Real-life use of delamanid: results from the European post-authorisation safety study.

BACKGROUND: A post-authorisation safety study (PASS) on delamanid (DLM) was conducted as part of a post-approval commitment to the European Medicines Agency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of DLM in a real-life setting, its safety, and treatment outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB). METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentric, non-interventional study conducted in the European Union. MDR-TB Regimen selection and patient monitoring were conducted in accordance with existing medical practices. Data on the use of DLM, related adverse events, and treatment outcomes were collected for up to 30 months after the first DLM dose. Descriptive summary statistics were used for continuous and categorical variables. RESULTS: Out of 86 patients, one had extrapulmonary TB. Two-thirds of the patients were treated with DLM for more than 24 weeks. The most frequent adverse drug reaction to DLM was QT interval prolongation. Resistance to DLM was detected in one patient during treatment. The treatment success rate was 77%. CONCLUSION: No new safety concerns were revealed, including in patients treated with DLM for more than 24 weeks. QT interval prolongations were well managed and did not lead to any clinically significant cardiac effects. The treatment outcomes were in line with the WHO target for Europe.

CONTEXTE: Une étude de sécurité post-autorisation (PASS) sur le délamanide (DLM) a été menée dans le cadre d'un engagement post-approbation auprès de l'Agence européenne des médicaments. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer l'utilisation du DLM dans un contexte réel, son innocuité et les résultats du traitement chez les patients atteints de TB multirésistante (MDR-TB). MÉTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude prospective, multicentrique et non interventionnelle menée dans l'Union européenne. La sélection du schéma thérapeutique de la MDR-TB et le suivi des patients ont été effectués conformément aux pratiques médicales existantes. Les données sur l'utilisation du DLM, les effets indésirables connexes et les résultats du traitement ont été recueillies jusqu'à 30 mois après la première dose de DLM. Des statistiques sommaires descriptives ont été utilisées pour les variables continues et catégorielles. RÉSULTATS: Sur 86 patients, un avait une TB extrapulmonaire. Les deux tiers des patients ont été traités avec du DLM pendant plus de 24 semaines. L'effet indésirable le plus fréquent du DLM était l'allongement de l'intervalle QT. Une résistance au DLM a été détectée chez un patient pendant le traitement. Le taux de réussite du traitement était de 77%. CONCLUSION: Aucun nouveau problème de sécurité n'a été révélé, y compris chez les patients traités par le DLM pendant plus de 24 semaines. Les allongements de l'intervalle QT ont été bien gérés et n'ont pas entraîné d'effets cardiaques cliniquement significatifs. Les résultats du traitement étaient conformes à l'objectif de l'OMS pour l'Europe.

Outcome of treatment of MDR-TB or drug-resistant patients treated with bedaquiline and delamanid: Results from a large global cohort.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends countries introduce new anti-TB drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of bedaquiline (and/or delamanid)- containing regimens in a large cohort of consecutive TB patients treated globally. This observational, prospective study is based on data collected and provided by Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) centres and analysed twice a year. All consecutive patients (including children/adolescents) treated with bedaquiline and/or delamanid were enrolled, and managed according to WHO and national guidelines. Overall, 52 centres from 29 countries/regions in all continents reported 883 patients as of January 31st 2021, 24/29 countries/regions providing data on 100% of their consecutive patients (10-80% in the remaining 5 countries). The drug-resistance pattern of the patients was severe (>30% with extensively drug-resistant -TB; median number of resistant drugs 5 (3-7) in the overall cohort and 6 (4-8) among patients with a final outcome). For the patients with a final outcome (477/883, 54.0%) the median (IQR) number of months of anti-TB treatment was 18 (13-23) (in days 553 (385-678)). The proportion of patients achieving sputum smear and culture conversion ranged from 93.4% and 92.8% respectively (whole cohort) to 89.3% and 88.8% respectively (patients with a final outcome), a median (IQR) time to sputum smear and culture conversion of 58 (30-90) days for the whole cohort and 60 (30-100) for patients with a final outcome and, respectively, of 55 (30-90) and 60 (30-90) days for culture conversion. Of 383 patients treated with bedaquiline but not delamanid, 284 (74.2%) achieved treatment success, while 25 (6.5%) died, 11 (2.9%) failed and 63 (16.5%) were lost to follow-up.

Validating the Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to prepare and validate the Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire and evaluate its correlation with polysomnography results. METHODS: In this study, we included patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent overnight polysomnography between January 1 in 2018 and January 1 in 2019. All patients completed the STOP-BANG questionnaire before polysomnography. To assess the adequacy of the questionnaire, we used contingency tables and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The study included 236 patients. The mean age of the patients was 55.2 ± 11.5 years and 159 (68%) were men. The mean apnea-hypopnea index for the entire study group was 33.8 ± 28.4, and the mean STOP-BANG score was 5.4 ± 1.6 points. Moderate (0.3-0.7, p < 0.05) correlations were found between the STOP-BANG questionnaire scores and all measured objective anthropometric and polysomnography parameters. The questionnaire's Cronbach's alpha score was 0.408. Based on the analysis of the ROC curves, the cut-off STOP-BANG score of 3 points showed a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 50% (AUC = 0.717) for the identification of any OSA. The positive predictive value (PPV) for an identification of any OSA at a cut-off point of 3 was 96%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 26%. CONCLUSIONS: The linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire was carried out in accordance with international recommendations. The Lithuanian version of the STOP-BANG questionnaire is characterized by high sensitivity and average specificity in diagnosing OSA.