RESUMO
Purpose: Chest tomosynthesis (CTS) has a relatively longer acquisition time compared with chest X-ray, which may increase the risk of motion artifacts in the reconstructed images. Motion artifacts induced by breathing motion adversely impact the image quality. This study aims to reduce these artifacts by excluding projection images identified with breathing motion prior to the reconstruction of section images and to assess if motion compensation improves overall image quality. Approach: In this study, 2969 CTS examinations were analyzed to identify examinations where breathing motion has occurred using a method based on localizing the diaphragm border in each of the projection images. A trajectory over diaphragm positions was estimated from a second-order polynomial curve fit, and projection images where the diaphragm border deviated from the trajectory were removed before reconstruction. The image quality between motion-compensated and uncompensated examinations was evaluated using the image quality criteria for anatomical structures and image artifacts in a visual grading characteristic (VGC) study. The resulting rating data were statistically analyzed using the software VGC analyzer. Results: A total of 58 examinations were included in this study with breathing motion occurring either at the beginning or end ( n = 17 ) or throughout the entire acquisition ( n = 41 ). In general, no significant difference in image quality or presence of motion artifacts was shown between the motion-compensated and uncompensated examinations. However, motion compensation significantly improved the image quality and reduced the motion artifacts in cases where motion occurred at the beginning or end. In examinations where motion occurred throughout the acquisition, motion compensation led to a significant increase in ripple artifacts and noise. Conclusions: Compensation for respiratory motion in CTS by excluding projection images may improve the image quality if the motion occurs mainly at the beginning or end of the examination. However, the disadvantages of excluding projections may outweigh the benefits of motion compensation.
RESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of reduction in effective dose on the reproduction of anatomical structures in chest tomosynthesis (CTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four CTS examinations acquired at exposure settings resulting in an effective dose of 0.12 mSv for an average sized patient were included in the study. The examinations underwent simulated dose reduction to dose levels corresponding to 32%, 50%, and 70% of the original dose using a previously described and validated method. The image quality was evaluated by five thoracic radiologists who rated the fulfillment of specified image quality criteria in a visual grading study. The ratings for each image quality criterion in the dose-reduced images were compared to the corresponding ratings for the full-dose examinations using visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis. The area under the resulting VGC curve (AUCVGC) provides a measure of the difference between the ratings, where an AUCVGC of 0.5 indicates no difference. RESULTS: The dose reductions resulted in inferior reproduction of structures compared to the original dose level (AUCVGC <0.5). Structures in the central region of the lung obtained the lowest AUCVGC for each dose level whereas the reproduction of structures in the parenchyma was least affected by the dose reduction. CONCLUSION: Although previous studies have shown that dose reduction in CTS is possible without affecting the performance of certain clinical tasks, the reproduction of normal anatomical structures is significantly degraded even at small reductions. It is therefore important to consider the clinical purpose of the CTS examinations before deciding on a permanent dose reduction.
Assuntos
Radiografia Torácica , Humanos , Doses de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Radiografia Torácica/normasRESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Chest tomosynthesis has been suggested as a suitable alternative to CT for follow-up of pulmonary nodules. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility of detecting pulmonary nodule growth using chest tomosynthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated nodules with volumes of approximately 100 mm3 and 300 mm3 as well as additional versions with increasing volumes were created. The nodules were inserted into images from pairs of chest tomosynthesis examinations, simulating cases where the nodule had either remained stable in size or increased in size between the two imaging occasions. Nodule volume growths ranging from 11% to 252% were included. A simulated dose reduction was applied to a subset of the cases. Cases differing in terms of nodule size, dose level, and nodule position relative to the plane of image reconstruction were included. Observers rated their confidence that the nodules were stable in size or not. The rating data for the nodules that were stable in size was compared to the rating data for the nodules simulated to have increased in size using ROC analysis. RESULTS: Area under the curve values ranging from 0.65 to 1 were found. The lowest area under the curve values were found when there was a mismatch in nodule position relative to the reconstructed image plane between the two examinations. Nodule size and dose level affected the results. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that chest tomosynthesis can be used to detect pulmonary nodule growth. Nodule size, dose level, and mismatch in position relative to the image reconstruction plane in the baseline and follow-up examination may affect the precision.