When to shed? Patterns and drivers of time to first ecdysis in snakes.

Time from birth or hatching to the first shed (postnatal ecdysis) in snakes ranges from about an hour to several weeks depending upon the species. We assessed patterns in time to postnatal ecdysis in 102 snake species for which we could source appropriate information, covering 2.6% of all extant snake species, and related measures to various biological traits. Reconstruction revealed ancestral time to postnatal ecdysis to be 11 days. Since time to postnatal ecdysis can be shorter or longer than the ancestral state, we argue that there are several competing drivers for time to postnatal ecdysis. A reduced time to postnatal ecdysis has evolved in several lineages, commonly in ambush-foraging, viviparous vipers, while extended time to postnatal ecdysis is associated with oviparous species with maternal care. Of central importance is the impact of postnatal ecdysis on the scent levels of neonates, resulting in a reduction of time to postnatal ecdysis in chemically cryptic species, while the pivotal role of scent in mother-neonate recognition has resulted in the retention or extension of time to postnatal ecdysis. We showed that postnatal ecdysis improves chemical crypsis. The patterns revealed in this study suggest that measures of time to postnatal ecdysis can provide insights into the biology of snakes and be used as an indicator of certain life history traits.

Digestive efficiencies are independent of gut passage times in rainbow skinks (Trachylepis margaritifer).

Constraints on physiological processes imposed on ectotherms by environmental temperatures can be severe, affecting many aspects of their biology. Included in the suite of physiological processes affected is gut motility, with below optimum temperatures generally resulting in slow gut passage. Trachylepis margaritifer (rainbow skink) however presents an unusual pattern whereby gut passage time decreases at a low temperature compared to when at an intermediate temperature. It has been suggested that this may be a 'cutting-your-losses' response whereby nutritional gain is sacrificed by voiding the digesta to reduce the risk of these rotting within the gut at these low temperatures, and if this is so, it should result in reduced digestive performance at 25°C. We tested this hypothesis by measuring appetite, apparent digestive efficiency (ADE) and apparent assimilation efficiency (AAE) in T. margaritifer. We found that although temperature significantly affected appetite and gut passage time, it did not affect digestive efficiency. Both ADE (>90%) and AAE (>80%) were high and temperature-independent across the range tested. Thus, the 'cutting-your-losses' hypothesis does not explain faster gut passage at 25°C. High digestive parameters could be maintained by increasing concentrations of digestive enzyme at low temperatures but remains to be tested in this species.