is lack of information about the clinical characteristics and predictive value of this mutation in systemic therapy of unresectable disease. We retrospectively reviewed clinical BRAF mutation testing results and the records of melanoma patients at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics from 2011 to 2017. DNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were sequenced using a next-generation sequencing panel or dye terminator sequencing covering exon 15 of the BRAF gene. The study protocol was approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board. Nine patients (5.3% of 168 cases with BRAF mutation) were found to have the V600R mutation. We report our experience in treatment of seven patients with V600R-mutant melanoma, whose clinical records were available for review. Four patients in our cohort received BRAF inhibitors. Three patients demonstrated partial objective response to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. V600R-mutant melanoma accounts for a significant number of cases even in single-institution practices. We believe that testing for BRAF-mutation status should include rare variants of this mutation. From our experience, the high rate of ulceration, male predominance and advanced age at diagnosis are features of melanoma with V600R mutation, which are similar to those reported for V600K mutation. We observed objective response to BRAF/MEK inhibitors in three cases with V600R variant.

Targeting Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Related Refractory Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST) in a Phase II Study of Everolimus in Combination with Bevacizumab (SARC016).

PURPOSE: There are no known effective medical treatments for refractory MPNST. Inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor in MPNST results in upregulation of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling and angiogenesis, which contributes to disease progression. We conducted a phase II study for patients (pts) with refractory MPNST combining everolimus (10 mg PO once daily) with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) (complete response, partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with chemotherapy refractory sporadic or NF1 MPNST were eligible. Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles (the WHO criteria). A two-stage design targeting a 25% CBR was used: if ≥ 1/15 pts in stage 1 responded, enrollment would be expanded by 10 pts, and if ≥ 4/25 patients had clinical benefit, the combination would be considered active. RESULTS: Twenty-five pts, 17 with NF1 and 8 with sporadic MPNST, enrolled. One of 15 pts in stage 1 had clinical benefit. Of 10 additional pts enrolled, 2 had clinical benefit. The median number of completed cycles was 3 (range 1-16). Adverse events were similar to those known for this combination. CONCLUSION: With a CBR of 12% (3/25), the combination of everolimus and bevacizumab did not reach the study's target response rate and is not considered active in refractory MPNST.

Patterns of response with talimogene laherparepvec in combination with ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone in metastatic unresectable melanoma.

Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has demonstrated efficacy for unresectable melanoma. We explored response patterns from a phase 2 study evaluating patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1c malignant melanoma who received T-VEC plus ipilimumab or ipilimumab alone. Patients with objective response per modified irRC were evaluated for pseudo-progression (single ≥25% increase in tumour burden before response). Patients without pseudo-progression were classified by whether they responded within or after 6 months of treatment start; those with pseudo-progression were classified by whether pseudo-progression was due to increase in existing lesions or development of new lesions. Overall, 39% (n = 38/98) in the combination arm and 18% (n = 18/100) in the ipilimumab arm had an objective response. Eight responders (combination, n = 7 [18.4%]; ipilimumab, n = 1 [5.6%]) had pseudo-progression; most occurred by week 12 and were caused by an increase in existing lesions. These data reinforce use of T-VEC through initial progression when combined with checkpoint inhibitors.Trial Registration NCT01740297 (ClinicalTrials.gov; date of registration, December 4, 2012); 2012-000307-32 (ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu; date of registration, May 13, 2014).