[Constraint during care in elderly people with cognitive disorders]. / La contrainte lors des soins chez le sujet âgé atteint de troubles cognitifs.

Constraints in the care of vulnerable elderly people are part of the daily life of services. This practice must not avoid multidisciplinary reflection by preserving the autonomy of patients' decisions despite cognitive disorders. The search for consent and reasons for refusing care must be the leitmotif and coercion the exception and must be supported.

The Association Between Age and Admission to an Inappropriate Ward: A Cross-Sectional Survey in France.

Half of elderly patient hospitalizations are preceded by an emergency department (ED) visit. Hospitalization in inappropriate wards (IWs), which is more frequent in case of ED overcrowding and high hospital occupancy, leads to increased morbidity. Elderly individuals are the most exposed to these negative health care outcomes. Based on a nationwide cross-sectional survey involving all EDs in France, the aim of this study was to explore whether age was associated with admission to an IW after visiting an ED. Among the 4384 patients admitted in a medical ward, 4065 were admitted in the same hospital where the ED was located, among which 17.7% were admitted to an IW. Older age was associated with an increased likelihood of being admitted to an IW (OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.02-1.90 for patients aged 85 years and older and OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.02-1.91 for patients aged 75-84 years, compared with those under 45 years). ED visits during peak periods and cardio-pulmonary presenting complaint were also associated with an increased likelihood of admission to an IW. Despite their higher vulnerability, elderly patients are more likely to be admitted to an IW than younger patients. This result reinforces the need for special attention to be given to the hospitalization of this fragile population.

Multidisciplinary support for ethics deliberations during the first COVID wave.

BACKGROUND: The first COVID-19 wave started in February 2020 in France. The influx of patients requiring emergency care and high-level technicity led healthcare professionals to fear saturation of available care. In that context, the multidisciplinary Ethics-Support Cell (EST) was created to help medical teams consider the decisions that could potentially be sources of ethical dilemmas. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to prospectively collect information on requests for EST assistance from 23 March to 9 May 2020. The secondary aim was to describe the Cell's functions during that period. RESEARCH DESIGN: This observational, real-time study of requests for Cell consultations concerned ethical dilemmas arising during a public health crisis. The EST created a grid to collect relevant information (clinical, patient's/designated representative's preferences and ethical principles strained by the situation), thereby assuring that each EST asked the same questions, in the same order. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Only our university hospital's clinicians could request EST intervention. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The hospital Research Ethics Committee approved this study (no. CER-2020-107). The patient, his/her family, or designated representative was informed of this ethics consultation and most met with EST members, which enabled them to express their preferences and/or opposition. FINDINGS/RESULTS: 33 requests (patients' mean age: 80.8 years; 29 had COVID-19: 24 with dyspnea, 30 with comorbidities). 17 Emergency Department solicitations concerned ICU admission, without reference to resource constraints; others addressed therapeutic proportionality dilemmas. DISCUSSION: Intervention-request motives concerned limited resources and treatment intensity. Management revolved around three axes: the treatment option most appropriate for the patient, the feasibility of implementation, and dignified care for the patient. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 crisis forced hospitals to envisage prioritization of ICU access. Established decision-making criteria and protocols do not enable healthcare professionals to escape ethical dilemmas. That acknowledgement highlights ethical risks, enhances the added-value of nursing and encourages all players to be vigilant to pursue collective deliberations to achieve clear and transparent decisions.

Acute critically ill elderly patients: What about long term caregiver burden?

PURPOSE: Acute critical illness induce a high caregivers burden in the young population, however data in the older population are lacking. The objectives of this study were to evaluate caregiver burden in a critically ill old population and to assess factors associated with mild to severe burden level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients from two participating centers of the ICE-CUB 2 trial were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were an age ≥75, at least one critical condition and preserved functional status. The primary endpoint was a Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) ≥ 21 at 6 months. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one patients (median age 86 [81-89] years) were included. Median caregiver ZBI at 6 months was 13 [5-27]. In the multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with moderate to severe burden were the 6-month ADL decrease (OR: 1.3, p = .049) and the 6-month mental component of the quality of life score (OR: 0.94, p = .0009). In contrast, age, ICU admission and length of hospital stay were not associated with moderate to severe load. CONCLUSION: In our study, functional status and mental health at 6 months were associated with mild to severe burden unlike age and admission in ICU.

Determinants of clinical presentation on outcomes in older patients with myocardial infarction.

AIM: Myocardial infarction without chest pain misleads the clinician, resulting in a diagnosis delay and an increase of mortality. The main objective of the present study was to determine the risk factors of atypical presentation in older patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS: All consecutive patients aged ≥75 years presenting with myocardial infarction and hospitalized in the cardiology intensive care unit were included in the present prospective multicenter observational study. All patients benefited from both specialized cardiac management and geriatric assessment. RESULTS: A total of 215 consecutive patients were included. The mean age was 85 ± 6 years. A total of 142 patients (66%) had a typical presentation (i.e. chest pain) and 73 patients (34%) had an atypical clinical presentation (i.e. no chest pain). A total of 29 (13.5%) patients died within 30 days of the index hospitalization. Higher Cumulative Illness Rating Score-Geriatric severity index score (P = 0.019) and initial atrial fibrillation (P = 0.022) were predictive of 30-day all-cause mortality. Typical presentation (P = 0.010) was a protective factor of 30-day all-cause mortality. A Cumulative Illness Rating Score for Geriatrics total score increase (P = 0.0003) and residing in a nursing home (P = 0.024) emerged as independent risk factors for atypical presentation. CONCLUSIONS: In "real-life" elderly patients, comorbidities influence the prognosis of myocardial infarction, but also clinical presentation. Identification of patients at risk of atypical presentation; that is, patients with multiple comorbid conditions, might help refine the prognostic value in older patients with myocardial infarction. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 1591-1596.

Determinants of invasive strategy in elderly patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge gaps across literature prevent current guidelines from providing the profile of elderly patients most likely to derive benefit from invasive strategy (IS) in non ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Furthermore, the benefit of IS in a real-world elderly population with NSTEMI remains unclear. The aims of this study were to determine factors that lead the cardiologist to opt for an IS in elderly patients with NSTEMI, and to assess the impact of IS on the 6-month all-cause mortality. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study enrolled all consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years old who presented a NSTEMI and were hospitalized in cardiology intensive care unit between February 2014 and February 2015. Patients were compared on the basis of reperfusion strategy (invasive or conservative) and living status at six months, in order to determine multivariate predictors of the realization of an IS and multivariate predictors of 6-month mortality. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were included; 87 (62%) underwent an IS. The strongest independent determinants of IS were younger age [odds ratio (OR): 0.85, 95%-confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.92; P < 0.001) and lower "Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric" number of categories score (OR: 0.83, 95%CI: 0.73-0.95; P = 0.002). IS was not significantly associated with 6-month survival (OR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.27-2.38; P = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world elderly patients with NSTEMI, younger patients with fewer comorbidities profited more often from an IS. However, IS did not modify 6-month all-cause mortality.