RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: While generally well tolerated for the treatment of severe laryngomalacia, bilateral supraglottoplasty has potential complications including supraglottic stenosis and aspiration. We report a more conservative staged supraglottoplasty in infants with severe laryngomalacia. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of our patients who underwent staged supraglottoplasty from June 2007 to June 2012. Fifteen infants were identified and scored based on stridor, retractions, oxygen saturation, and feeding quality. Outcomes were compared with those reported in the literature for conventional bilateral supraglottoplasty. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent had significant improvement or resolution of stridor following the first stage of surgery and 100% in those undergoing a second stage. Twelve patients (80%) had mild to no retractions following one procedure and 100% had resolution after a second surgery. All 6 patients with recurrent preoperative desaturations had resolution after the first stage of surgery. Of the 11 infants who had preoperative moderate-severe feeding problems, 9 of them (82%) had resolution after one surgery and the remaining 2 had resolution after a second surgery. There were no complications in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Staged supraglottoplasty appears to be an effective, low-risk method to treat severe laryngomalacia. A second procedure was only required in 40% of patients.
Assuntos
Laringomalácia , Laringoplastia , Epiglote/patologia , Epiglote/cirurgia , Métodos de Alimentação , Feminino , Glote/patologia , Glote/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Laringomalácia/complicações , Laringomalácia/congênito , Laringomalácia/metabolismo , Laringomalácia/fisiopatologia , Laringomalácia/cirurgia , Laringoplastia/efeitos adversos , Laringoplastia/métodos , Masculino , Consumo de Oxigênio , Período Pós-Operatório , Sons Respiratórios/etiologia , Sons Respiratórios/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Examine changing trends/instrument usage for pediatric adenotonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Survey of 300 members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology assessing instruments used in adenotonsillectomy currently and over the past 15 years. RESULTS: A total of 120 surveys were returned. The most common total tonsillectomy instruments for obstruction/infection were: monopolar electrocautery (ME) (53.1%/54.5%) and coblation (CT) (16.0%/16.1%). The most common subtotal tonsillectomy instrument for obstruction/infection was microdebrider (51.4%/30.8%). Over the past 15 years, ME predominated, cold utilization declined, and CT rose. The most common adenoidectomy instruments were ME (25.0%/25.0%), curette with touch-up ME (22.4%/22.4%), and microdebrider with touch-up ME (19.0%/14.7%). Over the past 15 years, curette with touch-up ME predominated early, curette utilization alone declined, and ME, microdebrider, and CT have risen. CONCLUSION: Pediatric otolaryngologist technique/instrument use for adenotonsillectomy has changed over the past 15 years. This study may be limited by the low survey response rate.
Assuntos
Adenoidectomia/instrumentação , Tonsilectomia/instrumentação , Adenoidectomia/tendências , Adolescente , Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Ablação por Cateter/tendências , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Criocirurgia/instrumentação , Criocirurgia/tendências , Curetagem/instrumentação , Curetagem/tendências , Desbridamento/instrumentação , Desbridamento/tendências , Eletrocoagulação/instrumentação , Eletrocoagulação/tendências , Humanos , Lactente , Terapia a Laser/instrumentação , Terapia a Laser/tendências , Microcirurgia/instrumentação , Microcirurgia/tendências , Otolaringologia/tendências , Tonsilectomia/tendências , Terapia por Ultrassom/instrumentação , Terapia por Ultrassom/tendênciasRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to increase knowledge through research in the area of operant management of chronic back pain, using a strong experimental design. Reinforcement was made contingent on rate of walking, and feedback about progress was provided at certain intervals during each observation session. The changing criterion experimental design for a single subject indicated important systematic increases in walking rate, while the no-reinforcement and non-contingent reinforcement procedures produced no systematic effect. Pre-post ratings showed an average decrease in reported pain.