Reinventing polysomnography in the age of precision medicine.

For almost 50 years, sleep laboratories around the world have been collecting massive amounts of polysomnographic (PSG) physiological data to diagnose sleep disorders, the majority of which are not utilized in the clinical setting. Only a small fraction of the information available within these signals is utilized to generate indices. For example, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) remains the primary tool for diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) despite repeated studies showing it to be inadequate in predicting clinical consequences. Today, there are many novel approaches to PSG signals, making it possible to extract more complex metrics and analyses that are potentially more clinically relevant for individual patients. However, the pathway to implement novel PSG metrics/analyses into routine clinical practice is unclear. Our goal with this review is to highlight some of the novel PSG metrics/analyses that are becoming available. We suggest that stronger academic-industry relationships would facilitate the development of state-of-the-art clinical research to establish the value of novel PSG metrics/analyses in clinical sleep medicine. Collectively, as a sleep community, it is time to reinvent how we utilize the polysomnography to move us towards Precision Sleep Medicine.

Home sleep apnea testing: comparison of manual and automated scoring across international sleep centers.

PURPOSE: To determine the agreement between the manual scoring of home sleep apnea tests (HSATs) by international sleep technologists and automated scoring systems. METHODS: Fifteen HSATs, previously recorded using a type 3 monitor, were saved in European Data Format. The studies were scored by nine experienced technologists from the sleep centers of the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC) using the locally available software. Each study was scored separately by human scorers using the nasal pressure (NP), flow derived from the NP signal (transformed NP), or respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) flow. The same procedure was followed using two automated scoring systems: Remlogic (RLG) and Noxturnal (NOX). RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scoring using the NP, transformed NP, and RIP flow were 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.99], 0.98 [0.96-0.99], and 0.97 [0.95-0.99], respectively. Using the NP signal, the mean differences in AHI between the average of the manual scoring and the automated systems were - 0.9 ± 3.1/h (AHIRLG vs AHIMANUAL) and - 1.3 ± 2.6/h (AHINOX vs AHIMANUAL). Using the transformed NP, the mean differences in AHI were - 1.9 ± 3.3/h (AHIRLG vs AHIMANUAL) and 1.6 ± 3.0/h (AHINOX vs AHIMANUAL). Using the RIP flow, the mean differences in AHI were - 2.7 ± 4.5/h (AHIRLG vs AHIMANUAL) and 2.3 ± 3.4/h (AHINOX vs AHIMANUAL). CONCLUSIONS: There is very strong agreement in the scoring of the AHI for HSATs between the automated systems and experienced international technologists. Automated scoring of HSATs using commercially available software may be useful to standardize scoring in future endeavors involving international sleep centers.

Opportunities for utilizing polysomnography signals to characterize obstructive sleep apnea subtypes and severity.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a heterogeneous sleep disorder with many pathophysiological pathways to disease. Currently, the diagnosis and classification of OSA is based on the apnea-hypopnea index, which poorly correlates to underlying pathology and clinical consequences. A large number of in-laboratory sleep studies are performed around the world every year, already collecting an enormous amount of physiological data within an individual. Clinically, we have not yet fully taken advantage of this data, but combined with existing analytical approaches, we have the potential to transform the way OSA is managed within an individual patient. Currently, respiratory signals are used to count apneas and hypopneas, but patterns such as inspiratory flow signals can be used to predict optimal OSA treatment. Electrocardiographic data can reveal arrhythmias, but patterns such as heart rate variability can also be used to detect and classify OSA. Electroencephalography is used to score sleep stages and arousals, but specific patterns such as the odds-ratio product can be used to classify how OSA patients responds differently to arousals. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we examine these and many other existing computer-aided polysomnography signal processing algorithms and how they can reflect an individual's manifestation of OSA. SIGNIFICANCE: Together with current technological advance, it is only a matter of time before advanced automatic signal processing and analysis is widely applied to precision medicine of OSA in the clinical setting.

Recognizable clinical subtypes of obstructive sleep apnea across international sleep centers: a cluster analysis.

Study Objectives: A recent study of patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Iceland identified three clinical clusters based on symptoms and comorbidities. We sought to verify this finding in a new cohort in Iceland and examine the generalizability of OSA clusters in an international ethnically diverse cohort. Methods: Using data on 972 patients with moderate-severe OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥ 15 events per hour) recruited from the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC), we performed a latent class analysis of 18 self-reported symptom variables, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. Results: The original OSA clusters of disturbed sleep, minimally symptomatic, and excessively sleepy replicated among 215 SAGIC patients from Iceland. These clusters also generalized to 757 patients from five other countries. The three clusters had similar average AHI values in both Iceland and the international samples, suggesting clusters are not driven by OSA severity; differences in age, gender, and body mass index were also generally small. Within the international sample, the three original clusters were expanded to five optimal clusters: three were similar to those in Iceland (labeled disturbed sleep, minimal symptoms, and upper airway symptoms with sleepiness) and two were new, less symptomatic clusters (labeled upper airway symptoms dominant and sleepiness dominant). The five clusters showed differences in demographics and AHI, although all were middle-aged (44.6-54.5 years), obese (30.6-35.9 kg/m2), and had severe OSA (42.0-51.4 events per hour) on average. Conclusions: Results confirm and extend previously identified clinical clusters in OSA. These clusters provide an opportunity for a more personalized approach to the management of OSA.

Cost minimization using an artificial neural network sleep apnea prediction tool for sleep studies.

RATIONALE: More than a million polysomnograms (PSGs) are performed annually in the United States to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Third-party payers now advocate a home sleep test (HST), rather than an in-laboratory PSG, as the diagnostic study for OSA regardless of clinical probability, but the economic benefit of this approach is not known. OBJECTIVES: We determined the diagnostic performance of OSA prediction tools including the newly developed OSUNet, based on an artificial neural network, and performed a cost-minimization analysis when the prediction tools are used to identify patients who should undergo HST. METHODS: The OSUNet was trained to predict the presence of OSA in a derivation group of patients who underwent an in-laboratory PSG (n = 383). Validation group 1 consisted of in-laboratory PSG patients (n = 149). The network was trained further in 33 patients who underwent HST and then was validated in a separate group of 100 HST patients (validation group 2). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were compared with two previously published prediction tools. The total costs from the use of the three prediction tools and the third-party approach within a clinical algorithm were compared. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The OSUNet had a higher +LR in all groups compared with the STOP-BANG and the modified neck circumference (MNC) prediction tools. The +LRs for STOP-BANG, MNC, and OSUNet in validation group 1 were 1.1 (1.0-1.2), 1.3 (1.1-1.5), and 2.1 (1.4-3.1); and in validation group 2 they were 1.4 (1.1-1.7), 1.7 (1.3-2.2), and 3.4 (1.8-6.1), respectively. With an OSA prevalence less than 52%, the use of all three clinical prediction tools resulted in cost savings compared with the third-party approach. CONCLUSIONS: The routine requirement of an HST to diagnose OSA regardless of clinical probability is more costly compared with the use of OSA clinical prediction tools that identify patients who should undergo this procedure when OSA is expected to be present in less than half of the population. With OSA prevalence less than 40%, the OSUNet offers the greatest savings, which are substantial when the number of sleep studies done annually is considered.