Autologous micrografts and methotrexate in plantar erosive lichen planus: healing and pain control. A case report.

Erosive lichen planus is an uncommon variant of lichen planus. We report a case of longstanding and refractory plantar ELPs causing disabling and opiate-resistant pain treated with 'classic' meshed skin graft combined with Rigenera®  micrografts. After approximately 9 months follow-up, no clinical recurrence or pain were observed. Erosive lichen planus (ELP) is an uncommon variant of lichen planus, involving oral cavity and genitalia and, less often plantar areas, where it usually presents with chronic erosions of the soles, along with intense, disabling pain and progressive loss of toenails. An abnormal immune cellular response (CD8+ lymphocytes and macrophages) and the consequent altered production of multiple mediators (interleukin-12, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, RANTES and MMP-9), seem to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis, although the etiology remains uncertain. From a histological point of view, ELP shows keratinocyte apoptosis, intense inflammatory response and basal epithelial keratinocytes TNF-α overexpression. Several therapies have been proposed, with variable and controversial results. While topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are the treatments of choice for localized forms, short pulses of systemic glucocorticoids, phototherapy, and systemic immunosuppressants are recommended for generalized cases. Surgery has been reported as a possible therapeutic option in refractory and stable cases with localized lesions, either alone or with cyclosporine. Herein, we report a case of longstanding and refractory plantar ELPS causing disabling and opiate-resistant pain treated with 'classic' meshed skin graft combined with Rigenera® micrografts.

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: day surgery or one day surgery?

Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders, from 10% to 20% of all patients admitted at a clinical investigation need to undergo surgery, stapled haemorrhoidopexy is gaining wide acceptance as an interesting, safe and less painful technique, but hemorrhage is one of the most serious early complications and is a severe complication in day surgery. In our day surgery proctology, surgical procedures represent about 32%. Of these, 24% are for hemorrhoidal disease, we present our protocol and experience for early and safe discharge, 6h after stapled hemorrhoidopexy surgery.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Results of a 4-year personal case series]. / Antibioticoprofilassi in chirurgia. Risultati di 4 anni su casistica personale.

A prospective study of surgical infections in our Department of Surgery in the years 1986-1989 is reported. 2719 patients entered the study: they represent the total number of patients operated in the above said period (628 urgent and 2091 elective operations). As suggested in 1964 by Altmeier, surgical procedures were classified in four groups according to the potential risk of intraoperative contamination. For every septic complication observed pertinent cultures were performed and responsible pathogens identified. We present our protocol of antibacterial prophylaxis which distinguishes antibiotics given as "ultra short term", "short term", "antibiotic prophylaxis". The results obtained and particularly the total number of infections (3.9%), and the percentage of infections in group 3 (4.6%) and in group 4 (23.1%) procedures validate the usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis in these patients. In group 1 and group 2 patients the usefulness of antibiotic prophylaxis seems very doubtful.