Dual antiplatelet therapy does not improve outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage compared with aspirin monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiology of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) may include platelet activation and microthrombi formation. Antiplatelet therapy may reduce the incidence of DCI and improve clinical outcomes after aSAH. This study compared outcomes among aSAH patients receiving aspirin monotherapy versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients treated at a single institution between November 2011 and December 2017 were divided according to whether they received aspirin monotherapy or DAPT after endovascular treatment. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of the groups were compared, including incidences of delayed cerebral ischemia, bleeding complications, symptomatic vasospasm, in-hospital mortality, and functional status 6 months after discharge. RESULTS: During the study period, 142 patients met study inclusion criteria, of which 123 were treated with aspirin monotherapy (87 %) and 19 were treated with DAPT (13 %). There was no statistically significant difference between the aspirin monotherapy and DAPT groups with respect to incidences of delayed cerebral ischemia (4.9 vs 10.5 %; p = 0.32), symptomatic vasospasm (13.0 vs 15.8 %; p = 0.74), or good clinical outcome at 6-month follow up (73.3 vs 66.7 %; p = 0.56). The DAPT group experienced a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (21 vs 5.7 %; p = 0.02), but DAPT did not remain independently predictive of this outcome on regression analysis. There was a trend toward a higher bleeding complication rate in the DAPT group (0.8 vs 5.3 %; p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: DAPT does not reduce the incidence of DCI or improve outcomes in aSAH patients, and may increase the risk of clinically significant bleeding complications.

Endovascular Treatment of Wide-Necked Intracranial Aneurysms with the Scepter XC Balloon Catheter, with Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) Jr. Deployment as a "Bailout" Technique.

BACKGROUND: The Scepter XC balloon catheter can be used for balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) of cerebral aneurysms but also accommodates delivery of a low-profile visible intraluminal stent (LVIS Jr.). We assessed the safety and effectiveness of BAC using the Scepter XC, with LVIS Jr. stent-assisted coiling (SAC) as a bailout option. METHODS: A single-institution prospectively maintained neurointerventional database was reviewed for wide-necked (neck width ≥4 mm or dome/neck ratio <2) saccular aneurysms treated using the Scepter XC. Complication and angiographic occlusion rates of BAC and SAC procedures were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify variables predictive of complete aneurysm occlusion. RESULTS: The cohort included 141 wide-necked saccular intracranial aneurysms treated in 135 procedures. SAC was used to treat 30% of aneurysms by deploying the LVIS Jr. through the Scepter XC. The overall procedural complication rate was 8.9%, including a 1.5% rate of symptomatic thromboembolic events and 3.0% rate of hemorrhagic complications, with no significant differences in complications between BAC and SAC procedures (P = 0.27). The overall complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 96%, with trends toward higher complete aneurysm occlusion and lower retreatment rates with SAC (78 vs. 57%; P = 0.13; 0 vs. 8.4%, P = 0.13). Multivariate logistic regression identified aneurysm size, procedure technique (BAC or SAC), and duration of follow-up as independent predictors of complete aneurysm occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Scepter XC for BAC, with LVIS Jr. SAC as a bailout option, shows acceptable angiographic and clinical results.