Nasogastric tube utilization after esophagectomy: an unnecessary gesture? / Uso de sonda nasogástrica en pacientes sometidos a esofaguectomía: ¿Un gesto innecesario?

INTRODUCTION: Nasogastric decompressive tube utilization has been accepted as one of the basic perioperative care measures after esophageal resection surgery. However, with the development of multimodal rehabilitation programs and without clear evidence to support their use, the systematic indication of this measure may be controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive and comparative study of patients who had undergone Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in our center -from January 2015 to December 2018- with placement (Group S), or without placement (Group N) of a decompressive tube in gastroplasty during postoperative period. Epidemiological variables and differences between groups in post-surgical morbidity and mortality, hospital stay, onset of oral tolerance and the need for nasogastric tube placement were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 61 years, being 86% male. 46.5% were hypertensive, 25.5% had lung disease and 16.3% had diabetes mellitus. The median length of hospital stay was 9 days in group S versus 11.5 days in group N, with no differences in the onset of oral tolerance. Anastomotic dehiscence rate was 5% and 0% respectively. The overall mortality was 2.3% in the first 90 days, without differences between the groups. Placement of nasogastric tube during postoperative period was required only in 1 patient (4.3%) of the group N. CONCLUSIONS: Non-use of nasogastric tube during postoperative period of an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is a safe measure, as it is not associated with a higher rate of complications or hospital stay. This fact may be able to improve patients' comfort and postoperative recovery.

Usefulness of the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict and discriminate prognosis in gastric carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: The lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) have been proposed to minimize the stage migration phenomenon. The value of the LODDS and LNR staging systems to predict and discriminate prognosis was assessed and compared to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification (pN). METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-six patients with gastric carcinoma were retrospectively studied. Disease-specific survival rates were calculated for every pN, LNR, and LODDS category. RESULTS: Four LNR categories (0, 1-25, 26-75, and >76 %) and four LODDS categories (-5 to -3, > -3 to -1, > -1 to 3, and >3 to 5) were established. In the multivariate analysis, only the stage pT3-4 versus pT1-2 (HR 1.88, 95 % CI 1.11-3.20, p=0.02) and LODDS as continuous variable (HR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.21-1.61, p<0.001) remained as independent prognostic factors. In patients with <16 lymph nodes retrieved, only the LODDS system could discriminate different disease-specific survival curves for every category. LODDS categories were able to discriminate subgroups with different prognoses in pN stages and LNR categories. CONCLUSIONS: The LODDS staging system was superior to the pN classification and LNR system to discriminate risk prognosis especially in patients with an insufficient number of retrieved lymph nodes.

Prognosis for gastric carcinomas with an insufficient number of examined negative lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND: The optimal system for lymph node (LN) staging in gastric cancer is still a subject of debate. The aim of our study was to analyse the probability of error in negative LN (pN0) gastric carcinomas when a low number of LNs were harvested using a probabilistic model. METHODS: Patients with gastric carcinoma who underwent R0 resection at three university hospitals between 2004 and 2009 were retrospectively included. A Bayesian model was used to analyse the probability of error for negative LNs (pN0) gastric carcinomas. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were used to compare the overall and specific mortality of prognosis groups. RESULTS: Of the 291 patients included, 123 were classified as pN0 (42%). A significant correlation was found between the extent of the LN dissection performed and the number of the LNs retrieved. According to the Bayesian model the carcinomas with 9 or fewer negative lymph nodes were considered to have a high risk (HR) of misclassification, whereas patients with 10-25 LNs analysed and those with more than 26 negative lymph nodes were considered to have a moderate risk (MR) and low risk (LR), respectively. The log-rank test showed a significant improvement in the disease-specific survival for the MR pN0 (p < 0.001) and LR pN0 (p < 0.04) but not for the HR pN0 patients compared to pN1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed probabilistic model is clinically useful for differentiating the prognosis in pN0 gastric carcinomas when an insufficient number of negative lymph nodes are retrieved.