Anticancer and Biological Effects of Some Natural Compounds and Theoretical Investigation of them Against RdRP of SARS-COV-2: In Silico and In Vitro Studies.

In this study, Skullcapflavone I and Skullcapflavone II molecules showed good inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase and sorbitol dehydrogenase enzymes with IC50 values of 102.66 ± 8.43 and 95.04 ± 11.52 nM for α-glucosidase and 38.42 ± 3.82 and 28.81 ± 3.26 µM for sorbitol dehydrogenase. The chemical activities of Skullcapflavone I and Skullcapflavone II against α-glucosidase and sorbitol dehydrogenase were assessed by conducting the molecular docking study. The anticancer activities of the compounds were examined against SW-626, SK-OV-3, OVCAR3, and Caov-3 cell lines. The chemical activities of Skullcapflavone I and Skullcapflavone II against some of the expressed surface receptor proteins (estrogen receptor, EGFR, androgen receptor, and GnRH receptor) in the mentioned cell lines were investigated using in silico calculations. Moreover, the activity of the compounds against RNA polymerase of SARS-COVE-2 was also assessed using the molecular modeling study. These compounds created strong contacts with the enzymes and receptors. The considerable binding affinity of the compounds to the enzymes and proteins showed their ability as inhibitors. Furthermore, even at modest dosages, these substances markedly reduced the viability of ovarian cancer cells. Additionally, the viability of ovarian cancer cells was significantly decreased by a 300 µM dosage of all compounds. Antiovarian cancer results of Skullcapflavone I on SK-OV-3, SW-626, OVCAR3, and Caov-3 were 63.14, 1.55, 19.42, and 52.04 µM, respectively. Also, cytotoxicity results of Skullcapflavone II on SK-OV-3, SW-626, OVCAR3, and Caov-3 were 5.18, 21.44, 33.87, and 72.66 µM, respectively.

Upregulated expression of NOP2 predicts worse prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma by promoting tumor growth.

Background: : NOP2 nucleolar protein plays a crucial role in early embryo development and cell proliferation. The role of NOP2 in human gastric adenocarcinoma has not been elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to examine the expression levels of NOP2 and dissected whether NOP2 expression was associated with aggressive clinicopathological outcomes of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: : Clinicopathological analysis was performed in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Expression of NOP2 was tested by immunohistochemistry staining and quantitative RT-PCR. The prognostic role of NOP2 in gastric adenocarcinoma patients was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The effect of NOP2 on cell proliferation was examined through cellular experiments and mice models. Results: : NOP2 expression was elevated in gastric adenocarcinoma tissues compared to normal gastric tissues. High expression of NOP2 was significantly correlated with tumor size, invasion depth, and lymph node metastasis. Moreover, patients with high NOP2 expression had poorer overall survival, and NOP2 was identified as an independent prognosis factor. Using the gastric adenocarcinoma cells, we found that NOP2 can promote tumor cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo. Conclusions: : Overexpression of NOP2 significantly correlates with a poorer prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients and suggested the potential of NOP2, which may serve as a novel prognostic biomarker in gastric adenocarcinoma.