RESUMO
Objective To describe Harborview Medical Center's experience with the involvement of caseworker cultural mediators (CCM) for patients requiring neurocritical care. Methods Using univariate and multivariate analysis (model adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores, mechanical ventilation, transition to comfort measures only (CMO), and death by neurologic criteria), we examined CCM team members' involvement in the care of Amharic/Cambodian/Khmer/Somali/Spanish/Vietnamese patients admitted to our neurocritical care service between 2014-2022, factors associated with CCM utilization, and changes in CCM utilization after a QI initiative was implemented in 2020 to encourage healthcare providers to consult the CCM team. Results Compared to eligible patients (n=827) who did not receive CCM referral, patients with CCM involvement (n=121) were younger (49 [interquartile range, IQR 38,63] vs. 56 [IQR 42,68] years, p = 0.002), had greater illness severity (admission GCS 8.5 [IQR 3,14] vs. 14 [IQR 7,15], p < 0.001, SOFA scores (5 [IQR 2,8] vs. 4 [IQR2,6], p = 0.007), and more frequently required mechanical ventilation (67% vs. 40%, odds ratio, OR 3.07, 95% CI 2.06,4.64), with higher all-cause mortality (20% vs. 12%, RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09, 2.95), and with a higher rate of transition to CMO (11.6% vs. 6.2%, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03;3.66). The CCM QI initiative was independently associated with increased CCM involvement (aOR 4.22, 95% CI [2.32;7.66]). Overall, 4/10 attempts made by CCMs to reach out to the family to provide support were declined by the family. CCMs reported providing cultural/emotional support (n=96, 79%), end-of-life counseling (n=16, 13%), conflict mediation (n=15, 12.4%), and facilitating goals of care meetings (n=4, 3.3%). Conclusions Among eligible patients, CCM consultations appeared to occur in patients with higher disease severity. Our QI initiative increased CCM involvement.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with limited-English proficiency (LEP) face multiple barriers to equitable healthcare. Interventions that go beyond interpretation, such as the use of bicultural-bilingual patient navigators, hold promise for addressing multi-level barriers. However, data about how to operationalize the tasks that are key to such interventions across diverse LEP communities are lacking. OBJECTIVE: Using our health system's bicultural-bilingual caseworker-cultural mediator (CCM) program serving Amharic-, Cambodian/Khmer-, Somali-, Spanish-, and Vietnamese-speaking patients, we sought to understand the key tasks that comprise the CCMs' role and how these tasks enable them to address barriers to healthcare for patients with LEP. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2019 with a purposive sample (n=23) of clinicians, CCMs, and patients with LEP or their family members from all language groups. PARTICIPANTS: Patients or family members receiving CCM services, CCMs, and clinicians who referred patients to the program. APPROACH: Content analysis consisting of a hybrid deductive-inductive qualitative approach. KEY RESULTS: Seven CCM tasks were identified: advocacy, care coordination, navigation, interpretation, education, mediation, and emotional support. Additionally, four key impacts emerged that described the ways in which these tasks enabled the CCMs to facilitate equitable care: bridging the patient, family, community, clinical team, and healthcare system; impacting knowledge of cultural issues and of the healthcare system; troubleshooting cultural barriers and problem solving; and enhancing relationship building. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several tasks and impacts that enabled CCMs to address multi-level barriers to care experienced by patients with LEP and their families across diverse cultural and linguistic groups. Findings suggest opportunities for the generalizability of programs such as ours for multiple LEP populations. Additionally, interventions having a greater scope than interpretation and including relationships with communities may be more successful in addressing barriers to equitable care at the individual, system, and community levels.